Global Warming

On Apr 3, 6:10 pm, Bob Schwartz <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Bill C said:

I can't believe, and I'm probably the only one, that I let myself get
sucked in by this [censored] again. I'm about as sick of this as everyone
else is.

A long time ago I concluded that you had a need for
this sort of thing and that's why you are unable to
walk away from it.

For some of us it is the tweaks of Partridge Family
fantasies from adolescence that keeps us here. For
others it is arguing on the internet. What I don't
get are the Mork and Mindy groupies. That's just
not right.

Bob Schwartz

I don't know I could get sucked in by this:
http://www.hanacoast.ws/femalestars/pam_dawber/
The leotard shot aint too shabby ;-)

Couldn't find any on a bicycle, but I'd love to get sucked into this:
http://www.teamdarkside.ca/gallery.php?pic=17
we're talking lust here:
http://www.jassystems.com/ipsc/sbt%20pics/index.htm

Enjoy!
Bill C

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

Quoted message said:

On Apr 3, 12:33 pm, Donald Munro <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Which one was that half borg with the big breasts ? You could easily
have got assimilated by her breasts if you weren't careful.

Quoted message said:

Ah, yes. I believe her name was "Two-of-Large."

Oh no--don't take the brain-boost!

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDShttp://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

This IS performance enhancing, or maybe intimidating:
http://www.fhmonline.com/girls_girls_of_fhm_article.asp?idx_id=2566

Here's a little "popular" science too:
http://www.fhmonline.com/articles-1276.asp

Bill C

Bill C said:

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

Quoted message said:

On Apr 3, 12:33 pm, Donald Munro <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

> Which one was that half borg with the big breasts ? You could easily
> have got assimilated by her breasts if you weren't careful.

Quoted message said:

Ah, yes. I believe her name was "Two-of-Large."

Oh no--don't take the brain-boost!

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDShttp://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

This IS performance enhancing, or maybe intimidating:
http://www.fhmonline.com/girls_girls_of_fhm_article.asp?idx_id=2566

Here's a little "popular" science too:
http://www.fhmonline.com/articles-1276.asp

Bill C

This has been the best usenet climate change thread ever.

--
Bill Asher

On Apr 3, 2:33 pm, Ted van de Weteringe <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Donald Munro said:

Which one was that half borg with the big breasts ?

Don't act like you don't know. Yes, you even watched Voyager.

She has had sex at least once:

http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Jeri_Ryan/ActressJeriR_Granitz_15200788.jpg

http://blog.synthesis.net/2008/03/05/jeri-ryan-from-borg-to-milf-in-9-months/

William Asher said:

This has been the best usenet climate change thread ever.

Please don't say that your globes were warming.

[email hidden] wrote in news:d6bd4ec9-7e0c-4643-b7ce-
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

William Asher said:

This has been the best usenet climate change thread ever.

Please don't say that your globes were warming.

If they are, and I'm not saying they are, it would be in a discreet manly
kind of way. Anyway, I prefer to think of it as my globes being forced
radiatively. Maybe that's not any better.

--
Bill Asher

Interesting climate article:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7187/pdf/452531a.pdf

Discussion of the article:

http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080402/pdf/452508a.pdf

William Asher said:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7187/pdf/452531a.pdf

Discussion of the article:

http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080402/pdf/452508a.pdf

Top five terms that make you think climate scientists are, um, a tad
frustrated:

5. Forcings
4. Global warming
3. Pielke
2. La Nina
1. O-zone

Quoted message said:

William Asher said:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7187/pdf/452531a.pdf

Discussion of the article:

http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080402/pdf/452508a.pdf

Top five terms that make you think climate scientists are, um, a tad
frustrated:

5. Forcings
4. Global warming
3. Pielke
2. La Nina
1. O-zone

Top five terms demonstrating they are perverts:

5. Decadal oscillation
4. Deep convection
3. Thermohaline circulation
2. Polar amplification
1. Deep ice core

--
Bill Asher

William Asher said:

This has been the best usenet climate change thread ever.

--
Bill Asher- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Bill
Some more possibly incredibly good news here:
http://tinyurl.com/5rt9h9
quoted:
$1 per gallon biofuel touted
Wednesday, April 09, 2008By STAN [email hidden]
AMHERST - Researchers at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst have
made a potential breakthrough in the development of "green gasoline,"
a biofuel that could cost as little as $1 a gallon.

Using a revolutionary process that rapidly heats, then cools wood,
grass or other plants to extract hydrocarbons, George W. Huber, an
assistant professor of chemical engineering, and a team of graduate
students were able to produce a liquid identical to gasoline in a
single-step process that took under a minute.

"We've proven this method on a small scale in the lab," Huber said.
"But we need to make further improvements and prove it on a large
scale before it's going to be economically viable."

Then there's the flip side:
http://www.recorder.com/story.cfm?id_no=4985903

River at risk

BY RICHIE DAVIS RECORDER STAFF
Published: Wednesday, April 09, 2008

AMHERST -- Climate change will reduce the availability of water in the
Connecticut River in summer and increase sediment and pollution loads,
according to a University of Massachusetts researcher.

This would be a disaster for me personally anyway as the river and
it's surroundings are up there with bicycles in my world, and the new
house is right near the river, and on a pond that used to be part of
the river.
Bill C

http://www.mass.gov/dcr/parks/central/crgw.htm
http://www.ctriver.org/
http://www.portlandriversidemarina.com/river_raft_links/

Bill C said:

William Asher said:

This has been the best usenet climate change thread ever.

--
Bill Asher- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Bill
Some more possibly incredibly good news here:
http://tinyurl.com/5rt9h9
quoted:
$1 per gallon biofuel touted
Wednesday, April 09, 2008By STAN [email hidden]
AMHERST - Researchers at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst have
made a potential breakthrough in the development of "green gasoline,"
a biofuel that could cost as little as $1 a gallon.

Using a revolutionary process that rapidly heats, then cools wood,
grass or other plants to extract hydrocarbons, George W. Huber, an
assistant professor of chemical engineering, and a team of graduate
students were able to produce a liquid identical to gasoline in a
single-step process that took under a minute.

"We've proven this method on a small scale in the lab," Huber said.
"But we need to make further improvements and prove it on a large
scale before it's going to be economically viable."

Then there's the flip side:
http://www.recorder.com/story.cfm?id_no=4985903

River at risk

BY RICHIE DAVIS RECORDER STAFF
Published: Wednesday, April 09, 2008

AMHERST -- Climate change will reduce the availability of water in the
Connecticut River in summer and increase sediment and pollution loads,
according to a University of Massachusetts researcher.

This would be a disaster for me personally anyway as the river and
it's surroundings are up there with bicycles in my world, and the new
house is right near the river, and on a pond that used to be part of
the river.
Bill C

http://www.mass.gov/dcr/parks/central/crgw.htm
http://www.ctriver.org/
http://www.portlandriversidemarina.com/river_raft_links/

Interesting story on the biofuel. However, I think it is odd though that
we put so much effort into finding ways to continue on with lifestyles that
are inherently unsustainable.

I think decreased water in the Connecticut River is going to be the least
of your worries in 15 years. But then I am a Casandrist at heart, mainly
because it goes so well with being a misanthropic secular nihilist.

--
Bill Asher

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

So then Nova has a program telling us that the Sun is actually cooling off..
I wonder how long before we're hearing cries of GLOBAL COOLING again?

Can you say, normal cyclic variations?

Dumbass -

It hasn't cycled at this rate in at least 100,000 years (based upon
ice cores).

One of the wonderful things about this election is that the Global
Warming Deniers don't have a candidate who is as stupid as they are.

John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all plan on doing
something to reduce carbon emissions.

Bon apetit!

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

William Asher said:

Bill C said:

On Apr 3, 8:19 pm, William Asher <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

This has been the best usenet climate change thread ever.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

--
Bill Asher- Hide quoted text -

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

- Show quoted text -

Quoted message said:

Hey Bill
 Some more possibly incredibly good news here:
http://tinyurl.com/5rt9h9
quoted:
$1 per gallon biofuel touted
Wednesday, April 09, 2008By STAN [email hidden]
AMHERST - Researchers at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst have
made a potential breakthrough in the development of "green gasoline,"
a biofuel that could cost as little as $1 a gallon.

Quoted message said:

Using a revolutionary process that rapidly heats, then cools wood,
grass or other plants to extract hydrocarbons, George W. Huber, an
assistant professor of chemical engineering, and a team of graduate
students were able to produce a liquid identical to gasoline in a
single-step process that took under a minute.

Quoted message said:

"We've proven this method on a small scale in the lab," Huber said.
"But we need to make further improvements and prove it on a large
scale before it's going to be economically viable."

Quoted message said:

Then there's the flip side:
http://www.recorder.com/story.cfm?id_no=4985903

Quoted message said:

River at risk

Quoted message said:

BY RICHIE DAVIS RECORDER STAFF
Published: Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Quoted message said:

AMHERST -- Climate change will reduce the availability of water in the
Connecticut River in summer and increase sediment and pollution loads,
according to a University of Massachusetts researcher.

Quoted message said:

This would be a disaster for me personally anyway as the river and
it's surroundings are up there with bicycles in my world, and the new
house is right near the river, and on a pond that used to be part of
the river.
 Bill C

Quoted message said:

http://www.mass.gov/dcr/parks/central/crgw.htm
http://www.ctriver.org/
 http://www.portlandriversidemarina.com/river_raft_links/

Interesting story on the biofuel.  However, I think it is odd though that
we put so much effort into finding ways to continue on with lifestyles that
are inherently unsustainable.

I think decreased water in the Connecticut River is going to be the least
of your worries in 15 years.  But then I am a Casandrist at heart, mainly
because it goes so well with being a misanthropic secular nihilist.

--
Bill Asher- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You've got to read Florence King's books.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_King
Love her!
Bill C

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Quoted message said:

So then Nova has a program telling us that the Sun is actually cooling
off.
I wonder how long before we're hearing cries of GLOBAL COOLING again?

Can you say, normal cyclic variations?

It hasn't cycled at this rate in at least 100,000 years (based upon
ice cores).

By all means tell us everything you know about ice cores.

Quoted message said:

One of the wonderful things about this election is that the Global
Warming Deniers don't have a candidate who is as stupid as they are.

Not nearly as stupid as someone who is willing to believe that the earth
isn't stable.

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Quoted message said:

So then Nova has a program telling us that the Sun is actually cooling
off.
I wonder how long before we're hearing cries of GLOBAL COOLING again?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Can you say, normal cyclic variations?

Quoted message said:

It hasn't cycled at this rate in at least 100,000 years (based upon
ice cores).

By all means tell us everything you know about ice cores.

Quoted message said:

One of the wonderful things about this election is that the Global
Warming Deniers don't have a candidate who is as stupid as they are.

Not nearly as stupid as someone who is willing to believe that the earth
isn't stable.

Look who's commenting on stability. Thanks, I needed a chuckle!

R

Kurgan Gringioni said:

John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all plan on doing
something to reduce carbon emissions.

And just exactly what would that be? Presidents don't make laws,
Congress does.

Any international treaty must be approved by the Senate. When the
Senate got wind that Clinton wanted to sign the Kyoto Treaty it passed
a resolution condemning the treaty 95-0. Clinton, sent Al Gore to
sign the treaty, which he did, but Clinton never sent it to the Senate
for ratification.

Jack Hollis said:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT), Kurgan Gringioni

Quoted message said:

John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all plan on doing
something to reduce carbon emissions.

And just exactly what would that be?  Presidents don't make laws,
Congress does.

Any international treaty must be approved by the Senate.  When the
Senate got wind that Clinton wanted to sign the Kyoto Treaty it passed
a resolution condemning the treaty 95-0.  Clinton, sent Al Gore to
sign the treaty, which he did, but Clinton never sent it to the Senate
for ratification.

Dumbass -

It's a decade later. The Democrats will control Congress. The balance
of public opinion has swung the other way because of the relentless
amount of scientific evidence that supports the theory.

The three remaining presidential candidates have the same opinion on
that issue for a reason.

You've got no horse in the race buddy. Get used to it.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

RicodJour said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Not nearly as stupid as someone who is willing to believe that the earth
isn't stable.

Look who's commenting on stability. Thanks, I needed a chuckle!

Dumbass,

He hasn't core dumped in years. What you're taking as instability
is a design feature.

Bob Schwartz

In article <[email hidden]>,

Bob Schwartz said:

RicodJour said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Not nearly as stupid as someone who is willing to believe that the earth
isn't stable.

Look who's commenting on stability. Thanks, I needed a chuckle!

Dumbass,

He hasn't core dumped in years.

Oh dear. http://tinyurl.com/5tpxv6

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Kurgan Gringioni said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

So then Nova has a program telling us that the Sun is actually cooling off.
I wonder how long before we're hearing cries of GLOBAL COOLING again?

Can you say, normal cyclic variations?

Dumbass -

It hasn't cycled at this rate in at least 100,000 years (based upon
ice cores).

Read it again: http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/050/mwr-050-11-0589a.pdf

The conditions described for 1922 are much more severe (or mild) than anything
even the most fanatic global warmists have recently claimed.

Of course there's climate change. There has never been anything else.

<Hobbes@spnb&s.com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Been up against stupid fads before and swatted 'em down before. Nothing
new.

What is really surprising is the age of the extremist Liberals here. You'd
think that 50 years of massive disappointment from their leaders might have
clued them in, but no.