Fabian Cancellara

Howard Kveck said:

You think he knows what number "It's Raining Men" is on the jukebox off the top of
his head?

666.

Howard Kveck said:

Quoted message said:

You think he knows what number "It's Raining Men" is on the jukebox
off the top of
his head?

Kyle Legate said:

666.

Or 696 ?

Donald Munro said:

Howard Kveck said:

Quoted message said:

You think he knows what number "It's Raining Men" is on the jukebox
off the top of
his head?

Kyle Legate said:

666.

Or 696 ?

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Sex#Sex_positions

--
Bill Asher

Howard Kveck said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Fred Fredburger said:

Howard Kveck said:

In article <[email hidden]>, "Tom Kunich"
<cyclintom@yahoo. com>
wrote:

> "Fred Fredburger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
>> Davey Crockett wrote:
>>> jean-yves hervé a écrit profondement:
>>> | | Gay liberal would tend to imply that some liberals are not gay.
>>> Liberal | gay is the proper way to phrase it, I think.
>>>
>>> A Queer is a Queer is a Queer
>> Are you Gertrude Stein.
> Are you Alice B. Toklas?
(Well, sometimes you just have to do it Kunich style (sorry for that
image, Bob).)

Are you Tom B. Dickless?

You leave him alone!

Tom's the kind of sensitive guy that can name Gertrude Stein's lovers at
the drop of a hat! Right off the top of his (presumably hatless) head.

You think he knows what number "It's Raining Men" is on the jukebox off the top of
his head?

How familiar are you with Tom's jukebox?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Fred Fredburger said:

Howard Kveck said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Fred Fredburger said:

Howard Kveck wrote:
> In article <[email hidden]>, "Tom Kunich"
> <cyclintom@yahoo. com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Fred Fredburger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> news:[email hidden]...
>>> Davey Crockett wrote:
>>>> jean-yves hervé a écrit profondement:
>>>> | | Gay liberal would tend to imply that some liberals are not gay.
>>>> Liberal | gay is the proper way to phrase it, I think.
>>>>
>>>> A Queer is a Queer is a Queer
>>> Are you Gertrude Stein.
>> Are you Alice B. Toklas?
> (Well, sometimes you just have to do it Kunich style (sorry for that
> image, Bob).)
>
> Are you Tom B. Dickless?
>
You leave him alone!

Tom's the kind of sensitive guy that can name Gertrude Stein's lovers at
the drop of a hat! Right off the top of his (presumably hatless) head.

You think he knows what number "It's Raining Men" is on the jukebox off
the top of his head?

How familiar are you with Tom's jukebox?

Oh, it's just an edjumicated guess...

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Andre said:

Kyle Legate said:

dave a said:

So what you are saying is that Cancellara decided he didn't have the
motivation to win the ToC TT but decided to be motivated enough to place
fifth?  Or maybe he is so good that he just took the day off and wound
up in fifth place anyway.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I say [censored].  He wanted to win to show the likes of Levi and DaveZ.
who was boss in the TT.  He tried his best, but it wasn't good enough.
Then, loser that he is, he makes a lame excuse.  No class.

Quoted message said:

Fanboi,

Quoted message said:

Cancellara already showed them who's boss in the prologue. Since then
he's been training at a reasonable pace to be ready for important races.

What doesn't make sense is that if he was only "training at a
reasonable pace", why did he only lose 19 seconds on the toughest
stage? He was going all out man! I believe he just wasn't fully
recuperated from that cold rainy stage and therefore lost the TT. The
excuses he made were still stupid. He'll still probably win the TDF
prologue anyway. C'est drole non?

Andre

I smell a severe lack of understanding of cycling^^

1. FC and LH did go all out. FC didn't deny that for a second.

BUT

2. FC has a build up toward Paris-Roubaix, whereas LH had a buildup
towards ToC and Paris Nice. Quite simply: this isn't a logical peak
for FC, whereas it is a perfect peak for a GC contender. A GC
contender will after the Tireno, ToC, PN tone down again upwards to
his next goal (Giro/TdF/Vuelta)

That FC won the prologue is not completely conflicting with this, due
to the nature of the discipline. High-speed steering is a major part
of it and FC has that skill beyond any other.

And what FC said is obviously true: the motivation of both of them is
obviously different considering the courses. It's ridiculous to deny
that ToC is more important for LH than FC and the same goes reversely
for the TdS.

In article
<[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

Andre said:

Kyle Legate said:

dave a wrote:
> So what you are saying is that Cancellara decided he didn't have the
> motivation to win the ToC TT but decided to be motivated enough to place
> fifth?  Or maybe he is so good that he just took the day off and wound
> up in fifth place anyway.

Quoted message said:

> I say [censored].  He wanted to win to show the likes of Levi and Dave Z.
> who was boss in the TT.  He tried his best, but it wasn't good enough.
> Then, loser that he is, he makes a lame excuse.  No class.

Quoted message said:

Fanboi,

Quoted message said:

Cancellara already showed them who's boss in the prologue. Since then
he's been training at a reasonable pace to be ready for important races.

What doesn't make sense is that if he was only "training at a
reasonable pace", why did he only lose 19 seconds on the toughest
stage? He was going all out man! I believe he just wasn't fully
recuperated from that cold rainy stage and therefore lost the TT. The
excuses he made were still stupid. He'll still probably win the TDF
prologue anyway. C'est drole non?

Andre

I smell a severe lack of understanding of cycling^^

1. FC and LH did go all out. FC didn't deny that for a second.

BUT

2. FC has a build up toward Paris-Roubaix, whereas LH had a buildup
towards ToC and Paris Nice. Quite simply: this isn't a logical peak
for FC, whereas it is a perfect peak for a GC contender. A GC
contender will after the Tireno, ToC, PN tone down again upwards to
his next goal (Giro/TdF/Vuelta)

That FC won the prologue is not completely conflicting with this, due
to the nature of the discipline. High-speed steering is a major part
of it and FC has that skill beyond any other.

And what FC said is obviously true: the motivation of both of them is
obviously different considering the courses. It's ridiculous to deny
that ToC is more important for LH than FC and the same goes reversely
for the TdS.

This is all true and what FC said is _true_, but saying
it is low grade regardless of how hard anybody tries to
explain it away.

He could have said "LH smoked me. I'm looking for a rematch."

--
Michael Press

dave a said:

Geraard Spergen said:

Dave said:

Andre wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> excuses...he got kicked in the teeth in his own specialty.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

No [censored].  Sore loser I would say.  For him to say the ToC is Levi's
biggest race is really a joke.  Where did Levi place relative to
FatboyCancellarain last year's tour day france?

Quoted message said:

Last month, Leipheimer would probably have said the ToC was in his top 5
most important races of the year.  A few days before the start, he was
disinvited to 3 of the other 4, and I wouldn't be surprised to see the
D-Tour snub his team as well.

Quoted message said:

Most important race?  Hell it might be his last race of any importance
at all; no wayCancellarais going to have that kind of motivation in
California... he's got a full plate in the next few months.

So what you are saying is thatCancellaradecided he didn't have the
motivation to win the ToC TT but decided to be motivated enough to place
fifth?  Or maybe he is so good that he just took the day off and wound
up in fifth place anyway.

I say [censored].  He wanted to win to show the likes of Levi and Dave Z.
who was boss in the TT.  He tried his best, but it wasn't good enough.
Then, loser that he is, he makes a lame excuse.  No class.

Today, Fabian Cancellara said at the post-race news
conference, "This victory is important for my team, but
it is bittersweet, because in no way can it make up for
getting sand kicked in my face at the Tour of California ITT.
I am still too ashamed to show my face in rbr ever again."

And that's why "Callistus Valerius/Crescentius Vespasianus"
has only posted twice since the ToC.

Ben