Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Front Wheel Spokes Coming Undone

Started by Kenny · · Last activity · 69 posts · 1,557 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 December 2006
Last activity
10 January 2007
Original author
Kenny
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,557
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My front wheel is a 32 spoke 3 cross Record hub wheel that I built up
    using DT Comps 1.8/1.6 double butted spokes with DT alloy nipples. Last
    Sunday was the first time in a month that I had ridden it. I hadn't
    used this wheel for a month because the bike I use it with was waiting
    for replacement springs for my ergos. Well anyway last Sundays ride was
    full of climbing and steep enough for me to get out of the saddle a few
    times. After that ride I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary.
    This morning's ride was different. The weather was cold compared to
    last week, about 10 c colder today. About 8 km into the ride I hear
    twinging and clunking sounds. At first I thought it was my sensor
    magnet banging into the sensor (Sigma 800). I stop to take a look but
    it looked ok. I continue riding, the sounds are still there and getting
    louder. I get out of the saddle to climb over a small roller along the
    route, when I do this the front feels mushy. WTF? Stopped immediately
    and squeezed a couple of spokes. SOB! Practically all the spokes on the
    front wheel were loose! I'm not talking touch-up only loose, I'm
    talking "the wheel might collapse loose." I've been riding this wheel
    for 2500km with only doing minor touch-ups after the initial build.
    Never seen this before. Some of my thoughts on how this may have
    happened are:

    1. Maybe I didn't have enough tension when I declared the wheel
    finished.

    2. Something that has to do with aluminum nipples and stainless steel
    spokes and there characteristics in relation to heat. Could it be that
    fluctuating ambient temperature where my bike is parked caused the
    alloy nips and the stainless steel spokes to unscrew from each other?

    If assumption 1 is true then wouldn't the effect be gradual. Meaning
    that I would have early warning that something is wrong. Like the wheel
    going out of true? I don't know.

    I'm leaning towards assumption 2. But I really don't know. Help anyone?

  2. Kenny said:

    My front wheel is a 32 spoke 3 cross Record hub wheel that I built up
    using DT Comps 1.8/1.6 double butted spokes with DT alloy nipples. Last
    Sunday was the first time in a month that I had ridden it. I hadn't
    used this wheel for a month because the bike I use it with was waiting
    for replacement springs for my ergos. Well anyway last Sundays ride was
    full of climbing and steep enough for me to get out of the saddle a few
    times. After that ride I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary.
    This morning's ride was different. The weather was cold compared to
    last week, about 10 c colder today. About 8 km into the ride I hear
    twinging and clunking sounds. At first I thought it was my sensor
    magnet banging into the sensor (Sigma 800). I stop to take a look but
    it looked ok. I continue riding, the sounds are still there and getting
    louder. I get out of the saddle to climb over a small roller along the
    route, when I do this the front feels mushy. WTF? Stopped immediately
    and squeezed a couple of spokes. SOB! Practically all the spokes on the
    front wheel were loose! I'm not talking touch-up only loose, I'm
    talking "the wheel might collapse loose." I've been riding this wheel
    for 2500km with only doing minor touch-ups after the initial build.
    Never seen this before. Some of my thoughts on how this may have
    happened are:

    1. Maybe I didn't have enough tension when I declared the wheel
    finished.

    Bing, bing, bing, we have a winner!!!

    Overtime, the wheel will loosen a wee bit to the point that it will go
    completely loose....

    Quoted message said:


    2. Something that has to do with aluminum nipples and stainless steel
    spokes and there characteristics in relation to heat. Could it be that
    fluctuating ambient temperature where my bike is parked caused the
    alloy nips and the stainless steel spokes to unscrew from each other?

    You are only talking about temp swings in the 60-70 degree range,
    right? Not a factor.

    Quoted message said:


    If assumption 1 is true then wouldn't the effect be gradual. Meaning
    that I would have early warning that something is wrong. Like the wheel
    going out of true? I don't know.

    I'm leaning towards assumption 2. But I really don't know. Help anyone?

    Nope, number one...use a tensiometer(see Jobst!!!, correct speling!!))

  3. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    Bing, bing, bing, we have a winner!!!

    Overtime, the wheel will loosen a wee bit to the point that it will go
    completely loose....

    Thanks, Peter.

  4. Kenny wrote:
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    1. Maybe I didn't have enough tension when I declared the wheel
    finished.

    most likely. use a $60 tensiometer.

    Quoted message said:


    2. Something that has to do with aluminum nipples and stainless steel
    spokes and there characteristics in relation to heat. Could it be that
    fluctuating ambient temperature where my bike is parked caused the
    alloy nips and the stainless steel spokes to unscrew from each other?

    no.

    next time, use the tensiometer and the "mavic method" of bedding the
    spokes in. the wheel will remain true and tension constant thereafter.

  5. jim beam said:

    next time, use the tensiometer and the "mavic method" of bedding the
    spokes in. the wheel will remain true and tension constant thereafter.

    Jim, what is the "mavic method"?

  6. On 17 Dec 2006 09:55:03 -0800, "Ron Ruff" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    jim beam said:

    next time, use the tensiometer and the "mavic method" of bedding the
    spokes in. the wheel will remain true and tension constant thereafter.

    Jim, what is the "mavic method"?

    Dear Ron,

    It's a little confusing. Here's a somewhat mistaken recent
    endorsement:

    "A better method of stress relief is to stand the wheel on its axle
    and press down on the rim with hands diametrically opposite, once
    between each pair of spokes."

    --Jobst Brandt

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/aaa1c64310024d4f

    But, as I said, it's a little confusing.

    Lay the wheel flat on a workbench, with the axle supported by a chunk
    of 2x4.

    Now lean hard on the wheel, pussing down with one hand on each side of
    the rim.

    Go around the wheel, doing this for all the upper spokes, then flip it
    over, and do the spokes on other side.

    When I tried this on a wheel whose spokes had been squeezed before it
    was ridden about 1,200 miles, some spokes cracked noisily as they
    unwound a little. Another poster who tried the method reported the
    same noisy results.

    Most people can put more tension on the spokes by leaning on a wheel
    laid flat like a roulette wheel than by squeezing a pair of spokes
    with one hand.

    But more tension obviously doesn't allow a spoke to unwind. If
    anything, more tension makes a spoke more reluctant to unwind.

    The spokes unwind because the tension drops on the other spokes on the
    wheel, more than tension would drop if you just squeezed a pair of
    spokes together. It's the spokes going slack that are unwinding and
    making the cracking noise.

    So the Mavic lean-on-a-wheel-laid-lfat method does provide better
    unwinding than squeezing spoke pairs. You can hear the cracking.

    (At least that's what I assume the noise means. I had to lean hard to
    make the cracking noise, and once the wheel made a cracking noise, it
    never cracked again, no matter how hard I leaned on that section. Lean
    on another section hard enough, and crack! Eventually, no more
    cracking noises.)

    But it's not stress relief. Other tests have shown that increasing
    tension beyond normal levels doesn't provide any significant
    mechanical stress relief. There are indeed demonstrable residual
    stresses from bending spokes, but these stresses are demonstrably
    relieved just by building the wheel up to normal tension.

    A typical 60-pound hand-squeeze raises spoke tension only about 55~65
    pounds. (The dramatic spoke bending is due to the slack gained when
    the rim deforms into a faint N or Z shape, not wildly increased
    tension.)

    Leaning on the wheel the Mavic way with 100 pounds of force is much
    easier and raises tension higher, to around 85~95 pounds for the top
    spokes at each hand.

    However, raising spoke tension from normal levels like this has no
    apparent effect on residual stresses because they've already been
    removed.

    A spoke bent but not tensioned will show obvious stress relief when
    the bend is heated with a propane torch. The ends of the bent spoke
    move quite obviously as the bend opens up.

    Tension a spoke with the same bend a little, heat it to relieve the
    remaining stresses, and the movement is noticeably less.

    Repeat the process, increasing the tension each time, and the spoke
    bend eventually shows no significant change.

    By the time that a bent spoke was tensioned to ~200 pounds, it no
    longer showed any more stress relief by unbending when heated with a
    propane torch than a straight, unused spoke, fresh from the factory.

    There was no apparent difference between the spoke tensioned to ~200
    pounds and a spoke tensioned to ~400 pounds. By the time that normal
    tension was reached, there just weren't any residual stresses left to
    relieve.

    Here's a post about what happened to the upper and lower spokes around
    a wheel laid flat when I loaded 100 pounds onto a board laid across
    the wheel:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/5c0ce7ddb9094b02

    The Mavic lean-on-the-wheel-laid-flat method allows slightly higher
    tension than squeezing spoke pairs, but the real advantage is probably
    that the lowering of tension in other spokes allows more unwinding.

    There's no law against using both methods on the same wheel.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  7. Quoted message said:

    Leaning on the wheel the Mavic way with 100 pounds of force is much
    easier and raises tension higher, to around 85~95 pounds for the top
    spokes at each hand.

    If you're not careful though you can bend a rim doing this.

    As others have menioned wheelbuilding machines support the rim around
    the perimeter while pushing the axle laterally. An alternative might be
    to support the rim in five or six spots with some blocks and do the
    same thing manually.

    -Amit

  8. Quoted message said:


    1. Maybe I didn't have enough tension when I declared the wheel
    finished.

    Agree. Have experienced similar phenomonon, but not quite as badly as you
    describe. Enough that after 5-10 rides my brand-new rear wheel looked like
    a potato chip.

    Mike Lackey
    Madison, AL

  9. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Leaning on the wheel the Mavic way with 100 pounds of force is much
    easier and raises tension higher, to around 85~95 pounds for the top
    spokes at each hand.

    If you're not careful though you can bend a rim doing this.

    theoretically, but you've got to be really strong or heavy to bend a rim
    by hand! seriously, try it. especially one that's been laced. maybe
    this fear comes from when spokes are tensioned "as high as the rim can
    bear" [i.e. over-tensioned] and watching rims subsequently taco? it
    doesn't take much extra to buckle a rim in that situation because it's
    near yield.

    Quoted message said:


    As others have menioned wheelbuilding machines support the rim around
    the perimeter while pushing the axle laterally.

    that's not ideal - it assumes all spokes are tensioned equally and that
    they seat equally. the "mavic method" can be used to seat untensioned
    spokes, so is independent of any rim/spoke/hub/tension variance.

    Quoted message said:

    An alternative might be
    to support the rim in five or six spots with some blocks and do the
    same thing manually.

    see above.

  10. Someone said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Leaning on the wheel the Mavic way with 100 pounds of force is
    much easier and raises tension higher, to around 85~95 pounds for
    the top spokes at each hand.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you're not careful though you can bend a rim doing this.

    Quoted message said:

    theoretically, but you've got to be really strong or heavy to bend a
    rim by hand! seriously, try it. especially one that's been laced.
    maybe this fear comes from when spokes are tensioned "as high as the
    rim can bear" [i.e. over-tensioned] and watching rims subsequently
    taco? it doesn't take much extra to buckle a rim in that situation
    because it's near yield.

    I don't believe so. I use that method to straighten buckled wheels
    and I am no Clark Kent. In fact, that and a derivative of it is the
    way rims are straightened if the mishap did not cause a kink. A bit
    of plane geometry shows what large spoke forces can be achieved.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    As others have mentioned wheelbuilding machines support the rim
    around the perimeter while pushing the axle laterally.

    If you have 36-spokes that take about nine times as much force. Not
    easily done manually.

    Quoted message said:

    that's not ideal - it assumes all spokes are tensioned equally and
    that they seat equally. the "mavic method" can be used to seat
    untensioned spokes, so is independent of any rim/spoke/hub/tension
    variance.

    Don't beat around the bush. This action is for stress relief not
    seating or untwisting spokes that were left twisted by the builder.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    An alternative might be to support the rim in five or six spots
    with some blocks and do the same thing manually.

    Quoted message said:

    see above.

    Jobst Brandt

  11. On 18 Dec 2006 04:41:27 GMT, [email hidden] wrote:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Don't beat around the bush. This action is for stress relief not
    seating or untwisting spokes that were left twisted by the builder.

    Dear Jobst,

    Okay, I'll repeat myself in this thread.

    Neither spoke squeezing nor the Mavic-lean-on-the-wheel provide any
    significant stress relief.

    The spoke elbow has been stress-relieved by ordinary tension.

    I demonstrated this in testing. Bend a spoke, heat it with a propane
    torch, and watch the spoke bend as the stress is relieved.

    Bend another spoke, apply light tension, and repeat--the spoke bends
    less because the highest residual stresses are the first to yield and
    be relieved.

    Bend a third spoke, tension it to around 200 lbs, toast it, and note
    that it scarcely moves at all--the significant residual stresses have
    been relieved.

    Bend a fourth spoke, tension it to around 400 lbs, toast it, and see
    the same thing. No difference is observed--no significant stress was
    left to relieve.

    As a cross-check, carefully mark several straight, unused spokes,
    fresh from the factory. Hang them, toast them from end to end, and
    note that they bend no more than the spoke tensioned to around 200
    pounds bent. The tension being relieved in this case is the tiny
    residual stress from the straightening of the spoke as the wire came
    off the coil from the factory.

    The Mavic lean-on-the-wheel method does allow spokes to untwist that
    spoke squeezing does not untwist, but that's because tension drops
    dramatically on the bottom-side spokes when you lean on the rim. The
    slightly higher tension on the top-side spokes only discourages them
    from untwisting.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  12. Quoted message said:
    Someone said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Leaning on the wheel the Mavic way with 100 pounds of force is
    > much easier and raises tension higher, to around 85~95 pounds for
    > the top spokes at each hand.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If you're not careful though you can bend a rim doing this.

    Quoted message said:

    theoretically, but you've got to be really strong or heavy to bend a
    rim by hand! seriously, try it. especially one that's been laced.
    maybe this fear comes from when spokes are tensioned "as high as the
    rim can bear" [i.e. over-tensioned] and watching rims subsequently
    taco? it doesn't take much extra to buckle a rim in that situation
    because it's near yield.

    I don't believe so. I use that method to straighten buckled wheels
    and I am no Clark Kent. In fact, that and a derivative of it is the
    way rims are straightened if the mishap did not cause a kink. A bit
    of plane geometry shows what large spoke forces can be achieved.

    you're making no sense brandt. or more likely, you're trying to
    deliberately obfuscate the issue. a rim cannot be bent by hand. tools
    [levers] are needed to raise the stress sufficiently to yield it.
    however, rims can easily be made to buckle if they are pre-loaded with
    excess spoke tension. and if ever any individual on the planet is
    responsible for rim failure, both with buckling and cracking, it is
    jobst brandt with the immortal words "tension as high as the rim can
    bear". well done jobst. you cost mavic millions. i hope you're proud.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    As others have mentioned wheelbuilding machines support the rim
    around the perimeter while pushing the axle laterally.

    If you have 36-spokes that take about nine times as much force. Not
    easily done manually.

    Quoted message said:

    that's not ideal - it assumes all spokes are tensioned equally and
    that they seat equally. the "mavic method" can be used to seat
    untensioned spokes, so is independent of any rim/spoke/hub/tension
    variance.

    Don't beat around the bush.

    i'm not. and i'm net seeking refuge in obfuscation either.

    Quoted message said:

    This action is for stress relief not
    seating or untwisting spokes that were left twisted by the builder.

    "stress relief" according to jobst brandt is "seating spokes into the
    hub" by anyone else. and loosening spokes with lateral deflection
    /does/ allow twisted spokes to untwist. you'd know that if you'd
    bothered to check.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    An alternative might be to support the rim in five or six spots
    with some blocks and do the same thing manually.

    Quoted message said:

    see above.


  13. Carl Fogel said:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Don't beat around the bush. This action is for stress relief not
    seating or untwisting spokes that were left twisted by the builder.

    Quoted message said:

    OK, I'll repeat myself in this thread.

    Quoted message said:

    Neither spoke squeezing nor the Mavic-lean-on-the-wheel provide any
    significant stress relief.

    Quoted message said:

    The spoke elbow has been stress-relieved by ordinary tension.

    Quoted message said:

    I demonstrated this in testing. Bend a spoke, heat it with a propane
    torch, and watch the spoke bend as the stress is relieved.

    I don't think you proved that. If the spoke wasn't over-bent it
    cannot be stress relieved. I think thats plastically deform at the
    elbow has been established, but that the high stress caused by this
    deformation is relieved is not. Your demonstration does not show that
    spoke elbows that have been bent to an acute angle, during spoking,
    don't have residual stress, and that residual stress cannot be relaxed
    without additional temporary overload.

    I'm sure you recall the experiment I did with the wheel that regularly
    broke spokes and ceased to do so after I stretched the spokes in
    place. Also that it was a standard procedure of experienced old time
    bicycle mechanics in the professional racing business that I met in
    Europe. I observed the methods and saw the results. I did not invent
    the process out of theoretical thin air.

    Quoted message said:

    Bend another spoke, apply light tension, and repeat--the spoke bends
    less because the highest residual stresses are the first to yield
    and be relieved.

    How can the residual stress of bending to a new shape be relieved if
    not subjected to a temporary overload? The way you describe this, the
    highest stress encountered must remain after the wheel is tensioned if no
    temporary overload is applied (stress relieving).

    Quoted message said:

    Bend a third spoke, tension it to around 200 lbs, toast it, and note
    that it scarcely moves at all--the significant residual stresses
    have been relieved.

    How? Please explain.

    Quoted message said:

    Bend a fourth spoke, tension it to around 400 lbs, toast it, and see
    the same thing. No difference is observed--no significant stress was
    left to relieve.

    I saw your tests and could not arrive at the results you claim. These
    spokes were no longer in the situation that causes residual stress.
    However, high skin stresses that are in equilibrium, would not change
    the shape of the heated element significantly (visibly) but are still
    there before heating, compressive on the outside of bends and tensile
    on the inside. These relax at about the same rate when heated and
    produce no visible change.

    Quoted message said:

    As a cross-check, carefully mark several straight, unused spokes,
    fresh from the factory. Hang them, toast them from end to end, and
    note that they bend no more than the spoke tensioned to around 200
    pounds bent. The tension being relieved in this case is the tiny
    residual stress from the straightening of the spoke as the wire came
    off the coil from the factory.

    Your test will not reveal residual stress, the spoke being in
    equilibrium before and after being subjected to annealing. As I
    mentioned, tensile testing to yield will remove any residual stress
    from a deformed (wiggly-kinky) spoke. I performed that test as I
    mentioned. Heating that spoke would not have changed its shape, it
    being in equilibrium before and after heating, although heating would
    relax residual stress it will not change the shape.

    Quoted message said:

    The Mavic lean-on-the-wheel method does allow spokes to untwist that
    spoke squeezing does not untwist, but that's because tension drops
    dramatically on the bottom-side spokes when you lean on the rim. The
    slightly higher tension on the top-side spokes only discourages them
    from untwisting.

    You don't want that to occur. Stress relieving should not change the
    trueness of the wheel, and it doesn't if you don't leave spokes
    twisted during final tensioning and truing.

    Jobst Brandt

  14. Quoted message said:
    Carl Fogel said:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Don't beat around the bush. This action is for stress relief not
    seating or untwisting spokes that were left twisted by the builder.

    Quoted message said:

    OK, I'll repeat myself in this thread.

    Quoted message said:

    Neither spoke squeezing nor the Mavic-lean-on-the-wheel provide any
    significant stress relief.

    Quoted message said:

    The spoke elbow has been stress-relieved by ordinary tension.

    Quoted message said:

    I demonstrated this in testing. Bend a spoke, heat it with a propane
    torch, and watch the spoke bend as the stress is relieved.

    I don't think you proved that. If the spoke wasn't over-bent it
    cannot be stress relieved. I think thats plastically deform at the
    elbow has been established, but that the high stress caused by this
    deformation is relieved is not. Your demonstration does not show that
    spoke elbows that have been bent to an acute angle, during spoking,
    don't have residual stress, and that residual stress cannot be relaxed
    without additional temporary overload.

    I'm sure you recall the experiment I did with the wheel that regularly
    broke spokes and ceased to do so after I stretched the spokes in
    place. Also that it was a standard procedure of experienced old time
    bicycle mechanics in the professional racing business that I met in
    Europe. I observed the methods and saw the results. I did not invent
    the process out of theoretical thin air.

    Quoted message said:

    Bend another spoke, apply light tension, and repeat--the spoke bends
    less because the highest residual stresses are the first to yield
    and be relieved.

    How can the residual stress of bending to a new shape be relieved if
    not subjected to a temporary overload? The way you describe this, the
    highest stress encountered must remain after the wheel is tensioned if no
    temporary overload is applied (stress relieving).

    Quoted message said:

    Bend a third spoke, tension it to around 200 lbs, toast it, and note
    that it scarcely moves at all--the significant residual stresses
    have been relieved.

    How? Please explain.

    Quoted message said:

    Bend a fourth spoke, tension it to around 400 lbs, toast it, and see
    the same thing. No difference is observed--no significant stress was
    left to relieve.

    I saw your tests and could not arrive at the results you claim. These
    spokes were no longer in the situation that causes residual stress.
    However, high skin stresses that are in equilibrium, would not change
    the shape of the heated element significantly (visibly) but are still
    there before heating, compressive on the outside of bends and tensile
    on the inside. These relax at about the same rate when heated and
    produce no visible change.

    rubbish. you don't know what you're talking about jobst. /you/
    [mistakenly] think that springback is evidence of residual stress - so
    how can you /possibly/ claim to interpret carl's very neat and useful
    experiments???

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    As a cross-check, carefully mark several straight, unused spokes,
    fresh from the factory. Hang them, toast them from end to end, and
    note that they bend no more than the spoke tensioned to around 200
    pounds bent. The tension being relieved in this case is the tiny
    residual stress from the straightening of the spoke as the wire came
    off the coil from the factory.

    Your test will not reveal residual stress, the spoke being in
    equilibrium before and after being subjected to annealing. As I
    mentioned, tensile testing to yield will remove any residual stress
    from a deformed (wiggly-kinky) spoke. I performed that test as I
    mentioned. Heating that spoke would not have changed its shape, it
    being in equilibrium before and after heating, although heating would
    relax residual stress it will not change the shape.

    but it /did/ change the shape!!! or did you not read the same
    experiments as the rest of us?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    The Mavic lean-on-the-wheel method does allow spokes to untwist that
    spoke squeezing does not untwist, but that's because tension drops
    dramatically on the bottom-side spokes when you lean on the rim. The
    slightly higher tension on the top-side spokes only discourages them
    from untwisting.

    You don't want that to occur. Stress relieving should not change the
    trueness of the wheel, and it doesn't if you don't leave spokes
    twisted during final tensioning and truing.

    but it does change the trueness of a wheel jobst!!! that's why we do it
    - to make sure spokes are bedded in sufficiently that it doesn't happen
    in service and have the wheels go out of true!!!

  15. jim beam said:

    [email hidden] wrote:


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure you recall the experiment I did with the wheel that regularly
    broke spokes and ceased to do so after I stretched the spokes in
    place. Also that it was a standard procedure of experienced old time
    bicycle mechanics in the professional racing business that I met in
    Europe. I observed the methods and saw the results. I did not invent
    the process out of theoretical thin air.

    oh, i missed this little peach... now, wait, let's get this completely
    straight... you /copied/ others, yet you claim to have /invented/ this
    process? i'm all ears jobst, please explain the logic of that one if
    you will...

  16. On 18 Dec 2006 05:36:50 GMT, [email hidden] wrote:

    Dear Jobst,

    Bend a spoke in the middle.

    Measure the bend by marking the ends on some paper.

    Heat it with a propane torch to a glowing orange.

    Let it cool.

    Measure the bend again. I predict that it will have expanded. What do
    you predict?

    Bend more spokes in the middle the same way. Using a vise rig of the
    kind that I described, tension them to up 400 pounds. Remove them from
    the rig and heat the bends with a propane torch to a glowing orange.

    Measure the bends again.

    I predict that the low-tension spoke ~100 pounds will show about half
    the expansion of the first spoke--the tension relieved residual
    stresses. What do you predict?

    I predict that the spoke tensioned to around 200~250 pounds will show
    scarcely any expansion at all--all significant residual stress has
    been relieved. What do you predict?

    I predict that the spoke tensioned to around 400 pounds, far higher
    than spoke-squeezing can raise a spoke's tension, will also show
    scarcely any expansion at all--the residual stresses were relieved a
    long time ago. What do you predict?

    Take several straight spokes, fresh from the factory. Lay them out
    next to a straight edge and mark their ends. Then heat the straight
    sections to a glowing orange with a propane torch.

    I predict that the spokes will bend ever so slightly as the residual
    stresses left after the coiled wire was straightened are relieved.
    What do you predict?

    I predict that the tiny bend will be about as much as the faint change
    in the ends of spokes bent and tensioned from 200 to 400 pounds--that
    is to say, insignificant. What do you predict?

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  17. Nice article but taking windup out of spokes is not 'stress
    relieving'...A wheel can be properly stress relieved and still 'ping'
    when ridden the first time. MUST do both and altho flat wheel push down
    'can' do both, squeezing parallel spokes is the best stress relieve and
    bouncing rim up/down on padded area is best to take windup out.

    BTW-these days, I wouldn't trust anything Mavic says to do...

    Quoted message said:

    On 17 Dec 2006 09:55:03 -0800, "Ron Ruff" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    jim beam said:

    next time, use the tensiometer and the "mavic method" of bedding the
    spokes in. the wheel will remain true and tension constant thereafter.

    Jim, what is the "mavic method"?

    Dear Ron,

    It's a little confusing. Here's a somewhat mistaken recent
    endorsement:

    "A better method of stress relief is to stand the wheel on its axle
    and press down on the rim with hands diametrically opposite, once
    between each pair of spokes."

    --Jobst Brandt

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/aaa1c64310024d4f

    But, as I said, it's a little confusing.

    Lay the wheel flat on a workbench, with the axle supported by a chunk
    of 2x4.

    Now lean hard on the wheel, pussing down with one hand on each side of
    the rim.

    Go around the wheel, doing this for all the upper spokes, then flip it
    over, and do the spokes on other side.

    When I tried this on a wheel whose spokes had been squeezed before it
    was ridden about 1,200 miles, some spokes cracked noisily as they
    unwound a little. Another poster who tried the method reported the
    same noisy results.

    Most people can put more tension on the spokes by leaning on a wheel
    laid flat like a roulette wheel than by squeezing a pair of spokes
    with one hand.

    But more tension obviously doesn't allow a spoke to unwind. If
    anything, more tension makes a spoke more reluctant to unwind.

    The spokes unwind because the tension drops on the other spokes on the
    wheel, more than tension would drop if you just squeezed a pair of
    spokes together. It's the spokes going slack that are unwinding and
    making the cracking noise.

    So the Mavic lean-on-a-wheel-laid-lfat method does provide better
    unwinding than squeezing spoke pairs. You can hear the cracking.

    (At least that's what I assume the noise means. I had to lean hard to
    make the cracking noise, and once the wheel made a cracking noise, it
    never cracked again, no matter how hard I leaned on that section. Lean
    on another section hard enough, and crack! Eventually, no more
    cracking noises.)

    But it's not stress relief. Other tests have shown that increasing
    tension beyond normal levels doesn't provide any significant
    mechanical stress relief. There are indeed demonstrable residual
    stresses from bending spokes, but these stresses are demonstrably
    relieved just by building the wheel up to normal tension.

    A typical 60-pound hand-squeeze raises spoke tension only about 55~65
    pounds. (The dramatic spoke bending is due to the slack gained when
    the rim deforms into a faint N or Z shape, not wildly increased
    tension.)

    Leaning on the wheel the Mavic way with 100 pounds of force is much
    easier and raises tension higher, to around 85~95 pounds for the top
    spokes at each hand.

    However, raising spoke tension from normal levels like this has no
    apparent effect on residual stresses because they've already been
    removed.

    A spoke bent but not tensioned will show obvious stress relief when
    the bend is heated with a propane torch. The ends of the bent spoke
    move quite obviously as the bend opens up.

    Tension a spoke with the same bend a little, heat it to relieve the
    remaining stresses, and the movement is noticeably less.

    Repeat the process, increasing the tension each time, and the spoke
    bend eventually shows no significant change.

    By the time that a bent spoke was tensioned to ~200 pounds, it no
    longer showed any more stress relief by unbending when heated with a
    propane torch than a straight, unused spoke, fresh from the factory.

    There was no apparent difference between the spoke tensioned to ~200
    pounds and a spoke tensioned to ~400 pounds. By the time that normal
    tension was reached, there just weren't any residual stresses left to
    relieve.

    Here's a post about what happened to the upper and lower spokes around
    a wheel laid flat when I loaded 100 pounds onto a board laid across
    the wheel:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/5c0ce7ddb9094b02

    The Mavic lean-on-the-wheel-laid-flat method allows slightly higher
    tension than squeezing spoke pairs, but the real advantage is probably
    that the lowering of tension in other spokes allows more unwinding.

    There's no law against using both methods on the same wheel.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  18. Kenny said:

    My front wheel is a 32 spoke 3 cross Record hub wheel that I built up
    using DT Comps 1.8/1.6 double butted spokes with DT alloy nipples. Last
    Sunday was the first time in a month that I had ridden it. I hadn't
    used this wheel for a month because the bike I use it with was waiting
    for replacement springs for my ergos. Well anyway last Sundays ride was
    full of climbing and steep enough for me to get out of the saddle a few
    times. After that ride I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary.
    This morning's ride was different. The weather was cold compared to
    last week, about 10 c colder today. About 8 km into the ride I hear
    twinging and clunking sounds. At first I thought it was my sensor
    magnet banging into the sensor (Sigma 800). I stop to take a look but
    it looked ok. I continue riding, the sounds are still there and getting
    louder. I get out of the saddle to climb over a small roller along the
    route, when I do this the front feels mushy. WTF? Stopped immediately
    and squeezed a couple of spokes. SOB! Practically all the spokes on the
    front wheel were loose! I'm not talking touch-up only loose, I'm
    talking "the wheel might collapse loose." I've been riding this wheel
    for 2500km with only doing minor touch-ups after the initial build.
    Never seen this before. Some of my thoughts on how this may have
    happened are:

    1. Maybe I didn't have enough tension when I declared the wheel
    finished.

    2. Something that has to do with aluminum nipples and stainless steel
    spokes and there characteristics in relation to heat. Could it be that
    fluctuating ambient temperature where my bike is parked caused the
    alloy nips and the stainless steel spokes to unscrew from each other?

    If assumption 1 is true then wouldn't the effect be gradual. Meaning
    that I would have early warning that something is wrong. Like the wheel
    going out of true? I don't know.

    I'm leaning towards assumption 2. But I really don't know. Help anyone?

    I'd go with number 1. Recent experience running a pair of cheap machine builds
    that I knew were a bit undertensioned. They went fine for a long time until
    pretty abruptly went way slack. I think the curve of looseness enabling further
    loosening is nonlinear and they may only have backed off a half turn every
    1000KM until they got to the point where they just let go.

    Ron

  19. Carl Fogel said:

    Bend a spoke in the middle.

    Quoted message said:

    Measure the bend by marking the ends on some paper.

    Quoted message said:

    Heat it with a propane torch to a glowing orange.

    Quoted message said:

    Let it cool.

    Quoted message said:

    Measure the bend again. I predict that it will have expanded. What
    do you predict?

    It depends on the bend and the method of heating. The rate of heating
    (annealing) affects the outcome of the process.

    Quoted message said:

    Bend more spokes in the middle the same way. Using a vise rig of
    the kind that I described, tension them to up 400 pounds. Remove
    them from the rig and heat the bends with a propane torch to a
    glowing orange.

    Quoted message said:

    Measure the bends again.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the low-tension spoke ~100 pounds will show about
    half the expansion of the first spoke--the tension relieved residual
    stresses. What do you predict?

    This exposes how deep the residual stress lies, not whether there is
    any. Cracks start at the outside of a spoke and that is where the
    highest residual stress is concentrated.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the spoke tensioned to around 200~250 pounds will
    show scarcely any expansion at all--all significant residual stress
    has been relieved. What do you predict?

    I don't disagree that you can demonstrate shape change, but the proof
    of what the prior state of the spoke before heating was, is not there.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the spoke tensioned to around 400 pounds, far higher
    than spoke-squeezing can raise a spoke's tension, will also show
    scarcely any expansion at all--the residual stresses were relieved a
    long time ago. What do you predict?

    As I said, unless the spoke is temporarily overloaded, the residual
    stress of shaping the elbow bend cannot be relieved.

    Quoted message said:

    Take several straight spokes, fresh from the factory. Lay them out
    next to a straight edge and mark their ends. Then heat the straight
    sections to a glowing orange with a propane torch.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the spokes will bend ever so slightly as the residual
    stresses left after the coiled wire was straightened are relieved.
    What do you predict?

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the tiny bend will be about as much as the faint
    change in the ends of spokes bent and tensioned from 200 to 400
    pounds--that is to say, insignificant. What do you predict?

    I appreciate your delving into these matters with the enthusiasm most
    people do not have, but the effect of the experiment are not
    necessarily linked with what you have set as a goal of the test.

    Jobst Brandt

  20. Quoted message said:
    Carl Fogel said:

    Bend a spoke in the middle.

    Quoted message said:

    Measure the bend by marking the ends on some paper.

    Quoted message said:

    Heat it with a propane torch to a glowing orange.

    Quoted message said:

    Let it cool.

    Quoted message said:

    Measure the bend again. I predict that it will have expanded. What
    do you predict?

    It depends on the bend and the method of heating. The rate of heating
    (annealing) affects the outcome of the process.

    Quoted message said:

    Bend more spokes in the middle the same way. Using a vise rig of
    the kind that I described, tension them to up 400 pounds. Remove
    them from the rig and heat the bends with a propane torch to a
    glowing orange.

    Quoted message said:

    Measure the bends again.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the low-tension spoke ~100 pounds will show about
    half the expansion of the first spoke--the tension relieved residual
    stresses. What do you predict?

    This exposes how deep the residual stress lies, not whether there is
    any. Cracks start at the outside of a spoke and that is where the
    highest residual stress is concentrated.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the spoke tensioned to around 200~250 pounds will
    show scarcely any expansion at all--all significant residual stress
    has been relieved. What do you predict?

    I don't disagree that you can demonstrate shape change, but the proof
    of what the prior state of the spoke before heating was, is not there.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the spoke tensioned to around 400 pounds, far higher
    than spoke-squeezing can raise a spoke's tension, will also show
    scarcely any expansion at all--the residual stresses were relieved a
    long time ago. What do you predict?

    As I said, unless the spoke is temporarily overloaded, the residual
    stress of shaping the elbow bend cannot be relieved.

    Quoted message said:

    Take several straight spokes, fresh from the factory. Lay them out
    next to a straight edge and mark their ends. Then heat the straight
    sections to a glowing orange with a propane torch.

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the spokes will bend ever so slightly as the residual
    stresses left after the coiled wire was straightened are relieved.
    What do you predict?

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the tiny bend will be about as much as the faint
    change in the ends of spokes bent and tensioned from 200 to 400
    pounds--that is to say, insignificant. What do you predict?

    I appreciate your delving into these matters with the enthusiasm most
    people do not have, but the effect of the experiment are not
    necessarily linked with what you have set as a goal of the test.

    Jobst Brandt

    Dear Jobst,

    Your theory leaves you unable to make any predictions.

    It seems obviously self-contradictory.

    Consider that typical spoke tensions are 90 to 110 kg, about 200 to
    240 pounds of tension.

    Yet typical posters are going to be doing very well if they manage to
    squeeze spoke pairs with 60 pounds of force and produce 55~65 pounds
    of tension increase.

    So a spoke that was at 90 kgf or ~200 pounds will reach only about 260
    pounds of tension, while a spoke that was at 110 kgf or ~240 pounds
    will reach around ~300 pounds of tension.

    Yet endless posts assert that both spokes will achieve immortality
    because all significant residual stresses have been relieved by the
    momentary rise in tension.

    So the theory seems to claim that these two states are the same:

    tension increase max tension
    200 pounds 60 pounds 260 pounds
    240 pounds 60 pounds 300 pounds

    Note that the maximum tension of the first spoke is about the same as
    the starting tension of the second spoke, yet the same effect is
    claimed for both spokes.

    Part of Langmuir's first law of bad or pathological science reads:

    " . . . the magnitude of the effect is substantially independent of
    the intensity of the cause."

    http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~ken/Langmuir/langB.htm#Characteristic%20Symptoms

    There is a regrettable tendency on RBT to type theories instead of
    testing them. When tests and measurements fail to confirm theories,
    the theories need better support than vague "it depends" claims.

    Is the theory now to be limited to relieving just the tiny stresses
    created by bending the elbows very slightly by hand, as opposed to the
    obviously larger stresses of bending the elbow about 95 degrees at the
    factory?

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.