Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Difference between 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette?

Started by Boyd Speerschne · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,306 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 June 2003
Last activity
23 June 2003
Original author
Boyd Speerschne
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,306
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello,

    What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in price)?

    Thanks in advance,

    - Boyd S.

  2. Quoted message said:

    What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in price)?

    The Ultegra is lighter due to its aluminum carrier body, while the '105 cassette is entirely steel.
    It *seems* that Ultegra cassettes are quieter, but could be my imagination. I notice no difference
    in shifting quality or lifespan though.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com

  3. Boyd asks-<< What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in
    price)? >><BR><BR>

    Last section(largest) of the cogset is on a carrier for ultegra, just pinned together loose cogs for
    105. The pins can be taken out for cleaning, BTW, a good thing.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  4. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in price)?

    The Ultegra is lighter due to its aluminum carrier body, while the '105 cassette is entirely
    steel. It *seems* that Ultegra cassettes are quieter, but could be my imagination. I notice no
    difference in shifting quality or lifespan though.

    Also take a look at SRAM Shimano compatible cassettes. They are lighter than Ultegra and about the
    same price. The chrome plating (I think) is nice and shiny. Performancebike has them.

  5. [email hidden] (Richard Chan) wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in price)?

    The Ultegra is lighter due to its aluminum carrier body, while the '105 cassette is entirely
    steel. It *seems* that Ultegra cassettes are quieter, but could be my imagination. I notice no
    difference in shifting quality or lifespan though.

    Also take a look at SRAM Shimano compatible cassettes. They are lighter than Ultegra and about the
    same price. The chrome plating (I think) is nice and shiny. Performancebike has them.

    Aren't the SRAM cassettes one piece? I'm only concerned because I tend to where out some gears
    faster than others; its a lot cheaper to replace one or two gears than the whole cassette.

    - Boyd S.

  6. Quoted message said:

    Also take a look at SRAM Shimano compatible cassettes. They are lighter than Ultegra and about the
    same price. The chrome plating (I think) is nice and shiny. Performancebike has them.

    Unless they've changed from the generation I tried, the SRAM cassettes are all individual steel
    cogs, not bolted together tightly enough to allow multiple cogs to carry the load. When used on an
    aluminum cassette mechanism, they tend to dig in pretty nastily, making them a bear to remove. Could
    be they're made differently now.

    The Ultegra and DuraAce cassettes, for the most part, spread the load by either attaching multiple
    cogs (three) to one alloy carrier, or by incorporating spacers into the individual cogs. The issue
    is that the contact surface between cog and body (which is what must carry the pedaling forces) is
    considerably greater, and less likely to damage the cassette mechanism.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in
    > price)?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    The Ultegra is lighter due to its aluminum carrier body, while the '105 cassette is entirely
    steel. It *seems* that Ultegra cassettes are quieter, but could be my imagination. I notice no
    difference in shifting quality or lifespan though.

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Richard Chan) wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Also take a look at SRAM Shimano compatible cassettes. They are lighter than Ultegra and about
    the same price. The chrome plating (I think) is nice and shiny. Performancebike has them.

    "Boyd Speerschneider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Aren't the SRAM cassettes one piece? I'm only concerned because I tend to where out some gears
    faster than others; its a lot cheaper to replace one or two gears than the whole cassette.

    SRAM #7 are single cogs which may be swapped. SRAM #9 uses a spider.

    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  8. Quoted message said:

    That issue aside, how well do the SRAM cassettes shift compared to Shimano/Campy, and how long do
    they last? Any difference?

    The SRAM cassette I used was a 12-26 9 speed, and it worked just fine; I noticed no difference in
    shifting between it and my Ultegra. A bit noisier perhaps, but otherwise fine.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com

  9. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Also take a look at SRAM Shimano compatible cassettes. They are lighter than Ultegra and about
    the same price. The chrome plating (I think) is nice and shiny. Performancebike has them.

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Unless they've changed from the generation I tried, the SRAM cassettes are all individual steel
    cogs, not bolted together tightly enough to allow multiple cogs to carry the load. When used on an
    aluminum cassette mechanism, they tend to dig in pretty nastily, making them a bear to


    remove.

    Quoted message said:

    Could be they're made differently now.

    The Ultegra and DuraAce cassettes, for the most part, spread the load by either attaching multiple
    cogs (three) to one alloy carrier, or by incorporating spacers into the individual cogs. The issue
    is that the contact surface between cog and body (which is what must carry the


    pedaling

    Quoted message said:

    forces) is considerably greater, and less likely to damage the cassette mechanism.

    The SRAM #7 has loose swappable cogs. Their #9 is a spidered system. As in Shimano, choose your
    feature set, as both formats are current.

    ps-We sell quite a few SRAM cassettes as the weight and available sizes are favorable to some
    riders' tastes. It's good to have a choice of alternate vendors IMHO.

    Distribution is excellent too, so prompt delivery is a factor for us. Most of our suppliers
    have them.
    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  10. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What's the difference between a 105 and Ultegra 9-speed cassette (besides about $10 in price)?

    The Ultegra is lighter due to its aluminum carrier body, while the '105 cassette is entirely
    steel. It *seems* that Ultegra cassettes are quieter, but could be my imagination. I notice no
    difference in shifting quality or lifespan though.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com


    Well, I'm not a particularly strong rider and I sheared my ultegra cassette spider to pieces after
    ~5000 miles, so I'd go 105 next time!

  11. Quoted message said:

    Well, I'm not a particularly strong rider and I sheared my ultegra cassette spider to pieces after
    ~5000 miles, so I'd go 105 next time!

    Not a typical experience. Between our two shops we sell probably 400 road bikes/year with Ultegra,
    maybe a lot more if I think about it, and none of my customers have (yet) "sheared" an Ultegra
    cassette body. And some of them *are* very strong riders. I'd say something was defective about
    either the body or the installation (although I can't figure how it could be installed that would
    cause that). But it's certainly not a reason to avoid an Ultegra cassette (or DuraAce, for that
    matter, which also has an aluminum carrier for many of the cogs).

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.