rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Coker rim/cranks observation

Started by MuniAddict · · Last activity · 21 posts · 891 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
6 June 2007
Last activity
7 June 2007
Original author
MuniAddict
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
891
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. WOw! I just got a loaner coker from a friend who has two, so that's
    really cool and now I'll have a 36-er to use 'till I get my own! But
    here's what I've noticed very quickly; This loaner is an original coker
    w/steel rim, which was just trued and spins beautifully.

    John (Vivalargo) also has a basic coker but with an (older) airfoil and
    the same coker tire as my loaner. He uses the prowheel 127mm alum.
    cranks and when I rode it, It was smooth, nimble and got up to speed
    quickly. It is a joy to ride.

    On *This* loaner, with the steel rim and coker tire, and 127mm *steel*
    cranks (couldn't find any alum. 127's locally) with no "q" factor like
    the Prowheels, I immediately noticed that it was MUCH harder to get
    this coker up to speed, and overall it just felt sluggish.

    So my question is, do you think it *soley* because of the steel rim and
    or the steel cranks vs John's setup? The conditions were basically the
    same, on flat ground with little or no wind. I also noticed that when I
    *did* hit a hilly section, that it was more difficult to climb,
    compared to John's coker. thoughts?😄

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  2. Yeah the rim weight seems to make a hell of a difference. I found my
    airfoil/125mm alloy cranks wheel to be easier to accelerate than my
    steel rim/150mm steel crank wheel, despite it being a higher gear.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  3. kington99 said:

    Yeah the rim weight seems to make a hell of a difference. I found my
    airfoil/125mm alloy cranks wheel to be easier to accelerate than my
    steel rim/150mm steel crank wheel, despite it being a higher gear.

    Now that's amazing, and I totally can believe that! Yeah I felt that
    when I rode john's Coker it was as easy or maybe even easier to ride
    than with the standard 152's on a steel rim. I was mainly wondering if
    there were maybe some other factors involved other than weight, like
    the more aerodynamic shape of the rim. Thanks.🙂

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  4. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger! From what I've heard it seems
    to be the lighter rolling weight of the airfoil which makes the
    difference. I've got a radial with steel rim, alloy 125mm cranks and
    coker tire at 50psi and the setup isn't exactly zippy but I enjoy it.
    At first I had difficulty wielding the beast but since I've gained much
    more control and strength.

    --
    Brian O.

    mscalisi said:

    We only need one 36" rim, one that doesn't suck. A properly sized KH rim
    (like the 29er only larger) would be awesome.

    'ProjectUNI' (http://www.otherworldsociety.org/projectuni) - The
    Unicyclist PC Game - In Early Development.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Brian O.'s Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10744
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  5. I have steel rim and cranks, and I get up to speed just fine.

    --
    Jerrick

    ~*~!I ride for Christ, Fun, Challenges, and a lot
    more!~*~
    '!Gallery!' (http://tinyurl.com/gf2g9)
    '!MRIS!' (http://tinyurl.com/jjjnz)
    'Easy Tire Removal Guide.' (http://tinyurl.com/rd9ru)
    My sponsor '~!SIXSIXONE!~' (http://sixsixone.com/)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jerrick's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11632
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  6. if u have a light car it gets up to speed faster than a heavier car
    right...
    so if u have a light coker it will get up to speed faster than a
    heavier coker..

    --
    Uniman_3

    Words are made to strike the minds of the unsuspecting.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Uniman_3's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14387
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  7. Jerrick said:

    I have steel rim and cranks, and I get up to speed just fine.

    That's good, but from what I'm sensing from those who have ridden *both*
    steel -then- airfoils, is that everything is just that much easier and
    faster. Again, that's not to say that your setup isn't fine for you.
    Have you made the comparison, and did you find any substantial
    difference? Btw, what size/material cranks are you using?

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  8. I'm guessing that's more rim the rim then the cranks. Were the spokes
    the same?

    --
    mscalisi

    Quoted message said:

    <> Unicycle for (reducing the) Buddha <><


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    mscalisi's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4961
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  9. mscalisi said:

    I'm guessing that's more rim the rim then the cranks. Were the spokes
    the same?

    Yeah John has the 12 gauge non-stainless spokes, as does my loaner. only
    real difference is the rim and crank material; length is identical.

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  10. I said both rim and crank were steel. =p

    Umm, length is 127, or 125, I cant remember which ones I bought. Pretty
    sure its the 127s though.

    I dont know, I just have never cared too much about weight, or even
    think about it when riding. I hop on and start pedaling, and in a few
    revs im up to my cruising speed and I jsut relax and float.

    --
    Jerrick

    ~*~!I ride for Christ, Fun, Challenges, and a lot
    more!~*~
    '!Gallery!' (http://tinyurl.com/gf2g9)
    '!MRIS!' (http://tinyurl.com/jjjnz)
    'Easy Tire Removal Guide.' (http://tinyurl.com/rd9ru)
    My sponsor '~!SIXSIXONE!~' (http://sixsixone.com/)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jerrick's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11632
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  11. Jerrick said:

    I said both rim and crank were steel. =p

    Umm, length is 127, or 125, I cant remember which ones I bought. Pretty
    sure its the 127s though.

    I dont know, I just have never cared too much about weight, or even
    think about it when riding. I hop on and start pedaling, and in a few
    revs im up to my cruising speed and I jsut relax and float.

    Oh yeah sorry I saw that you did mention alum!:o Well that's cool. I
    rode a friends steel rimmed coker for a 20 miler using 152mm (steel)
    cranks and it was smooth as butta!

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  12. Yeah, you just get more leverage which helps move the steel rim. I had
    150ish cranks on at first, and rode those a lot, but bent them doing
    muni, and then bought shorter cranks just for fun.

    At first, hills felt a little harder to get up, but now they feel the
    sme as how the longer cranks feel.

    --
    Jerrick

    ~*~!I ride for Christ, Fun, Challenges, and a lot
    more!~*~
    '!Gallery!' (http://tinyurl.com/gf2g9)
    '!MRIS!' (http://tinyurl.com/jjjnz)
    'Easy Tire Removal Guide.' (http://tinyurl.com/rd9ru)
    My sponsor '~!SIXSIXONE!~' (http://sixsixone.com/)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jerrick's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11632
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  13. There's certainly nothing wrong with that, but lighter components will
    get you there faster. To those of us who do a significant amount of
    riding on 36ers, the higher performance components are worth it. For a
    more casual rider, steel is indeed fine.

    Just like square taper cranks might fine for a casual MUni rider, but
    don't really serve the needs of those who want to take it to the next
    level.

    Jerrick said:

    I have steel rim and cranks, and I get up to speed just fine.

    --
    mscalisi

    Quoted message said:

    <> Unicycle for (reducing the) Buddha <><


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    mscalisi's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4961
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  14. i santa cruz, many of us despise aluminum cranks; they break way too
    easily (right jason?). I've seen it happen a few times on rides. Steel
    is the way to go, although, it will bend...

    corbin

    --
    corbin

    http://www.corbinstreehouse.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    corbin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7561
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  15. corbin said:

    i santa cruz, many of us despise aluminum cranks; they break way too
    easily (right jason?). I've seen it happen a few times on rides. Steel
    is the way to go, although, it will bend...

    corbin

    They break? Is that under "normal" riding conditions, or offroad riding
    where there's probably a lot more stress on them? That _still_
    shouldn't cause them to break should it? The *KH Moment cranks are
    aluminum* and I haven't heard of any of those breaking, and I do 5'
    drops with them! Or could it be the inferior quality of *some* alum
    cranks that cause them to break?😕

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  16. It all makes sense to me...better parts = better unicycle.

    Although, like many above me have said, I ride just fine on the steel
    rim and cranks. I've never thought to myself that I don't get up to
    speed quick enough.

    I think you have to consider the conditions in which you'll be riding.
    If you're riding on mostly flat..your weight really doesn't matter.

    Brian O. said:

    What doesn't kill you makes you stronger!

    --
    Chexjc

    www.myspace.com/thelostguitarist
    AIM: Guitardude88
    Check out my videos!
    http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=JasonCheckla
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chexjc's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/13511
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  17. MuniAddict said:

    They break? Is that under "normal" riding conditions, or offroad riding
    where there's probably a lot more stress on them? That _still_
    shouldn't cause them to break should it? The *KH Moment cranks are
    aluminum* and I haven't heard of any of those breaking, and I do 5'
    drops with them! Or could it be the inferior quality of *some* alum
    cranks that cause them to break?😕

    It's Coker muni, although, the time they break is when people are going
    down steep hills and applying a lot of pressure. Jason broke one were
    the pedal screw area was just trashed while going down a steep hill
    with no brake. Taking pedals on and off will wear them away more
    quickly than steel. Rob has broken many of them; he says they "snap".
    You would hope they wouldn't break..but they do!

    The KH cranks and hub are very different; they are a lot beefier (and
    splined) than the tapered coker cranks.

    -corbin

    --
    corbin

    http://www.corbinstreehouse.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    corbin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7561
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  18. I've liked my aluminum tri-drilled Kookas a lot, and they've held up
    very well. A thousand miles plus now with no adjustment, loosening, or
    issue of any sort. Although I have heard that Kooka has historically
    been one of the strongest aluminum cranks, so maybe that is why.

    On the climbing difficulty you mentioned, it may be due to flex with
    the steel rim that you are not conscious of because you're busy
    climbing, but it nevertheless adds to the effort needed. When I bought
    my first coker, stock w steel rim, etc., I noticed a clicking sound on
    my wheel whenever I was doing a semi-steep climb or descent. It wasn't
    there on the flats. Turned out it was my computer magnet hitting the
    "reader", and the reason it was hitting it was due to wheel flex. I
    would not have really noticed the flex if it wasn't for that noise.

    That said--and just my humble opinion Terry--but I think you're
    over-thinking this whole steel stock versus airfoil versus crank
    material versus blah topic. You're serial posting. I think one
    challenge may be the relatively short comparison rides on the different
    models you've tried. The "feel" of any given one could be influenced by
    a number of factors, and it takes multiple longer rides (in my view) on
    any given beast before you can really assess or make strong
    comparisons. When I first got my GB4 36, it felt strange to ride after
    my stock coker. The sage advice I got from U-Turn was to put on some
    miles. And then some more miles. Then see if I still felt the same.

    My reco would be maximize around the wheel first, meaning get the
    Airfoil rim, wide hub, and the strongest wheel build you can afford.
    You'll ultimately benefit from the extra strength and longevity, and
    knowing how you like to hop around, if you had a steel rim you would
    one day give in to the temptation to do some curbs or something, and
    you'll eventually mess it up. Ask Harper...who was fine for thousands
    of miles on his stock coker, then decided one day to get into the stair
    hopping business.

    If you can save some on crank weight, great, but personally I'd
    maximize around other factors like preferred Q, etc. In case of my
    current setup, I maximized around flexibility. While the Kookas are not
    the lightest of aluminum cranks, the tri-drill option gives me
    flexibility to change crank lengths, which suits the kind of riding I
    do. For a while I had a pair of steel 140s that were quite heavy, but
    they worked great and I got used to them quickly and they would
    accelerate and climb fine. Once you get into a good wheel and frame,
    the other details make less of a difference...you'll get used to
    anything once you've put in some miles.

    $.02,

    TB

    --
    tomblackwood

    Tailgate at your own risk...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tomblackwood's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3762
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  19. tomblackwood said:

    You're serial posting.

    $.02,TB

    Couldn't resist! 😉

    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |Filename: 186536545_20024adcac_o.jpg |
    |Download: http://www.unicyclist.com/attachment/20454 |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

    --
    MuniAddict

    "On Earth it would be...12 noon" (Twilight zone episode, "To serve
    man."😉

    My Videos: http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699

    My favorite FG clip: http://tinyurl.com/28847b
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  20. MuniAddict said:

    Couldn't resist! HAha howabout that! Cereal, Post (brand) and unicycle
    all in one "Serial post!"😉

    Dude....🙄

    --
    tomblackwood

    Tailgate at your own risk...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tomblackwood's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3762
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61492

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.