neil0502 said:The shifters on my old MTB blew out last week. Replaced them, the bars,
and all cables. That all seems fine.
Pulled off my cantilever brakes, f&r, greased studs, then looked the
parts over. Pads have dry rot, hardware is rusted. Small parts add up
quickly. I'd like to replace.
My ?'s : Seems like there are some pretty good canti's on the market
right now, reasonably priced (e.g., Avids). There's also the option of
using a pulley gizmo (Sheldon Brown's article: http://tinyurl.com/37fcx)
and installing a direct-pull brake.
Are canti's dated technology, or a brake that's applicable only to
tourers and obsolete MTB's? I never had a problem setting them up, or
getting an appropriate degree of mechanical advantage. Are direct-pulls
just a better design, and worth any compromise that the 'Travel Agent'
gizmo might imply? Should the brake boss care which I put on?
TIA
Neil
One of the Avid cantis has a reputation for squealing. I don't know if
this is because of the design or because lots of talkative people
don't know how to set them up....
I have no problems with cantilever brakes. I have
linear/v-brake/direct pull on one bike and cantis on another (and dual
pivots on the road bike). Each is different, but both work well.
Unless you are having problems braking, feeling unsafe, I wouldn't
encourage you to go to direct pull.
I never feel unsafe with cantis, but I do occasionally go overboard
with the direct pull and come close to locking up a wheel when it
isn't a good thing to do. The direct pull take a more delicate touch.
A short range between just starting to brake and full pressure.
For the cost of the travel agents, you can get brake levers for direct
pull brakes, can't you? Why clutter the bike up? I think that the
travel agents are worth looking at if you have integrated
brake/shifters, but if they are separate, just get new levers.