Quote: This topic seems to have kicked off more discussion around why or should endurance athletes participate in resistance training at all.. :-) Rather than the gap I believe exists around stress score for resistance training, given all these fancy training packages that are now on the market.
So far looking around it appears that logging resistance training or other training without a meter to measure effort is done on RPE. So if one has a good feel for RPE for an athlete than one could enter a perceived effort into a program like WKO, but I have coached a lot of people in the past and it is difficult for me to tell by my observation if they are really pushing a certain intensity or have become good at acting as if they are pushing a certain intensity. Unfortunately I have come across a few that put on a really good show in training, but I had doubt they were pushing to the best of their ability. Generally speaking I can tell if someone is putting forth the effort, but I'm just saying a few were really good actors. Nice thing about a power meter is that it cuts through the acting and tells the truth as long as it is calibrated and consistent.
As an individual and being honest with myself I have a feel based on RPE and could may be manually log into WKO a certain IF, which was what I used to do before I bought a power meter. For about a year I purchased a copy of WKO and would enter my IF based on perceived effort. (As personal preference I do not plan to enter my resistance training and mix it into my cycling training when viewing the PMC within WKO)
Here is a study or two done on this subject
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov15142026Open ↗
secure.ausport.gov.aumonitoring training loadOpen ↗
I trained back this morning and if I were to judge my effort for the various types of pulls using machines and free weights I would guess my IF to be at 0.8 based on perceived intensity and duration.
In my brief search for quantifying resistance training in the studies it appeared that the only method listed was RPE.