If you have a time that will get you in what they call "preferred start" at
Chicago, then you are home free. The COURSE is fast.
If not and you can't manage to move yourself into the low 3 hour corralls
then you are SOL. I've run Chicago, NYC, and Boston. Chicago
is by far the most crowded at the start and persists for the longest time.
Wall to wall people for 5 - 6 miles and then thinning to simply crowded.
Everyone there wants to cross the start line ahead of everyone else. NYC
has WIDE, multiple starts, BOSTON simply enforces their corralls with
the threat of execution.
Best bet for a BQ is somewhere else. Don't get me wrong though, Chicago
was a blast. I enjoyed it. Just would hate to have you build your year
around something that could slow you that's beyond your control.
"Ian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
A new year and my goal is to qualify for Boston. I am looking for
opinions on the corral system I see that is used in Chicago.. (I would
be in the "Preferred Start (I)" corral if I registered)
I love the crowds of big marathons so I would love to qualify here..
but I hear lots of people say 'you don't run PBs at big marathons'..
This qualifier corral system looks appealing to me as it seems to
negate the problem of having to dodge around too many slower runners.
I would like to hear about runners experiences at Chicago and whether
they would recommend it or not.
Thanks!