Quoted message said:Quoted message said:([email hidden]) I misread the problem and gave irrelevant advice.
My apology.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:You need more threads? As Mike S correctly suggested, get more threads
cut
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:at an LBS.
From the original post:
"Jon Isaacs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Problem: my fork needs about 5mm of more threads before my first headset
nut
Quoted message said:can screwdown onto the bearings. I can't cut more threads on it as it is a rockshock and they
advise against doing anything like that due to somesort of internal butting."
Apparently this fork has thinner tubing below the threads so it does not
seem
Quoted message said:wise to cut the threads further, at least according to Rock Shock.
According to Mark McMaster's post, it would seem that this is a 1.125 inch fork.
How about this:
Use the top bearing assembly from a threadless head set and then use two
or
Quoted message said:more jam nuts to lock the headset in place.
The inner race should just slide over the area where there are no threads
and
Quoted message said:the nuts would keep the whole thing together.
Rumors notwithstanding I have never seen a fork which is thinner in the middle than at the top. It
would I think be an expensive thing to do, wouldn't it?
--
Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.orgOpen ↗ Open every day since 1 April 1971