Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

helmet ventilation?

Started by C.J.Patten · · Last activity · 37 posts · 1,629 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 July 2005
Last activity
31 July 2005
Original author
C.J.Patten
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,629
Views / 30 days
3

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–37 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Dear Chris,

    Actually, the thin metal domes amplify the weak signal
    sufficiently to be received by our instruments at a muc
    greater distance and allow us in turn to reach and control a
    much wider audience.

    Kang & Kodos

    ....and always whirling...WHIRLING!!!! *Bob Dole spinning around furiously in
    slightly off-center orbits*

  2. Just zis Guy said:
    C.J.Patten said:

    When you spend 5 times as much to get something like a Giro Atmos (i
    gather they use it on the tour?) is the ventilation that much
    better? Would you notice your head staying that much cooler?

    I don't think it's anything to do with cost (most properties of
    helmets are not, as far as I can tell - some very cheap Chinese
    helmets are Snell certified, no Bell helmet is) but there was some
    research I heard of recently.

    A headform was heated to 42C, and a fan was then blown over it for 4
    minutes. Temperature drops were 10.5C for the bare head, 9.1C for the
    best helmet, 2.5C for the worst helmet.

    So I'm sure there is a big difference in cooling effect, as you
    surmise. Finding out where on the scale between, as it were, 13% and
    76% reduction in cooling effect any one particular helmet lies, is
    likely to be problematic! It is probably a function of the size and
    number of vents, but maybe not, and of course these might have a
    consequent effect on structural integrity as well.

    It's a good question, actually - I don't know to what extent the body
    is able to compensate for the reduced cooling. As far as I understand
    it the scalp plays the major part in cooling the head, and there is
    evidence in respect of cricketers that helmet-induced heating impairs
    reactions. I think there are probably as many unknown unknowns as
    known unknowns here.

    IOW, possibly.

    :-D

  3. Just zis Guy said:

    A headform was heated to 42C, and a fan was then blown over it for 4
    minutes. Temperature drops were 10.5C for the bare head, 9.1C for the
    best helmet, 2.5C for the worst helmet.

    Of course, there isn't always a fan handy when you are stopped at
    traffic lights. Or crawling up a hill.

    James

  4. James Annan said:
    Just zis Guy said:

    A headform was heated to 42C, and a fan was then blown over it for 4
    minutes. Temperature drops were 10.5C for the bare head, 9.1C for the
    best helmet, 2.5C for the worst helmet.

    Of course, there isn't always a fan handy when you are stopped at
    traffic lights. Or crawling up a hill.

    James

    Dear Guy and James,

    Of course, if our heads actually reached 107.6 degrees
    Fahrenheit, it probably wouldn't matter whether we were
    stopped, crawling up a hill, or doing 90 mph.

    Irrelevantly,

    Carl Fogel

  5. Quoted message said:
    James Annan said:
    Just zis Guy said:

    A headform was heated to 42C, and a fan was then blown over it for 4
    minutes. Temperature drops were 10.5C for the bare head, 9.1C for the
    best helmet, 2.5C for the worst helmet.

    Of course, there isn't always a fan handy when you are stopped at
    traffic lights. Or crawling up a hill.

    James

    Dear Guy and James,

    Of course, if our heads actually reached 107.6 degrees
    Fahrenheit, it probably wouldn't matter whether we were
    stopped, crawling up a hill, or doing 90 mph.

    Cooling to 31.5C doesn't sound like much fun either. Maybe I'll start
    to wear a woolly hat.

    James

  6. James Annan said:
    Quoted message said:

    A headform was heated to 42C, and a fan was then blown over it for 4
    minutes. Temperature drops were 10.5C for the bare head, 9.1C for the
    best helmet, 2.5C for the worst helmet.

    Quoted message said:

    Of course, there isn't always a fan handy when you are stopped at
    traffic lights. Or crawling up a hill.

    Unless you are Ivan Basso, in which case you have no shortage of fans,
    mostly female (but they are not looking at your head).

    Oh, /that/ sort of fan. As you were, then...

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "Let’s have a moment of silence for all those Americans who are stuck
    in traffic on their way to the gym to ride the stationary bicycle."
    - Earl Blumenauer

  7. Bill Sornson said:

    IOW, possibly.

    Yep, or possibly not. But I don't think cost is going to be a
    particularly reliable indicator.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "Let’s have a moment of silence for all those Americans who are stuck
    in traffic on their way to the gym to ride the stationary bicycle."
    - Earl Blumenauer

  8. I had a solid helmet I broke in a fall last year. The replacement is a Bell
    with vents. I don't notice it's any cooler.

    --
    Bob Burns
    Mill Hall PA
    (email is spamtrap)

    "C.J.Patten" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I won't get in to a helmet debate. I wear one, reasons irrelevant for this
    thread.

    My question has to do with vents.

    My current helmet is a Giro Indicator. This wasn't an expensive helmet but
    it fits well.

    When you spend 5 times as much to get something like a Giro Atmos (i
    gather they use it on the tour?) is the ventilation that much better?
    Would you notice your head staying that much cooler?

    Any other extremely vented helmets? (don't say "bare head" smart-asses)

    Thanks,
    Chris

  9. Bob Burns said:

    I had a solid helmet I broke in a fall last year.

    That's what you get for wearing a helmet.

  10. <snipped>>

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, /that/ sort of fan. As you were, then...

    Guy
    --


    Wow...."As you were" ...I haven't heard that expression since Camp
    Pendleton!

    Semper Fi!

    John

    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    C.J.Patten said:

    "(PeteCresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Per Ron Hardin:

    Quoted message said:

    t's a 1975 Bell mushroom helmet, a pleasant sun-reflecting white with
    rigid
    white styrofoam insulation, so it takes off all the radiative solar heat.
    That's
    a huge benefit. Riding without it is much hotter, very noticeable.

    Now you've got me thinking it's the color. Mine's a dark-ish grey.
    Maybe a little strategically-applied spray paint...

    Better yet, get some aluminum foil. It's easy to mold and with a bit of 3M
    spray tack, you can stick it to the helmet.

    An added plus: aliens won't be able to read your thoughts anymore.

    A fine attempt at misinformation. The aluminum foil is to block
    the secret government mind control signals.

    --
    Michael Press

  12. John said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh, /that/ sort of fan. As you were, then...

    Quoted message said:

    Wow...."As you were" ...I haven't heard that expression since Camp
    Pendleton!

    As Guy is too young for National Service (aka compulsory call-up) it
    probably means that he, like me, went to a grammar (high) school with a
    compulsory army cadet force (CCF).

    Mike

  13. I googled around and found that you can get the article from
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2687.2000.00053.x. Unfortunately you have
    to pay for it...

    It was also published in the Jan/Feb 2001 Bicycling Australia if you can
    find a copy of that.

    Nick

    "C.J.Patten" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well heck, that's a tease! I gotta find that study!
    Thanks for that though... good to know.

    "Nick Payne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Someone at RMIT published research on this in Bicycling Australia a
    couple of years back. Can't remember the exact details, but I think they
    stuck temperature sensors in/on a headform, heated it, then blew air
    across and measured the rate of cooling with various helmets (and also
    with no helmet as a comparison). There was no correlation between price
    and and how well the helmet allowed cooling to take place. Some of the
    cheap helmets with what appeared to be poor ventilation were near the top
    of the list and some of the expensive ones which were mostly slots were
    near the bottom. And the best of the helmets allowed cooling as rapidly
    as a bare head.

    Nick

    "C.J.Patten" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I won't get in to a helmet debate. I wear one, reasons irrelevant for
    this thread.

    My question has to do with vents.

    My current helmet is a Giro Indicator. This wasn't an expensive helmet
    but it fits well.

    When you spend 5 times as much to get something like a Giro Atmos (i
    gather they use it on the tour?) is the ventilation that much better?
    Would you notice your head staying that much cooler?

  14. Mike Causer said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Oh, /that/ sort of fan. As you were, then...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Wow...."As you were" ...I haven't heard that expression since Camp
    Pendleton!

    Quoted message said:

    As Guy is too young for National Service (aka compulsory call-up) it
    probably means that he, like me, went to a grammar (high) school with a
    compulsory army cadet force (CCF).

    Actually I went to a 1,000+ year old public school (that's Brit-speak
    for a private school) which had an /optional/ combined cadet force
    (CCF) which I did not join. I was an officer cadet for a short while
    at University but failed medical due to asthma. This disability means
    I find it hard to maintain an average speed of over 20mph for more
    than a couple of hours when riding solo on open roads.

    I have no idea where I got the phrase from, possibly my father (who
    was in the RAF) or maybe it's just one of those British phrases you
    pick up in books.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "Let’s have a moment of silence for all those Americans who are stuck
    in traffic on their way to the gym to ride the stationary bicycle."
    - Earl Blumenauer

  15. J

    Quoted message said:


    Actually I went to a 1,000+ year old public school (that's Brit-speak
    for a private school) which had an /optional/ combined cadet force
    (CCF) which I did not join. I was an officer cadet for a short while
    at University but failed medical due to asthma. This disability means
    I find it hard to maintain an average speed of over 20mph for more
    than a couple of hours when riding solo on open roads.

    I have no idea where I got the phrase from, possibly my father (who
    was in the RAF) or maybe it's just one of those British phrases you
    pick up in books.

    Guy
    --


    It's a standard military phase meaning "disregard my last command" or
    something similar. I heard it used many times in the USMC, but that was
    40 years ago. Don't hear it much in the civilian world.

    Sorry about the asthma holding you back on your faster rides. My lungs
    are fine, it's the years that have taken their toll. Can't do much
    about that, except train harder.

    John

  16. you know? said:

    Actually I went to a 1,000+ year old public school (that's Brit-speak
    for a private school)

    Which school managed that feat? I don't even know of any universities
    anywhere that are more than a millennium old (Googling, though, there is
    one that just barely qualifies: Al-Azhar in Cairo, Egypt, has been
    operating since 969 AD, and 2 of them in India that predate that one by
    some bit). Hmmm..

    The only pre-1000 AD schools I can find in Britain are:
    The King's School, Canterbury (597)
    King's School, Rochester (604)
    St Peter's, York (627)
    Warwick School (914?)
    St Albans School (948)
    King's School, Ely (970)
    [the next one is listed as 1096, do not even close to 1000 years old]

    I would guess you attended one of the latter two, unless it was one not on
    the list for some reason?

    Jasper

  17. Quoted message said:

    If you pay $130 for a helmet, it's guaranteed to keep a decapitated
    head under 300 gees in a 14.01 mph impact.

    Whereas if you pay $15 for a helmet, that decapitated head may not hit
    300 gees until, oh, 15 or 16 mph.

    OK, it's not a big difference. And nobody will ever tell you the exact
    numbers. But the difference is there. The more you pay, the less
    protection you get.

    So if I pay $1000 I get to ride helmetless but it actually looks like I
    have one?

    Jasper

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.