Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Cycle Lanes Signs or Paint ???

Started by Jeytown · · Last activity · 16 posts · 2,056 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
25 July 2006
Last activity
5 August 2006
Original author
Jeytown
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,056
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. hey just another quick question guys

    this question goes out to those who use dedicated cycle lanes to get to there destinations

    of those what would you rather prefer

    a painted sign on the road indicating where and which direction to go to

    or

    the standard blue sign on a telegraph pole

    the reason im asking is that i quite often get confused finding cycle paths on roads when looking for that tricky blue sign

    your thoughts ?????

  2. Paint on the road.

    What I don't like is bike lanes that take you within the door zone. The vechiles expect you to be in the bike lane if its painted, but if theres none, you can ride outside the door zone.

  3. i agree there is supposed to be a 400mm buffer zone between parked car and bike lane but i agree totally there needs to be another solution when it comes to car doors.

  4. Jeytown said:

    i agree there is supposed to be a 400mm buffer zone between parked car and bike lane but i agree totally there needs to be another solution when it comes to car doors.

    Make an Australian Design Rule for all cars sold to be scissor lift.

  5. 400mm??!!! How long is a car door?

  6. The proposed bike lanes for Kent st, in Sydney CBD include a door zone, so it will appear that the mistake made with many existing bike lanes, is now being addressed with new bike paths.

  7. mikesbytes said:

    The proposed bike lanes for Kent st, in Sydney CBD include a door zone, so it will appear that the mistake made with many existing bike lanes, is now being addressed with new bike paths.


    Hi Mike
    I was having a chat with another cyclist about this and his comment was that he is waiting for a court case to come up from someone being doored while riding in the marked cycle lane. The marked bike lane shows where the cyclist is "supposed to ride" which places them in a dangerous position.
    What bike paths are giving extra room?

    Cheers

    Geoff

  8. geoffs said:

    Hi Mike
    I was having a chat with another cyclist about this and his comment was that he is waiting for a court case to come up from someone being doored while riding in the marked cycle lane. The marked bike lane shows where the cyclist is "supposed to ride" which places them in a dangerous position.
    What bike paths are giving extra room?

    Cheers

    Geoff

    Hi Geoff, is the cyclist suing the motorist, or the motorist suing the cyclists?

    The kerb side lanes are generally good. I liked the William st ones, apart from the odd taxi dropping off or picking up.

    Cheers Michael. BTW I saw a tamdem down at Newtown, rather like the one that the goodies rode [whats the term for a 3 seater], but a 2 seater.

  9. bike lanes should be painted AND signposted.

  10. three person bike = tridem

  11. mikesbytes said:

    Hi Geoff, is the cyclist suing the motorist, or the motorist suing the cyclists?

    The kerb side lanes are generally good. I liked the William st ones, apart from the odd taxi dropping off or picking up.

    Cheers Michael. BTW I saw a tamdem down at Newtown, rather like the one that the goodies rode [whats the term for a 3 seater], but a 2 seater.


    Tandem simply means that the riders are in fore and aft line rather than side by side. It can have any number of riders greater than1.

  12. Cycle lanes signs and paint are both required and signs can give directions where paint can give motorist awareness that bikes will be on that road .

    Beauyboy

  13. 62vette said:

    three person bike = tridem


    tridem and didn't like it?

  14. mikesbytes said:

    The proposed bike lanes for Kent st, in Sydney CBD include a door zone, so it will appear that the mistake made with many existing bike lanes, is now being addressed with new bike paths.

    Well in fact BikeSydney and BIKEastboth had to push for that and for a minimum of 600mm. Of course Kent St is at risk due to the NSW State Gov's choice to remove the bike lanes on William St. So come to the Sausages for Stupidity ride on Sun 30th - there is an earlier post with all the details.

  15. blinddog said:

    Well in fact BikeSydney and BIKEastboth had to push for that and for a minimum of 600mm. Of course Kent St is at risk due to the NSW State Gov's choice to remove the bike lanes on William St. So come to the Sausages for Stupidity ride on Sun 30th - there is an earlier post with all the details.

    Having seen someone be knocked off a bike by a car door on the pacific highway, I'm well aware of the risk, luckly he was not hurt by the fall and the traffic managed to stop.

    The tunnel owners are suing NSW govt for the reversals they started this week.

  16. [font=Arial]I think that paint works better, but it's better with signs and paint.[/font]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.