Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Formula for frame size, and Trek frames

Started by sergen · · Last activity · 6 posts · 2,717 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 August 2005
Last activity
22 August 2005
Original author
sergen
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,717
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have learnt that the measurement of one's inseam is important to calculating frame size.

    Could somebody offer advice on the correct frame size for me - I have an 82.5 cm inseam (my total height is 178 cms)?

    As an aside - does anybody know whether Trek bike frames are measured Center-To-Top or Center-to-Center.

    Many thanks.

  2. sergen said:

    I have learnt that the measurement of one's inseam is important to calculating frame size.

    Could somebody offer advice on the correct frame size for me - I have an 82.5 cm inseam (my total height is 178 cms)?

    As an aside - does anybody know whether Trek bike frames are measured Center-To-Top or Center-to-Center.

    Many thanks.


    Current treks are measured center to top of an extended seattube. Pay attention to TT length and seattube angle.

  3. sergen said:

    I have learnt that the measurement of one's inseam is important to calculating frame size.

    Could somebody offer advice on the correct frame size for me - I have an 82.5 cm inseam (my total height is 178 cms)?

    As an aside - does anybody know whether Trek bike frames are measured Center-To-Top or Center-to-Center.

    Many thanks.


    Follow this link. http://www.wrenchscience.com/WS1/Secure/Fitting/Height.asp?aes=ht&dept=cmp&anms=false
    You should find it very helpful.

    Scott

  4. From Competitive Cyclist's website:

    Competitive Cyclist Fit Calculator

    Measuring your body for the purpose of buying a new bicycle can be a daunting and confusing exercise. There are numerous techniques for determining your ideal size and fit, the most widely accepted of which
    is the “Lemond method”, as set forth by Greg Lemond in his classic late-80’s book “The Complete Bike of Bicycling”. The Lemond method provides the logic and the math behind virtually every bike fitting system
    you’ll encounter. Whether your fitting is performed in a retail environment with tools such as Bio-Racer, the Fit Stik or the Fit Kit, or if you’ve derived your fit from a database-driven on-line fitting system, certain truths almost always hold true:

    1. You will always be asked for your inseam, and you will always be provided with the following conclusions:
    a. Your center-to-center seat tube will equal (inseam x 0.65).
    b. Your center-to-top seat tube will equal (inseam x 0.67).
    c. Your bb-saddle height will equal (inseam x 0.883).

    2. You will always be asked for a torso length and an arm length, and you will always be provided with the following conclusion:
    a. Your total effective reach (i.e. the sum of your top tube length plus your stem length) will equal (torso + arm)/2 + 4.
    b. Alternatively, instead of torso length, you might be asked for the length of your sternal notch to the ground. In this case, your total effective reach will equal (sternal notch – inseam + arm)/2 + 4.

    Most folks rely on the Lemond method for one good reason: it’s quite accurate. Over time, though, we became fixated on the two significant drawbacks of the process:

    1. It computes your ideal seat tube measurement and initial seat height based solely on your inseam. Your femur length, however, can play a major role in determining your ability to produce maximum power in an adequately comfortable position. For example, if your femurs are long, you’ll need a setback seatpost and a higher saddle position than someone
    with a smaller bone structure.

    2. It offers only an overall effective reach measurement for your upper body. In other words, you won’t be provided specific information about your top tube length and your stem length. Rather, you’ll get the sum of an idealized top-tube-plus-stem measurement. Some riders are better suited to a combination of a long top tube and a short stem, some riders are the opposite, and some are in between.

    When we made the decision to develop our Fit Calculator, it was specifically an effort to address these limitations. It became a bit of an obsession for us. We traveled to New York (more than once) to attend the
    weeklong Serotta Bike Fit Certification seminar, we logged countless hours fitting people on our Fit Cycle, we analyzed systems such as the Fit Kit inside and out, and we worked with the cycling consultants at the
    Australian Institute of Sport. We expanded the scope of biomechanical variables taken into account by the Lemond Method,, allowing us to substantially improve upon its accuracy.

    In terms of your upper body, our Fit Calculator takes into account both your torso length and your arm length, which sheds quite a bit of light on the inter-relationship between your top tube and stem. In terms of
    your legs, our Fit Calculator evaluates your femur length and tibia length independently, allowing it to provide you a more accurate assessment of both your frame size and initial seat height.

    Is our system better than Lemond’s? Not necessarily. But it’s a more comprehensive evaluation of your anatomy, which in turn allows us to provide you with a greater amount of information for selecting and
    setting up your new bike. Think of it as a trustworthy second opinion to put alongside Lemond’s tried and true system. After you enter your measurements, we’ll supply you with fit and sizing data based both on the
    Fit Calculator and on the Lemond method. When you consider these numbers in combination with your sense of how well you fit on your existing bike, you’ll be armed with virtually all of the data you’ll need
    for sizing yourself to a new bike.

    We need 7 core pieces of information in order to calculate your optimum frame size and initial position. You’ll need the assistance of another person to make the most accurate measurements possible. And don’t
    be afraid to take each measurement 2 or 3 times and average the measurements together. Please keep in mind that the accuracy of the Fit Calculator is strictly a function of the accuracy of the information you
    provide! We’ve discovered over time that if there is a large variation between the results from the Lemond method and the results from the Fit Calculator, it’s a strong indication that the body measurements you’ve
    provided are inaccurate. Please take your time and be as meticulous as possible!

    Input

    Wear your cycling shorts, and take the measurements in bare feet.

    1. Inseam
    Set your feet approximately 8” apart and straddle a straight edge – something like a square or a 2’ level is ideal. Put as much pressure on your crotch as you feel when sitting on your bike seat. Measure the distance from the top of the level to the ground. Alternatively, mark the wall, then step away and take the measurement of the mark to the ground. And whatever you do, please don’t use the inseam measurement from your Levi’s! Pants inseams are at least 2” shorter than your actual inseam.

    2. Trunk
    Sit on a stool with your back straight and your pelvis hard against the wall. Make sure your back is straight and your pelvis is against the wall. Place the level on top of your AC (Acromioclavicular) joint and against the wall. The AC is the bony bump on top of your shoulder. Measure from the bottom of the level to the top of the stool. Measure both sides of your body and average the measurements.

    3. Forearm
    Remain seated and hold a cylindrical object (a magic marker is ideal) in your fist. Lower your arm so that your upper arm is against the wall (make sure your elbow is touching the wall) with your forearm at a right angle to the wall. Keep the object perpendicular to your forearm, and measure from the inside of the object to the wall. Measure both forearms and average the measurements.

    4. Arm
    Remain seated. Continue to hold the cylindrical object and extend your arm in front of you, holding your arm parallel to the ground. Make sure your shoulder does not come unnaturally forward and that your back stays against the wall. Also make sure that the object in your hand is perpendicular to your arm. Measure from the inside of the object to the wall. Measure both arms and average the measurements.

    5. Thigh
    Remain seated, again making sure your back is straight and your pelvis is hard against the wall. Make sure your femur is parallel to the ground and your tibia is perpendicular to the ground. Place the level across the front of both of your kneecaps, then measure from the inside face of the straight edge to the wall. Take this measurement from both legs, then take the average.

    6. Lower Leg
    Remain seated. Place the level across the top edge of your kneecaps (where they connect to the bottom of your inner quadriceps muscles). Measure from the bottom of the level to the ground.

    7. Sternal Notch
    Stand up against the wall. Set your feet approximately 8” apart and straddle a level. Find the sternal notch in your neck – it’s the bony “V” immediately beneath your Adam’s apple. Measure the distance from the apex of the notch to the floor.

    Output

    1. Seat Tube Range C-C
    Your new bike’s seat tube height should fall within this range. “Center-to-Center” signifies the length of the seat tube as measured from the center of the bottom bracket spindle to the midpoint of where the seat tube intersects the top tube. The seat tube height is most important as it relates to your head tube. If your seat tube is too short, your head tube will almost certainly be too short. This results in too low of a handlebar position placing an inordinate amount of stress on your neck and back. For this very reason, if you feel as though you could go with either of two sizes, going with the bigger frame is normally advisable. Please keep in mind that many frames come with a sloping or “compact” frame geometry in which the C-C seat tube measurement is artificially short. In the case of compact frames, you should primarily focus on the top tube measurement.

    2. Seat Tube Range C-T
    “Center-to-Top” signifies the length of the seat tube as measured from the center of the bottom bracket spindle to the top of the seat tube where it intersects the top tube. Colnago is the one brand we sell that sizes their bikes according to C-T instead of C-C, so pay close attention to this
    measurement range if your primary interest is in a Colnago.

    3. Top Tube Range
    This measurement is along the top tube, from the midpoint at the seat tube to the midpoint at the head tube. No single piece of frame geometry has a greater impact on comfort than your top tube. If you plan on paying attention to one measurement and one measurement only, make it this one. Keep in mind that we do not measure the actual top tube on bikes with compact frame geometry. Rather, we use an “Effective Top Tube” measurement – an imaginary line drawn parallel to the ground along the length of the top tube.

    4. Stem Length
    This measurement indicates your ideal stem length. It takes into account that your stem will be flipped to its flatter angle (e.g. 80° for Deda, 84° for Ritchey).

    5. BB-Saddle Position
    This measurement is along the seat tube, from the center of the bottom bracket spindle to the top of the saddle. It is an ideal starting point for saddle height. Given the varying differences of cleat and pedal heights, and given the varying differences in the thickness of saddles, the BB-Saddle position has a broad range of 2cm.

    6. Saddle-Handlebar
    This measurement ties together your choice of stem length with your saddle setback. It is measured from the nose of the saddle to the near edge of your handlebar. Keeping within this range will assure that you don’t accidently push the weight balance of your bike either too far
    forward or backward.

    7. Saddle Setback
    This measurement is primarily a function of your femur length. The longer your femurs, the further your saddle needs to be behind the bottom bracket in order to allow you to produce power. If you sit too far forward (or too far back) you can over-emphasize certain muscles and joints,
    which robs you of power and can potentially cause you injury.

    8. Seatpost Type
    This measurement is also primarily a function of your femur length, as well as your inseam. Tall riders and riders with long femurs benefit from the additional leverage they derive from a setback seatpost. Short riders and riders with medium-to-small femurs benefit from a non-setback post as it allows them harness the power of their hamstrings and glutes. Ritchey, Campagnolo, and Deda all make superb setback seatposts. Thomson is legendary for their non-setback Elite seatpost.

  5. What is your height in inches?

  6. ToffoIsMe said:

    What is your height in inches?

    Tech72 - wow, thank you for the detailed response.

    Toffo - my height in inches is 70 inches (5 ft 10 inches)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.