UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle computer on a MTB?

Started by James · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,031 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
6 December 2004
Last activity
8 December 2004
Original author
James
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,031
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

  2. James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

  3. trembler50 said:


    James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    Which cycle computer would you guys recommend?

  4. "James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Who cares if it looks twattish, and why should it anyway? Apart from being a
    point of interest the information provided can aid navigation.
    I haven't got one (but often refer to riding partners for info) which adds
    to the fun of being on a way-marked enduro, not only haven't I a clue as to
    where I am but also am clueless as to how far I've ridden and therefore how
    much further to go, sort of like where am I man? :-)

    Pete

  5. James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Depends on what you use your bike for.

    If you want to know how far/fast you are going then they are good.

    If you are just posing on the high street, buy a very expensive one :-)

    If you are just plugging mud in a local quarry, you probably don't need
    one.

  6. Peter B vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    "James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Who cares if it looks twattish, and why should it anyway? Apart from
    being a point of interest the information provided can aid navigation.
    I haven't got one (but often refer to riding partners for info) which adds
    to the fun of being on a way-marked enduro, not only haven't I a clue as
    to where I am but also am clueless as to how far I've ridden and
    therefore how much further to go, sort of like where am I man? :-)

    Way to go, that man. I doff my cap to you in deference to a most worthy
    outlook on navigational techniques .. 😉

    I presume you come from the Mark Thatcher school of navigation .. 😉

    --
    Paul ...
    http://dogpoopblog.blogspot.com/
    http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php

  7. James vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Yes to both .. but does it _really_ matter that much?

    If you need one, you need one. If you look like a [censored] with a cycle
    computer, you almost certainly also look like a [censored] without one. and
    vice-versa of course .. 😉

    --
    Paul ...
    http://dogpoopblog.blogspot.com/
    http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php

  8. James said:
    trembler50 said:
    James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    FFS, when you get to be a big boy you'll care less what something
    *looks* like and do it because you want to! Don't you think it's a
    little silly worrying if a MTB might look daft with a cycle computer?
    Have you ever noticed an MTB with one and thought "That looks a little
    bit daft"? No? Why do you think anyone is going to notice yours? Or
    care if they do?

    --
    Trevor Barton

  9. James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    If thats the case then my mtb with a cycle computer + GPS must be really
    twatish!

    :-D

    I'm happy with my sigma bc500 bike computer.

    --
    Brian

  10. James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Why would it? It's not exactly big or noticable.

    --

    Burning_Ranger

    To email: [email hidden]

  11. James said:
    trembler50 said:


    James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    Which cycle computer would you guys recommend?

    Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing, as a thin cable has
    the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when off-road.
    David E. Belcher

  12. James said:
    trembler50 said:


    James said:

    Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    Which cycle computer would you guys recommend?

    Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing, as a thin cable has
    the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when off-road.
    David E. Belcher

  13. David E. Belcher vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:
    James said:
    trembler50 said:


    James Wrote:
    > Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    Which cycle computer would you guys recommend?

    Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing, as a thin cable has
    the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when off-road.
    David E. Belcher

    We use the oft mentioned £3 (whatever it was) Aldi wireless jobbie on our
    mtb's .. It works well and has never let us down, other than from
    self-inflicted abuse to it .. 😉

    --
    Paul ...
    http://dogpoopblog.blogspot.com/
    http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php

  14. David E. Belcher <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    : wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing, as a thin cable has
    : the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when off-road.

    I took the computer off the MTB. I found the average speed and distance
    readings just too depressing. I don't want to now that I've only gone
    25 miles in three hours!

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
    It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness

  15. David E. Belcher said:


    Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing,

    Just another battery (always in a different size) to go flat.

    Quoted message said:

    as a thin cable has the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when off-road.

    Some cyclecomputers have a much sturdier wire

    --
    ---
    Marten Gerritsen

    INFOapestaartjeM-GINEERINGpuntNL
    www.m-gineering.nl

  16. in message <[email hidden]>,

    David E. Belcher (') said:


    James said:
    trembler50 said:


    James Wrote:
    > Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?

    Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    Which cycle computer would you guys recommend?

    Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing, as a thin cable has
    the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when off-road.

    Yes, definitely. The problem is made worse by front suspension movement
    which means a cable always has to be loose and will definitely cause
    trouble.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; All in all you're just another nick in the ball
    -- Think Droid

  17. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>,

    David E. Belcher (') said:


    James said:

    On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 05:03:35 +1100, trembler50
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >
    > James Wrote:
    >> Ok, or does it look a bit twatish?
    >
    > Essential!

    Then I suppose I'd better get one. I've been considering it for a
    while but I wasn't sure if it'd look a bit daft or not.

    Which cycle computer would you guys recommend?

    Don't know what other posters think, but I'm just wondering if a
    wireless computer might be a good idea for MTBing, as a thin cable
    has the potential to get snagged on bits of foliage, etc. when
    off-road.

    Yes, definitely. The problem is made worse by front suspension
    movement which means a cable always has to be loose and will
    definitely cause trouble.

    Not if you wrap it round the brake line/cable, thobut.

    --

    Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/
    World Domination?
    Just find a world that's into that kind of thing, then chain to the
    floor and walk up and down on it in high heels. (Mr. Sunshine)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.