On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:08:35 -0500, Fred Barney <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:jj says...
Quoted message said:There are quite a few people who have done it using Low Carbing. I lost
about 70lbs that way several years ago and kept it all off except for about
20-25lbs. What's superhuman is keeping it off past five years. Few do that,
ime.
The solution is intensive bicycling.
Absolutely! Might take another year before I'm riding as intensely as I'd
like, though.
Quoted message said:At 40+ calories per mile for a vigorous ride, I can eat just about anything
I want and still lose weight. I actually find that my appetite doesn't increase
as much as the calories I burn.
I think this part varies. Some people report a rise in appetite. For me
exercise is usually an appetite suppressant.
Quoted message said:If I do vigorous 50 mile ride with lots of hills
and burn 2300 calories, it is difficult to eat enough to make back all
the calories.
If you can do this daily, then more power to you. Right now I'm in the
process of another increase. About 12-15miles per day of fairly hilly
terrain is what I'm able to do each day and still be recovered the next
day.
Quoted message said:Yesterday I ate 21oz. of rib eye and a big bowl of ice
cream with magic shell topping along with a big breakfast and a light
lunch and I came out 450 calories in the negative for the day.
And the more lean body mass you have, generally the faster you burn it off
as well.
Quoted message said:I just couldn't eat any more. After my 75 mile ride Saturday, I was 1500
calories in the negative for the day. I gained about 10lbs over the
winter and started the riding season slow and late, but I'm probably in
as good a biking shape now as I have ever been after about 6 weeks of
hitting it hard. The ten pounds is mostly gone and I don't feel I need
to lose much more, but if I was to aspire to pro racer skinny I would
need to lose another 15.
Cool. Ever do anything like ride the Everest challenge, or the Death ride?
Sound's like you'd do ok. Next step! ;-)
jj