Chris Malcolm said:James Annan <[email hidden]> writes:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:However much friction there is or isn't, adding a rear wheel skid to the
mix is hardly going to help matters. On very slippery ground it might be
sensible to use the rear brake cos a front wheel skid is even worse.
It doesn't have to very slippery. On many ordinary wet roads you'll
need the back brake, and overusing it a little is very useful way of
getting a warning signal of an easily controllable rear wheel skid
rather than a hit-the-road front skid.
"Need" = "need to use to achieve the absolute theoretical maximum
braking effect", or "need to use to brake effectively"? The former may
be true, but I don't believe the latter.
Quoted message said:So in your opinion the vast majority of cyclists do the vast majority
of their cycling on dry roads?
Um..not sure about _vast_ majority, but the added benefit from using the
rear brake is certainly very small in all normal circumstances - and
when it does have a theoretical benefit, it also introduces the risk of
a skid. It is very much an optional extra in my riding, rather than
essential.
James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/