rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Freestyle with a 24"?

Started by dudewithasock · · Last activity · 14 posts · 271 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
18 January 2006
Last activity
18 January 2006
Original author
dudewithasock
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
271
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have been reading all over the place that a freestyle unicycle is a
    20". Is this actually set in stone? Will a 24" work just as well? What
    advantages and/or disadvantages does it have over a 20"?

    --
    dudewithasock

    'My Unicycling Journal'
    (http://www.unicyclist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44950)
    officially ended - currently in the process of preparing it for my free
    webspace.

    'MR - Reply 40,000' (http://tinyurl.com/dwwy5)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    dudewithasock's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10900
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  2. JSM rides a 24", and swears by it. You'll find that the wheel is a bit
    less responsive to being forced to do things it doesn't want to, and
    you'll have to play to it more. Also, any skill where your leg has to
    cross over to the opposite pedal across the tire (seat on side) will be
    more problematic as the wheel is taller.

    It's a preference thing, generally it's considered easier to use a 20",
    however it's quite possible to be very good with a 24". Unicycling is
    more about the rider than the machine in any case!

    --
    flyer
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    flyer's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9894
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  3. The general idea is that it is easier to do most tricks on a 20". I find
    that on a 24" you dont have much room to fit your foot on the frame,
    you leg has to really bend to get there, whereas on a 20" youve got the
    longer seat post and a crown which is much further down. This seems to
    be where the problem occurs unless you've got your saddle up nice and
    high on your 24".

    [image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v15/DriftingGray/UNIMOD.gif]

    --
    Brian O.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Brian O.'s Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10744
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  4. That was an exaggeration by a lot, Brian, but you get the idea.

    --
    UniTyler

    'Tyler's Macro Photography' (http://tcox6.photosite.com)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    UniTyler's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6120
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  5. UniTyler said:

    That was an exaggeration by a lot, Brian, but you get the idea.

    i think it was a perfect representation.

    anyway...back in the late 80's early 90's when unicycling was getting
    popular, most of the freestyle riders were using 24" wheels. then at a
    convention, the Japanese used 20" wheeled freestyle unis instead, and
    they were AWESOMe. so most people switched.
    I thiiink thats the story behind it...I remember johnfoss telling it
    once. i should just wait till he comes to tell it properly. consider
    this a preview.

    --
    James_Potter

    to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

    michael atkinson
    mdotedotatkinsonatgmaildotcom
    President of the '_MRIS_' (http://tinyurl.com/dk2de)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    James_Potter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3807
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  6. Yeah, more like this maybe...

    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |Filename: UNIMOD.gif |
    |Download: http://www.unicyclist.com/attachment/11629 |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+

    --
    forrestunifreak

    'My gallery' (http://tinyurl.com/bbf9x)

    www.seattlebikesupply.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    forrestunifreak's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6828
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  7. I don't think a 24" unicycle is better than a 20" for freestyle, but it
    does work. Just yesterday I rode out of backward seat drag on my 24".
    So if you have only a 24" unicycle, don't be discouraged from learning
    freestyle. With practice, you should be able to do anything you can do
    on a 20" except cross over riding. On the other hand, if you have a
    20", use it, because it will probably be easier in the long run.

    There are several advantages to a 24", but these are probably
    outweighed by its problems. A 24" is bigger, faster, and has more
    momentum. This might come in handy for some things, side ride for
    instance. The size factor might also make it visually more appealing
    for things like stand-up tricks. (You get a couple extra inches.) You
    don't have to lean down so far for hand wheel walk. The wheel is
    bigger, and give you more space for foot wheel walk. Since you're
    higher up on a 24", you have more time to land on your feet when you
    fall.

    --
    jsm

    Help edit the Unicyclopedia!
    http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/The_Unicyclopedia

    "wish i could be in a signature...*sigh*" -chosen
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    jsm's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6911
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  8. James_Potter said:

    ...I remember johnfoss telling it once. i should just wait till he
    comes to tell it properly. consider this a preview.

    Some corrections:
    I came along in 1980, when we Americans were mostly riding 24"
    Schwinns, and using them for everything. Ahh, a simpler time. There are
    still people out there who want to keep it where you only need one
    unicycle for everything. Fine, but please don't prevent us from growing
    the sport and conventions! Oh, sorry, end rant.

    Anyway, the first big splash by 20" wheels was perhaps made by the
    three guys from Sweden who came in 1981. They were Joaquim Malm, Peter
    Holmgren, and Hakan Frurskar (spelling undoubtedly wrong). Joaquim Malm
    is credited with the invention of coasting. And the three of them, more
    or less as a group, are credited with the introduction of seat drag,
    bouncing seat on floor, gliding and a whole general "1980s Swedish
    style" of unicycling. Theirs was perhaps a precursor to Street riding,
    but done indoors and not yet involving obstacles. But their quick,
    sudden movements style of riding very much lent itself to a small,
    lightweight wheel. They took advantage of the lightness and hard
    bumpers of the Miyata Deluxe unicycles of the day, and others followed.

    Oh, and those three had a younger guy who wanted to be like them, but
    lived pretty far away. He got better. His name is Peter Rosendahl
    (http://www.peter-rosendahl.com).

    I stuck with 24" through 1983, but in 1984 got a 20" and started
    converting over. I remember a few frustrating months where that smaller
    wheel was not behaving as I'd expected it to, but after I got used to
    it, I was able to make use of its advantages.

    - Coasting, gliding, possibly standup skills made easier by longer gap
    between seat and fork crown
    - Quick movements easier due to lighter wheel
    - Pairs riding easier due to smaller wheel

    And this is a major one, though I didn't learn it until a little bit
    later
    - On a 20" wheel, you can do the same performance in a smaller space
    than on a 24", period. This makes a big difference when your performing
    space is an elementary school stage or other very limited space!

    But the 24" also has advantages, as JSM mentioned. Speed, momentum, and
    visual size. Spins are easier for two reasons. Your pedals are much
    less likely to hit the ground, and the higher speed per revolution
    allows for more spinning options. Extra weight = momentum, as in the
    side ride like JSM said. Same can apply to other moves. And if you have
    an audience, a 24" wheel is going to look more impressive than a 20",
    especially if you're a really tall person.

    For wheel walking, once you've got the technique down, wheel size is
    not an issue. I find it easier on the 20" because my legs have more
    room to move around. This is why it's so hard on a Coker; your knees
    have to be much higher and the position is more awkward.

    Sem & Teresa are a great example of top professional performers on 24"
    wheels. Though they don't do a lot of 20" style tricks, it's not
    because they can't, it just isn't their style. When I think of world
    champions over the years, at least in the individuals, I think nearly
    all of them were on 20" wheels. This includes Teresa, who was the first
    women's champion.

    Carol Bahorich (now Carol Bricker, who hosted NAUCC 2004 in Salt Lake
    City), won at Unicon II on a 24" Miyata. Her sister Wendy (now Gryzch;
    hosted MUni events last summer in Bowling Green) used a 24" in 1988 and
    I'm pretty sure she was the winner at Unicon IV.

    --
    johnfoss

    John Foss
    "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
    -----------------------------------------------

    "Idiot America—where fact is merely that which enough people believe,
    and truth is measured only by how fervently they believe it." --
    Charles Pierce, in Esquire Magazine
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  9. And there it is....Ohh isnt Peter Rosandahl in Genius book of records a
    couple times?

    --
    caw89

    'Cody's Gallery' (http://gallery.unicyclist.com/Codys-Gallery)

    'sixsixone' (http://sixsixone.com/)

    AIM: unicaw89

    -last edited by god on 3000-01-01 at 12:00 am-
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    caw89's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8228
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  10. as with most things its a matter of preference. like you could do trials
    ona 24 tho its not recomended. you could tdo freestyle on a 24 but it
    will be a little less manueverable and and heavier. but still a matter
    of preference.

    --
    trials_uni

    You can't get up and try it again if you don't fall first.
    -Phil
    'Check Out my Newbie Guide' (http://tinyurl.com/99yez) <---new more
    informative post go now! edited today!
    Also Join the 'Unicyclist Roster'
    (http://ecstasy.winternet.com/roster/index.php?) and meet other
    unicyclists in your area!
    Make Your Own 'Juggling Clubs!' (http://www.crazytieguy.com/clubs.htm)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    trials_uni's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10953
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  11. Brian O. said:

    The general idea is that it is easier to do most tricks on a 20". I find
    that on a 24" you dont have much room to fit your foot on the frame,
    you leg has to really bend to get there, whereas on a 20" youve got the
    longer seat post and a crown which is much further down. This seems to
    be where the problem occurs unless you've got your saddle up nice and
    high on your 24".

    [image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v15/DriftingGray/UNIMOD.gif]

    that 24" drawing looks more like a coker! and the 20" looks like a
    Hub!:p

    --
    terrybigwheel

    Terry
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    terrybigwheel's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11418
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  12. terrybigwheel said:

    that 24" drawing looks more like a coker! and the 20" looks like a
    Hub!:p

    Scale wise it would be a 56" wheel, with a 20" seat post, making the
    minimum leg length over 55", a rider just over 11 feet high. The 20"
    wheel would have a seat post 50 inches long, requiring a miminum leg
    length of over 65" a rider just under 13 feet tall!

    Good luck.

    Besides for that, the drawing illustrates the advantages and
    disadvantages adequately.

    --
    UNIquelyCanadian

    ~Cameron
    New Photos Added: _www.camerondonaldson.com__

    "If you're looking for truth, don't search within yourself --You're the
    one who's confused in the first place!"
    - Frank Peretti
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    UNIquelyCanadian's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7524
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  13. UNIquelyCanadian said:

    Scale wise it would be a 56" wheel, with a 20" seat post, making the
    minimum leg length over 55", a rider just over 11 feet high.

    Hey, I've ridden a 56" wheel before, and I'm way under 11'! It had a
    pretty short seat post though...

    For Caw89, Peter Rosendahl has had probably a dozen or more Guinness
    records. Check out the web site!

    --
    johnfoss

    John Foss
    "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
    -----------------------------------------------

    "Idiot America—where fact is merely that which enough people believe,
    and truth is measured only by how fervently they believe it." --
    Charles Pierce, in Esquire Magazine
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

  14. Holy [censored] people, its MS Paint, im not going to produce a work of art.
    It got the point across did it not?

    --
    Brian O.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Brian O.'s Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10744
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/46177

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.