On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:18:56 GMT, Doug Freese wrote in
<news:[email hidden]> on sci.med.nutrition :
Quoted message said:"Enrico C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:And the point of this article is? It says its not banning milk
alltogether, just the fattest milk, whats wrong with that?
I think that you can live drinking milk or not drinking milk,
depending on if you like it or not.
Agree.
Ok.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:But, when comparing whole milk to fat free or reduced fat milk, you
should also consider my five questions:
Quoted message said:1. Taste. Whole milk tastes better, IMHO, as it is the fat that gives
taste. Is giving up taste really necessary?
This is a mater of taste. I have been drinking skim milk for eons and I
find the taste wonderful. Since I like mile and drink a lok of it, skim
helps me minimize my fat. If I want fat I have a nice peice of cake or
pie.
Generally speaking it's the fat that gives taste. With no or little
fat, I guess you just taste the sugars in milk.
But you have got a point here, as taste is... a matter of taste. 🙂
Thus, my question #1 changes to: *IF* you liked the taste of whole
milk, would you give it up for a supposedly healthier diet? And, does
the fat in a cup of whole milk make you diet "unhealthy", or is it the
overall balance of nutrients in the diet?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:2. Feeling of satiety. I couldn't find the satiety or fullness indexes
for milk, but I guess a glass of whole milk will satisfy you more than
the equivalent amount of [may I say "watery"? 😉 ] nonfat milk.
Thus, won't you end up drinking more nonfat milk than whole milk?
Aactully if works just the reverse for me. Whole milk tastes like heavy
cream so I can't get passed a sip.
That proves my point, doesn't it?
If you only had whole milk left in your fridge, you would drink just a
sip of it! 😉
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:3. Glycemic Index. If you want to keep GI low, I gather that whole
milk is a better choice than skimmed milk, isn't it?
And if you body has no GI reaction?
Well, #3 is for those who do have! 🙂
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:4. Doesn't the fat content help absorption of fat-soluble vitamins and
of minerals in milk?
I prefer to have better control of my fat and not the fat in milk.
Ok, but what do you say about the specific question #4?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:5. Composition of fat in milk. Yes, it is saturated fat. But not all
saturated fats are equal.
And not all women are the same.
That's it. You don't give up all of them because you had troubles with
one or two! 😉
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I gather that short and middle chain
saturated fatty acids, and stearic acid (18:0), are not *that* bad,
are they?
I choose to not want the saturated fat.
I choose to not have to much. My favorite fat is extra virgin olive
oil, I eat much fish rather than meat, and so on... But then, I can't
see the point in aiming to a "zero saturated fat" diet (unless for
some specific health reason, maybe).
Quoted message said:The fact that there may be
something else I'm missing is just fine
Quoted message said:Next question. The answer seems so simple - drink skim milk it has all
the healthy stuff less the saturated fat.
Skimmed milk has somewhat more sugars, hasn't it?
Quoted message said:Of course if someone thinks
milk is bad for anyone passed age two even though millions drink it in
good health, there isn't much anyone can do.
Agreed.
--
Enrico C
* cut the ending "cut-togli.invalid" string when replying by email *