Hypothetical for Cohen

"David" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

OK, here is a question for you. It's a dog question. You know how much
Sheba means to you, right? What if you had to choose between your dogs
life and some human's life - which would you choose? Say it was a
housewife in Boston or a troll in usenet - would they be worth more than
your dog. What if you had to choose between JRH or Bill Davidson (oe me)
or your dog's life. Which would you choose? Or is it only family/good
friends/relatives that would be worth more than your dog to you in a
hypothetical situation?

<yawn>

Quoted message said:

OK, here is a question for you. It's a dog question. You know how much Sheba

means to you, right? What if you had to choose between your dogs life
and
some human's life - which would you choose? Say it was a housewife in
Boston
or a troll in usenet - would they be worth more than your dog. What if
you
had to choose between JRH or Bill Davidson (oe me) or your dog's life.
Which
would you choose? Or is it only family/good friends/relatives that
would be
worth more than your dog to you in a hypothetical situation?>

Hey loser, that's a LOT more than "one question". I take it your
double-digit IQ wasn't in math?

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

OK, here is a question for you. It's a dog question. You know how much
Sheba

means to you, right? What if you had to choose between your dogs life
and
some human's life - which would you choose? Say it was a housewife in
Boston
or a troll in usenet - would they be worth more than your dog. What if
you
had to choose between JRH or Bill Davidson (oe me) or your dog's life.
Which
would you choose? Or is it only family/good friends/relatives that
would be
worth more than your dog to you in a hypothetical situation?>

Hey loser, that's a LOT more than "one question". I take it your
double-digit IQ wasn't in math?

Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and around 5
times smarter than you are?

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:50:57 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and around 5
times smarter than you are?

Yes. But who might that be?

"Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:50:57 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and around 5
times smarter than you are?

Yes. But who might that be?

Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
numbers game

"David" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:50:57 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and around
5
times smarter than you are?

Yes. But who might that be?

Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
numbers game

.... chirp... chirp

David said:

"Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David said:

Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and around 5
times smarter than you are?

Yes. But who might that be?

Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
numbers game

HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
me. I'm a jealous [censored]!

David

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

"Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

"David" <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
>around 5
>times smarter than you are?

Yes. But who might that be?

Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
numbers game

HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
me. I'm a jealous [censored]!

I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I would
like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David said:

"Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
>>around 5
>>times smarter than you are?
>
> Yes. But who might that be?

Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
numbers game

HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
me. I'm a jealous [censored]!

I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I would
like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David wrote:
> "Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
> >>around 5
> >>times smarter than you are?
> >
> > Yes. But who might that be?
>
> Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's
> a
> numbers game

HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
me. I'm a jealous [censored]!

I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I would
like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

Oh c'mon - you're being a meanyhead - it's a hypothetical - I'm really
interested in your thoughts on this. It's an ethical dilemma. If you don't
reply I will never ever laugh at your jokes again.

Quoted message said:

On 3 Feb 2006 23:56:09 -0800, "David Cohen" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David wrote:
> "Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
> >>around 5
> >>times smarter than you are?
> >
> > Yes. But who might that be?
>
> Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
> numbers game

HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
me. I'm a jealous [censored]!

I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I would
like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

I think he's just being silly again David (the sensical one, not him)
and you should seriously consider allegedly "killfiling" him. We don't
want too many of these Mensa people clogging up the Group anyway.

With friends like him, who needs enemas? ;o)

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> David wrote:
>> "Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
>> > "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
>> >>around 5
>> >>times smarter than you are?
>> >
>> > Yes. But who might that be?
>>
>> Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's
>> a
>> numbers game
>
> HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
> me. I'm a jealous [censored]!
>
I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I would
like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

Oh c'mon - you're being a meanyhead - it's a hypothetical - I'm really
interested in your thoughts on this. It's an ethical dilemma. If you don't
reply I will never ever laugh at your jokes again.

Oh, all right, just stop whining!

I would choose to have the dog killed in lieu of killing anyone who I
cared about more then the dog. That list of people varies. The only
permanent member of that list is my daughter. Everybody else need
worry.

David

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

David wrote:
> "David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > David wrote:
> >> "Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
> >> > "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
> >> >>around 5
> >> >>times smarter than you are?
> >> >
> >> > Yes. But who might that be?
> >>
> >> Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day.
> >> It's
> >> a
> >> numbers game
> >
> > HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick
> > with
> > me. I'm a jealous [censored]!
> >
> I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I
> would
> like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

Oh c'mon - you're being a meanyhead - it's a hypothetical - I'm really
interested in your thoughts on this. It's an ethical dilemma. If you
don't
reply I will never ever laugh at your jokes again.

Oh, all right, just stop whining!

I would choose to have the dog killed in lieu of killing anyone who I
cared about more then the dog. That list of people varies. The only
permanent member of that list is my daughter. Everybody else need
worry.

Well that's on honest reply and I would have thought less of you had you
said anything else. (It's just . . . well. . .it would be difficult to have
to explain to Lee Michaels widow that you had to put him down because Sheba
is more important to you.)

JRH said:

David Cohen said:

David said:

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> David wrote:
>> "Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
>> > "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
>> >>around 5
>> >>times smarter than you are?
>> >
>> > Yes. But who might that be?
>>
>> Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day. It's a
>> numbers game
>
> HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick with
> me. I'm a jealous [censored]!
>
I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I would
like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

I think he's just being silly again David (the sensical one, not him)
and you should seriously consider allegedly "killfiling" him. We don't
want too many of these Mensa people clogging up the Group anyway.

Hey! I was a member of Mensa a long time ago. I took the membership
tests just for fun, to see how I'd do. I did. of course, brilliantly!

Found out the only thing Mensa members have in common is the ability to
do really well on standardized IQ tests.

David
the genius one, not you know who

"David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

JRH said:

David Cohen said:

David wrote:
> "David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > David wrote:
> >> "Leo Betters" <[email hidden]> wrote
> >> > "David" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Is your definition of loser someone who is gainfully employed and
> >> >>around 5
> >> >>times smarter than you are?
> >> >
> >> > Yes. But who might that be?
> >>
> >> Give it time, you may get lucky and say something funny one day.
> >> It's a
> >> numbers game
> >
> > HEY! No fair. If you're gonna' troll me with a silly post, stick
> > with
> > me. I'm a jealous [censored]!
> >
> I don't know why you say it was a silly post. I was dead serious. I
> would
> like to know. I wasn't trolling you (this time)

It's silly because it's a nonsensical hypothetical. No reasonable
scenario would give rise to a "it's him or the dog" threat. It's like
asking if I would prefer to have Martians or Venusians invade Earth.

Of course, everyone knows Venusian women are hotter, so, maybe I coud
choose.

David
the sensical one, not you

I think he's just being silly again David (the sensical one, not him)
and you should seriously consider allegedly "killfiling" him. We don't
want too many of these Mensa people clogging up the Group anyway.

Hey! I was a member of Mensa a long time ago. I took the membership
tests just for fun, to see how I'd do. I did. of course, brilliantly!

Found out the only thing Mensa members have in common is the ability to
do really well on standardized IQ tests.

David
the genius one, not you know who

Ha ha! Good that you are Mensa also. It was getting lonely at the top.

Quoted message said:

"David Cohen" wrote

Quoted message said:

Hey! I was a member of Mensa a long time ago. I took the membership
tests just for fun, to see how I'd do. I did. of course, brilliantly!

Found out the only thing Mensa members have in common is the ability to
do really well on standardized IQ tests.

I always wondered how many mensa members there would be if they administered
a social skills test.

I figured that it would cut the numbers in half, at least.