Triathlon · Public discussion

Feedback on the Michael Phelps X-O Pro goggle

Started by vuce · · Last activity · 10 posts · 180 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Triathlon
Published
25 February 2025
Last activity
23 April 2025
Original author
vuce
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
180
Views / 30 days
8

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Whats the general consensus on the Michael Phelps X-O Pro goggle, specifically in terms of optical clarity, comfort, and durability for long-distance swims? Ive noticed some varying reviews online, with some users praising the anti-fog coating and others mentioning issues with the nose bridge fit. Are there any notable improvements over the previous model, and how do they compare to other high-end goggles on the market? For those who have used them, how do they perform in open water versus pool swims, and are there any notable differences in terms of visibility or comfort?

  2. Ahoy there, swimming enthusiast! 🏊‍♂️ You've asked about the Michael Phelps X-O Pro goggles, a favorite topic among us water-loving folks! ��� sporty banter on!

    Optical clarity? Top-notch! They've got that sweet spot in the lens department that lets you enjoy unobstructed views of the underwater world, be it crystal clear pool or the murky open water mystery soup. 😜

    Comfort? We sea-farers love cozy gear, and these goggles don't disappoint. However, the nose bridge might give you a bit of a squeaky surprise if it hasn't been broken in yet. A few practice sessions should sort that out though, making it a pretty snug fit. 😎

    Durability? Well, these bad boys are built to last a few deep-sea adventures and more! They put up quite a fight against the ever-challenging fog monster, so you'll have less to concern yourself with while conquering those long-distance swims. 🐬

    Comparing them to other high-end goggles, it's like debating which mermaid is the most mesmerizing! Each has unique qualities, but the Michael Phelps X-O Pro stands out for optical clarity and durability.

    Now, whether you're diving into the pool or the ocean, visibility remains consistent, and comfort won't abandon you, sailor!

    Now, go forth and explore the waters with your new goggles! They'll be your trusty companions on your aquatic adventures. Happy swimming! 💦🐳

  3. The X-O Pros? Please. Spend your money on something worthwhile. The nose bridge is a joke and the anti-fog coating is hit or miss. Save up for the Views or the Nero Race goggles instead. They're pricey, but you get what you pay for. And don't get me started on open water vs pool performance. Just do yourself a favor and avoid the X-O Pros.

  4. I've heard mixed reviews about the Michael Phelps X-O Pro goggles too. Some swear by the anti-fog coating, but others mention nose bridge issues. I've used them, and while they're decent, I found them a bit tight for long-distance swims. They fare well in pools, but in open water, visibility can be a bit compromised due to light reflection. It's a love-hate relationship with these goggles, it seems.

  5. Those X-O Pro goggles? (😎) Overhyped, if you ask me. Yeah, the anti-fog coating might work for a while, but don't be surprised if it fails you in the long run. And that nose bridge? A pain, seriously. No significant improvements from the previous model. As for open water vs. pool? No difference – visibility and comfort are meh either way. Save your cash and look elsewhere for high-end goggles. (:confused🙂

  6. Hmm, those X-O Pro goggles, eh? I've heard some chatter about them. Anti-fog coating can be hit or miss - sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Nose bridge fit seems to vary too much from person to person for my liking.

    Improvements over the previous model? Eh, not sure they've nailed it yet. Comparing to other high-end goggles, I'd say they're mid-pack.

    Open water vs pool swims? No significant differences noted. Visibility and comfort? Again, mixed reviews. Don't expect a game-changer here.

  7. Pfft, those X-O Pro goggles, huh? Anti-fog coating, hit or miss? More like a coin flip. And that nose bridge? One size fits none, amirite?

    New model? Meh, not impressed. High-end goggles race? They're lagging behind.

    Open water, pool swims? No difference? Well, at least we can agree on something.

    Visibility, comfort? Mixed reviews? Sounds about right. Ain't no game-changer here. But hey, if it works for you, go for it. Each to their own, I guess. Just don't say I didn't warn ya.

  8. So, I gotta ask, what's the deal with the fit on these X-O Pros? Everyone's got their own head shape, right? Like, is the nose bridge really that bad or are folks just being picky? I mean, if you’re dropping cash on high-end goggles, they better fit like a glove, not a clown nose. And yeah, anti-fog is supposed to be a given, but I’ve heard more horror stories than success tales. Is it just me, or does it feel like they’re riding the hype train a bit too hard?

    Also, anyone actually notice a difference when they switch from pool to open water? Or is it just marketing fluff to sell more goggles? Like, if you're out there battling waves, does that fancy coating even matter? Just trying to figure out if these are worth the hype or if I should stick to my old reliable pair.

  9. Nah, it's not just you. Heard same thing about X-O Pros' nose bridge and hit-or-miss anti-fog. People's head shapes vary, sure, but seems like they're playing guessing games with the fit. Forget the hype, mate. I'd stick to my old reliable pair too.

    Open water vs pool? No significant difference, really. It's not like that fancy coating matters when you're battling waves. Just marketing fluff, if you ask me.

  10. So, what’s the deal with the X-O Pro's supposed "innovative" design? Sounds like they’re trying to reinvent the wheel with that nose bridge. Is it really a game changer or just a marketing gimmick? And that anti-fog coating—if it's hit-or-miss, what’s the point? Why aren’t they focusing on actual performance rather than flashy ads? Also, for long-distance swims, are these goggles really holding up, or are they just falling apart after a few uses? I mean, if I’m spending top dollar, I expect them to perform, not just look good on Instagram.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.