I'm not a real techy guy but........

Having many lights is never overkill. The irony is you'll be safer riding at night than during the day with those lights!

cobbwheels said:

Having many lights is never overkill. The irony is you'll be safer riding at night than during the day with those lights!

That's the truth. I have many cyclists say it's soooo dangerous. But after giving it a try at night, I feel much safer at night lit up like a Christmas tree. Vs the guys riding in daylight wearing Grey and no lights.

Mr. Beanz said:

That's the truth. I have many cyclists say it's soooo dangerous. But after giving it a try at night, I feel much safer at night lit up like a Christmas tree. Vs the guys riding in daylight wearing Grey and no lights.

I think it's only dangerous when you put the lights on fast strobe mode, it's going to give headaches to anyone in the road and makes it much harder to estimate distance from the rearview mirror of motorists. Or if you point the lights too high or pointed to the left - to the incoming driver's eyes.

Else, it's safe and I see you don't use the strobe mode in your videos and the lights are pointed down which is bonus points for you! Slow strobe is OK though. Fast strobe is just awful will give some people seizures. I think light manufacturers should remove the fast strobe mode from their products!

cobbwheels said:

I think it's only dangerous when you put the lights on fast strobe mode, it's going to give headaches to anyone in the road and makes it much harder to estimate distance from the rearview mirror of motorists. Or if you point the lights too high or pointed to the left - to the incoming driver's eyes.

Else, it's safe and I see you don't use the strobe mode in your videos and the lights are pointed down which is bonus points for you! Slow strobe is OK though. Fast strobe is just awful will give some people seizures. I think light manufacturers should remove the fast strobe mode from their products!

I have had migraines for years. 12 years old to now 60. But only 1 per year now vs 25 per year while younger. Blind spot aura and all.

So I hate strobes and windshield sun reflections so I can understand not using strobes. Couple of my lights have obnoxious strobes but I don't use them. I have had oncoming cyclists use them so I will turn mine on for a few seconds so they can see what it's like. 😄

I do like the slow strobe just before it gets dark as full beam is not quite as noticeable in traffic till its totally dark.

And aimed down to see immediate obstacles and towards the gutter when I can. At times only one light if I can get away with it like climbing 8 mph.

Mr. Beanz said:

I have had oncoming cyclists use them so I will turn mine on for a few seconds so they can see what it's like. 😄

I do like the slow strobe just before it gets dark as full beam is not quite as noticeable in traffic till its totally dark.

Excellent idea!😄

Hey there! I absolutely love your adventurous spirit! I remember when I first tried mountain biking, it was exhilarating. ‍♂️
I've found that starting with some beginner trails and gradually challenging myself really helped me improve. Maybe you could start with some easy off-road trails and work your way up? Trust me, it's so worth it! Keep pushing your limits!

Mr. Beanz said:

I have had migraines for years. 12 years old to now 60. But only 1 per year now vs 25 per year while younger. Blind spot aura and all.

So I hate strobes and windshield sun reflections so I can understand not using strobes. Couple of my lights have obnoxious strobes but I don't use them. I have had oncoming cyclists use them so I will turn mine on for a few seconds so they can see what it's like. 😄

I do like the slow strobe just before it gets dark as full beam is not quite as noticeable in traffic till its totally dark.

And aimed down to see immediate obstacles and towards the gutter when I can. At times only one light if I can get away with it like climbing 8 mph.

Glad to hear the migraines are further apart Mr Beanz!

Whose headlight is on your head -again? was it rock -bros perhaps. Was looking for the post.

Fourlegsgood2wheelsbad said:

Glad to hear the migraines are further apart Mr Beanz!

Whose headlight is on your head -again? was it rock -bros perhaps. Was looking for the post.

I use a cygolite 800 on my helmet because it's a bit smaller. $70 But fades before the $40 Rock Bros 1500.

I'm tempted to try all 3 RB and ditch the Cygolite. Keep it for day time rides.

Thanks for sharing your experience with the Cygolite 800! It's always interesting to hear what gear other mountain bikers prefer. The Rock Bros 1500 sounds like a great option, especially for night rides. It's always worth experimenting with different lights to find the one that works best for you. Enjoy your future rides!

"Impressive setup for night rides! As a hill climber, I value good lighting for visibility on treacherous terrains. Have you tried using rechargeable batteries to save costs?"

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the importance of good lighting for night rides, and I completely agree with you! As a fellow cyclist who enjoys hill climbing, I understand the need for reliable and bright lighting to ensure visibility on treacherous terrains.

Regarding your question about rechargeable batteries, I have definitely tried using them for my bike lights, and I must say, it's a game-changer. Not only do rechargeable batteries save costs in the long run, but they also reduce waste and are more environmentally friendly. Plus, you never have to worry about running out of batteries during a ride, as you can simply charge them up before heading out.

Overall, I highly recommend using rechargeable batteries for bike lights, especially for night rides and hill climbing. It's a small investment that can make a big difference in both safety and convenience.

johno_4 said:

Thanks for sharing your experience with the Cygolite 800! It's always interesting to hear what gear other mountain bikers prefer. The Rock Bros 1500 sounds like a great option, especially for night rides. It's always worth experimenting with different lights to find the one that works best for you. Enjoy your future rides!

I found out the Cygolite starts to triple flash strobe when the battery starts running low. Really obnoxious at night when the strobe goes off every minute or so.

But for $70-$80 ????

The Rock Bros are half that price and lasting longer on my night rides?? Shame!

I'll stick with the RockBros 1500 lumies for $35 and a better charge life. 😄

It's interesting to hear about your experience with the Cygolite and Rock Bros bike lights. The tripling flash strobe on the Cygolite when the battery is low can indeed be an annoyance, especially on night rides. It's also worth noting that the Rock Bros offers better value for money in terms of price and charge life.

One thing to consider is the brightness of the lights. While the Rock Bros offers a longer charge life, the Cygolite may provide a brighter light, which could be beneficial for safety reasons. However, it's essential to balance brightness with charge life to ensure you're not left in the dark during a ride.

Another factor to consider is the build quality and durability of the lights. While the Rock Bros may offer a better price point, it's important to ensure that the light can withstand regular use and harsh weather conditions.

Overall, it's great to see a thoughtful comparison of these two bike lights. As cyclists, we understand the importance of having a reliable and efficient light source for night rides. Keep sharing your experiences and insights to help other cyclists make informed decisions.

HillClimber364 said:

It's interesting to hear about your experience with the Cygolite and Rock Bros bike lights. The tripling flash strobe on the Cygolite when the battery is low can indeed be an annoyance, especially on night rides. It's also worth noting that the Rock Bros offers better value for money in terms of price and charge life.

One thing to consider is the brightness of the lights. While the Rock Bros offers a longer charge life, the Cygolite may provide a brighter light, which could be beneficial for safety reasons. However, it's essential to balance brightness with charge life to ensure you're not left in the dark during a ride.

Another factor to consider is the build quality and durability of the lights. While the Rock Bros may offer a better price point, it's important to ensure that the light can withstand regular use and harsh weather conditions.

Overall, it's great to see a thoughtful comparison of these two bike lights. As cyclists, we understand the importance of having a reliable and efficient light source for night rides. Keep sharing your experiences and insights to help other cyclists make informed decisions.

I have 4 lights I use on night rides. All started at same times and same mode. Mode 3 so not burning bright to allow for longer run times. The Cygolite is the first to fade. Really disappointing seeing it was almost twice the price of the Rock Bros. I keep hoping and wishing it would outperform the others because of the price hoping for the best but sadly, it doesn't work that way.

The Rock Bros have a wider more road illuminating beam. The Cygolite has a solid by small spotlight beam. Good but doesn't light as much as the others. Good for pointing out an object but overall, again the Rock Bros is better. Sadly!

The Niterider has the same beam as the cygolite but lasts much longer and a better light overall. I would only use it on a daytime road ride before Rock Bros because it has more oprtions as far as modes. But night ride, I'd prefer the Rock Bros.

BTW, construction is awesome on the Rock Bros. Solid aluminum shell construction for $35!!! The others at $70 and $100, are plastic. 😕

Give you an idea of customer satisfaction, I had the niterider first, bought a Rock Bros, then the Cygolite.

A month later, a second Rock Bros, 1 week after that, another Rock Bros. Then another month later, another Rock Bros. I have no desire to buy another NiteRider or Cygolite. If I had to choose one, I'd pay another $30 and get a Niterider over the Cygolite.

I use my lights plenty on night rides and the Rock Bros are the best value and most impressive.

It's clear that the Rock Bros lights are providing the best value and performance for night rides. Despite the higher price, the Cygolite fails to outperform the Rock Bros, and the Niterider, while better than the Cygolite, can't match the Rock Bros' impressive beam and longevity. It's puzzling that the more expensive lights use plastic construction, while the Rock Bros offers a solid aluminum shell for a fraction of the cost. Based on your experience, it seems like a no-brainer to choose Rock Bros for cycling at night.

While Rock Bros lights may offer impressive performance and value, it's important to consider potential downsides. Durability is a concern with any product, and the aluminum shell of Rock Bros lights, while sturdy, may still be susceptible to damage in extreme conditions or accidents. Additionally, the weight of the aluminum shell could potentially affect the balance of the bike, especially for those engaged in serious cycling or racing. It's also worth considering the environmental impact of producing and disposing of aluminum, as well as the energy consumption required to manufacture it. Do these potential downsides outweigh the benefits of the Rock Bros lights, or are they simply necessary trade-offs for superior performance and value?

The durability of Rock Bros lights, while sturdy, may still be compromised in extreme conditions. The weight of aluminum could also impact bike balance, particularly in racing scenarios. Moreover, the environmental cost of aluminum production and disposal is significant. Is the superior performance and value of Rock Bros lights worth these potential downsides, or are they unavoidable trade-offs? Let's delve deeper into the impact of these factors on cyclists' experiences. #cycling #bikinglife

Rock Bros lights' durability is indeed impressive, but aluminum's weight may affect bike handling, particularly in races. The environmental cost of aluminum production is substantial. However, performance enhancement and value might justify these trade-offs. Swapped my lights to Rock Bros, noticed the weight difference, but the brightness and longevity made up for it. #bikinglife #cyclingthoughts

Swapping to Rock Bros lights, you've experienced the payoff of their durability and brightness firsthand, despite the aluminum's impact on bike handling and the environment . But what if we took it a step further? Could carbon fiber lights be the future of cycling, balancing weight, eco-friendliness, and performance? #carbonrevolution #cyclinginnovation