Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Expensive obesity

Started by Tamyka Bell · · Last activity · 46 posts · 2,501 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
20 September 2005
Last activity
14 October 2005
Original author
Tamyka Bell
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,501
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. From Scientific American:
    *Study Assesses Annual Cost of Obesity to Employers

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that the
    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    Full article: http://tinyurl.com/dtgj9
    (http://cl.exct.net/?ffcd16-fe61177271650c7f7011-fe3116707360067f721073-ff3310707762)

  2. Tamyka Bell said:

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that the
    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    It sounds as though employers ought to be (a) providing bikes for commuting
    (b) paying staff for the extra time it takes, if any.

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

  3. "Tamyka Bell" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:

    From Scientific American:
    *Study Assesses Annual Cost of Obesity to Employers

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that the
    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    Imagine all the burgers you could buy with that $2500(USD!?) if you weren't
    obese!..

    cheers,
    GPL

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> "Michael" == Michael Warner <[email hidden]> writes:

    Michael On Wed said:
    Quoted message said:

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to
    medical expenses and missed days of work. A new study has
    concluded that the annual additional cost for an obese worker can
    reach $2500.

    Michael> It sounds as though employers ought to be (a) providing
    Michael> bikes for commuting (b) paying staff for the extra time it
    Michael> takes, if any.

    I doubt that will sit well with the board members of a corporation.
    A more likely scenario is that employability will be dependent on the
    waistline.

    Some would argue that's already the case.
    --
    Cheers | ~~ __@
    Euan | ~~ _-\<,
    Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)

  5. They are considering providing cheap bikes for schools here on the ANU
    campus so people can ride between different buildings on campus. Perhaps we
    could encourage those less fit to use them often?

    --
    Bean

    Remove "yourfinger" before replying
    "Michael Warner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tamyka Bell said:

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that the
    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    It sounds as though employers ought to be (a) providing bikes for


    commuting

    Quoted message said:

    (b) paying staff for the extra time it takes, if any.

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

  6. GPLama said:
    Tamyka Bell said:

    From Scientific American:
    *Study Assesses Annual Cost of Obesity to Employers

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that the
    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    Imagine all the burgers you could buy with that $2500(USD!?) if you weren't
    obese!..

    we have a chocolate bar machine and coke drink machine here at work,
    sad thing is they make a killing =/

    we've been lobbying for "healthy" food in these things =D

    we got museli bars, which didn't sell 'cause they are horrible
    and diet coke =\

    kim

  7. Bean Long said:

    They are considering providing cheap bikes for schools here on the ANU
    campus so people can ride between different buildings on campus. Perhaps we
    could encourage those less fit to use them often?

    Wouldn't it be better to make the unfit people walk between buildings and the bikes be a luxury for the fit? (afterall bikes are very efficient). I am not sure of the layout but it should be impossible to get a car (except courier vehicles etc) anywhere near any of the buildings. That way everyone would have to do some exercise.

  8. quote='Michael Warner'On Wed said:

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that the
    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    It sounds as though employers ought to be (a) providing bikes for commuting
    (b) paying staff for the extra time it takes, if any.

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw[/QUOTE]

    My employer has ample showers and change facilities (first class, really) and has us enrolled in the local council gym's lunchtime sport competitions. I'd say we have close to zero obese employees out of about a hundred... ok, maybe a couple could lose a few kg... but no obesity here! It's all about having an environment conducive to exercise. We also got rid of cake day and replaced it with big tray of assorted fruit day.

    Ritch

  9. "Kim Hawtin" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:


    we have a chocolate bar machine and coke drink machine here at work,
    sad thing is they make a killing =/

    When I was working with JayWoo a few years back, we had pies and cans of Red
    Bull supplied.. bad bad bad... I managed to keep my intake to a minimum...
    lucky I got out of there quick smart!

    Quoted message said:

    we've been lobbying for "healthy" food in these things =D
    we got museli bars, which didn't sell 'cause they are horrible
    and diet coke =\

    haha, I've just cracked my 2nd can of that stuff for the day... hmmm
    "carbonated filler"... cough *spew burp*

    cheers,
    GPL

  10. ritcho said:


    Michael Warner said:
    Tamyka Bell said:

    There are a variety of health risks associated with obesity. The
    condition can be hard on the corporate wallet, too, owing to medical
    expenses and missed days of work. A new study has concluded that


    the

    Quoted message said:

    annual additional cost for an obese worker can reach $2500.

    It sounds as though employers ought to be (a) providing bikes for
    commuting
    (b) paying staff for the extra time it takes, if any.

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

    My employer has ample showers and change facilities (first class,
    really) and has us enrolled in the local council gym's lunchtime sport
    competitions. I'd say we have close to zero obese employees out of
    about a hundred... ok, maybe a couple could lose a few kg... but no
    obesity here! It's all about having an environment conducive to
    exercise. We also got rid of cake day and replaced it with big tray of
    assorted fruit day.

    Ritch

    --
    ritcho

    Oooh, you had me hooked until you said no cake. I cannot imagine a world
    with no cake. It would be a very sad workplace.

    Tam

  11. Euan said:

    I doubt that will sit well with the board members of a corporation.
    A more likely scenario is that employability will be dependent on the
    waistline.

    ROFL, have you seen the average board member?

  12. ritcho said:

    My employer has ample showers and change facilities (first class,
    really) and has us enrolled in the local council gym's lunchtime sport
    competitions. I'd say we have close to zero obese employees out of
    about a hundred... ok, maybe a couple could lose a few kg... but no
    obesity here! It's all about having an environment conducive to
    exercise. We also got rid of cake day and replaced it with big tray of
    assorted fruit day.

    URL?
    With my luck it will be in Melbourne, or QLD.

  13. On 2005-09-21, ritcho (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    We also got rid of cake day and replaced it with big tray of
    assorted fruit day.

    WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?!

    Punish people who can manage their diets properly 🙁

    Mmmmm, cupcakes.

    --
    TimC
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.

  14. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> "Terry" == Terry Collins <[email hidden]> writes:

    Terry Euan said:
    Quoted message said:

    I doubt that will sit well with the board members of a
    corporation. A more likely scenario is that employability will
    be dependent on the waistline.

    Terry> ROFL, have you seen the average board member?

    Yes. That doesn't change anything. Ever heard of ``do as I say not as
    I do?'' Ah the trappings of power...
    --
    Cheers | ~~ __@
    Euan | ~~ _-\<,
    Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)

  15. ritcho said:

    My employer has ample showers and change facilities (first class,
    really) and has us enrolled in the local council gym's lunchtime sport
    competitions. I'd say we have close to zero obese employees out of
    about a hundred... ok, maybe a couple could lose a few kg... but no
    obesity here!

    They can also cram more workers into the same floor area :-)

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

  16. ritcho said:

    My employer has ample showers and change facilities (first class,
    really) and has us enrolled in the local council gym's lunchtime sport
    competitions. I'd say we have close to zero obese employees out of
    about a hundred... ok, maybe a couple could lose a few kg... but no
    obesity here! It's all about having an environment conducive to
    exercise. We also got rid of cake day and replaced it with big tray of
    assorted fruit day.

    BTW, I read somewhere that hundreds of office workers died in
    the WTC attack because they were too fat and unfit to walk
    down the stairs. Ok, running upstairs requires some fitness
    (I've tried building racing!) but downstairs? That's really sad.

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

  17. Michael Warner said:

    BTW, I read somewhere that hundreds of office workers died in
    the WTC attack because they were too fat and unfit to walk
    down the stairs. Ok, running upstairs requires some fitness
    (I've tried building racing!) but downstairs? That's really sad.

    I was unfortunate enough to get caught in a fire drill back when I was
    working for Ericsson, on the 40-something floor of the Daimaru office
    building (the one above Museum[1] station). Let's just say that I paced
    myself, and made sure that I stretched afterwards; I could very easily
    have ended up stiff and sore after that effort, and count myself lucky
    that I didn't.

    The WTC was, what, 90+ floors? I would not have wanted to take the
    stairs from the higher floor levels if it could possibly have been
    avoided, no matter how fit I might have been.

    [1] It's not Melbourne Central Station, damnit! I refuse to call a
    station after a shopping centre!

    --
    My Usenet From: address now expires after two weeks. If you email me, and
    the mail bounces, try changing the bit before the "@ to usenet".

  18. "Stuart Lamble" wrote in message ...

    Quoted message said:


    I was unfortunate enough to get caught in a fire drill back when I was
    working for Ericsson, on the 40-something floor of the Daimaru office
    building (the one above Museum[1] station). Let's just say that I paced
    myself, and made sure that I stretched afterwards; I could very easily
    have ended up stiff and sore after that effort, and count myself lucky
    that I didn't.

    2nded.. I started working in the Rialto a few days after Sept 11.. so then
    came a few downstairs drills from the 32ndish(?) floor.. I wasn't a
    'cyclist' at the time and was burning for a few days after..

    cheers,
    GPL

  19. "Stuart Lamble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Warner said:

    BTW, I read somewhere that hundreds of office workers died in
    the WTC attack because they were too fat and unfit to walk
    down the stairs. Ok, running upstairs requires some fitness
    (I've tried building racing!) but downstairs? That's really sad.

    I was unfortunate enough to get caught in a fire drill back when I was
    working for Ericsson, on the 40-something floor of the Daimaru office
    building (the one above Museum[1] station). Let's just say that I paced
    myself, and made sure that I stretched afterwards; I could very easily
    have ended up stiff and sore after that effort, and count myself lucky
    that I didn't.

    The WTC was, what, 90+ floors? I would not have wanted to take the
    stairs from the higher floor levels if it could possibly have been
    avoided, no matter how fit I might have been.

    [1] It's not Melbourne Central Station, damnit! I refuse to call a
    station after a shopping centre!

    --
    My Usenet From: address now expires after two weeks. If you email me, and
    the mail bounces, try changing the bit before the "@ to usenet".

    OK, so you'd wind up a bit ragged at the bottom, but I reckon that if there
    was the burning wreckage of a 747 lodged a couple of floors above me, I'd be
    down the stairs and several blocks away like a suitably terrified rabbit;
    and I do actually carry a bit of extra weight (I don't know that I have lost
    that much, FD, that jersey's exceedingly unflattering) and I'm definitely
    not a runner. Hell, I'd manage that even before I started exercising and
    quit smoking and it'd hurt a hell of a lot, but I'd be outta there. I'd be
    worrying about the stiffness later. I can't imagine how unfit I'd have to be
    to NOT make it down the stairs.

  20. Stuart Lamble said:

    I was unfortunate enough to get caught in a fire drill back when I was
    working for Ericsson, on the 40-something floor of the Daimaru office
    building (the one above Museum[1] station). Let's just say that I paced
    myself, and made sure that I stretched afterwards; I could very easily
    have ended up stiff and sore after that effort, and count myself lucky
    that I didn't.

    Granted that it's not a natural, comfortable movement, and stresses
    leg muscles in an unaccustomed way. I've noticed that descending lots
    of steps leaves me a bit stiff the next day, like any activity that I'm not
    accustomed to. OTOH, I can't imagine getting puffed out doing it.

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.