WOw! I just got a loaner coker from a friend who has two, so that's
really cool and now I'll have a 36-er to use 'till I get my own! But
here's what I've noticed very quickly; This loaner is an original coker
w/steel rim, which was just trued and spins beautifully.
John (Vivalargo) also has a basic coker but with an (older) airfoil and
the same coker tire as my loaner. He uses the prowheel 127mm alum.
cranks and when I rode it, It was smooth, nimble and got up to speed
quickly. It is a joy to ride.
On *This* loaner, with the steel rim and coker tire, and 127mm *steel*
cranks (couldn't find any alum. 127's locally) with no "q" factor like
the Prowheels, I immediately noticed that it was MUCH harder to get
this coker up to speed, and overall it just felt sluggish.
So my question is, do you think it *soley* because of the steel rim and
or the steel cranks vs John's setup? The conditions were basically the
same, on flat ground with little or no wind. I also noticed that when I
*did* hit a hilly section, that it was more difficult to climb,
compared to John's coker. thoughts?😄
--
MuniAddict
"On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
man."😉
My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699
My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com