GRRR, saw part of todays 'report' with Ann Widdecombe MP attacking cyclists, the www.gm.tv has a biased piece to support their prog, 2 wheeled menace indeed.
Shows their ignorance as they refer to the highway code as law, neatly omitting rule 51 which says do not ride more than 2 abreast.
Ergo, you can ride 2 abreast and will car drivers please stop blowing their horns whne we do on quiet roads.
"Martyn Bolt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
GRRR, saw part of todays 'report' with Ann Widdecombe MP attacking cyclists, the www.gm.tv has a biased piece to support their prog, 2 wheeled menace indeed.
Shows their ignorance as they refer to the highway code as law, neatly omitting rule 51 which says do not ride more than 2 abreast.
Ergo, you can ride 2 abreast and will car drivers please stop blowing their horns whne we do on quiet roads.
Call to arms or what?
Martyn
I saw about 10 seconds of Doris doing her usual ranting and switched off - literally. It was at the bit where she said words to the effect that when motorists break the law they are actively prosectuted but cyclists are not. She gave the example of when motorists jump red lights and when cyclists jump red lights. *Neither* should do it, and Doris's ranting of effectively the poor put-upon motorist makes me want to puke. She, as well as too many petrol-headed tosspots seem to view cyclists as non-motorists, as if we are some sort of separate species of sub-human, when a lot of us drive too... And why, of why... when they get 'a cyclist' in, does said cyclist have to resemble Swampy the eco-terrorist!!! BAH!!!!
"Martyn Bolt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
GRRR, saw part of todays 'report' with Ann Widdecombe MP attacking cyclists, the www.gm.tv has a biased piece to support their prog, 2 wheeled menace indeed.
Shows their ignorance as they refer to the highway code as law, neatly omitting rule 51 which says do not ride more than 2 abreast.
Ergo, you can ride 2 abreast and will car drivers please stop blowing their horns whne we do on quiet roads.
Call to arms or what?
Martyn
I saw about 10 seconds of Doris doing her usual ranting and switched off - literally. It was at the bit where she said words to the effect that when motorists break the law they are actively prosectuted but cyclists are not. She gave the example of when motorists jump red lights and when cyclists jump red lights. *Neither* should do it, and Doris's ranting of effectively the poor put-upon motorist makes me want to puke. She, as well as too many petrol-headed tosspots seem to view cyclists as non-motorists, as if we are some sort of separate species of sub-human, when a lot of us drive too... And why, of why... when they get 'a cyclist' in, does said cyclist have to resemble Swampy the eco-terrorist!!! BAH!!!!
What really got me (and I had to leave the house when she said it!) was
"OK, so a few motorists might occaisionally jump red lights but all cyclists do it"
Well, I saw a bus and seven cars go through red lights at least three seconds into the red this morning and one cyclist who slowed, looked and sidled through safely (he wasn't splatted anyway).
"bin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
MSeries said:
wafflycat said:
"MSeries" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
>> Cheers, helen s > > Was it Bob Davis ?
No, Bob was pencilled in but they rang him to say they didn't want him.
Bin
If he doesn't have dreadlocks & fungus sprouting out of his chin, it may because he looks to normal to be a cyclist... because as we all know, and as is stated on the GMTV web site at