Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Helmet cam...

Started by Chris Glidden · · Last activity · 21 posts · 828 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
14 July 2006
Last activity
18 July 2006
Original author
Chris Glidden
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
828
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've been toying with the idea of getting a set up to film my rides. I
    don't want to spend huge amounts of $$$ but I don't want to compromise
    quality either. For those of you in the know, what setup would get me
    the most bang for my buck?

    Muchas gracias,

    CG

  2. Chris Glidden said:

    I've been toying with the idea of getting a set up to film my rides. I
    don't want to spend huge amounts of $$$ but I don't want to compromise
    quality either. For those of you in the know, what setup would get me
    the most bang for my buck?

    Muchas gracias,

    CG

    Depends. Do you already have the miniDV? Do you want to risk it on
    your helmet? Does it have A/V inputs?

    I have two bullet cams I no longer use and would let go cheap, but you
    need a miniDV with A/V inputs for it to work. There aren't many of
    those around anymore.

    If you already have the MiniDV and don't mind risking it on the helmet
    an enclosure will set you back around $200. That and some engineering
    to attach it to your helmet are all you would need.

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

  3. Ride-A-Lot wrote:>

    Quoted message said:

    Depends. Do you already have the miniDV? Do you want to risk it on
    your helmet? Does it have A/V inputs?

    I have two bullet cams I no longer use and would let go cheap, but you
    need a miniDV with A/V inputs for it to work. There aren't many of
    those around anymore.

    If you already have the MiniDV and don't mind risking it on the helmet
    an enclosure will set you back around $200. That and some engineering
    to attach it to your helmet are all you would need.

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

    I will need to get an updated camcorder as well, I would prefer
    something small I can throw in my Camelback. I don't need the extra
    weight on my head. I'm totally new to this so it a bit of an
    education. Does the bullet/lipstick cam you use dictate the resolution
    of the capture regardless of the actual camcorder or is it based
    strictly on the camcorder?

    Thanks Mitch,

    CG

  4. Chris Glidden said:

    Ride-A-Lot wrote:>

    Quoted message said:

    Depends. Do you already have the miniDV? Do you want to risk it on
    your helmet? Does it have A/V inputs?

    I have two bullet cams I no longer use and would let go cheap, but you
    need a miniDV with A/V inputs for it to work. There aren't many of
    those around anymore.

    If you already have the MiniDV and don't mind risking it on the helmet
    an enclosure will set you back around $200. That and some engineering
    to attach it to your helmet are all you would need.

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

    I will need to get an updated camcorder as well, I would prefer
    something small I can throw in my Camelback. I don't need the extra
    weight on my head. I'm totally new to this so it a bit of an
    education. Does the bullet/lipstick cam you use dictate the resolution
    of the capture regardless of the actual camcorder or is it based
    strictly on the camcorder?

    Thanks Mitch,

    CG

    What's another 5 pounds on your head?

    You will need a Sony DCR-HCXX series camcorder or as I have just found
    out, an Archos Multimedia Player/Recorder (never tried it that way) in
    order to use a bulletcam. You can get most of the details and products
    here:

    http://www.viosport.com

    The Viosport Adventure Cam3 (I have one of these) will give you the
    highest resolution of any bullet cam (520 lines). The cheaper bullet
    cams are in the 380 lines range. The difference between the cheap and
    Cam3 is very noticeable in quality and brightness. Still not as good as
    the miniDV itself, but cam3 is respectable. You will not get a 16:9
    format with the bullet cam.

    Fry's has the cheapest model of the Sony DCR-HCXX series, but it's still
    around $500 - $600. The bullet cam is another $329.

    Then you have to think about editing. You could use XP's built in
    software, but it sucks BIG time. Adobe now makes a cheap version of
    premiere called Elements which should work for simple editing. It is
    around $100. But, the best results will come from the full version of
    premiere. I have seen it for around $900, but there is always those who
    use Bit Torrent. I am not advocating that and yes, I do own the full
    blown product.

    Yes, it's not a cheap hobby.

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

  5. Ride-A-Lot said:
    Chris Glidden said:

    Ride-A-Lot wrote:>

    Quoted message said:

    Depends. Do you already have the miniDV? Do you want to risk it on
    your helmet? Does it have A/V inputs?

    I have two bullet cams I no longer use and would let go cheap, but you
    need a miniDV with A/V inputs for it to work. There aren't many of
    those around anymore.

    If you already have the MiniDV and don't mind risking it on the helmet
    an enclosure will set you back around $200. That and some engineering
    to attach it to your helmet are all you would need.

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

    I will need to get an updated camcorder as well, I would prefer
    something small I can throw in my Camelback. I don't need the extra
    weight on my head. I'm totally new to this so it a bit of an
    education. Does the bullet/lipstick cam you use dictate the resolution
    of the capture regardless of the actual camcorder or is it based
    strictly on the camcorder?

    Thanks Mitch,

    CG

    What's another 5 pounds on your head?

    You will need a Sony DCR-HCXX series camcorder or as I have just found
    out, an Archos Multimedia Player/Recorder (never tried it that way) in
    order to use a bulletcam. You can get most of the details and products
    here:

    http://www.viosport.com

    The Viosport Adventure Cam3 (I have one of these) will give you the
    highest resolution of any bullet cam (520 lines). The cheaper bullet
    cams are in the 380 lines range. The difference between the cheap and
    Cam3 is very noticeable in quality and brightness. Still not as good as
    the miniDV itself, but cam3 is respectable. You will not get a 16:9
    format with the bullet cam.

    Fry's has the cheapest model of the Sony DCR-HCXX series, but it's still
    around $500 - $600. The bullet cam is another $329.

    Then you have to think about editing. You could use XP's built in
    software, but it sucks BIG time. Adobe now makes a cheap version of
    premiere called Elements which should work for simple editing. It is
    around $100. But, the best results will come from the full version of
    premiere. I have seen it for around $900, but there is always those who
    use Bit Torrent. I am not advocating that and yes, I do own the full
    blown product.

    Yes, it's not a cheap hobby.

    I have the original Vaiosport cam and it's ok but not great. I decided
    it was more hassle that it was worth and haven't used it in ages.
    That's cool about the Archos, I was thinking that something like that
    would be the ticket. I saw a recorder that used CF cards as storage that
    had promise too, but it needed some hacking (for example - it only came
    with an AC adapter and no battery solution, and a remote would be nice).
    But that product seemed like it was aimed at people wanting to record
    stuff to watch on smart phones or iPods, so it used lots of compression.

    If I could score a cheap enough flash-based recorder I might give it a
    whirl again. That would make the helmet cam self-contained, and then I
    could use my other cam for non-helmet perspectives on the same shoot.

    Matt

  6. MattB said:

    I have the original Vaiosport cam and it's ok but not great. I decided
    it was more hassle that it was worth and haven't used it in ages.
    That's cool about the Archos, I was thinking that something like that
    would be the ticket.

    Don't get too excited. Video stored on a hard drive based device like
    the Archos is heavily compressed, typically MPEG-4.

    Quality suffers mightily, editing is more difficult, etc.

  7. pete fagerlin said:
    MattB said:

    I have the original Vaiosport cam and it's ok but not great. I decided
    it was more hassle that it was worth and haven't used it in ages.
    That's cool about the Archos, I was thinking that something like that
    would be the ticket.

    Don't get too excited. Video stored on a hard drive based device like
    the Archos is heavily compressed, typically MPEG-4.

    Quality suffers mightily, editing is more difficult, etc.

    Is it a HD or memory based device? If it's hard drive, then forget it.
    The drive can't take the hits. I thought those JVC HD cameras would
    be great, but one light hit and it automatically shuts down the drive.
    Useless.

    Nevermind, it must be Hard Drive if it's 30 GB. In that case it will
    not work for mountain biking.

    --
    o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
    www.schnauzers.ws

  8. pete fagerlin said:
    MattB said:

    I have the original Vaiosport cam and it's ok but not great. I decided
    it was more hassle that it was worth and haven't used it in ages.
    That's cool about the Archos, I was thinking that something like that
    would be the ticket.

    Don't get too excited. Video stored on a hard drive based device like
    the Archos is heavily compressed, typically MPEG-4.

    Quality suffers mightily, editing is more difficult, etc.

    It...is...alive...

    JD


  9. Quoted message said:
    Chris Glidden said:

    I've been toying with the idea of getting a set up to film my rides. I
    don't want to spend huge amounts of $$$ but I don't want to compromise
    quality either. For those of you in the know, what setup would get me
    the most bang for my buck?

    Look at http://www.atc1000.com/poison.asp?p=street

  10. Ask a skydiver, camera flyers have been using helmet cams for years.
    Many skydiving helmets are designed to hold cameras and these guys are
    interested in the lightest smallest equipment. Try someplace like
    dropzone.com for skydiver talk.

    Chris Glidden said:

    I've been toying with the idea of getting a set up to film my rides. I
    don't want to spend huge amounts of $$$ but I don't want to compromise
    quality either. For those of you in the know, what setup would get me
    the most bang for my buck?

    Muchas gracias,

    CG

  11. trailgalore said:

    Look at http://www.atc1000.com/poison.asp?p=street

    That setup is an absolute piece of feces.

  12. CinderGirl said:

    Ask a skydiver, camera flyers have been using helmet cams for years.
    Many skydiving helmets are designed to hold cameras and these guys are
    interested in the lightest smallest equipment. Try someplace like
    dropzone.com for skydiver talk.

    I was wondering what had happened to you. At least now I know you
    didn't frap in somewhere. Now go ride your bike...

    JD still digs the "Titanium" beer shirt

  13. JD said:

    CinderGirl wrote:
    I was wondering what had happened to you. At least now I know you
    didn't frap in somewhere. Now go ride your bike...

    JD still digs the "Titanium" beer shirt

    Tee hee, I just moved out south of Sacramento and its all F L A T.
    Auburn is a drive. I have riden some around Latrobe since its closest.
    Plus the skydiving is a little addicting 😉

    Still digging my rim. I've learned not to leave my bike parts laying
    around in parking lots 😉

  14. CinderGirl said:
    JD said:

    CinderGirl wrote:
    I was wondering what had happened to you. At least now I know you
    didn't frap in somewhere. Now go ride your bike...

    JD still digs the "Titanium" beer shirt

    Tee hee, I just moved out south of Sacramento and its all F L A T.
    Auburn is a drive. I have riden some around Latrobe since its closest.
    Plus the skydiving is a little addicting 😉

    Are you skydiving in Lodi? I'd wager the cost of lifts has skyrocketed
    a bit in the past couple of years. Twin Otters drink a lot of juice.

    Quoted message said:

    Still digging my rim. I've learned not to leave my bike parts laying
    around in parking lots 😉

    That's a good thing!

    JD

  15. JD said:

    Are you skydiving in Lodi? I'd wager the cost of lifts has skyrocketed
    a bit in the past couple of years. Twin Otters drink a lot of juice.

    $15 to altitude 7 days a week. Its been years since they raised prices
    out there. We got two Beech 99's too. All with air conditioning 😉

  16. Damn good price. Tom in Eloy

    CinderGirl said:
    JD said:

    Are you skydiving in Lodi? I'd wager the cost of lifts has skyrocketed
    a bit in the past couple of years. Twin Otters drink a lot of juice.

    $15 to altitude 7 days a week. Its been years since they raised prices
    out there. We got two Beech 99's too. All with air conditioning 😉

  17. Oh I LOVE Eloy!! Love the tunnel, love the skyvan, love the balloon,
    love the bar!

    tom said:

    Damn good price. Tom in Eloy

  18. On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:24:18 -0700, CinderGirl <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Oh I LOVE Eloy!! Love the tunnel, love the skyvan, love the balloon,
    love the bar!

    Come-on Cinder Chic, this is a family NG. Please, no more talk about no
    Love Tunnel.
    ____
    Slack

  19. $21 to 12.5(or higher) here.

    CinderGirl said:

    Oh I LOVE Eloy!! Love the tunnel, love the skyvan, love the balloon,
    love the bar!

    tom said:

    Damn good price. Tom in Eloy

  20. tom said:

    $21 to 12.5(or higher) here.

    If we buy a block of 50 tickets we get em for $13 a jump 😉

    Come visit sometime!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.