Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My range was 18-25 points daily.
Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" - how does that work? Is it more effective?
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Flexpoints???
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 26 January 2004
- Last activity
- 26 January 2004
- Original author
- Mette
- Posts
- 10
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 641
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others don't.
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are concerned, when you figure with
flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why they call them flex - you can use them
anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range allowed you 175 points per week, plus activity points. In
flex, you now are given a strict daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be
assigned. Based on this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points ... for a
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can not bank them
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change between these two programs is that
in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when calculating points. In newer programs, you can
only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced 1-2-3 with a newer points program
(winning points). In this program they lowered the daily ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of
your old 1-2-3 range would change to 18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161
max weekly points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching to flex points from
the winning points program, you have the allowance to consume 14 additional points per week. Many of
us felt that adding 14 points per week hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to
refigure the maintenance routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitely keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we don't then it
makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning points program
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.Joyce
Mette said:
Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My range was 18-25 points daily.
Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" - how does that work? Is it more effective? -
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then and it must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others
don't.Quoted message said:
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are concerned,
when youQuoted message said:
figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why they
callQuoted message said:
them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed youQuoted message said:
175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are given a
strictQuoted message said:
daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based onQuoted message said:
this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points ...
for aQuoted message said:
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can not
bank themQuoted message said:
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change between
theseQuoted message said:
two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when
calculatingQuoted message said:
points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced 1-2-3
with aQuoted message said:
newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered the
dailyQuoted message said:
ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would change
toQuoted message said:
18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weeklyQuoted message said:
points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching to
flexQuoted message said:
points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to consume
14Quoted message said:
additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points per
weekQuoted message said:
hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenanceQuoted message said:
routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitelyQuoted message said:
keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we
don't thenQuoted message said:
it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning points
programQuoted message said:
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
Joyce
Mette said:
Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
rangeQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" - how does that work? Is it
more effective? -
Is anyone able to post, please, the "old" 1-2-3 range of points / day for various weights? Would be
much appreciated. Regards RickMette said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then and it must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others
don't.Quoted message said:
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are concerned,
when youQuoted message said:
figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why they
callQuoted message said:
them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed youQuoted message said:
175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are given a
strictQuoted message said:
daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based onQuoted message said:
this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points ...
for aQuoted message said:
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can not
bank themQuoted message said:
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change between
theseQuoted message said:
two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when
calculatingQuoted message said:
points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced 1-2-3
with aQuoted message said:
newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered the
dailyQuoted message said:
ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would change
toQuoted message said:
18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weeklyQuoted message said:
points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching to
flexQuoted message said:
points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to consume
14Quoted message said:
additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points per
weekQuoted message said:
hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenanceQuoted message said:
routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitelyQuoted message said:
keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we
don't thenQuoted message said:
it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning points
programQuoted message said:
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
Joyce
Mette said:
Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
rangeQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" - how does that work? Is it
more effective? -
Oh oh. I didn't realize that you can only use 4 fiber points. Thanks for telling me.
Sandy
"Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then and
itQuoted message said:
must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others
don't.Quoted message said:
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are concerned,
when youQuoted message said:
figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why
theyQuoted message said:
call
Quoted message said:
them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed youQuoted message said:
175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are given a
strictQuoted message said:
daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based onQuoted message said:
this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points ...
for aQuoted message said:
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can not
bank themQuoted message said:
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change
betweenQuoted message said:
these
Quoted message said:
two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when
calculatingQuoted message said:
points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced 1-2-3
with aQuoted message said:
newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered the
dailyQuoted message said:
ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would
changeQuoted message said:
to
Quoted message said:
18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weeklyQuoted message said:
points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching
toQuoted message said:
flex
Quoted message said:
points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to
consumeQuoted message said:
14
Quoted message said:
additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points per
weekQuoted message said:
hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenanceQuoted message said:
routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitelyQuoted message said:
keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we
don't thenQuoted message said:
it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning
pointsQuoted message said:
program
Quoted message said:
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
Joyce
Mette said:
Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
rangeQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" -
howQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
does that work? Is it more effective?
-
It is not 4 fiber points. It is 4 grams of fiber per item when calculating the points the old 1-2-3
program, had unlimited fiber grams, so it really adjusted the points significantly.Debbie
"Sandy W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:nopKb.754654$Tr4.2120505@attbi_s03...
Quoted message said:
Oh oh. I didn't realize that you can only use 4 fiber points. Thanks for telling me.
Sandy
"Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then
andQuoted message said:
it
Quoted message said:
must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others
don't.Quoted message said:
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are
concerned,Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
when you
Quoted message said:
figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why
theyQuoted message said:
call
Quoted message said:
them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed youQuoted message said:
175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are given
aQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
strict
Quoted message said:
daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based onQuoted message said:
this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points
...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
for a
Quoted message said:
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can
notQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
bank them
Quoted message said:
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change
betweenQuoted message said:
these
Quoted message said:
two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when
calculatingQuoted message said:
points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced
1-2-3Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
with a
Quoted message said:
newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered
theQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
daily
Quoted message said:
ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would
changeQuoted message said:
to
Quoted message said:
18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weeklyQuoted message said:
points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching
toQuoted message said:
flex
Quoted message said:
points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to
consumeQuoted message said:
14
Quoted message said:
additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points
perQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
week
Quoted message said:
hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenanceQuoted message said:
routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitelyQuoted message said:
keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we
don't thenQuoted message said:
it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning
pointsQuoted message said:
program
Quoted message said:
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
Joyce
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:14:29 +0100, "Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
rangeQuoted message said:
>was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" -
howQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>does that work? Is it more effective?
>
>
> -
Thanks, That what I meant.
Sandy
"Deb in Northern California" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:mvednb5wLdoh12eiRVn-
[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
It is not 4 fiber points. It is 4 grams of fiber per item when
calculatingQuoted message said:
the points the old 1-2-3 program, had unlimited fiber grams, so it really adjusted the points
significantly.Debbie
"Sandy W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:nopKb.754654$Tr4.2120505@attbi_s03...
Quoted message said:
Oh oh. I didn't realize that you can only use 4 fiber points. Thanks for telling me.
Sandy
"Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then
andQuoted message said:
it
Quoted message said:
must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it,
othersQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
don't.
>
> It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are
concerned,Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
when you
> figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why
theyQuoted message said:
call
> them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed you
> 175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are
givenQuoted message said:
a
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
strict
> daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based on
> this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points
...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
for a
> total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can
notQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
bank them
> - they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change
betweenQuoted message said:
these
> two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams
whenQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
calculating
> points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
>
> Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced
1-2-3Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
with a
> newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered
theQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
daily
> ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would
changeQuoted message said:
to
> 18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weekly
> points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So
switchingQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
to
Quoted message said:
flex
> points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to
consumeQuoted message said:
14
> additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points
perQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
week
> hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenance
> routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing
toQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
definitely
> keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if
weQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
don't then
> it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning
pointsQuoted message said:
program
> - only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
>
> Joyce
>
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:14:29 +0100, "Mette" <[email hidden]>Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>
> >Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points.
MyQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
range
> >was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term
"flexpoints" -Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
how
Quoted message said:
> >does that work? Is it more effective?
> >
> >
> >
> -
I think that is pretty much the same attitude many of us took ... if it ain't broke, why fix it?
I've become fairly accustomed to the flexpoint plan now, just have to remember to drop off 14
flexpoints at the beginning of the week. I also DO bank my activity points, and bank uneaten
food points - but the weekly totals come out to the same amount of points as the old program.
I've had to make adjustments because I do ww online, and their journal *forces* us to use their
flexpoint system.Joyce
Mette said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then and it must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others
don't.Quoted message said:
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are concerned,
when youQuoted message said:
figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why they
callQuoted message said:
them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed youQuoted message said:
175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are given a
strictQuoted message said:
daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based onQuoted message said:
this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points ...
for aQuoted message said:
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can not
bank themQuoted message said:
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change between
theseQuoted message said:
two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when
calculatingQuoted message said:
points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced 1-2-3
with aQuoted message said:
newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered the
dailyQuoted message said:
ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would change
toQuoted message said:
18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weeklyQuoted message said:
points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching to
flexQuoted message said:
points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to consume
14Quoted message said:
additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points per
weekQuoted message said:
hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenanceQuoted message said:
routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitelyQuoted message said:
keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we
don't thenQuoted message said:
it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning points
programQuoted message said:
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
Joyce
Mette said:
Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
rangeQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" - how does that work? Is it
more effective? -
That was another change that was made from the 1-2-3 program, to the Winning points program. I
believe the logic was that people were loading up on highfiber items, counting them as zero or
extremely low points in higher servings - and then wondering why no weightloss (or minimal) was
happening. So the 4g fiber cap was introduced.Joyce
Sandy W said:
Oh oh. I didn't realize that you can only use 4 fiber points. Thanks for telling me.
Sandy
"Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then and
itQuoted message said:
must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it, others
don't.Quoted message said:
It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are concerned,
when youQuoted message said:
figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why
theyQuoted message said:
call
Quoted message said:
them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed youQuoted message said:
175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are given a
strictQuoted message said:
daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based onQuoted message said:
this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points ...
for aQuoted message said:
total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can not
bank themQuoted message said:
- they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change
betweenQuoted message said:
these
Quoted message said:
two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams when
calculatingQuoted message said:
points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced 1-2-3
with aQuoted message said:
newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered the
dailyQuoted message said:
ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would
changeQuoted message said:
to
Quoted message said:
18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weeklyQuoted message said:
points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So switching
toQuoted message said:
flex
Quoted message said:
points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to
consumeQuoted message said:
14
Quoted message said:
additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points per
weekQuoted message said:
hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenanceQuoted message said:
routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing to
definitelyQuoted message said:
keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if we
don't thenQuoted message said:
it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning
pointsQuoted message said:
program
Quoted message said:
- only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
Joyce
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:14:29 +0100, "Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
rangeQuoted message said:
>was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" -
howQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>does that work? Is it more effective?
>
>
> -
That is the explanation we got from our WW leader.
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
That was another change that was made from the 1-2-3 program, to the
WinningQuoted message said:
points program. I believe the logic was that people were loading up on
highfiberQuoted message said:
items, counting them as zero or extremely low points in higher servings -
and thenQuoted message said:
wondering why no weightloss (or minimal) was happening. So the 4g fiber
cap wasQuoted message said:
introduced.
Joyce
Sandy W said:
Oh oh. I didn't realize that you can only use 4 fiber points. Thanks for telling me.
Sandy
"Mette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Thank you Joyce!
Ya know, I think Ill just stick to my good ol' 1-2-3 - it worked then
andQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
it
Quoted message said:
must work now:o)
"Joyce" <[email hidden]> skrev i en meddelelse
"]news:[email hidden]...
> Guess it all depends on who you talk to. Some seem to like it,
othersQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
don't.
>
> It is almost exactly like the 1-2-3 plan as far as points are
concerned,Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
when you
> figure with flexpoints you aren't allowed to bank points (that's why
theyQuoted message said:
call
> them flex - you can use them anytime you want). In 1-2-3 your range
allowed you
> 175 points per week, plus activity points. In flex, you now are
given aQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
strict
> daily target - 20 being what your old 1-2-3 range would be assigned.
Based on
> this you would work with 140 daily points PLUS 35 weekly flex points
...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
for a
> total of 175 points per week. You can earn activity points, but can
notQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
bank them
> - they must be used the same day they are earned. Another change
betweenQuoted message said:
these
> two programs is that in 1-2-3 there was no cap on the fiber grams
whenQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
calculating
> points. In newer programs, you can only use a maximum of 4 g fiber.
>
> Where the complaints come in (and I still complain). WW replaced
1-2-3Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
with a
> newer points program (winning points). In this program they lowered
theQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
daily
> ranges by 2 points, so the equivalent of your old 1-2-3 range would
changeQuoted message said:
to
> 18-23. Banking was allowed. Based on this you were allowed 161 max
weekly
> points, plus activity points which also could be banked. So
switchingQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
to
Quoted message said:
flex
> points from the winning points program, you have the allowance to
consumeQuoted message said:
14
> additional points per week. Many of us felt that adding 14 points
perQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
week
> hindered our weightloss, or made it very difficult to refigure the
maintenance
> routine - so just stuck with the winning points program. One thing
toQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
definitely
> keep in mind is that you don't HAVE to use those flexpoints (and if
weQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
don't then
> it makes me think we still are going right back to the old winning
pointsQuoted message said:
program
> - only the banking is done for us. <g>😉.
>
> Joyce
>
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:14:29 +0100, "Mette" <[email hidden]>Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>
> >Uhm..when I started WW four years ago it was called 1-2-3 points. My
range
> >was 18-25 points daily. Now I suddenly heard the term "flexpoints" -
howQuoted message said:
> >does that work? Is it more effective?
> >
> >
> >
>
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.