While community collaboration can be a double-edged sword, I'd argue that it's not misinformation that's the main concern, but rather the lack of critical thinking in consuming that information. 
Sure, unvetted tips can lead to confusion, but isn't it our responsibility to cross-check and verify? Instead of solely relying on professionals, why not empower ourselves with knowledge and make informed decisions?
As for cycling lingo, I see it as a secret handshake, but not an exclusive one. It's like a private club where everyone's welcome, as long as they're willing to learn the language. Instead of dumbing down our conversations, let's uplift newcomers and help them join our club. That's what a cycling community is all about, right?
Sure, unvetted tips can lead to confusion, but isn't it our responsibility to cross-check and verify? Instead of solely relying on professionals, why not empower ourselves with knowledge and make informed decisions?As for cycling lingo, I see it as a secret handshake, but not an exclusive one. It's like a private club where everyone's welcome, as long as they're willing to learn the language. Instead of dumbing down our conversations, let's uplift newcomers and help them join our club. That's what a cycling community is all about, right?
