Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Fork or forks?

Started by Zog The Undeniable · · Last activity · 18 posts · 675 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 July 2005
Last activity
3 August 2005
Original author
Zog The Undeniable
Posts
18
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
675
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–18 of 18
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is it "a carbon fork" or "a pair of carbon forks"? And in an accident,
    is "the fork" bent, or are "the forks" bent?

    Just wondering...

  2. Zog The Undeniable said:

    Is it "a carbon fork" or "a pair of carbon forks"? And in an accident,
    is "the fork" bent, or are "the forks" bent?

    Just wondering...

    One fork, with two fork blades. The cutlery isn't a trio or quad of forks
    either. Plus, the origin of the word is from 'forked' as in 'he speaks
    with forked tongue!', ie, something that splits into two.

    Jasper

  3. Jasper Janssen said:
    Zog The Undeniable said:

    Is it "a carbon fork" or "a pair of carbon forks"? And in an
    accident, is "the fork" bent, or are "the forks" bent?

    Just wondering...

    One fork, with two fork blades. The cutlery isn't a trio or quad of
    forks either. Plus, the origin of the word is from 'forked' as in 'he
    speaks with forked tongue!', ie, something that splits into two.

    Now if people would just stop saying "handlebars".

    Bill "unless it's a tandem there's just ONE" S.

  4. Bill Sornson said:

    Now if people would just stop saying "handlebars".

    And "front fork", as if there's a "rear fork".

  5. Greg Berchin said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    Now if people would just stop saying "handlebars".

    And "front fork", as if there's a "rear fork".

    Two of them, even. The lower rear fork and the seatstay rear fork.

    Jasper

  6. On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:47:24 GMT, Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Two of them, even. The lower rear fork and the seatstay rear fork.

    True, but doe anyone ever refer to them as such? I know them as "chain
    stays" and "seat stays".

  7. Greg Berchin said:

    On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:47:24 GMT, Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Two of them, even. The lower rear fork and the seatstay rear fork.

    True, but doe anyone ever refer to them as such? I know them as "chain
    stays" and "seat stays".

    Depends. Especially in designs that have an actual fork (seatstays
    especially have that sometimes), where the stays come together into a
    single tube before they meet the rest of the frame, I'd be tempted to use
    the terminology, except that the generally accepted rbt term is stays, so
    I'd use that here. But to a non-bikie?

    Jasper

  8. He bent both fork blades or just one?

    "Zog The Undeniable" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:42ebbbeb.0@entanet...

    Quoted message said:

    Is it "a carbon fork" or "a pair of carbon forks"? And in an accident,
    is "the fork" bent, or are "the forks" bent?

    Just wondering...

  9. Zog The Undeniable said:

    Is it "a carbon fork" or "a pair of carbon forks"? And in an accident, is
    "the fork" bent, or are "the forks" bent?

    Just wondering...

    Do you sit down to your sirloin dinner with forks in hand?

    😄

    Mind you, it bugs me when people say "pant" instead of "pants".

    LOL

  10. "maxo" wrote: (clip) Mind you, it bugs me when people say "pant" instead of
    "pants".
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    If a pair of pliers is what we know it is, then it follows that a "plier" is
    one handle with its attached jaw. And a "scissor" is a loop handle with its
    attached blade. But, singularly, neither of these things can work. So how
    is a "plier" anything?

  11. Whenever I see a fork that has three tines instead of four, I call it a
    threek.

    Tom

  12. Tom Reingold said:

    Whenever I see a fork that has three tines instead of four, I call it
    a threek.

    What are these -- tworks?
    http://www.thegrillstoreandmore.com/image/products/big-pics/9289.jpg

  13. Tom Reingold said:


    Whenever I see a fork that has three tines instead of four, I call it a
    threek.

    Tom

    ROFL!!

    I've got some small ones with three tines--I use them as herring jar
    tools. I'll not be able to use them now without giggling. Thanks.

  14. Tom Reingold said:
    Quoted message said:

    Whenever I see a fork that has three tines instead of four, I call
    it a threek.

    I think of neptune's implement:

    http://tinyurl.com/cyurs

    Jobst Brandt

  15. Quoted message said:
    Tom Reingold said:
    Quoted message said:

    Whenever I see a fork that has three tines instead of four, I call
    it a threek.

    I think of neptune's implement:

    http://tinyurl.com/cyurs

    Jobst Brandt

    I get a "permission denied" type of error there.

    Tom

  16. jobst.brandt said:

    I think of neptune's implement:

    http://tinyurl.com/cyurs

    Jobst Brandt

    Access Verboten--but you're obviously referring to a trident, a handy tool
    for those Costco olive jars.

    😄

  17. 30 Jul 2005 18:38:17 +0100 Zog The Undeniable said:

    Is it "a carbon fork" or "a pair of carbon forks"? And in an accident,
    is "the fork" bent, or are "the forks" bent?

    Just wondering...

    It is A fork.

    They ARE fork blades.

    Think about the utensil you eat with. It is A fork (singular) with
    tines (plural.)

    -
    -----------------------------------------------
    Jim Adney [email hidden]
    Madison, WI 53711 USA
    -----------------------------------------------

  18. "Tom Reingold" wrote: Whenever I see a fork that has three tines instead
    of four, I call it a threek.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    So, I guess it's not hard to imagine what a "fourk" would be.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.