Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Hit by a car door (Melb).

Started by TimC · · Last activity · 21 posts · 1,391 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
28 March 2006
Last activity
30 March 2006
Original author
TimC
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,391
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On 2006-03-29, Sasha (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who has been in a similar
    situtation, particularly in regards to the outcome in terms of the Police
    prosecution and retrieving compensation for bike damage from the car owners
    insurance. Unfortunately privacy laws do not allow the Police to tell me who
    the car owner is at this stage (they can once the investigation is
    complete), so it looks like I may be without a bike for a while.

    If you are confident you'll be able to get your money back, I was told
    I could lodge a freedom of information request for ~$35.

    Since in my case, the witnesses were all contemptable lazy sods who
    all just chose to drive on instead of giving details, I didn't think
    it likely enough that I would ever get money off the driver, so didn't
    bother -- I had already racked up enough expenses[1].

    It's a stupid law. Why the heck would the details be made available
    after an investigation, but not before?

    Quoted message said:

    Finally, I cannot believe the stupidity of these people in giving false
    details where a person has been injured. The car in question was quite
    extensively damaged (it was an almost new Ford ute),

    Pity.

    About it not being a writeoff, I mean. About the only fate suited to
    ford utes.

    Quoted message said:

    so they would have had
    to make a claim on insurance anyway. What the hell goes through the minds of
    these people?

    Minds? You mean arses?

    Quoted message said:

    Anyway, if anyone can help that would be greatly appreciated.

    Sorry... Good luck.

    [1] Still dealing with TAC today, would you beleive it? Trying to get
    some money back from a dental visit in November.

    --
    TimC
    "This company performed an illegal operation but they will not be shut
    down." -- Scott Harshbarger from consumer lobby group on Microsoft

  2. Sasha wrote -

    <a balanced account of a motorist and passanger's stupidity snipped>

    Quoted message said:

    I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who has been in a
    similar situtation, particularly in regards to the outcome in terms of the
    Police prosecution

    Its a while since I looked at it but my recollection is that there is a very
    specific traffic regulation (in NSW) about fairly strict liability for
    failing to take care when opening a vehicle door on a public road - I
    suspect Vic will have much the same regulation.

    If that's right then what about issuing a local court civil summons for the
    replacement cost of your bike (and jersey/nicks?) as soon as you have the
    correct names and addresses of those involved - it may be some satisfaction
    to have them have to personally deal with that cost or the excess if they
    are insured.

    I did that when a taxi rear ended me (on the scoot, not the bike) and found
    the local court office people really helpful about the process and ended up
    with all damage paid for plus the costs of issuing the summons - it did take
    a fair while because the driver did nothing with the summons so I had to
    spend time finding out how the process really worked (if they just try and
    ignore it there are things you can do which force them to pay).

    That's a civil action that you control separate from the prosecution the
    police may instigate and control for their failing to give accurate
    particulars after injury or damage.

    And commisserations from all of us - accidents are one thing, dishonesty is
    quite another.

    best, Andrew

  3. Firstly, glad to hear you are (vaguely) OK.

    Are you a BV member? if so, contact me fdutch at gmail.com and I can direct you as to what's available and what to do thru them and their lawyers.

    If not, basically it will take persistance and thoroughness on your part.
    DONT let the police let it slide, cos it's all too hard.
    If nothing else they are guilty of giving false ID and leaving scene of accident without supplying ID. This is indisputable by Police or them.

    As Tim says you can get identity of driver (It's his/her liability basically unless a taxi/Bus for some idiotic reason!) thru FOI request.
    It may also be worth telling police involved that you need those details to make claim for bike damages.
    On that, take your 'precious' off for assessment/quote.
    PS make sure you are happy with the shop you geet it quoted from as many insurance Co's will make cheque straight out to them, not you!!

    Lastly, DONT GIVE UP and keep us in the loop.
    good luck
    FD

  4. Sasha said:

    Anyway, if anyone can help that would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi Sasha, I'll forward these details onto my cycling contacts in the local area. The Westgarth area has changed a *lot* during the last decade with cafes and increased traffic et al. It's not exactly one of my favourite spots, even after to wash off speed when coming off Ruckers Hill.

    Have you considered printing this information and distributing to businesses in the area, or indeed, putting up notices in the area? Best of luck with you recovery and please keep us posted on developments. If you need assistance with what I suggested, please contact me on cfsmtbATgmailDOTcom, as I'm a local who lives just up the hill. 🙂

  5. In aus.bicycle on Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:31:58 +1100

    flyingdutch said:


    As Tim says you can get identity of driver (It's his/her liability
    basically unless a taxi/Bus for some idiotic reason!) thru FOI
    request.

    I recall an incident in SA a while ago where the court held that the
    liability was with whoever opened the door, and wasn't claimable on
    the car's 3rd party unless the driver opened the door - the passenger
    was on their own!

    Not applicable in Vic, but worth considering elsewhere...

    My home contents insurance covers me for liability, so if passenger
    has same, you can suggest they claim on it and they might be more
    willing to pay.

    Zebee

  6. Hi cyclists,

    I will keep this short for the time being and save the full story for
    another day. Basically, I was hit by a passenger of a car who swung his door
    open in front of me whilst he was waiting in traffic. I hit the door at full
    speed, suffered injuries (the full extent of which are still unknown at this
    stage) and my racing bike is a write off (bike is a mid range Orbea). The
    driver and passenger of the car then supplied false details to me in the
    hope that I did not note their registration. I did, the matter has been
    reported to the Police and parties involved will apparently be charged with
    various offences in due course- or so the Police tell me.

    This incident occured at approx 9.30am last Friday (24th) on High Street
    Northcote going towards the CBD, approx 100metres before the Westgarth St
    intersection.

    I am now seeking witnesses to the incident. There were plenty of people who
    witnessed it, but in my writhing pain and preoccupation with my injuries I
    was unable to collect their details. I am hoping someone out there witnessed
    the accident or knows someone who did. It would help mine and the Police's
    case greatly.

    I know it is a long shot, but if anyone here saw the accident or knows of
    someone who did please email me at sashan(nospam)@alphalink.com.au. Please
    remove (nospam) before emailing.

    I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who has been in a similar
    situtation, particularly in regards to the outcome in terms of the Police
    prosecution and retrieving compensation for bike damage from the car owners
    insurance. Unfortunately privacy laws do not allow the Police to tell me who
    the car owner is at this stage (they can once the investigation is
    complete), so it looks like I may be without a bike for a while.

    Finally, I cannot believe the stupidity of these people in giving false
    details where a person has been injured. The car in question was quite
    extensively damaged (it was an almost new Ford ute), so they would have had
    to make a claim on insurance anyway. What the hell goes through the minds of
    these people?

    Anyway, if anyone can help that would be greatly appreciated.

  7. Since a car was involved you can (and should) put in a TAC claim. This
    may cover your medical bills, their may also be an option to sue under
    common law for damages, loss of income, possibly your bike.

    Since the TAC is a no fault situation, it does not require the
    cooperation of the car owner. In fact the TAC has paid out on hit run
    claims with no chance of even knowing any details of the car. It
    ususally requires a witness for this

    Currently I know of a person who was riding illegally on the foot path
    who got hit by a car. The TAC is paying the medical bills. Remember
    it is a no fault situation. They will probably send out a couple of
    case mangers to interview you.

  8. AFAIK, and IMO, IME (to use some great usenet acronyms) the car is covered
    by CTP (- has to be by law with valid rego.). Any harm caused to you by the
    car and any resultant physio, psycho stuff (where applicable) is covered by
    this policy.

    The car was in the control of the driver, the passenger was an invited party
    and the insco would have trouble stepping away from the fact their insured
    car caused the injury.

    The car owner's insurance (comprehensive) will cover the damage to your bike
    and clothing to the point of replacement. Get the receipts, a valuation
    from your LBS (pre accident state obviously) and tender the details to the
    insco after the Police have done the charging / whatever. Even the Vicroads
    people should give the 3rd party insco details to you I would think. If
    there is any problem ID'ing the company for comp ins., the Police will get
    that information for you. Otherwise, call the various inscos and ask them
    if you can lodge a claim, give them the rego & see who owns the policy that
    way. In any case, the claim may need a police case number.
    Any descriptions of the driver / passenger you would already have given will
    help to nail them.

    ***
    Any communications with the Police / inscos, anyone, write a diarised log of
    events. Times calls are made, who you speak to and what was discussed.
    This is a must do. Better to keep confusion out of the equation where
    possible because often this stuff happens fast and calls get confused in
    your memory.

    My wife is going through the latter stages still of her accident along these
    lines of a year ago. Operation next week on her wrist to try & get it
    right.

    Cycling accidents and [censored] motorists are a PITA (just for one final
    acronym!)

    Good Luck with your situation.
    Jock

    "Sasha" <sashan(nospam)@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    | Hi cyclists,
    |
    | I will keep this short for the time being and save the full story for
    | another day. Basically, I was hit by a passenger of a car who swung his
    door
    | open in front of me whilst he was waiting in traffic. I hit the door at
    full
    | speed, suffered injuries (the full extent of which are still unknown at
    this
    | stage) and my racing bike is a write off (bike is a mid range Orbea). The
    | driver and passenger of the car then supplied false details to me in the
    | hope that I did not note their registration. I did, the matter has been
    | reported to the Police and parties involved will apparently be charged
    with
    | various offences in due course- or so the Police tell me.
    |
    | This incident occured at approx 9.30am last Friday (24th) on High Street
    | Northcote going towards the CBD, approx 100metres before the Westgarth St
    | intersection.
    |
    | I am now seeking witnesses to the incident. There were plenty of people
    who
    | witnessed it, but in my writhing pain and preoccupation with my injuries I
    | was unable to collect their details. I am hoping someone out there
    witnessed
    | the accident or knows someone who did. It would help mine and the Police's
    | case greatly.
    |
    | I know it is a long shot, but if anyone here saw the accident or knows of
    | someone who did please email me at sashan(nospam)@alphalink.com.au. Please
    | remove (nospam) before emailing.
    |
    | I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who has been in a
    similar
    | situtation, particularly in regards to the outcome in terms of the Police
    | prosecution and retrieving compensation for bike damage from the car
    owners
    | insurance. Unfortunately privacy laws do not allow the Police to tell me
    who
    | the car owner is at this stage (they can once the investigation is
    | complete), so it looks like I may be without a bike for a while.
    |
    | Finally, I cannot believe the stupidity of these people in giving false
    | details where a person has been injured. The car in question was quite
    | extensively damaged (it was an almost new Ford ute), so they would have
    had
    | to make a claim on insurance anyway. What the hell goes through the minds
    of
    | these people?
    |
    | Anyway, if anyone can help that would be greatly appreciated.
    |
    |

  9. Jock wrote:
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    The car was in the control of the driver, <snip>

    Woo, that's a bit wierd!! Couldn't the driver then argue the car made me
    do it?

  10. In aus.bicycle on Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:00:53 GMT

    Jock said:

    AFAIK, and IMO, IME (to use some great usenet acronyms) the car is covered
    by CTP (- has to be by law with valid rego.). Any harm caused to you by the
    car and any resultant physio, psycho stuff (where applicable) is covered by
    this policy.

    State-dependent.

    gpoc.tas.gov.auR MAIB FirstSubmision2003 Append%20C.pdf

    has an overview of state policies.

    Vic specifically mentions dooring as covered.

    NSW restricts it to "caused by owner or driver" so passengers dooring
    you aren't covered.

    Qld is "injury by, through or in connection with a motor vehicle" so
    that should cover passenger dooring

    WA doesn't specify, but seems to only count "driving", so I don't
    think a dooring will count.

    SA specifically mentions actions of passengers as covered.

    ACT only insures the driver so if the passenger doors you the CTP
    won't cover it.

    Zebee

  11. If it was as you suggest, I would have left out 'the' before control.
    Basic stuff really.
    Jock
    "Brendo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    | Jock wrote:
    | <snip>
    | > The car was in the control of the driver, <snip>
    |
    | Woo, that's a bit wierd!! Couldn't the driver then argue the car made me
    | do it?

  12. Sasha said:

    Thanks to everyone that has responded to date. It is all good advice. I will
    be speaking to the Police today, and will keep the group updated. Hopefully
    common sense will prevail anjd the car owner will cooperate once he realises
    the seriousness of the charges he faces. Anyway, will post an update soon.

    Thanks to all,

    Sasha

    Hope all goes well with this Sasha. Remember, you are dealing with a ute driver who gave false details - ie he has very limited conscience. I hope you bent the feck outta the ute door at a minimum.

    I think the key, apart from accurate record keeping, is determination, persistance and stamina to see this through to the end, so that at least the pain of kit and bike replacement is eased, and you get your medicals covered.

  13. Jock said:

    If it was as you suggest, I would have left out 'the' before control.
    Basic stuff really.
    Jock
    "Brendo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    | Jock wrote:
    | <snip>
    | > The car was in the control of the driver, <snip>
    |
    | Woo, that's a bit wierd!! Couldn't the driver then argue the car made me
    | do it?


    Sorry, good point. It was late!
    Brendo

  14. Jock said:


    Any communications with the Police / inscos, anyone, write a diarised log of
    events. Times calls are made, who you speak to and what was discussed.
    This is a must do. Better to keep confusion out of the equation where
    possible because often this stuff happens fast and calls get confused in
    your memory.

    Seconded. This really is useful. Particularly when it becomes evident
    that the insurance company is procrastinating in the hope that you
    will go away.

  15. Sasha said:

    Thanks to everyone that has responded to date. It is all good
    advice. I will be speaking to the Police today, and will keep the
    group updated. Hopefully common sense will prevail anjd the car
    owner will cooperate once he realises the seriousness of the charges
    he faces. Anyway, will post an update soon.

    Good luck in your fight -- I may not have much to offer, but you have my
    moral support. Here's hoping that it's not too difficult to get the
    compensation you deserve.

    --
    My Usenet From: address now expires after two weeks. If you email me, and
    the mail bounces, try changing the bit before the "@ to usenet".

  16. "Brendo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    | Jock wrote:
    | > If it was as you suggest, I would have left out 'the' before control.
    | > Basic stuff really.
    | > Jock
    | > "Brendo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | > news:[email hidden]...
    | > | Jock wrote:
    | > | <snip>
    | > | > The car was in the control of the driver, <snip>
    | > |
    | > | Woo, that's a bit wierd!! Couldn't the driver then argue the car made
    me
    | > | do it?
    | >
    | >
    | Sorry, good point. It was late!
    | Brendo

    You get that.
    Jock

  17. Good luck, Sasha. I'm a local too, I would have been riding along on Westgarth half an hour or so before then. I do avoid High St, as I do most roads that have trams and shops.

    A couple of years ago I almost witnessed an accident where a cyclist was coming down the hill, passing on the left some stopped cars. A car turning right from High St into Union St through a gap in the stopped cars collected the cyclist. I was riding up Union St and just heard it but didn't get a good look. Checked to see how the cyclist was and I called for the ambulance and police. Cyclist was OK, even though he did not have a helmet.

    When the police arrived, they spoke to the driver who was an older man - "never had an accident in his life" - so it looked like they were going to charge him.

  18. On 2006-03-30, slaw (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    When the police arrived, they spoke to the driver who was an older man
    - "never had an accident in his life" - so it looked like they were
    going to charge him.

    "him" as in older man, or "him" as in cyclist?

    If cyclist, I hope the police remembered it is illegal to cross lane
    boundaries without
    1) giving sufficient indication.
    2) giving way to someone already in the lane.

    I know Melbourne drivers are incapable of doing either, but they are
    both still required.

    I was about to inform a certain red car driver today of their lack of
    driving skill, but alas, they got away.

    --
    TimC
    Er, RFC 882 put the dot in .com.

  19. TimC said:


    I was about to inform a certain red car driver today of their lack of
    driving skill, but alas, they got away.

    Given your crit form Tim, surely you could have chased him down 😉 Guess
    any chance of me keeping up with you on the Warrandyte climb are well
    and truly gone.

    DaveB

  20. Thanks to everyone that has responded to date. It is all good advice. I will
    be speaking to the Police today, and will keep the group updated. Hopefully
    common sense will prevail anjd the car owner will cooperate once he realises
    the seriousness of the charges he faces. Anyway, will post an update soon.

    Thanks to all,

    Sasha

    "Sasha" <sashan(nospam)@alphalink.com.au> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi cyclists,

    I will keep this short for the time being and save the full story for
    another day. Basically, I was hit by a passenger of a car who swung his
    door open in front of me whilst he was waiting in traffic. I hit the door
    at full speed, suffered injuries (the full extent of which are still
    unknown at this stage) and my racing bike is a write off (bike is a mid
    range Orbea). The driver and passenger of the car then supplied false
    details to me in the hope that I did not note their registration. I did,
    the matter has been reported to the Police and parties involved will
    apparently be charged with various offences in due course- or so the
    Police tell me.

    This incident occured at approx 9.30am last Friday (24th) on High Street
    Northcote going towards the CBD, approx 100metres before the Westgarth St
    intersection.

    I am now seeking witnesses to the incident. There were plenty of people
    who witnessed it, but in my writhing pain and preoccupation with my
    injuries I was unable to collect their details. I am hoping someone out
    there witnessed the accident or knows someone who did. It would help mine
    and the Police's case greatly.

    I know it is a long shot, but if anyone here saw the accident or knows of
    someone who did please email me at sashan(nospam)@alphalink.com.au. Please
    remove (nospam) before emailing.

    I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who has been in a
    similar situtation, particularly in regards to the outcome in terms of the
    Police prosecution and retrieving compensation for bike damage from the
    car owners insurance. Unfortunately privacy laws do not allow the Police
    to tell me who the car owner is at this stage (they can once the
    investigation is complete), so it looks like I may be without a bike for a
    while.

    Finally, I cannot believe the stupidity of these people in giving false
    details where a person has been injured. The car in question was quite
    extensively damaged (it was an almost new Ford ute), so they would have
    had to make a claim on insurance anyway. What the hell goes through the
    minds of these people?

    Anyway, if anyone can help that would be greatly appreciated.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.