In article <[email hidden]>, Gordon <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:Bernard Hill <[email hidden]> wrote
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>, Martin Richardson
<[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
But now we have touching the void to fill our screens.
Have we? I had to travel 50 miles to a 'minority interest' cinema to see it. Are you saying it's
out on video/dvd?
It isn't on 'at a cinema near me'.
I don't think it can possibly be as good as the book, but it would make a good documentary for TV.
It's an excellent *complement* to the book. It is a Film Four production and *is* a documentary
format. The 2 authors recite the course of events in normal "talking heads" format and then the film
cuts to actors performing those events.
The things which it gives which were not in the book were, for me:
a) the sense of excitement in the start of the climb
b) the feeling of the storm
c) the complexity of the crevasse. My imagination in the book had it as a much simpler place!
d) ditto for crossing the glacier on the way back. The search for a route between crevasses which a
walker on 2 legs could have strode or jumped across.
e) the harshness of the moraine when you're trying to crawl.
As I say, it in no way replaces the book: it amplifies it in ways which books are weak, and the book
fills in details omitted from the film.
Bernard Hill Selkirk, Scotland