General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Cooking Time for meat to absorb wine?

Started by Jim · · Last activity · 11 posts · 445 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 February 2006
Last activity
5 February 2006
Original author
Jim
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
445
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    ..... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Jim

  2. Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    I can't answer the question about how long it would take for the liquid
    to be absorbed. I can tell you that if you're cooking over low heat,
    the liquid isn't as likely to be absorbed as it is for it to evaporate,
    first the alcohol, then the water. Also, definitely buy a drinking
    wine, not a cooking one. The wine doesn't have to be high end
    expensive, but it should be one that doesn't make you want to spit it
    out when you taste it. Since the recipe is from an Italian cookbook,
    get an inexpensive bianco and a chianti.

    Probably irrelevant information: I tried La Bastarda yesterday. The
    label is hysterical, and the wine was quite nice for the price.

    --Lia

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Cooking wine is generally of very lousy quality, mostly watered down
    regular wine with a lot of salt added. Use any wine for cooking that you
    enjoy drinking.

    As for how long to cook the stew after you add the wine, it would be
    easier to tell if you included the full recipe, but my guess is to just
    try ten minutes, taste, and if it doesn't taste good enough, add more
    wine, cook further, and add any spices you think the dish might need.
    Cook a few minutes longer if necessary, then repeat the taste test. Let
    taste be your guide.

  4. Jim wrote on 04 Feb 2006 in rec.food.cooking

    Quoted message said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After
    cooking onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white
    wine and the same of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the
    liquid is absorbed" .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have
    to go out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Jim

    drinking wine would be preferred as cooking wine is way too salty to
    actually use. Plus with a wine that you'd drink or have drunk in the past
    you are assured of the taste/flavour you are adding. As to the
    'absorbed', I find that about 20 minutes of simmering (per cup 250ml)
    takes the edge of added wine and hass the wine melded in with the other
    flavours in the stew, but that isn't really answering your question. Just
    ensure that the proper thickening of the broth occurs and it tastes ok to
    you, would be what I would do.

    --
    The eyes are the mirrors....
    But the ears...Ah the ears.
    The ears keep the hat up.

  5. Ditto to all of this:

    1. Err on the side of extra time in simmering - it is hard to simmer "too
    low."
    2. Buy wine you can drink - NOT cooking wine.
    3. Buy extra pancetta - it is more than yummy - to use the technical food
    term.

  6. "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the
    same of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is
    absorbed" .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to
    go out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Jim

    It's not really absorbed but rather evaporates. It's a common technique for
    concentrating the wine flavor and getting rid of most of the alcohol. I'd
    guess maybe 20-30 minutes?

    --
    Peter Aitken
    Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

  7. Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Always use decent wine for cooking. It reduces, and if you have a funky tasting
    wine that bad taste is going to be concentrated.

    That is a heck of a lot of wine, and wine is not exactly absorbed by the meat.
    The meat does take on some of the flavour, but the wine reduces.

    Be very careful about the temperature. Braising is a good way to make tougher
    cuts of meat tender and tasty, but you have to be very careful about the
    temperature. It requires a gentle simmer ...... not boiling!!! A stew boiled is
    a stew spoiled.

    I prefer to cook stews in the covered pot in a 300 degree oven. While I prefer
    to cook them one day and then re-heat them the next day, they can be good the
    first day but they need 3-4 hours of slow cooking.

  8. Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    The wine will evaporate and form a reduction but will not be absorbed.

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    If the pan is covered, the meat will give off liquid and you will up
    with more, not less. If the pan is not covered, the wine will
    evaporate, concentrating the flavor. Just cook the stew until it is
    done. I like mine cooked several hours, depending on the kind of meat.

    Quoted message said:

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    There's no such thing as "cooking" wine. There's just good wine and bad
    wine. Life is too short to buy bad wine.

    --
    Dan Abel
    [email hidden]
    Petaluma, California, USA

  10. Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    ..... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Meat won't absorb much wine or any other water-based liquid while
    cooking. It surrenders it as the protein denatures. The wine is actually
    evaporating, reducing, and concentrating flavors.

    Forget cooking wines. They're usually third-rate wines with salt added.
    Use something you'd drink.

    Pastorio

  11. Dave Smith said:
    Jim said:

    I'm going to cook a beef stew from an Italian cookery book. After cooking
    onions, pancetta and then the meat, you add 375ml of white wine and the same
    of red wine, then "cook over a low heat till all the liquid is absorbed"
    .... with no indication of how long this might be.

    Does anyone have any idea of how long it might take?

    And would I be better using drinking type wine or cooking wine? I have to go
    out shopping, anyway, now I've found out what pancetta is.

    Always use decent wine for cooking. It reduces, and if you have a funky tasting
    wine that bad taste is going to be concentrated.

    That is a heck of a lot of wine, and wine is not exactly absorbed by the meat.
    The meat does take on some of the flavour, but the wine reduces.

    Be very careful about the temperature. Braising is a good way to make tougher
    cuts of meat tender and tasty, but you have to be very careful about the
    temperature. It requires a gentle simmer ...... not boiling!!! A stew boiled is
    a stew spoiled.

    I prefer to cook stews in the covered pot in a 300 degree oven. While I prefer
    to cook them one day and then re-heat them the next day, they can be good the
    first day but they need 3-4 hours of slow cooking.


    Agree with you absolutely about all of the above. Actually, I'd be a bit
    worried about a recipe that referred to the liquid being "absorbed", but
    the problem might be with the translation if the cookbook is originally
    Italian.

    Have you ever used beef cheek for stew? It is absolutely the best cut,
    if you can get it. The result is like oxtail - and you cook it much the
    same way - but no fat and no bones.

    Something I do with braises (a Stephanie Alexander tip) is cover them
    with a piece of baking paper cut to fit. You still put the lid on the
    pot, but it prevents any drying out.

    Christine

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.