Mark Janeba said:Quoted message said:In addition it seems typical that once one stops the athletic activity they
don't necessarily stop the consumption of 'mass quantities'. That's how I
once gained 60lbs. I stopped the running biking and swimming and weight
training to work 12 hours a day (in addition to my regular job) on a
computer consulting job but didn't realize - or didn't think about -
changing my food intake.
I agree that turning off the conveyor belt of food to the mouth is hard.
After all, in training/racing, these guys gotta eat like vacuum
cleaners to get enough calories of the right kind (e.g. not all beer).
While I think he will suceed, it would be interesting to know *how*
Armstrong will avoid blimping - keeping up a heavy amount of exercise,
massively cutting intake, or both. Come to think of it, that's
information massive numbers of (us) Americans could use.
Mark
There are actually chemicals that are released as part of the digestive
cycle that make you insatiably hungry. (Called 'ghrelins', I believe) When
you've been not getting enough nutrients they peak making it hard to do
'starvation dieting'.
But for someone that gets used to eating 5,6,7,8 thousand calories even in
the off-season, ya gotta wonder if that takes a toll. On the digestive
system, on the 'set-point', you name it. Fortunately, at 33 he's still very
young. Interesting though how pro cycling seems to age your face, though.
He looks a lot older this year than even 3 years ago.
We'll see, I guess. I'm betting/hoping he'll get bored of the 'kids' and go
into pro triathlons and have another career there and as a master. OK,
maybe a selfish hope - b/c then we'll get to see more Lance! ;-)
jj