WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOD AND AN MD?
See the very end of this post...
THIS POST IS WORTH **BILLIONS** PER YEAR TO THE AMERICAN
ECONOMY...
Even if there weren't money to be saved, WHY are we letting
medical dieties
(MDs) knowingly close birth canals up to 30%?
VAGINAS
Why are we letting medical dieties (MDs) slice vaginas en
masse (euphemism "routine episiotomy"😉 -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing everything
possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth
canals - up to 30%?
See "The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all
women..." at the very end of this post...
PENISES
Nearly 100% of babies join me in calling for an end to
American medicine's grisly most frequent surgical behavior
toward males. (Most babies SCREAM their support - but some
are rendered unconscious by the intensity of the pain.)
KEY POINT...
ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION is *not* Jewish ritual
circumcision.
In late 1987, when I discovered American MDs using phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology to obtain consent to
perform "no medical indication" routine infant
circumcisions, I demanded an end to the obvious child abuse
and called for a religious exemption for Jewish
circumcision.
Pediatricians (the AAP, Jan/Feb 1988 issues of Pediatrics)
immediately called for opposition to ALL religious
exemptions, saying in effect that if MDs were to be forced
to stop circumcising - so would Jewish ritual circumcisers!
Immediately thereafter (March 1988), the California Medical
Association/CMA House of Delegates ignored its own
Scientific Board and by voice vote instantly changed routine
circumcision from "no medical indications" to "an effective
public health measure." ("Unjustifiable physical pain" is
the exact definition of child abuse in California. Child
abusers can go to prison for up to six years per count.
Calif. Penal Code Sec. 273a.)
NOTE: Jewish ritual circumcision originally entailed
leaving most of the foreskin on the penis - and
it was FAST!
"[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But
Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and
touched Moses' feet with it...So the LORD let him
alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)" holyspiritinteractive-holyspiritinteractive-Open ↗
.net/biblediscovery/zipporah.asp
Routine infant circumcision is American medicine's $400
million dollar per year GRISLY most frequent surgical
behavior toward males...
Routine infant circumcision should have ended BILLIONS of
dollars' worth of infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I
exposed AAP's perpetuation of phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology...
Ending this barbaric MD behavior toward babies (see "brutal"
"barbaric" quotes below) would not only save $400 million
dollars per year - it would stop the infant screams and
(paradoxically) PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American
males could make for themselves in adulthood. (It is likely
that - like most males on the planet - American males would
NOT chooose circumcision in adulthood.)
THINK ABOUT IT
AS INFANTS SCREAM AND WRITHE AND BLEED (note: sometimes
babies die or lose their penises)...
"One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is
sliced off." infocirc.orgMensHlth.htmOpen ↗
(paraphrasing Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of Circumcision:
The Hidden Trauma)
"The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
infocirc.orgMensHlth.htmOpen ↗ (quoting Ronald
Goldman, PhD, author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)
MDs ARE SLICING OFF PART OF THE BODY'S IMMUNE SYSTEM AT THE
ENTRANCE TO THE GENITO-URINARY SYSTEM!
THE PREPUCE (FORESKIN) HAS IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES!
"...A review of the scientific literature...reveals that the
actual effect of circumcision is the destruction of...clinically-
demonstated hygienic and immunological properties of the
prepuce and intact penis.
"The sphincter action of the preputial orifice functions
like a one way valve, blocking the entry of contaminants
while allowing the passage of urine.7,8
"Ectopic sebaceous glands concentrated near the frenulum
produce smegma.9-12 This natural emollient contains
prostatic and seminal secretions, desquamated epithelial
cells, and the mucin content of the urethral glands of
Littré.13,14 It protects and lubricates the glans and inner
lamella of the prepuce, facilitating erection, preputial
eversion, and penetration
"The inner prepuce contains apocrine glands,15 which
secrete cathepsin
B...chymotrypsin, neutrophil elastase,16 cytokine (a non-
antibody protein that generates an immune response on
contact with specific antigens)17...pheromones such as
androsterone18...[and lysozyme16]...
"...Lysozyme...also found in tears, human milk, and other
body fluids destroys bacterial cell walls..."
From Fleiss P, Hodges F, Van Howe RS. Immunological
functions of the human
MDs ARE DE FACTO LEGAL CHILD ABUSERS
MD-influenced prosecutors (DAs and AGs) are negligently
looking the other way, thereby making MDs de facto legal
child abusers.
I will cc this to my old roommate at UCLA, Bill Hodgman, now
chief deputy DA for LA County DA Mark Cooley via
[email hidden]
BEWARE: The first step in circumcision involves actually
RIPPING foreskin from glans - euphemism "freeing
adhesions" - as in,
"[F]reeing adhesions, is tantamount to cruel and unusual
punishment and is unfounded physiologically and medically."
[Kaplan GW: Circumcision: An overview. Current Problems in
Pediatrics, 1977;7(5):8]
Most MDs rip and slice infant penises with NO ANESTHESIA
Even *with* anesthesia, routine infant circumcision is still
child abuse.
PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED...
PLEASE FIND A LEGAL CHILD ABUSER WHO USES ANESTHESIA
(According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal
penile nerve block (DPNB) injections. "Ring block" is a
recommended anesthesia alternative.)
MDs KNOW IT IS CHILD ABUSE
As indicated above...
In late 1987, Pediatricians perpetuated phony "babies can't
feel pain" neurology... [Poland et al. Pediatrics
1987;80:446].
Since there were "no medical indications" for routine infant
circumcision, I asked the AAP/Poland et al. to help end it.
I also called for religious exemptions for Jews...
In the January 1988 issue of Pediatrics, AAP members were
told to "vigorously oppose in the legislatures," all present
and proposed religious exemptions and "defend the rights of
all children to the protection and benefits of the law...".
Translated: a religious circumcision exemption from the
child abuse laws means medical circumcision is indeed child
abuse; therefore we
B.A.s must oppose ALL religious exemptions. If we are
prosecuted, the rabbis and mohelim are going down with
us.
In the February 1988 issue of Pediatrics, the AAP
recommended anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse: "The
American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all states
adopt laws forbidding public disclosure...of information
that identifies victims of child abuse, their families, AND
PERPETRATORS [emphasis added]."
In March 1988, the California Medical Association House of
Delegates ignored its own Scientific Board and by voice vote
created "an effective public health measure" out of "no
medical indications." (CMA had long stated there were "no
medical indications" for routine infant circumcision.)
Weeks later, the AAP convened a circumcision task force
which - when it made its report one year later - failed to
mention that the phony CMA had declared routine infant
circumcision "an effective public health measure." (!)
Of course, AAP *also* failed to mention that American
medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology had been
exposed just months before the CMA discovered its new public
health measure!
AAP *still* hasn't acknowledged this understandable^^^
though unconscionable criminal negligence.
^^^It's understandable criminal negligence because MDs
wish to stay out of prison. This "wish to stay out of
prison" BIAS should be stated in every American medical
article on circumcision because most American MDs have
committed the crime.
"Most doctors believe babies can't feel pain...Most doctors
today...I bought it..."
- Dean Edell, M.D. claiming on national television that
his physician superiors at Cornell University taught
him that babies don't have nerves in their genitals.
(KGO-TV San Francisco, circa 1984)
American MDs can't simply stop the mass child abuse because
stopping the crime would be tantamount to admitting it.
See Care of the Intact Penis health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2413
VAGINAS
Coincidentally, American MDs senselessly slice most VAGINAS
at around the same time they slice most PENISES...
Mass vagina and and penis slicing - American medicine's most
frequent surgical behaviors toward males and females - are
obvious crimes of negligence which sometimes escalate to
criminally negligent homicide.
American OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism
"routine episiotomy"😉 - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY claiming to
be doing everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as
they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.
See Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of
Medicine health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2256
See also: Helping baby open birth canal (Why obstetrics is
criminal medical CAM)... health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2391
With birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%...
OBs are violently pushing on babies' spines (oxytocin,
Cytotec, PGE2) and gruesomely pulling (hands, forceps,
vacuums)...
Sometimes babies die, sometimes babies get paralyzed - but
most babies "only" have their necks gruesomely manipulated.
ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal
senselessly closed up to 30%.
MDs are anti- HUMAN - in addition to being anti-Semitic...
MDs knew about what I am talking about early last
century....
Harvard obstetrician Arthur B. Emmons, MD wrote in 1913
"[M]oving backward of the tip of the sacrum...enlarges the
available space not merely directly in proportion to the
distance backward, but more nearly by the square of that
distance." [Emmons, AB. A study of the variations in the
female pelvis, based on observations made on 217 specimens
of the American Indian squaw. Biometrika 1913; 9:34-47.]
And here's what was added to Williams Obstetrics at my
request:
"It should be noted...that the increase in the diameter of
the pelvic outlet occurs **only** if the sacrum is allowed
to rotate posteriorly, that is, only if the sacrum is not
forced anteriorly by the weight of the maternal pelvis
against the delivery table or bed." [Cunningham, MacDonald,
Leveno, Gant and Gilstrap, Williams Obstetrics Appleton-
Lange 1993:285, **italics in original]
Unfortunately, the authors of Williams Obstetrics left in
their text - in the same paragraph (!) the "dorsal widens"
bald lie that first called my attention to their text)!!
NOTE: The authors of Williams Obstetrics started telling
their "dorsal widens" bald lie back in the 70s when
Ohlsen pointed out to them that they were still
claiming that pelvic diameters don't change at
delivery...
home1.gte.netpart2ftc.htmlOpen ↗
According to Kitzinger [1993]
French obstetrician Michel Odent "would never risk a breech
delivery with the mother in a dorsal or semi-seated
position." ("Our only intervention will be to insist on the
supported squatting position..." [Odent quoted in Kitzinger
S. The Complete Book of Pregnancy and Childbirth.
"conceived, edited and designed" in London by Dorling
Kindersley Limited; published in New York by Alfred A.
Knopf, Inc. 1993:264]
QUESTION: If Odent would never risk a breech delivery with
the mother dorsal or semi-seated, why is he silent as
"[m]any doctors prefer to deliver breech babies with the
woman in the lithotomy position." [Kitzinger, 1993:261]
And why does Ms. Kitzinger herself unquestioningly advise
semi-sitting (closing birth canal up to 30%) as an option?
[Kitzinger, 1993:261]
MDs (Hannah et al.) recently decreed that singleton term
breeches be taken by cesarean section. reseau-reseau-Open ↗
naissance.com/rsn_journee_scientifique_01.html#reduire_siege
Because breech deliveries are performed in lithotomy, Hannah
et al. studied breech births with birth canals usually
closed up to 30%.
See Hannah et al.'s term breech tomfoolery/Gherman et al.'s
fetal radiation fraud groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/1306
REMEMBER: Obstetricians are KNOWINGLY closing birth canals
up to 30%...
SIMPLE PROOF...
According to the Merck Manual:
"When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are
hyperflexed to increase the diameter of the pelvic
outlet..." merck.comsection18Open ↗
/chapter253/253g.jsp
WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the
head is out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby
maximum pelvic outlet diameter?
WHY are we letting OBs and CNMwives force babies' heads
through birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%?
(An estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term babies suffer
unexplained brain bleeds! And babies actually suffer DENTS
in their skulls - "pingpong" skull fractures - though most
of these dents/"pingpong" fractures pop out.)
THE KICKER
OBs and CNMwives are KEEPING birth canals closed when
babies' shoulders get stuck!
The Merck Manual method for increasing the diameter of the
pelvic outlet - merely hyperflexing the mother's thighs - is
BAD McRoberts maneuver - and BAD McRoberts maneuver does not
roll the woman off her sacrum and therefore does NOT
increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet!
See ACOG birth crime video evidence health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2300
WMPI/JASON GARDOSI, MD
Here are the simple grisly biomechanics of semisitting (and
dorsal) delivery clearly stated by Jason Gardosi, MD,
director of the British National Health Service/NHS West
Midlands Perinatal Institute/WMPI...
"...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum
which is therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-
posterior diameter of the pelvic outlet..."
wmpi.netoe shoulder dystocia.htmOpen ↗
Incredibly, the just quoted WMPI site states the grisly
biomechanics of semisitting but then RECOMMENDS semisitting
delivery (closing the birth canal), as in,
"The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with
your back propped up with pillows...As you push, try to let
yourself 'open up' below..."
preg.infochapter11.htmOpen ↗
WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD is advising women to close their
birth canals, then saying: "As you push, try to let yourself
'open up' below..." (!)
ON A POSITIVE NOTE: The WMPI site does recommend a version
of GOOD McRoberts if the shoulders get stuck...
wmpi.netoe shoulder dystocia.htmOpen ↗
LAUGHABLE: Gardosi says of himself:
"Developed new obstetric aid, the 'Birth Cushion', for
studying squatting during the second stage of labour."
obgyn.netgardosi.htmOpen ↗
In fact, no one squatted in Gardosi's 1989 Lancet
"randomised controlled trial of squatting." (!)
See Edgbaston (UK) birth fraud (and 'the birth cushion'😉 health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2387
NOTE: At one time, WMPI/Jason Gardosi, MD and his British OB
pal Malcolm Griffiths got me censored from an
international obstetric listserv for protesting this
bizarre obstetric behavior - but fortunately not
before two of my articles got posted...
See forums.obgyn.netob gynOpen ↗
l/OBGYNL.9707/0128.html
See also: forums.obgyn.netob gynOpen ↗
l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html
MY BEST GUESS (as to why MDs haven't yet stopped the massive
obstetric crime)?
Stopping it would be tantamount to admitting it.
PARDONS IN ADVANCE FOR MDs...
As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs
(and MBs and anyone else who is senselessly closing
birth canals). MDs are just academic prime cuts forced
through this culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder
- medical school.
Pardons in advance will allow MDs to keep doing their
valid medical work, making money to pay the inevitable
civil damages.
LADIES: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN
the "extra" up to 30%. Just roll onto your side as you push
your baby out - or deliver on hands-and-knees, kneeling,
standing, squatting, etc.
BEWARE though: Some MDs and MBs will let you "try"
"alternative" delivery positions but will move you back to
dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal!) as you push
your baby out!
Talk to your MD or MB about this TODAY.
MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must -
first get the woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt.
MDs are a protected class...
I think there are geopolitical reasons for MDs having been
chosen as a protected class...
See Wild circumcision rhetoric of MDs/Israel's history groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2398
A RAY OF PEDIATRIC HOPE FOR HELPLESS INFANTS
In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics/AAP officially
stated in effect that MDs can no longer make infants scream
and writhe and bleed and sometimes die...and hide behind
PARENTS REQUEST IT cowardice...
According to AAP,
"[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient
exist independent of parental desires...
"...A[n infant's screaming writhing and bleeding obviously
constitutes the - TDG] patient's reluctance or refusal to
assent [and - TDG] should...carry considerable weight when
the proposed intervention is not essential to his or her
welfare and/or can be deferred without substantial risk...
"[T]hose who care for children need to provide for measures
to solicit assent and to attend to possible abuses of 'raw'
power over children when ethical conflicts occur." AMERICAN
ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Informed Consent, Parental Permission,
and Assent in Pediatric Practice(RE9510) Pediatrics Volume
95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317
aap.org00662.htmlOpen ↗
INFANT CIRCUMCISION: A BRUTAL, BARBARIC PRACTICE...
"After years of strapping babies down for this brutal
procedure and listening to their screams, we couldn't take
it any longer." [Sperlich BK, Conant M. Am J Nurs
(Jun)1994:16. "]http://www.cirp.org/nrc/]
"Nursing alert...[N]urses must consider their participation
in a surgical procedure that involves no anesthesia to be a
barbaric practice." (p. 205) Donna L. Wong's Essentials of
Pediatric Nursing [1997]
"[S]till all too often barbaric...[M.D.s]...would never
allow older children or adults to be subjected to such
practices, nor would they submit to it themselves..."
[Veteran circumcision cheerleader Colonel Thomas E.
Wiswell, MD in article in the April 24, 1997 New England
Journal of Medicine]
BOTTOMLINE...
If I were a baby about to have my penis ripped and sliced
again - I would want someone STOPPING the barbaric practice.
That failing, I would want anesthetic.
I say again:
PARENTS: IF YOU MUST HAVE YOUR SON'S FORESKIN AMPUTATED...
PLEASE FIND A LEGAL CHILD ABUSER WHO USES ANESTHESIA
(According to the medical literature, Mogen clamp and dorsal
penile nerve block (DPNB) injections are best - with "ring
block" being an anesthesia alternative.)
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo [email hidden]
PS1 ANTI-SEMITIC MDs: Again, when I discovered American MDs
using phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology to obtain
consent to perform "no medical indication" routine infant
circumcisions, I demanded an end to the obvious child abuse
and called for a religious exemption for Jewish
circumcision.
Pediatricians (the AAP) immediately called for opposition to
ALL religious exemptions, saying in effect that if MDs were
to be forced to stop circumcising - so would Jewish ritual
circumcisers!
Again: Jewish ritual circumcision originally entailed
leaving most of the foreskin on the penis - and it was FAST!
"[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But
Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and
touched Moses' feet with it...So the LORD let him
alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)" holyspiritinteractive-holyspiritinteractive-Open ↗
.net/biblediscovery/zipporah.asp
See also: Ancient nude wrestling (also: Surgeon Peter:
'circumcision...best performed without anaesthetic'😉 health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2432
PS2 SOME HAVE SAID THAT **I** AM ANTI-SEMITIC...
Yes, perhaps it is wrong for me to call for a religious
exemption that allows Jewish ritual circumcisers to harm the
tiniest Semites. After all, just as there is no scientific
evidence that non-Semitic infant foreskins should be
amputated by MEDICAL dieties (MDs), there is no scientific
evidence that a God wants tiny Semites to have *their*
foreskins amputated - in whole or in part - fast or slow.
As indicated above, I think American MDs are just stooges in
a geopolitical game.
See again: Ancient nude wrestling (also: Surgeon Peter:
'circumcision...best performed without anaesthetic'😉 health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2432
Truth be told, this doctor of chiropractic/DC would be
satisfied to stop medical deities (MDs) from senselessly
closing birth canals up to 30%.
It's a matter of CHIROPRACTIC PREVENTION (non-spinal
prevention) of the putative chiropractic clinicial entity
(vertebral subluxation)...
Medical dieties (MDs) are taking tiny lives and
paralyzing tiny limbs - and causing more putative
vertebral subluxations than my fellow DCs will ever be
able to adust by hand.
Stopping medical dieties (MDs) from closing birth canals is
the ultimate in CHIROPRACTIC PREVENTION.
Stopping the mass vagina and penis slashing would just be
chiropractic gravy - worth billions per year.
Mass vagina MD slicing (trauma to the perineum) is
"performed" for "free" - but...
"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all
women is trauma to perineum due to childbirth." (!)
ahcpr.govfactbk3.htmOpen ↗
WHY are we letting OBs knowingly close birth canals up to
30%?
Why are we letting them slice vaginas en masse -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY pretending they are doing
everything possible to OPEN birth canals - even as they
close birth canals?
The medical religion is an anti-HUMAN religion - in addition
to being anti-Semitic.
What is the difference between God and an MD?
God doesn't think he's an MD!
Thanks for reading, everyone.
Sincerely,
Todd
Ds. Gastaldo [email hidden]
Difference between God and an MD? health.groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2438