General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

feet first surface dive

Started by Mark Juszczec · · Last activity · 24 posts · 5,083 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 May 2004
Last activity
12 June 2004
Original author
Mark Juszczec
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5,083
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–24 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. JGH said:

    Martin W. Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    oscargrouch said:

    well using a term in its definition is
    brilliant...where'd you learn that?

    I didn't define surface dive. The term has a well-known
    definition. I assumed you knew it. Sorry. A surface dive
    is a dive that begins on the surface, not above the
    surface, and not below the surface. The surface dive is
    subdivided into the head first and the feet first types,
    with the obvious meanings.

    My opinion is that things really went wrong when he asked
    you if the guy was already in the water and just wants to
    get to the bottom and you said no. Probably you should have
    said yes.

    You mean, when he asked "do you mean he's fully in the
    water already (treading) and the "feet first surface dive"
    is just trying to drop down in the water to get to the
    bottom?" and I said "No, I mean he is in the water already,
    and he does a feet first surface dive," I should have said
    yes even though the guy is not treading water and a feet
    first surface dive is not just trying to drop down in the
    water to get to the bottom.

    Quoted message said:

    I too am a little confused by the question since the
    instructor should have explained how to do the surface dive
    before asking you to do it.

    But the original poster does know how to do a feet first
    surface dive. He said he didn't have a problem getting to
    the bottom of the pool using a feet first surface dive. His
    problem is that he can't bend down to pick up the brick
    because he immediately starts rising off the bottom. Several
    explanations of how to do that were given.

    Quoted message said:

    If even using the techniques your instructor taught you,
    you still can't do it, maybe you're just too boyant.
    Nothing can change the laws of physics. So I'm a little
    iffy on what kinds of tips you might be looking for.

    Anyway, to do a feet first surface dive, you spread your
    arms out, push down and do a scizors kick at the same time.
    Push yourself as far out of the water as possible. As you
    go down, you swing your arms back up over your head
    providing further force downward.

    That should provide sufficient momentum to get you to the
    bottom. You'll have to curl your legs as you touch bottom.
    Letting out a little air at that point will help. Maybe
    that's the key point. Don't let your momentum stop as you
    hit bottom. You might have to exhale to do that.

    Quoted message said:


    Then I suppose you have never seen a feet first,
    surface dive.

    Quoted message said:

    "Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >do you mean he's fully in the water already (treading)
    > >and the "feet
    first
    > >surface dive" is just trying to drop down in the water
    > >to get to the
    bottom?
    >
    > No, I mean he is in the water already, and he does a
    > feet first surface dive.
    >
    > >if so, and, mind you, i'm no hydrokinesiologist, then
    > >that seems like a pretty damn inefficient way to try
    > >to get to the bottom


    from

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >that
    position,
    > >especially if you want to pick something up when you
    > >get there...isn't it easier to dive head first and
    > >swim down there?
    >
    > Have you never watched synchronized swimmers during a
    > competition?
    >
    > >"Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    > >message
    > >"]news:[email hidden]...
    > >> "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    > >> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >here's my advice: don't call jumping in the pool a
    > >> >"feet first surface dive"
    > >>
    > >> He didn't. He *is* doing a feet first surface dive.
    > >> The test begins in the water, not on the deck.
    > >>
    > >> >"Mark Juszczec" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    > >> >message -"]news:[email hidden]-
    > >> >oogle.com...
    > >> >> Hi folks
    > >> >>
    > >> >> This is kind of related.
    > >> >>
    > >> >> I want to take the Red Cross Lifeguard
    > >> >> certifiction course. One
    part
    > >> >> is to grab a 10lb rubber brick off the bottom of
    > >> >> the pool. I'm
    doing
    > >> >> a feet first surface dive to get to the bottom.
    > >> >>
    > >> >> The problem is, although I can get my feet to
    > >> >> touch the


    bottom

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >> >> of
    the
    > >> >> pool, once I bend my knees to crouch to the brick
    > >> >> I start floating
    up.
    > >> >>
    > >> >> Does anyone have any tips to get to the bottom
    > >> >> faster and be able to crouch down without driving
    > >> >> myself away from the brick?
    > >> >>
    > >> >> Mark
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >
    >


  2. since you appear so smart, what you should have done is
    explain what a feet first surface dive is using some other
    terms besides the term under discussion (feet first surface
    dive)...i understand your desire to be a wiseass about it,
    especially given the manner in which i started this part of
    the conversation, but your wiseassedness would be more
    appreciated if you gave information at the same
    time...especially since, despite my attitude, it was obvious
    that i was less wiseassed and genuinely inquisitive about
    the concept once i (think i (but still not sure)) understood
    that a 'feet first surface dive' wasn't the simple thing i
    originally thought it was

    and now you say he is in the water, but not treading? is he
    floating? how's he keeping OFF the bottom if he's not doing
    either of those?

    "Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JGH said:

    Martin W. Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >well using a term in its definition is
    >brilliant...where'd you learn that?

    I didn't define surface dive. The term has a well-known
    definition. I assumed you knew it. Sorry. A surface
    dive is a dive that begins on the surface, not above
    the surface, and not below the surface. The surface
    dive is subdivided into the head first and the feet
    first types, with the obvious meanings.

    My opinion is that things really went wrong when he asked
    you if the guy was already in the water and just wants to
    get to the bottom and you said no. Probably you should
    have said yes.

    You mean, when he asked "do you mean he's fully in the
    water already (treading) and the "feet first surface dive"
    is just trying to drop down in the water to get to the
    bottom?" and I said "No, I mean he is in the water
    already, and he does a feet first surface dive," I should
    have said yes even though the guy is not treading water
    and a feet first surface dive is not just trying to drop
    down in the water to get to the bottom.

    Quoted message said:

    I too am a little confused by the question since the
    instructor should have explained how to do the surface
    dive before asking you to do it.

    But the original poster does know how to do a feet first
    surface dive. He said he didn't have a problem getting to
    the bottom of the pool using a feet first surface dive.
    His problem is that he can't bend down to pick up the
    brick because he immediately starts rising off the bottom.
    Several explanations of how to do that were given.

    Quoted message said:

    If even using the techniques your instructor taught you,
    you still can't do it, maybe you're just too boyant.
    Nothing can change the laws of physics. So I'm a little
    iffy on what kinds of tips you might be looking for.

    Anyway, to do a feet first surface dive, you spread your
    arms out, push down and do a scizors kick at the same
    time. Push yourself as far out of the water as possible.
    As you go down, you swing your arms back up over your
    head providing further force downward.

    That should provide sufficient momentum to get you to the
    bottom. You'll have to curl your legs as you touch
    bottom. Letting out a little air at that point will help.
    Maybe that's the key point. Don't let your momentum stop
    as you hit bottom. You might have to exhale to do that.

    Quoted message said:


    Then I suppose you have never seen a feet first,
    surface dive.

    >"Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >do you mean he's fully in the water already
    >> >(treading) and the "feet
    >first
    >> >surface dive" is just trying to drop down in the
    >> >water to get to the
    >bottom?
    >>
    >> No, I mean he is in the water already, and he does a
    >> feet first surface dive.
    >>
    >> >if so, and, mind you, i'm no hydrokinesiologist,
    >> >then that seems like a pretty damn inefficient way
    >> >to try to get to the bottom


    from

    Quoted message said:

    >> >that
    >position,
    >> >especially if you want to pick something up when you
    >> >get there...isn't it easier to dive head first and
    >> >swim down there?
    >>
    >> Have you never watched synchronized swimmers during a
    >> competition?
    >>
    >> >"Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >> >message
    >> >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >> >> "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    >> >> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >here's my advice: don't call jumping in the pool
    >> >> >a "feet first surface dive"
    >> >>
    >> >> He didn't. He *is* doing a feet first surface
    >> >> dive. The test begins in the water, not on the
    >> >> deck.
    >> >>
    >> >> >"Mark Juszczec" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >> >> >message news:91015c9e.0405200834.892ab46@posting-
    >> >> >.google.com...
    >> >> >> Hi folks
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> This is kind of related.
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> I want to take the Red Cross Lifeguard
    >> >> >> certifiction course. One
    >part
    >> >> >> is to grab a 10lb rubber brick off the bottom
    >> >> >> of the pool. I'm
    >doing
    >> >> >> a feet first surface dive to get to the bottom.
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> The problem is, although I can get my feet to
    >> >> >> touch the


    bottom

    Quoted message said:

    >> >> >> of
    >the
    >> >> >> pool, once I bend my knees to crouch to the
    >> >> >> brick I start floating
    >up.
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> Does anyone have any tips to get to the bottom
    >> >> >> faster and be able to crouch down without
    >> >> >> driving myself away from the brick?
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> Mark
    >> >> >
    >> >>
    >> >
    >>
    >


  3. oscargrouch said:

    since you appear so smart, what you should have done is
    explain what a feet first surface dive is using some other
    terms besides the term under discussion (feet first surface
    dive)...i understand your desire to be a wiseass about it,
    especially given the manner in which i started this part of
    the conversation, but your wiseassedness would be more
    appreciated if you gave information at the same
    time...especially since, despite my attitude, it was
    obvious that i was less wiseassed and genuinely inquisitive
    about the concept once i (think i (but still not sure))
    understood that a 'feet first surface dive' wasn't the
    simple thing i originally thought it was

    Well excuse me. The original poster was not confused about
    what a feet first surface dive is, so when your butt
    suddenly burst into the conversation as if to say we were
    stupid for talking about feet first surface dives at all, I
    assumed you were the one being the wiseass. How could I have
    been so stupid?

    Quoted message said:

    and now you say he is in the water, but not treading? is he
    floating? how's he keeping OFF the bottom if he's not doing
    either of those?

    The standard procedure is to swim to the location where the
    victim went down and do a surface dive. Why don't you just
    take the lifesaving course? When you join a discussion about
    lifesaving, the other people in the discussion reasonably
    think you know something about the subject.

    Quoted message said:

    "Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    JGH said:

    Martin W. Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    > "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>well using a term in its definition is
    >>brilliant...where'd you learn that?
    >
    > I didn't define surface dive. The term has a well-
    > known definition. I assumed you knew it. Sorry. A
    > surface dive is a dive that begins on the surface, not
    > above the surface, and not below the surface. The
    > surface dive is subdivided into the head first and the
    > feet first types, with the obvious meanings.

    My opinion is that things really went wrong when he
    asked you if the guy was already in the water and just
    wants to get to the bottom and you said no. Probably you
    should have said yes.

    You mean, when he asked "do you mean he's fully in the
    water already (treading) and the "feet first surface
    dive" is just trying to drop down in the water to get to
    the bottom?" and I said "No, I mean he is in the water
    already, and he does a feet first surface dive," I should
    have said yes even though the guy is not treading water
    and a feet first surface dive is not just trying to drop
    down in the water to get to the bottom.

    Quoted message said:

    I too am a little confused by the question since the
    instructor should have explained how to do the surface
    dive before asking you to do it.

    But the original poster does know how to do a feet
    first surface dive. He said he didn't have a problem
    getting to the bottom of the pool using a feet first
    surface dive. His problem is that he can't bend down to
    pick up the brick because he immediately starts rising
    off the bottom. Several explanations of how to do that
    were given.

    Quoted message said:

    If even using the techniques your instructor taught you,
    you still can't do it, maybe you're just too boyant.
    Nothing can change the laws of physics. So I'm a little
    iffy on what kinds of tips you might be looking for.

    Anyway, to do a feet first surface dive, you spread your
    arms out, push down and do a scizors kick at the same
    time. Push yourself as far out of the water as possible.
    As you go down, you swing your arms back up over your
    head providing further force downward.

    That should provide sufficient momentum to get you to
    the bottom. You'll have to curl your legs as you touch
    bottom. Letting out a little air at that point will
    help. Maybe that's the key point. Don't let your
    momentum stop as you hit bottom. You might have to
    exhale to do that.

    >
    > Then I suppose you have never seen a feet first,
    > surface dive.
    >
    >>"Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >>message
    >>"]news:[email hidden]...
    >>> "oscargrouch" <[email hidden]>
    >>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> >do you mean he's fully in the water already
    >>> >(treading) and the "feet
    >>first
    >>> >surface dive" is just trying to drop down in the
    >>> >water to get to the
    >>bottom?
    >>>
    >>> No, I mean he is in the water already, and he does a
    >>> feet first surface dive.
    >>>
    >>> >if so, and, mind you, i'm no hydrokinesiologist,
    >>> >then that seems like a pretty damn inefficient way
    >>> >to try to get to the bottom
    from
    >>> >that
    >>position,
    >>> >especially if you want to pick something up when
    >>> >you get there...isn't it easier to dive head first
    >>> >and swim down there?
    >>>
    >>> Have you never watched synchronized swimmers during
    >>> a competition?
    >>>
    >>> >"Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >>> >message
    >>> >"]news:[email hidden]...
    >>> >> "oscargrouch"
    >>> >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>> >>
    >>> >> >here's my advice: don't call jumping in the pool
    >>> >> >a "feet first surface dive"
    >>> >>
    >>> >> He didn't. He *is* doing a feet first surface
    >>> >> dive. The test begins in the water, not on the
    >>> >> deck.
    >>> >>
    >>> >> >"Mark Juszczec" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >>> >> >message news:91015c9e.0405200834.892ab46@postin-
    >>> >> >g.google.com...
    >>> >> >> Hi folks
    >>> >> >>
    >>> >> >> This is kind of related.
    >>> >> >>
    >>> >> >> I want to take the Red Cross Lifeguard
    >>> >> >> certifiction course. One
    >>part
    >>> >> >> is to grab a 10lb rubber brick off the bottom
    >>> >> >> of the pool. I'm
    >>doing
    >>> >> >> a feet first surface dive to get to the
    >>> >> >> bottom.
    >>> >> >>
    >>> >> >> The problem is, although I can get my feet to
    >>> >> >> touch the
    bottom
    >>> >> >> of
    >>the
    >>> >> >> pool, once I bend my knees to crouch to the
    >>> >> >> brick I start floating
    >>up.
    >>> >> >>
    >>> >> >> Does anyone have any tips to get to the bottom
    >>> >> >> faster and be able to crouch down without
    >>> >> >> driving myself away from the brick?
    >>> >> >>
    >>> >> >> Mark
    >>> >> >
    >>> >>
    >>> >
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >


  4. "Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Well excuse me. The original poster was not confused about
    what a feet first surface dive is, so when your butt
    suddenly burst into the conversation as if to say we were
    stupid for talking about feet first surface dives at all,
    I assumed you were the one being the wiseass. How could I
    have been so stupid?

    that's what i'm trying to figure out, especially since i
    admitted to being a wiseass for anyone who can read

    Quoted message said:

    The standard procedure is to swim to the location where
    the victim went down and do a surface dive. Why don't you
    just take the lifesaving course? When you join a
    discussion about lifesaving, the other people in the
    discussion reasonably think you know something about the
    subject.

    but it was obvious that i didn't, no?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.