| | "Drinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message | news:[email hidden]... | > Can we do a straw poll | Why? It might show how representative this ng is of the cycling population as a whole, at least on this matter. I believe the helmet wearing %
is
Quoted message said:
known though I've no idea what it is.
it could show whether the people who respond to this thread (and its orphans) are definitely /un/representative of the cycling population who were observed during studies of helmet wearing levels (AIUI it is not universally accepted that this is representative of the cycling population as a whole).
If you were to get the same percentage as DfT(?) helmet figures that would not tell you that the respondents /are/ representative only that it is possible that they are. And this doesn't even get into the question of whether the poll respondents are answering the question that was posed or the one that most people seem to have been assuming was intended. ie Yes, I don't wear a helmet or Yes I do wear a helmet best wishes james
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Mark Thompson said:
Given the huge amount of people on this ng a web based poll would be the only sensible way to do it.
And one which is less simplistic. I note that there is no way of registering "I wear a helmet but I don't think that not doing so is stupid" or the equivalent. It appears to be a question designed solely to prove a point, which is why haven't answered it.
You suspect a lack of scientific rigour? Why should this particular piece of helmet research be any different?
"Drinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> Can we do a straw poll of how many people don't wear a helmet compared
to
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> those that do. > > Please reply to this post with either Yes or No in the Subject and
let's
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
do > a count after a week.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Why don't you take the time to do some research of your own - you're clearly new round here, so it may be worth your while checking the newsgroup archives to find out what has been said many many times already.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
No need to be patronising. Do your own research and you might want to reconsider your definition of new!
Quoted message said:
Hmm, since August 2003. So how the hell have you managed to miss all the discussion over the past year telling you where you went wrong? Ah - you got ignored last time you posted your anecdote.
Quoted message said:
And I make no apologies for being patronising - you clearly haven't looked up the answers to any of the questions you're asking.
If past discussions here are any guide, there does seem to be a correlation of helmet-wearing with poor mental skills. Of course we must recognise that does not necessarily mean that wearing a helmet makes you stupid.
-- Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]
| In message <[email hidden]>, Patrick Herring | <[email hidden]> writes | | >[1] I can never remember when one should use "owing to" and when "due | >to", no doubt due to or owing to my grammar school education. | | I'd say 'because of' is probably better in both your sentences.
In message <[email hidden]>, Patrick Herring <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
congokid <[email hidden]> wrote:
| In message <[email hidden]>, Patrick Herring | <[email hidden]> writes | | >[1] I can never remember when one should use "owing to" and when "due | >to", no doubt due to or owing to my grammar school education. | | I'd say 'because of' is probably better in both your sentences.
Cheat! Or swot, I'm not sure.
I vaguely remember reading that 'due to' isn't used before a noun (possibly Sir Ernest Gowers' Complete Plain Words). Don't really know about 'owing to'.
-- congokid Good restaurants in London? Number one on Google http://congokid.com