Drugs! Is it all just getting stupid?



Eldron

New Member
Jan 24, 2002
968
2
0
Just read an article about Jorg Jaksche which equated cycling to soccer - saying that if equal rules were applied then anyone deemed to have faked a foul would be suspended from the team pending an enquiry.

Quite true I say!

It's got to the point where if you want your competition removed you drop a hypodermic needle in the trash then pull Pat McQuaid aside and say "listen Pat, I saw so-and-so drop something suspicious in that dustbin" (if of course some paparazzi scumbag didn't photograph you dropping the needle and rats you out in the first place). So-and-so will then be fired from his team and off the bike for at least 6 months while various labs, political organisations, sporting bodies and the media have a good moan.

I would love to have a fair TdF with no drugs but I would have preferred to watch a 2006 TdF where Basso/Ullrich/Sevilla took part. Isn't hindsight a b!tch?

Knee jerk reactions like the Operation Puerto only make the problem worse - innocent riders are without teams and income, sponsors are without star riders, team managers put year long plans in place only to have them smashed by rumours and heresay, the world thinks all cyclists are druggies etc.

There has to be a better way.
 
The fallout to OP was a kneejerk reaction I agree.

But the UCI has failed in it's duty of care to this sport since Festina 1998 (and arguably before that as well).

OP was designed to show that the UCI were "strong on anti-doping".
What they didn't factor in was the TDF winner being caught three weeks later and that OP "evidence" was no existent.

It's a lesson in total and utter incompetence.

And you're right - we're all being shortchanged by this sport.
 
limerickman said:
The fallout to OP was a kneejerk reaction I agree.

But the UCI has failed in it's duty of care to this sport since Festina 1998 (and arguably before that as well).

OP was designed to show that the UCI were "strong on anti-doping".
What they didn't factor in was the TDF winner being caught three weeks later and that OP "evidence" was no existent.

It's a lesson in total and utter incompetence.

And you're right - we're all being shortchanged by this sport.

I'm not sure the UCI can beat doping. The teams have more money & doctors than the UCI/WADA/national sporting bodies will ever have.

It's a bit like crime in South Africa - the police have 9mm pistols and the hardline criminals have AK47's... Guess who wins most of the time?

Ah if only human integrity beat human greed.
 
Eldron said:
...but I would have preferred to watch a 2006 TdF where Basso/Ullrich/Sevilla took part. Isn't hindsight a b!tch?

A lot of us were *****ing about that when we first heard they got kicked.


limerickman said:
What they didn't factor in was the TDF winner being caught three weeks later and that OP "evidence" was no existent.

I can't imagine a worse scenario to have happened to pro cycling's credibility: first they lose several of their star players on the eve of the Big Dance for suspicion of doping, then the winner of the same gets the boot for the same reason.

The only thing worse might be if LA came out and admitted he doped during his years.

On second thought, that might actually be helpful at this point.