UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle Instructor Training - Day #1

Started by Tilly · · Last activity · 144 posts · 4,735 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
24 January 2005
Last activity
31 January 2005
Original author
Tilly
Posts
144
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,735
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 141–144 of 144
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:01:33 +0000 someone who may be JohnB
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Nah, I blame the politicians ;-)

    Nice try.

    However, I would have said "party politicians":-)

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
    I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
    prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.

  2. LSMike said:

    Honestly, what use is the rear brake if you're trying to stop as fast
    as possible? There will be little to no weight on it making its
    contribution relatively useless.

    If the surface is not slippy enough to lift the back wheel off the
    ground, then you will need to use the back brake for fastest stopping,
    and using a little too much back brake means that you get warned that
    you're approaching the limit by an easily controllable backslide rather
    than a hit-the-ground-suddenly front slide.

    If you're trying to stop rolling backwards down a very steep hill in
    the rain, e.g. when stopped at lights, then the front brake may simply
    let front wheel wheel slip where the back brake will hold you.
    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  3. James Annan said:

    Mike Causer wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You're good at this, please tell us how you know when there's enough grip
    to aviate the back wheel and when there isn't. Have you tried it on damp
    tarmac, damp Bridport stone, wet tarmac, wet leaves?

    And when there isn't enough friction, and you've locked the front wheel
    and are on your way down, please tell us your techniques for minimising
    the injuries....

    Quoted message said:

    However much friction there is or isn't, adding a rear wheel skid to the
    mix is hardly going to help matters. On very slippery ground it might be
    sensible to use the rear brake cos a front wheel skid is even worse.

    It doesn't have to very slippery. On many ordinary wet roads you'll
    need the back brake, and overusing it a little is very useful way of
    getting a warning signal of an easily controllable rear wheel skid
    rather than a hit-the-road front skid.

    Quoted message said:

    But
    on any decent surface - ie the vast majority of all cycling - this
    statement in the original message is simply wrong:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Instructor Trainers were
    insistent that to stop a bike as fast as possible it was necessary to
    use both brakes, not front brakes alone.

    So in your opinion the vast majority of cyclists do the vast majority
    of their cycling on dry roads?
    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  4. Chris Malcolm said:

    James Annan <[email hidden]> writes:

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    However much friction there is or isn't, adding a rear wheel skid to the
    mix is hardly going to help matters. On very slippery ground it might be
    sensible to use the rear brake cos a front wheel skid is even worse.

    It doesn't have to very slippery. On many ordinary wet roads you'll
    need the back brake, and overusing it a little is very useful way of
    getting a warning signal of an easily controllable rear wheel skid
    rather than a hit-the-road front skid.

    "Need" = "need to use to achieve the absolute theoretical maximum
    braking effect", or "need to use to brake effectively"? The former may
    be true, but I don't believe the latter.

    Quoted message said:

    So in your opinion the vast majority of cyclists do the vast majority
    of their cycling on dry roads?

    Um..not sure about _vast_ majority, but the added benefit from using the
    rear brake is certainly very small in all normal circumstances - and
    when it does have a theoretical benefit, it also introduces the risk of
    a skid. It is very much an optional extra in my riding, rather than
    essential.

    James
    --
    If I have seen further than others, it is
    by treading on the toes of giants.
    http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.