Peter:
Thank you very much. I am a man of meager means. One income family, sick wife, company I worked for
went out of business last year, blah blah.
I am far from rich, heck I have a p/time job to pay for my cycling needs.
I was once very heavy and turned to cycling to save myself. In July 01, satisfied w/ my weight loss,
I bought a Torelli Countachw/ Daytona components and have jst over 14k miles on her.
Not being a cycling expert, I was wondering how it can be that cranks and bb can incrwase
efficiency. I am hearing that it can't, and will be delighted to put the money into things we need
for the house.
thanks again,
scott
"Qui si parla Campagnolo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:scott-<< What I am looking to accomplish is efficiency and have heard from several that a change
in crank and bb would achieve this.
Sorry, crank/BB won't do this, won't be any more effcient...
Any smooth BB and well shifting crank/rings will be 'efficient'. I'm
surprised
Quoted message said:anybody would actually say anoither crank or BB would be more 'efficient'
than
Quoted message said:another. Ring selection is far more important.
<< My tpical rides are 50-80 miles, 20-23 mph, and I am looking at avenues
to
Quoted message said:increase efficiency and power transfer.
Pedal choice, bicycle fit, good training and nutrition, not equipment-
<< From the results, it seems the consensus is that such a crank and bb
change
Quoted message said:will cost dollars, but not improve my performance. Would that be correct?
That is correct.
<< The reason I ask is sveral in my Saturday group recently made this
change
Quoted message said:and they all seem to be flying these past few weeks.
Their crank didn't do this, regardless of what they say...
Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.comOpen ↗ "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"