I'm curious to know if this article is right? Or were there flaws, as the rejecting journals said in
their rejection letters. Dr. Blanchard?
Dr. Chung? Is there anyone here willing to read through this and help me decide? Basically, I want
to know if Dr. Ravnskov's article is good science, and if the rejecting comments are valid. I
invite intelligent, civil and respectful discussion. MFG
From www.thincs.org
Is the peer-review system a guarantee for quality?
Most medical journals use the so-called peer-review system. This implies that for being published
all manuscripts are scrutinized by one or two external specialists (referees) in the issue.
Here are the comments from five referees, who were asked to review a manuscript by Uffe Ravnskov,
sent to and rejected by three different medical journals before it was accepted for publication in
Quarterly Journal of Medicine without any changes.
Ds. Ravnskov's comments were also sent to the editors of the journals that rejected the article.
Here are the objections by the referees together with Dr. Ravnskovs responses
You can read the QJM article here