A bike pro recently told me you get more gear choices with a double than with a triple. My present bike has a triple and I was planning to put a triple on my next road bike too... now I'm not sure. What do you think?
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
double or triple
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 27 August 2009
- Last activity
- 28 August 2009
- Original author
- Revds
- Posts
- 7
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,837
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Revds said:
A bike pro recently told me you get more gear choices with a double than with a triple. My present bike has a triple and I was planning to put a triple on my next road bike too... now I'm not sure. What do you think?
I think your bike pro failed muliplcation in school. If you ride where there are a lot of hills or ride off road, you may find a use for the low gears on a triple. Otherwise they will most likely be wasted if you ride mostly flat areas. You can also use a compact chainset which will allow you to run a double and still get low enough gearing to get up most hills.
-
kdelong said:
I think your bike pro failed muliplcation in school. If you ride where there are a lot of hills or ride off road, you may find a use for the low gears on a triple. Otherwise they will most likely be wasted if you ride mostly flat areas. You can also use a compact chainset which will allow you to run a double and still get low enough gearing to get up most hills.
Thanks... would the advice make any difference if I added that the bike I'm building up is an Aegis Aro all carbon road bike?
-
Revds said:
A bike pro recently told me you get more gear choices with a double than with a triple. My present bike has a triple and I was planning to put a triple on my next road bike too... now I'm not sure. What do you think?
A 'bike pro', huh?
Lessee, even tho there is overlap, 3 chainrings, the smallest smaller than a standard or a compact....add...subtract...carry the.......nope, more chainrings, more 'choices' .
Little 'payback' for a modern triple. If it gives the gearing you want or need to ride where you want to ride, get the triple. No reason to suffer up a hill because of coffee shop points.
-
I recently bought a compact after riding a tripple for several years. I do not notice much difference in climbing and I am not a strong climber.
-
GREMLIN52 said:
I recently bought a compact after riding a tripple for several years. I do not notice much difference in climbing and I am not a strong climber.
It depends on the cassette combo. I have a triple with a 12/25 at the rear (30 tooth small chainring up front). That is the same as my other bike with a 34 tooth smallchainring (50/34) and a 11/28 cassette on back. But when I go to the north Ga mountains I take my triple with a 12/30 on the rear. A triple WILL give you more climbing gears if that's what you're looking for.
There are several on-line gear calculators to help you decide. -
+1 on the triple giving more climbing choices. Once in the 30 ring, from 19 down to 27 gives me a nice range for the hills here. My buddy just put on his triple for the 6 Gap century next month. He has all three cranksets: standard, compact, and triple, but prefers the added choices with the triple for the 6 Gap event.
Compacts work fine, but on rollers here I like to get the big jumps quickly by going from 30 to the 39 to the 53 without having to click through the cassette at all.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.