UK and Europe · Public discussion

Dodgy computer readings

Started by Danny Colyer · · Last activity · 25 posts · 862 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
9 December 2005
Last activity
17 December 2005
Original author
Danny Colyer
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
862
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What's likely to cause excessive readings in a corded computer
    (specifically a CatEye Astrale) that's functioned without problems for
    nearly 5 years?

    When I got to work this morning, my computer showed a top speed of 97.3
    mph. I have a high degree of confidence that this was wrong. Trip
    distance showed 5.44 miles. Given that I topped up the tyres last
    night, it should have been 5.36 or 5.37.

    When I got home this evening it showed a top speed of 63.3 and a trip
    distance of 5.64 (it's usually 5.59).

    This morning I wondered if mobile phone interference could have had any
    effect, as I took a call during the ride. But my phone wasn't even on
    this evening.

    The leads for my Lumicycles run alongside the computer lead for some of
    their length, so this evening I wondered if switching my main beam on
    and off during the ride may have had some effect. But it never has
    before, and I didn't use the Lumis at all this morning.

    I had the wheel off yesterday to fix a puncture. I often manage to
    knock the computer sensor when I refit the wheel, but I'm not aware of
    that happening yesterday. Anyway, that usually results in either no
    reading, or in the sensor hitting the spokes. Neither has happened this
    time.

    I guess I'll just have a play with the sensor and see if I get similarly
    strange readings next week.

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  2. Danny Colyer said:

    What's likely to cause excessive readings in a corded computer
    (specifically a CatEye Astrale) that's functioned without problems for
    nearly 5 years?

    When I got to work this morning, my computer showed a top speed of
    97.3 mph. I have a high degree of confidence that this was wrong.
    Trip distance showed 5.44 miles. Given that I topped up the tyres
    last night, it should have been 5.36 or 5.37.

    When I got home this evening it showed a top speed of 63.3 and a trip
    distance of 5.64 (it's usually 5.59).

    I've had a Cateye give double max speed readings when the sensor has been
    too close to the magnet or not quite positioned right. It must've clicked
    twice per rev sometimes, but not often enough to affect trip distance very
    much.

    Well done for doing 48.65 mph! :-)

    Quoted message said:

    This morning I wondered if mobile phone interference could have had
    any effect, as I took a call during the ride. But my phone wasn't
    even on this evening.

    The leads for my Lumicycles run alongside the computer lead for some
    of their length, so this evening I wondered if switching my main beam
    on and off during the ride may have had some effect. But it never has
    before, and I didn't use the Lumis at all this morning.

    I wouldn't have thought anything like that would affect a /corded/
    computer. The sensors are just reed switches that simply close the
    circuit (I guess there's a fair amount of current and it's all very
    binary).

    Quoted message said:

    I had the wheel off yesterday to fix a puncture. I often manage to
    knock the computer sensor when I refit the wheel, but I'm not aware of
    that happening yesterday. Anyway, that usually results in either no
    reading, or in the sensor hitting the spokes. Neither has happened
    this time.

    I bet that's the problem but with a different result this time. Self
    amalgamating rubber tape should keep the sensor firmly in place (and epoxy
    resin for magnet).

    ~PB

  3. I've had this problem. All I could think of is that it was caused by
    the bike wheel rocking backwards and forwards slightly (on a train or
    when falling over) when the magnet was near the coil.

  4. Bob said:

    I've had this problem. All I could think of is that it was caused by
    the bike wheel rocking backwards and forwards slightly (on a train or
    when falling over) when the magnet was near the coil.

    You wouldn't be able to rock it fast enough to read 97 mph if you tried,
    so I'm quite sure the problem is caused by dodgy sensor/magnet
    positioning. I've had exactly the same problem two or three times....
    well, except the reading was lower in my cases!

    ~PB

  5. I said:
    Bob said:

    I've had this problem. All I could think of is that it was caused by
    the bike wheel rocking backwards and forwards slightly (on a train or
    when falling over) when the magnet was near the coil.

    You wouldn't be able to rock it fast enough to read 97 mph if you
    tried, so I'm quite sure the problem is caused by dodgy sensor/magnet
    positioning. I've had exactly the same problem two or three times....
    well, except the reading was lower in my cases!

    ps. Fixed by moving the sensor further out.

    ~PB

  6. Bob said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've had this problem. All I could think of is that it was caused by
    the bike wheel rocking backwards and forwards slightly (on a train or
    when falling over) when the magnet was near the coil.

    and Pete Biggs responded:

    Quoted message said:

    You wouldn't be able to rock it fast enough to read 97 mph if you tried,

    It'd certainly be a challenge with the 20" wheel that my bike computer
    reads. You can get close with the 36" wheel on a Coker, though :-)

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  7. Danny Colyer said:

    What's likely to cause excessive readings in a corded computer
    (specifically a CatEye Astrale) that's functioned without problems for
    nearly 5 years?

    Low battery? If the battery is 5 yrs old. Or the only time I've had
    problems with a Cateye corded over-reading it was caused by rain
    getting in between the computer and the mount. And solved by a smear of
    oil on the mounting to repel water.
    Iain

  8. Danny Colyer said:

    I had the wheel off yesterday to fix a puncture. I often manage to
    knock the computer sensor when I refit the wheel, but I'm not aware of
    that happening yesterday.

    97.3mph... Hmmm... Did you inadvertently fit a second, or even a third,
    sensor? I know it sounds unlikely, but you never know...

    d.

  9. Danny Colyer said:

    What's likely to cause excessive readings in a corded computer
    (specifically a CatEye Astrale) that's functioned without problems for
    nearly 5 years?

    Completely unlikely unless something else has changed, but Sheldon Brown
    (I think) had an explanation of incorrect readings being because the
    magnet orientation was wrong - read it years ago and the back of my
    tiny mind says it might have been for only one type of computer, too.

    --
    Nobby

  10. Quoted message said:

    Low battery? If the battery is 5 yrs old. Or the only time I've had
    problems with a Cateye corded over-reading it was caused by rain
    getting in between the computer and the mount. And solved by a smear of
    oil on the mounting to repel water.

    The battery's probably 2 or 3 years old, so that's a possibility. I've
    never had any problem with this computer in the rain, even in torrential
    downpours.

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  11. Dodgy computer readings?

    There's only quality computer reading here on u.r.c.
    --
    Ambrose

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, Danny

    Colyer () said:

    What's likely to cause excessive readings in a corded computer
    (specifically a CatEye Astrale) that's functioned without problems for
    nearly 5 years?

    When I got to work this morning, my computer showed a top speed of 97.3
    mph. I have a high degree of confidence that this was wrong. Trip
    distance showed 5.44 miles. Given that I topped up the tyres last
    night, it should have been 5.36 or 5.37.

    When I got home this evening it showed a top speed of 63.3 and a trip
    distance of 5.64 (it's usually 5.59).

    This morning I wondered if mobile phone interference could have had any
    effect, as I took a call during the ride. But my phone wasn't even on
    this evening.

    The leads for my Lumicycles run alongside the computer lead for some of
    their length, so this evening I wondered if switching my main beam on
    and off during the ride may have had some effect. But it never has
    before, and I didn't use the Lumis at all this morning.

    I had the wheel off yesterday to fix a puncture. I often manage to
    knock the computer sensor when I refit the wheel, but I'm not aware of
    that happening yesterday. Anyway, that usually results in either no
    reading, or in the sensor hitting the spokes. Neither has happened this
    time.

    I guess I'll just have a play with the sensor and see if I get similarly
    strange readings next week.

    I had something similar not long ago which turned out to have been
    caused by the insulation on the wires having gone west, allowing short
    circuits and similar trumpery. I decided to investigate after Vmax
    reached 224 km/h past the Imperial /Wa/ Museum.

    --
    Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
    Funsize Mars bars? What could possibly be MORE fun about eating LESS
    chocolate?

  13. Dave Larrington said:

    I had something similar not long ago which turned out to have been
    caused by the insulation on the wires having gone west, allowing short
    circuits and similar trumpery.

    With the strange readings I sometimes get on a variety of cyclo
    computers, I think that there is more than one possible cause, thus:

    * mobile phone interference (possibly not yours but someone passing)
    * rain/condensation inside unit
    * electromagnetic interference from certain types of light

    As other people have said, magnet/sensor position and wiring problems
    may also cause strange behaviour.

    My Raleigh Sports (3-speed Sturmey Archer hub, feels like it's made of
    solid lead) apparently reached 968mph on the way to work one day. I
    know I was riding hard and fast, but somehow I don't believe this to be
    accurate!

    My wife has a cyclo computer that used to work fine, and now goes nuts
    every time she turns on the front light. It's also very tempermental
    regarding time of day (it doesn't like going out after dark, for some
    reason).

    PhilD

    --
    <><

  14. Dave Larrington said:

    I had something similar not long ago which turned out to have been
    caused by the insulation on the wires having gone west, allowing short
    circuits and similar trumpery. I decided to investigate after Vmax
    reached 224 km/h past the Imperial /Wa/ Museum.

    213.7mph this morning. I tinkered with the sensor at lunchtime (didn't
    get round to it over the weekend) and clocked 158.7mph this evening.

    Insulation might be worth checking. Also, if I think about it tomorrow
    morning, I'll leave the max speed on the display and see if it shoots up
    at any particular point on the ride. The first dodgy reading coincided
    with my removal of the wheel to fix a puncture, which could have
    resulted in the sensor being knocked, but it also coincided with the
    wiring up of several new lights-on-sticks along the road that I work on.
    I dunno if a badly wired light-on-a-stick might put out a strong
    enough magnetic field to screw up the computer readings of passing cyclists.

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  15. Danny Colyer wrote:
    .........

    Quoted message said:

    I dunno if a badly wired light-on-a-stick might put out a strong
    enough magnetic field to screw up the computer readings of passing
    cyclists.

    Coiled wires? My money's still on sensor alignment though.

    ~PB

  16. Danny Colyer said:

    I dunno if a badly wired light-on-a-stick might put out a strong
    enough magnetic field to screw up the computer readings of passing cyclists.

    Might do. Further to my previous message, going in and out of
    supermarkets can have a funny effect: the security sensors to stop you
    nicking electronics and expensive booze play havock, as does the
    inductive loop they put in the road around retail parks to disable
    trolleys. I always put my cycle computer in a tin before going into a
    supermarket now.

    PhilD

    --
    <><

  17. PhilD said:

    Further to my previous message, going in and out of
    supermarkets can have a funny effect: the security sensors to stop you
    nicking electronics and expensive booze play havock, as does the
    inductive loop they put in the road around retail parks to disable
    trolleys. I always put my cycle computer in a tin before going into a
    supermarket now.

    Is yours a wired a cordless computer?

    ~PB

  18. Pete Biggs said:

    Is yours a wired a cordless computer?

    Yes, and yes. I have separate computers for different bikes. I have
    had problems with both sorts, seemingly by the same cause(s). I admit
    though that wireless types give more spectacular erroneous readings.

    PhilD

    --
    <><

  19. I said:
    Quoted message said:

    I dunno if a badly wired light-on-a-stick might put out a strong
    enough magnetic field to screw up the computer readings of passing
    cyclists.

    and Pete Biggs responded:

    Quoted message said:

    Coiled wires? My money's still on sensor alignment though.

    I kept an eye on the max speed this morning. It was 168.2 mph by the
    time I joined the cyclepath, 3/4 mile from home and the best part of 5
    miles before reaching the new lights-on-sticks.

    I readjusted the sensor again at lunchtime. On the way home, I had a
    reading of 160.8 mph by the time I joined the cyclepath (a few hundred
    yards from the office, after the lights-on-sticks). I reset the
    computer and had a more sensible max of 22 mph when I got home 5 miles
    later.

    I'll try cleaning the contacts this evening. If I still have problems
    tomorrow then I'll try another computer (I happen to have another
    Astrale), which should determine whether the problem is a low battery.

    I reckon it's probably a problem with the sensor, but perhaps not with
    sensor alignment, when I've still got the problem after realigning it twice.

    --
    Danny Colyer (my reply address is valid but checked infrequently)
    <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Subscribe to PlusNet <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/referral/>
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  20. "Pete Biggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    I said:
    Bob said:

    I've had this problem. All I could think of is that it was caused by
    the bike wheel rocking backwards and forwards slightly (on a train or
    when falling over) when the magnet was near the coil.

    You wouldn't be able to rock it fast enough to read 97 mph if you
    tried, so I'm quite sure the problem is caused by dodgy sensor/magnet
    positioning. I've had exactly the same problem two or three times....
    well, except the reading was lower in my cases!

    ps. Fixed by moving the sensor further out.

    Don't they have trip milometers these days?

    Alan

    Quoted message said:


    ~PB

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.