"Sorry, wanted to talk about conventional medicine.
Keep to the topic or it could be misconstrued as your having no substantial res ponse to the Polyphamacy post. I don't care, I can wait for someone without an axe to gr ind who can discuss the post line by line without changing the subject. As for attacking me that won'teven produce a response, I am fairly comfortable with myself, albeit open to in telligent suggestions. I am willing to throw the Polypharmacy piece in the woodstove whe n it can be demonstrated to be sufficiently flawed."
Then perhaps you should change the subject line, the "poly" was added to another thread. As it stands, cam is being put along side the "poly" topic and thus a response involving cam is relevant as to it's "poly" problems, risks, and dangers equall well to any other approach. I did not attack you in any message, and the flow of threads is in no single individuals control; except as changing the subject might redirect it temperarly toward the "poly" theme in isolation. I don't deny "poly" as a concern, but it can not be applied to one segment and not to all others as well.
Well I am asking for a discussion of Polypharmacy in conventional medicine now....... go for it......
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
"Sorry, wanted to talk about conventional medicine.
Keep to the topic or it could be misconstrued as your having no substantial res ponse to the Polyphamacy post. I don't care, I can wait for someone without an axe to gr ind who can discuss the post line by line without changing the subject. As for attacking me that won'teven produce a response, I am fairly comfortable with myself, albeit open to in telligent suggestions. I am willing to throw the Polypharmacy piece in the woodstove whe n it can be demonstrated to be sufficiently flawed."
Then perhaps you should change the subject line, the "poly" was added to another thread. As it stands, cam is being put along side the "poly" topic and thus a response involving cam is relevant as to it's "poly" problems, risks, and dangers equall well to any other approach. I did not attack you in any message, and the flow of threads is in no single individuals control; except as changing the subject might redirect it temperarly toward the "poly" theme in isolation. I don't deny "poly" as a concern, but it can not be applied to one segment and not to all others as well.
Still waiting......................
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
"Sorry, wanted to talk about conventional medicine.
Keep to the topic or it could be misconstrued as your having no substantial res ponse to the Polyphamacy post. I don't care, I can wait for someone without an axe to gr ind who can discuss the post line by line without changing the subject. As for attacking me that won'teven produce a response, I am fairly comfortable with myself, albeit open to in telligent suggestions. I am willing to throw the Polypharmacy piece in the woodstove whe n it can be demonstrated to be sufficiently flawed."
Then perhaps you should change the subject line, the "poly" was added to another thread. As it stands, cam is being put along side the "poly" topic and thus a response involving cam is relevant as to it's "poly" problems, risks, and dangers equall well to any other approach. I did not attack you in any message, and the flow of threads is in no single individuals control; except as changing the subject might redirect it temperarly toward the "poly" theme in isolation. I don't deny "poly" as a concern, but it can not be applied to one segment and not to all others as well.
Still waiting......................
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
"Sorry, wanted to talk about conventional medicine.
Keep to the topic or it could be misconstrued as your having no substantial res ponse to the Polyphamacy post. I don't care, I can wait for someone without an axe to gr ind who can discuss the post line by line without changing the subject. As for attacking me that won'teven produce a response, I am fairly comfortable with myself, albeit open to in telligent suggestions. I am willing to throw the Polypharmacy piece in the woodstove whe n it can be demonstrated to be sufficiently flawed."
Then perhaps you should change the subject line, the "poly" was added to another thread. As it stands, cam is being put along side the "poly" topic and thus a response involving cam is relevant as to it's "poly" problems, risks, and dangers equall well to any other approach. I did not attack you in any message, and the flow of threads is in no single individuals control; except as changing the subject might redirect it temperarly toward the "poly" theme in isolation. I don't deny "poly" as a concern, but it can not be applied to one segment and not to all others as well.
Still waiting......................
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
