Hypocrisy

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

mrbubl said:

Quoted message said:

The EXPERTS, yeah all of you in RBR, don't understand
the science they are seeing and cannot speak in intelligent
terms about what the tests reveal.

Kyle Legate said:

Show me the isotope mass spec trace and I will.

If you did the test Kunich would reject it and that would invalidate the
entire methodology, at least in the KVU (Kunich Virtual Universe).

But in the KVU, Tom invented the mass spectrometer.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Kyle Legate said:

Show me the isotope mass spec trace and I will.

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

If you did the test Kunich would reject it and that would invalidate the
entire methodology, at least in the KVU (Kunich Virtual Universe).

Howard Kveck said:

But in the KVU, Tom invented the mass spectrometer.

The KVU is large and may contain inconsistencies.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Kyle Legate wrote:
> Show me the isotope mass spec trace and I will.

Donald Munro said:

Quoted message said:

If you did the test Kunich would reject it and that would invalidate the
entire methodology, at least in the KVU (Kunich Virtual Universe).

Howard Kveck said:

But in the KVU, Tom invented the mass spectrometer.

The KVU is large and may contain inconsistencies.

So is Tom.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

mrbubl said:

The EXPERTS, yeah all of you in RBR, don't understand the science
they are seeing and cannot speak in intelligent terms about what the
tests reveal. They all have an answer but really don't know the
question. Is flandis telling the truth??

That is hardly the test of who can be in the jury of peers and it is
up to each side to make their case. It will never appear in a court of
peers anyway. It may make its way eventually to some arbitrators that
may have more technical knowledge than the rest of us.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:42:41 -0700, Tim Lines <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

bob sullivan said:

It's hypocritical for any of us to condemn Landis, because the simple
fact of the matter is that none of us know the truth.

Stop. Right. There.

Your condemnation, or the lack thereof, amounts to nothing. It is more
productive to examine your own failings than the failings of Landis or
his accusers.

OK, I've got that off my chest. Go about your drama, citizens.

Besides, its not hypocrisy. We've been doing the same thing to people
we know and people we don't; in cases that we have knowledge and cases
where we are collectively clueless. Anyone that posts is a potential
target and we've all sullied our reputations (except the true bottom
feeders) by participating on rbr to begin with.

We may have no class, taste or judgment, but we aren't necessarily
hypocrites.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...