Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Ergo shifters

Started by Rob Weinstock · · Last activity · 6 posts · 840 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
11 March 2004
Last activity
12 March 2004
Original author
Rob Weinstock
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
840
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My situation is that I have a nice older frame with 126mm
    rear spacing. I've raced this bike for several years, hung
    it up, and would like to get back into it. Frame material is
    such that I'll have to stick with 126mm hubs.

    It's currently configured with Shimano 7-speed hyperglide. I
    would really like to convert this to a "brifter"
    arrangement, but am indifferent if this is Shimano or
    "Shimagnolo". I would like to have 8-speeds, if possible.
    I've read Sheldon's incredibly informative website, but
    still have a number of questions:

    1. I have a set of well-used Ultegra 8-speed STI shifters,
    from another bike. If I change the spacers in the 8-sp
    cassette, can't I just use these cogs, in the spirit of
    the "8 of 9 on 7" modification? I'm assuming that the
    critical feature is the sprocket spacing...

    2. I read that the 8-sp Ergo shifters index to a spacing
    which matches the 7-speed Shimano HG, but am confused
    about the exact type of derailer required (i.e., long-
    cage, short-cage -- why does it matter?).

    3. If I were to consider 9-sp Ergo shifters, how many gears
    might I end up with on 126mm hubs -- 7,8, or 9? And what
    cassette spacing is needed and with which derailer?

    I came from ultra-flat Illinois, where a straight-
    block cassette is a useful thing to have. I now live
    in N. California, and will likely have to change my
    thinking on this.

    Thanks for any insights.

    Regards,

    Rob

  2. Rob Weinstock said:

    My situation is that I have a nice older frame with 126mm
    rear spacing. I've raced this bike for several years, hung
    it up, and would like to get back into it. Frame material
    is such that I'll have to stick with 126mm hubs.

    It's currently configured with Shimano 7-speed hyperglide.
    I would really like to convert this to a "brifter"
    arrangement, but am indifferent if this is Shimano or
    "Shimagnolo". I would like to have 8-speeds, if possible.
    I've read Sheldon's incredibly informative website, but
    still have a number of questions:

    1. I have a set of well-used Ultegra 8-speed STI shifters,
    from another bike. If I change the spacers in the 8-sp
    cassette, can't I just use these cogs, in the spirit of
    the "8 of 9 on 7" modification? I'm assuming that the
    critical feature is the sprocket spacing...

    If you use 8-speed spacers, you can't fit 8 sprockets on a
    7-speed body.

    Quoted message said:

    2. I read that the 8-sp Ergo shifters index to a spacing
    which matches the 7-speed Shimano HG, but am confused
    about the exact type of derailer required (i.e., long-
    cage, short-cage -- why does it matter?).

    Any indexable Campagnolo derailer will work fine with this.
    The cage length has to do with the sprocket and chainring
    size variation, not with how many of them you have.

    Quoted message said:


    3. If I were to consider 9-sp Ergo shifters, how many
    gears might I end up with on 126mm hubs -- 7,8, or 9?
    And what cassette spacing is needed and with which
    derailer?

    8 of 9 on 7. Read the article again, it's all
    explained there.

    sheldonbrown.comk7.html

    Sheldon "Like I Said..." Brown +----------------------------------------------------
    ---------+
    | Small change can often be found under seat cushions. |
    | --Robert A. Heinlein |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------
    --+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts Phone 617-244-
    9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find
    parts shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com
    sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  3. "Rob Weinstock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My situation is that I have a nice older frame with 126mm
    rear spacing. I've raced this bike for several years, hung
    it up, and would like to get back into it. Frame material
    is such that I'll have to stick with 126mm hubs.

    It's currently configured with Shimano 7-speed hyperglide.
    I would really like to convert this to a "brifter"
    arrangement, but am indifferent if this is Shimano or
    "Shimagnolo". I would like to have 8-speeds, if possible.
    I've read Sheldon's incredibly informative website, but
    still have a number of questions:

    1. I have a set of well-used Ultegra 8-speed STI shifters,
    from another bike. If I change the spacers in the 8-sp
    cassette, can't I just use these cogs, in the spirit of
    the "8 of 9 on 7" modification? I'm assuming that the
    critical feature is the sprocket spacing...

    2. I read that the 8-sp Ergo shifters index to a spacing
    which matches the 7-speed Shimano HG, but am confused
    about the exact type of derailer required (i.e., long-
    cage, short-cage -- why does it matter?).

    3. If I were to consider 9-sp Ergo shifters, how many
    gears might I end up with on 126mm hubs -- 7,8, or 9?
    And what cassette spacing is needed and with which
    derailer?

    I came from ultra-flat Illinois, where a straight-block
    cassette is a useful thing to have. I now live in N.
    California, and will likely have to change my thinking
    on this.

    Thanks for any insights.

    Regards,

    Rob

    If your concern is rear triangle width you might want to see
    how difficult inserting an 8/9 speed rear hub actually is.
    Since you have a set of 8 speed levers from another bike
    it's safe to assume that you have a wheel to match. You may
    be surprised at how easily it goes in with no frame
    spreading to deal with. I have an old Trek 2000 aluminum
    frame that started life as 7 speed Shimano 600. I upgraded
    another bike from 8 to 9 speed and had purchased lighter
    wheels along the way. I talked to Trek, the dealer, everyone
    said I couldn't spread the rear triangle on that bike. After
    about two years a little "light" went off and I went to the
    basement and tried swapping wheels. Voila, Eureka, it went
    right in with almost no coercion. 3 or 4000 off season miles
    later it still works great. Radiused nuts on the ends of the
    hub probably help. Bill Brannon

  4. On 11 Mar 2004 13:40:14 -0800, [email hidden] (Rob Weinstock)

    Quoted message said:

    My situation is that I have a nice older frame with 126mm
    rear spacing. I've raced this bike for several years, hung
    it up, and would like to get back into it. Frame material
    is such that I'll have to stick with 126mm hubs.

    What makes you think you'll have to stick with a 126mm hub?
    We seem to have all collectively forgotten that the early
    Dura Ace 8-speed rear hubs came with conical locknuts to
    assist in snapping them into 126mm rear triangles.

    Four years ago I put my money where my mouth was. I
    converted an old 126mm Trek 1400 (bonded aluminum) bike to
    8-speed. It only takes a little effort to get the rear wheel
    into the frame. I've now ridden it since then without
    suffering any dire consequences predicted by the doom-and-
    gloom crowd.

    I once did the trig to figure out what adding 2 millimeters
    to the short side of a right triangle about the size of a
    typical set of stays would do to the angle of the dropout.
    As I recall it changes the angle by about 1/4 degree. I'm
    guessing most frame builders would be happy to get the
    dropouts parallel by plus or minus 1/4 degree.

    You might want to rethink you decision to eschew a
    130mm hub.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net
    home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  5. On 11 Mar 2004 13:40:14 -0800, [email hidden] (Rob Weinstock)

    Quoted message said:

    My situation is that I have a nice older frame with 126mm
    rear spacing. I've raced this bike for several years, hung
    it up, and would like to get back into it. Frame material
    is such that I'll have to stick with 126mm hubs.

    What makes you think you'll have to stick with a 126mm hub?
    We seem to have all collectively forgotten that the early
    Dura Ace 8-speed rear hubs came with conical locknuts to
    assist in snapping them into 126mm rear triangles.

    Four years ago I put my money where my mouth was. I
    converted an old 126mm Trek 1400 (bonded aluminum) bike to
    8-speed. It only takes a little effort to get the rear wheel
    into the frame. I've now ridden it since then without
    suffering any dire consequences predicted by the doom-and-
    gloom crowd.

    I once did the trig to figure out what adding 2 millimeters
    to the short side of a right triangle about the size of a
    typical set of stays would do to the angle of the dropout.
    As I recall it changes the angle by about 1/4 degree. I'm
    guessing most frame builders would be happy to get the
    dropouts parallel by plus or minus 1/4 degree.

    You might want to rethink you decision to eschew a
    130mm hub.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net
    home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  6. "John Everett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 11 Mar 2004 13:40:14 -0800, [email hidden] (Rob

    Weinstock) said:

    My situation is that I have a nice older frame with 126mm
    rear spacing. I've raced this bike for several years,
    hung it up, and would like to get back into it. Frame
    material is such that I'll have to stick with 126mm hubs.

    What makes you think you'll have to stick with a 126mm
    hub? We seem to have all collectively forgotten that the
    early Dura Ace 8-speed rear hubs came with conical
    locknuts to assist in snapping them into 126mm rear
    triangles.

    Four years ago I put my money where my mouth was. I
    converted an old 126mm Trek 1400 (bonded aluminum) bike to
    8-speed. It only takes a little effort to get the rear
    wheel into the frame. I've now ridden it since then
    without suffering any dire consequences predicted by the
    doom-and-gloom crowd.

    I once did the trig to figure out what adding 2
    millimeters to the short side of a right triangle about
    the size of a typical set of stays would do to the angle
    of the dropout. As I recall it changes the angle by
    about 1/4 degree. I'm guessing most frame builders would
    be happy to get the dropouts parallel by plus or minus
    1/4 degree.

    You might want to rethink you decision to eschew a
    130mm hub.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net
    home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

    I'm using an old 8 speed Dura Ace rear hub with the conical
    lock nuts. I wonder if those can be purchased separately to
    ease the use of another hubset. I suppose a little judicious
    grinder/dremel work could accomplish the same thing. Bill

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.