Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Fixed gear ratios?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 36 posts · 1,326 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
24 July 2006
Last activity
30 July 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
36
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,326
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–36 of 36
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. email hidden said:


    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:


    Ride where you are going to ride the fixie with a normal geared
    bike....find the ratio you like, remember what it is...look at a gear
    chart and convert to the chainring and rear cog you wish to buy...for
    instance- ....

    My technique is similar, but a little more explicit. Take your
    "geared" bike and ride all the terrain you plan on riding with your
    fixed. On the most difficult hill, find the gear that will allow you
    to **barely** make it up. Choose that for your fixed gear.

    Doesn't sound right - I could make it up any of the hills on my
    regular training route on my TT bike with 88" fixed, but I wouldn't
    want to ride that gear for anything but racing and "race simulation"
    type training efforts

    Maybe it would be better to find the fastest downhill section of your
    training route and run the lowest gear that gets you down without
    feeling the need to drag the brake - almost impossible to simulate on
    a freewheel bike, but a more accurate guide to where the problem with
    fixed usually lies.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  2. joseph.santaniello said:

    Actually the tips and reasoning given by Graham and "Kinky" (Leave it
    to the Brits!) have helped quite a bit in figuring it out. I need a
    48x18 or 48x17. I think the reason I have problems basing my decision
    on tests with my road bike is due to the hilly roads and my heavy
    weight. At 230lbs I am quite dependent upon gears!

    IMNSHO the 48/17 is a bit tall, unless you are a real masher. I ride
    with a guy who rarely uses his small chainring, even on very hilly rides.
    He goes up the hills fast, but he seems to be in slow motion, since he
    usually is pushing a 52/17 or thereabouts.

    But unless you are like him, you might do better with an 18 or a 19.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
    _`\(,_ | certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to
    (_)/ (_) | reality. -- Albert Einstein

  3. Quoted message said:
    Lou Holtman said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> Does anyone have any idea what sort of gearing was used back in
    >> the days when the TdF and similar events were ridden on fixed
    >> gear bikes? What was/is considered an optimal gear for riding
    >> fast in rolling hills? Mountains? Flats?
    >>
    >> I am building up a fixed to be used for training/fun on rolling
    >> hills. I'm ordering some cogs, but I'm having trouble deciding
    >> what ratios to go with. I don't want to go nuts with ordering
    >> stuff, so I'm trying to narrow it down to 2, maybe 3 to
    >> experiment with. Whenever I try to figure it out by testing on my
    >> road bike, I can never make up my mind. 53x21, 53x19 are the two
    >> I have been leaning toward and their fixed counterparts 48x19,
    >> 48x17. So I'm thinking 17, 18, 19.
    >>
    >> Suggestions?
    >>
    >> Joseph
    >
    > Ride where you are going to ride the fixie with a normal geared
    > bike....find the ratio you like, remember what it is...look at a
    > gear chart and convert to the chainring and rear cog you wish to
    > buy...for instance-if you like the 39-15...and you want to use a
    > 42t ring...look up the equivalent of 39-15 inna 42-x...buy that.
    > BTW-even early on, I think the bikes were single speeds, not fixed
    > gear...so they could coats down hill, during the early years of
    > the TdF..

    That's just it, I can never make up my mind when I try to figure it
    out on my road bike.

    If YOU can't even make up your mind, how can we do that for you? I
    did what Peter suggested and it worked out fine.

    Actually the tips and reasoning given by Graham and "Kinky" (Leave it
    to the Brits!) have helped quite a bit in figuring it out. I need a
    48x18 or 48x17. I think the reason I have problems basing my decision
    on tests with my road bike is due to the hilly roads and my heavy
    weight. At 230lbs I am quite dependent upon gears! There is of course
    no such optimal single gear, and that is half the point of riding a
    fixed, but I think their advice has helped narrow it down quite a bit.

    That's the thing. I used to be a slow spinner until I rode my singlespeed
    around 24/7 at 53/18. Now the smaller hills become minor and I'm
    unaccustomed to downshifting in group rides. If you ride a little out of
    spec, your body will get used to it.

    --
    Phil Lee, Squid

  4. Quoted message said:

    Does anyone have any idea what sort of gearing was used back in the
    days when the TdF and similar events were ridden on fixed gear bikes?
    What was/is considered an optimal gear for riding fast in rolling
    hills? Mountains? Flats?

    I am building up a fixed to be used for training/fun on rolling hills.
    I'm ordering some cogs, but I'm having trouble deciding what ratios to
    go with. I don't want to go nuts with ordering stuff, so I'm trying to
    narrow it down to 2, maybe 3 to experiment with. Whenever I try to
    figure it out by testing on my road bike, I can never make up my mind.
    53x21, 53x19 are the two I have been leaning toward and their fixed
    counterparts 48x19, 48x17. So I'm thinking 17, 18, 19.

    Suggestions?

    Joseph

    Dear Joseph,

    Here are the gear inches for some fixie combinations mentioned in the
    thread, courtesy of Sheldon's calculator for a 700 x 25:

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

    As Sheldon mentions, using a longer or shorter crank will affect
    overall gearing, but gear inches seemed like the most familiar
    comparison.

    gear front
    inch x rear who likes it
    ---- ------- ------------
    48.x xx x xx 1920 alpine climbing side of flip-flop in 1920 report
    53.x xx x xx 1911 alpine climbing tdf winner Garrigou per steer
    60.3 48 x 21 no one
    60.5 39 x 17 no one
    62.8 50 x 21 no one
    63.3 48 x 20 no one
    64.3 39 x 16 Francesco DeVittori
    65.3 52 x 21 no one
    65.x xx x xx 1900 ordinary riders, Berto; 1920 report
    66.0 50 x 20 no one
    66.6 48 x 19 joseph.santaniello, David L. Johnson, Kinky Cowboy
    66.6 53 x 21 joseph.santaniello
    68.6 39 x 15 no one
    68.6 52 x 20 no one
    69.4 50 x 19 no one
    69.9 53 x 20 no one
    69.x xx x xx 1900 racers, Berto
    70.3 48 x 18 santaniello, Johnson, Peter, Tdf Lapebie per steer
    72.2 52 x 19 graham steer
    72.x xx x xx 1900 racers, Berto
    73.3 50 x 18 booker c. bense
    73.5 39 x 14 no one
    73.6 53 x 19 joseph.santaniello
    74.5 48 x 17 joseph.santaniello, David L. Johnson "a bit tall"
    75.x xx x xx Sheldon Brown's favorite
    76.2 52 x 18 no one
    77.6 50 x 17 no one
    77.7 53 x 18 joseph.santaniello, Phil Lee
    79.1 39 x 13 no one
    79.1 48 x 16 Specialized Langster and Bianchi Pista
    80.7 52 x 17 friend of David L. Johnson [1]
    82.2 53 x 17 joseph.santaniello
    82.4 50 x 16 no one
    85.7 39 x 12 no one
    85.7 52 x 16 no one
    87.4 53 x 16 no one
    88.x xx x xx Kinky Cowboy "could make it up" training route hills [2]

    [1] David isn't recommending his friend's gearing, just noting it.

    [2] Kinky isn't recommending 88 gear inches, just pointing out that
    using the highest practical climbing gear might not be a good way to
    choose the gear.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Peter said:

    "Phil Lee, Squid" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Suggestions?

    FWIW, the Specialized Langster and Bianchi Pista come stock with 48/16t
    gearing. I ride just a little shorter than that under that at 53/18 so
    as
    to work nicely with my semi-horizontal dropouts.


    My Langster came with a 48/18 free...
    So I put an 18 fixed on t'other side. It's a wee bit high so I might get
    a
    19 fixed to replace the 18 free.
    Peter

    What kind of terrain do you ride?


    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20% hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    I also more of a twiddling tourist than anything - happiest pedalling about
    90rpm.

    The bike's quite new - and has only had a few outings so far. However a
    recent 50 mile ride from London to Cambridge was no problem on it. I was
    going to put a 19 fixed opposite the 18 fixed, but having thought about it I
    might even put a 20 fixed on it (just in case of emergencies...). I wouldn't
    anticipate ever doing more that 100 miles on it though.

    Peter

  6. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    David L. Johnson said:
    joseph.santaniello said:

    Actually the tips and reasoning given by Graham and "Kinky" (Leave it
    to the Brits!) have helped quite a bit in figuring it out. I need a
    48x18 or 48x17. I think the reason I have problems basing my decision
    on tests with my road bike is due to the hilly roads and my heavy
    weight. At 230lbs I am quite dependent upon gears!

    IMNSHO the 48/17 is a bit tall, unless you are a real masher. I ride
    with a guy who rarely uses his small chainring, even on very hilly rides.
    He goes up the hills fast, but he seems to be in slow motion, since he
    usually is pushing a 52/17 or thereabouts.

    That's pretty close to what Sheldon recommends 42/15, or a ratio
    of about 2.8 ( front divided by back), I ride 2.77 and think
    thats about right.

    My rough rule of thumb would be the lowest gear that you can
    still spin up to about 30 mph without feeling totally
    out of control. Any lower than that and the downhills become
    torture. Of course with a gear that stiff, you'll need to accept
    walking up some hills now and then.

    This is somewhat higher than is generally recommended for using a
    fixed gear for "training" purposes, but if your purpose is
    to ride long distances I think a higher gear works out better.
    You are always going to suffer on the hills, you can't use
    a gear low enough to really make a difference. Better to get
    a comfortable speed on the flats and a much less torturous
    ride on the downhills.

    _ Booker C. Bense

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: 2.6.2

    iQCVAwUBRMe42WTWTAjn5N/lAQEnHAP+PoK2/7WX+OBVuKnHef0DWl7FKZ02FP6P
    wIlbzvbQ/RM9WvoOkQf7Kip3IvFAG59554dWOXRja4XG/pEFuRyJ9c+peDGlUowV
    KACF85G003FLOpAEGGlq6GbdYam3A5G/uo3exSz9ys5A6o8OShEvPq9W/vcYMGlH
    5xpzv6iTJU8=
    =Qg13
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  7. Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20% hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  8. Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually
    very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20%
    hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    I'd be interested to see that, too. I ride a route home with one hill I
    think is brutal. I have a topographical program and plugged in that
    road. Turns out the entire hill (bottom to top) is about 8% and the steep
    section is around 11-12%. 20% would be darn near impossible to ride up.

    --
    Bob in CT

  9. Bob in CT said:
    Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually
    very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20%
    hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    I'd be interested to see that, too. I ride a route home with one hill I
    think is brutal. I have a topographical program and plugged in that
    road. Turns out the entire hill (bottom to top) is about 8% and the steep
    section is around 11-12%. 20% would be darn near impossible to ride up.

    Dear Bob,

    No, 20% and 30% grades are perfectly possible on bicycles.

    (For other people, not me.)

    But such grades are rare and noteworthy. Here's a particularly scenic
    and foolish Italian climb:

    http://www.salite.ch/scanuppia.htm

    Note the kilometer or so of 20% to 28% grade near the start. Of
    course, as the pictures make clear, it's not exactly a normal paved
    road.

    Shorter and steeper climbs are famous. In California, for example,
    Fargo Street in Los Angeles attracts people with more legs than sense
    for an annual festival. It's claimed at anywhere from 30% to 35%.

    Pictures: http://www.lawheelmen.org/fargo.htm

    Results: http://www.lawheelmen.org/fargolst.htm

    Note that 61-year-old Doug Kubler climbed the hill 50 times that day.

    Some riders prefer to sit on the front of a tandem to make it easier
    to keep the front wheel down. Others zig-zag to reduce the effective
    grade. But most of them just pedal up the hill.

    However, lots of people claim (in good faith) that climbs are much
    steeper than they reallly are.

    In Colorado, a common mistake is to peek at a large-scale topo map,
    note the elevation change between the beginning and the end of a ride,
    measure the straight distance between the two points, and mistakenlyl
    calculate a 15% average grade for a 1 mile ride.

    But the road actually winds for 3 miles, so the grade is really only
    5%, not 15%. It may even have a few very short stretches of 15% grade
    (usually involving cutting the corners on hairpins), but it's awfully
    hard to find half a mile of 15% grade paved road in Colorado.

    But if there are significant 20% paved grades in Yorkshire, this site
    would love to add them to their list:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore.aspx?sid=509256be501f45528041e30bbd878d45&lingua=eng&da=az

    For U.S. posters, the site has a very short list of North American
    climbs:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=509256be501f45528041e30bbd878d45&lista=true&quanti=20&url=extraeuropa&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/m23m4

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  10. Quoted message said:
    Bob in CT said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:15:44 GMT, "Peter"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South
    > and
    > West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    > There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually
    > very
    > short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20%
    > hills,
    > so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    > Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    I'd be interested to see that, too. I ride a route home with one hill I
    think is brutal. I have a topographical program and plugged in that
    road. Turns out the entire hill (bottom to top) is about 8% and the
    steep
    section is around 11-12%. 20% would be darn near impossible to ride up.

    Dear Bob,

    No, 20% and 30% grades are perfectly possible on bicycles.

    (For other people, not me.)

    But such grades are rare and noteworthy. Here's a particularly scenic
    and foolish Italian climb:

    http://www.salite.ch/scanuppia.htm

    Note the kilometer or so of 20% to 28% grade near the start. Of
    course, as the pictures make clear, it's not exactly a normal paved
    road.

    Shorter and steeper climbs are famous. In California, for example,
    Fargo Street in Los Angeles attracts people with more legs than sense
    for an annual festival. It's claimed at anywhere from 30% to 35%.

    Pictures: http://www.lawheelmen.org/fargo.htm

    Results: http://www.lawheelmen.org/fargolst.htm

    Note that 61-year-old Doug Kubler climbed the hill 50 times that day.

    Some riders prefer to sit on the front of a tandem to make it easier
    to keep the front wheel down. Others zig-zag to reduce the effective
    grade. But most of them just pedal up the hill.

    However, lots of people claim (in good faith) that climbs are much
    steeper than they reallly are.

    In Colorado, a common mistake is to peek at a large-scale topo map,
    note the elevation change between the beginning and the end of a ride,
    measure the straight distance between the two points, and mistakenlyl
    calculate a 15% average grade for a 1 mile ride.

    But the road actually winds for 3 miles, so the grade is really only
    5%, not 15%. It may even have a few very short stretches of 15% grade
    (usually involving cutting the corners on hairpins), but it's awfully
    hard to find half a mile of 15% grade paved road in Colorado.

    But if there are significant 20% paved grades in Yorkshire, this site
    would love to add them to their list:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore.aspx?sid=509256be501f45528041e30bbd878d45&lingua=eng&da=az

    For U.S. posters, the site has a very short list of North American
    climbs:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=509256be501f45528041e30bbd878d45&lista=true&quanti=20&url=extraeuropa&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/m23m4

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    I've always wanted to do a ride like that. I'm still trying to figure out
    whether I can climb the street I live on, which is very steep and windy.
    I usually go from my house to another street, where it's much less steep..
    I've never tried going up the street I live on, but part of that is
    because I'm more afraid of cars than the incline. The good news is that
    there a lot more hills where I currently live in CT than where I used to
    live in AZ.

    Thanks for the information.

    --
    Bob in CT

  11. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually
    very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20% hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel


    Hi Carl,

    I guess it all depends how you measure you climbs. In England 10% is pretty
    common - although the climb may only be a few hundred metres long.
    As I said, Northwards of Leeds there are some 20% climbs, albeit for short
    distances.

    OS Maps show steep climbs with chevrons, and rides are created around these.
    http://www.ctcdevon.co.uk/chevrons.htm

    The steepest climbs are probably recognised as the Lake District climbs of
    Hardknott and Wrynose at 30% in sections and (if I remember) 20% for several
    hundred metres.
    http://www.cumbriawaycycleroute.co.uk/HardknottWrynosePass.jpg
    These are quite hard to get up - with rear panniers on there is a risk of
    toppling over backwards. A friend of mine fell off when he tried to put his
    foot down for a rest and discovered the ground wasn't within reach because
    of the gradient.

    Rgds, Peter

  12. Peter said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually
    very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20% hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel


    Hi Carl,

    I guess it all depends how you measure you climbs. In England 10% is pretty
    common - although the climb may only be a few hundred metres long.
    As I said, Northwards of Leeds there are some 20% climbs, albeit for short
    distances.

    OS Maps show steep climbs with chevrons, and rides are created around these.
    http://www.ctcdevon.co.uk/chevrons.htm

    The steepest climbs are probably recognised as the Lake District climbs of
    Hardknott and Wrynose at 30% in sections and (if I remember) 20% for several
    hundred metres.
    http://www.cumbriawaycycleroute.co.uk/HardknottWrynosePass.jpg
    These are quite hard to get up - with rear panniers on there is a risk of
    toppling over backwards. A friend of mine fell off when he tried to put his
    foot down for a rest and discovered the ground wasn't within reach because
    of the gradient.

    Rgds, Peter

    Dear Peter,

    It does indeed depend on how things are measured.

    Shorter sections can be much steeper, but judging by these profiles,
    there's no 500 meter section above . . .

    16.4% on Hardknott from Brotherilkeld:
    http://www.salite.ch/hardknott1.htm

    14.4% on Hardknott from Cockley Beck:
    http://www.salite.ch/hardknott.htm

    11.2% on Wrynose from Cockley Beck:
    http://www.salite.ch/wrynose1.htm

    13.0% on Wrynose from Fell Foot:
    http://www.salite.ch/wrynose.htm

    But they're still beastly steep, particularly if you're hauling
    panniers. And the road and highway departments love to put up signs
    about the very steepest sections.

    Accuracy is another troublesome area. Fargo Street in Los Angeles is
    rather short, fairly steady, and extremely hard to pin down--I've seen
    "official" estimates ranging from 30% to 35%.

    My daily ride is counter-clockwise because I prefer to descend through
    the 10% upper corner in the short S-bend down to the Arkansas River
    and climb back up the bluffs a few miles away in two gentle stages.
    It's much nicer to hit 37 mph on the runout and return on the highway
    than to struggle back up the steep gully.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  13. Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20% hills,
    so it's a bit different).


    Quoted message said:

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:


    Been there, climbed that.

    Quoted message said:


    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.


    I know of several short (less than half k) hills in Britain and Ireland
    marked at 1 in 5 and steeper. Whether that's accurate or not, they are
    all much steeper than Long Mynd. The worst that I know of is down the
    side of Harlech Castle in Wales, marked (if I remember right) as 1 in 2
    and a half! I tried cycling down it, but had to dismount - every time
    I braked, the back wheel lifted.

    FWIW, a short 1 in 5 is rideable on a 48 x 20.

    --
    Do onto pedestrians as you would have motorists do onto you.

  14. Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    I live in Leeds in Yorkshire. It's kind of hilly to the North, South and
    West, but kind of flat towards the East.
    There's very little above about 8% Eastwards and any hills are usually very
    short. More undulating than hilly really. (Northwards there are 20% hills,
    so it's a bit different).

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Peter

    Dear Peter,

    You might look for your rides in the 112 English climbs detailed here:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-kilometer grade that they list in England is 16.6%
    at Long Mynd out of Church Stretton:

    http://www.salite.ch/5500/5500.gif

    They'd be interested in paved roads with 20% grades. Over 10% is
    marked in red on the graphs, and is rare.

    We have plenty of hills steeper than 16% in England, although they
    don't sustain for long. Hill climb courses are often less than 1km
    long.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  15. On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:12:31 +0100, Kinky Cowboy <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    We have plenty of hills steeper than 16% in England, although they
    don't sustain for long. Hill climb courses are often less than 1km
    long.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    Dear Kinky,

    Er, judging by the altimetry, English climbs steeper than 16% are
    rarely as much as _half_ a kilometer long--that's the unit used for
    the grades.

    Browse through a few of the climbs at the site and see what they
    measured for yourself:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-km that I noticed was 16.4%, but I'm willing to
    learn of paved climbs not on the list (the site would love to hear
    about them), and I naturally agree that shorter sections are steeper.

    We tend to see a 15%, 20%, 25%, or 30% road sign meant for a hairpin
    or a short bend and then apply it quite a ways up the road through
    much flatter sections.

    (After a short stretch of real 30% grade, you can't blame your legs
    for thinking that that the road is still much too steep, even if it
    drops back to 12% for four times as long.)

    The misunderstanding is harmless, but you'll rarely lose money betting
    that people overestimate grade and distance.

    Odometers have improved our notions of distance, but grade is still
    harder to measure than the seats of our pants realize.

    I've measured the grade of that upper curve in my daily S-bend down to
    the Arkansas River. It really is about 10%. But it's also noticeably
    steeper than most of the rest of the S-bend. For some reason, however,
    I prefer to mention that 10% corner. The speedometer keeps me more
    hon--er, accurate about top speed, which was 37.5 mph today.

    For fun, try filling out the test below. It shows why we have such
    trouble judging grade. Skip a few degrees as you go higher. If there's
    any interest, I'll post the answers (which I certainly don't
    remember).

    1% grade = _____ degrees 16% grade = _______ degrees
    2% grade = _____ degrees 17% grade = _______ degrees
    3% grade = _____ degrees 18% grade = _______ degrees
    4% grade = _____ degrees 19% grade = _______ degrees
    5% grade = _____ degrees 20% grade = _______ degrees
    6% grade = _____ degrees 21% grade = _______ degrees
    7% grade = _____ degrees 22% grade = _______ degrees
    8% grade = _____ degrees 23% grade = _______ degrees
    9% grade = _____ degrees 24% grade = _______ degrees
    10% grade = _____ degrees 25% grade = _______ degrees
    11% grade = _____ degrees 26% grade = _______ degrees
    12% grade = _____ degrees 27% grade = _______ degrees
    13% grade = _____ degrees 28% grade = _______ degrees
    14% grade = _____ degrees 29% grade = _______ degrees
    15% grade = _____ degrees 30% grade = _______ degrees

    That covers grades up to the 30% on the sign whose link appeared in an
    earlier post. The point of the exercise is to remind us just how hard
    it would be to estimate a grade accurately without instruments, which
    is why the climbs of Europe site uses altimetry rather than just
    repeating what everyone "knows".

    Don't misunderstand me--I'm not denigrating UK climbs. I firmly
    believe that there are plenty of paved half kilometers in England
    steeper than I'm willing to pedal up.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  16. Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:12:31 +0100, Kinky Cowboy <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    We have plenty of hills steeper than 16% in England, although they
    don't sustain for long. Hill climb courses are often less than 1km
    long.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    Dear Kinky,

    Er, judging by the altimetry, English climbs steeper than 16% are
    rarely as much as _half_ a kilometer long--that's the unit used for
    the grades.

    Browse through a few of the climbs at the site and see what they
    measured for yourself:

    http://ciclismo.sitiasp.it/motore2.aspx?sid=c535c5bb63b240d19dba428a4b232ea0&lista=true&quanti=20&url=in&ID=0&pagina=1&filtra=null&da=az&come=af&lingua=eng&commenti=False
    or http://tinyurl.com/gf8dy

    The steepest half-km that I noticed was 16.4%, but I'm willing to
    learn of paved climbs not on the list (the site would love to hear
    about them), and I naturally agree that shorter sections are steeper.

    We tend to see a 15%, 20%, 25%, or 30% road sign meant for a hairpin
    or a short bend and then apply it quite a ways up the road through
    much flatter sections.

    (After a short stretch of real 30% grade, you can't blame your legs
    for thinking that that the road is still much too steep, even if it
    drops back to 12% for four times as long.)

    The misunderstanding is harmless, but you'll rarely lose money betting
    that people overestimate grade and distance.

    Odometers have improved our notions of distance, but grade is still
    harder to measure than the seats of our pants realize.

    I've measured the grade of that upper curve in my daily S-bend down to
    the Arkansas River. It really is about 10%. But it's also noticeably
    steeper than most of the rest of the S-bend. For some reason, however,
    I prefer to mention that 10% corner. The speedometer keeps me more
    hon--er, accurate about top speed, which was 37.5 mph today.

    For fun, try filling out the test below. It shows why we have such
    trouble judging grade. Skip a few degrees as you go higher. If there's
    any interest, I'll post the answers (which I certainly don't
    remember).

    1% grade = _____ degrees 16% grade = _______ degrees
    2% grade = _____ degrees 17% grade = _______ degrees
    3% grade = _____ degrees 18% grade = _______ degrees
    4% grade = _____ degrees 19% grade = _______ degrees
    5% grade = _____ degrees 20% grade = _______ degrees
    6% grade = _____ degrees 21% grade = _______ degrees
    7% grade = _____ degrees 22% grade = _______ degrees
    8% grade = _____ degrees 23% grade = _______ degrees
    9% grade = _____ degrees 24% grade = _______ degrees
    10% grade = _____ degrees 25% grade = _______ degrees
    11% grade = _____ degrees 26% grade = _______ degrees
    12% grade = _____ degrees 27% grade = _______ degrees
    13% grade = _____ degrees 28% grade = _______ degrees
    14% grade = _____ degrees 29% grade = _______ degrees
    15% grade = _____ degrees 30% grade = _______ degrees

    That covers grades up to the 30% on the sign whose link appeared in an
    earlier post. The point of the exercise is to remind us just how hard
    it would be to estimate a grade accurately without instruments, which
    is why the climbs of Europe site uses altimetry rather than just
    repeating what everyone "knows".

    Don't misunderstand me--I'm not denigrating UK climbs. I firmly
    believe that there are plenty of paved half kilometers in England
    steeper than I'm willing to pedal up.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    An email just asked why I haven't posted the answers for what grade%
    means in degrees.

    Er, because I saw no posts showing curiosity?

    But if grade% = tan(degrees, then . . .

    Quoted message said:

    For fun, try filling out the test below. It shows why we have such
    trouble judging grade. Skip a few degrees as you go higher. If there's
    any interest, I'll post the answers (which I certainly don't
    remember).

    1% grade = _0.57 degrees 16% grade = ___9.09 degrees
    2% grade = _1.15 degrees 17% grade = ___9.65 degrees
    3% grade = _1.72 degrees 18% grade = __10.20 degrees
    4% grade = _2.29 degrees 19% grade = __10.76 degrees
    5% grade = _2.86 degrees 20% grade = __11.31 degrees
    6% grade = _3.43 degrees 21% grade = __11.86 degrees
    7% grade = _4.00 degrees 22% grade = __12.41 degrees
    8% grade = _4.57 degrees 23% grade = __12.95 degrees
    9% grade = _5.14 degrees 24% grade = __13.50 degrees
    10% grade = _5.71 degrees 25% grade = __14.04 degrees
    11% grade = _6.28 degrees 26% grade = __14.57 degrees
    12% grade = _6.84 degrees 27% grade = __15.11 degrees
    13% grade = _7.41 degrees 28% grade = __15.64 degrees
    14% grade = _7.97 degrees 29% grade = __16.17 degrees
    15% grade = _8.53 degrees 30% grade = __16.70 degrees

    Basically, add 0.57 degrees for each 1%, slowly decreasing to 0.53 or
    so in this range. Very few people can estimate such tiny angles.
    Mostly, we gear down and lower our speed until we stop gasping for
    breath.

    And yes, there are two kinds of grade%, one that uses elevation
    divided by map distance (you went 5280 feet from point A to point B on
    a map and climbed 528 feet, so grade = 10%) and the other that uses
    elevation divided by actual distance (the hypotenuse is longer, so in
    real life you had to pedal 5,306 feet, 4 inches, an extra 26.33 feet
    per mile, a difference of only 0.5%.

    At "30%" grade, however, the disparity between the two methods becomes
    more noticeable. Either way, you climb 1584 feet, but one way, you
    pedal only 5036.8 feet (steep), the other way you pedal 5512.5 feet
    (spreading the work out over 10% more distance).

    That there are two ways to calculate grade% is one explanation for the
    30% to 35% range of estimates for steep hills like Fargo Street in Los
    Angeles.

    In real life, of course, paved roads rarely maintain grades as even as
    railroad grades for very long--there's no pressing need for such
    precision with cars or bicycles.

    CF

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.