I made sausage balls - pix

"modom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well I did:

http://i1.tinypic.com/o87406.jpg

I used chicken sausage spiked with a little Mexican chorizo and minced

I see a dark glob on the right. Cold that be them? You need a little work
on the photography as the lighting is poor.

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:37:44 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"modom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well I did:

http://i1.tinypic.com/o87406.jpg

I used chicken sausage spiked with a little Mexican chorizo and minced

I see a dark glob on the right. Cold that be them? You need a little work
on the photography as the lighting is poor.

Is this better?

http://i1.tinypic.com/o89non.jpg
--
modom

"My baby's got no clothes
'Cause she's makin' chicken soup."

-- Chuck E. Weiss

"modom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is this better?

http://i1.tinypic.com/o89non.jpg
--

Yes. Sausage ball details are still somewhat hidden but overall you can see
more of everything..

Edwin Pawlowski said:

"modom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well I did:

http://i1.tinypic.com/o87406.jpg

I used chicken sausage spiked with a little Mexican chorizo and minced

I see a dark glob on the right. Cold that be them? You need a little work
on the photography as the lighting is poor.

Needs a sense of ethetics, he has none... and those horrendous red/blue
plates gotta go. Food could be good but the slovenly way it's
presented, disasterous.

Sheldon

In article <[email hidden]>,

Edwin Pawlowski said:

I see a dark glob on the right. Cold that be them? You need a little work
on the photography as the lighting is poor.

What are you, Siskel and Ebert? "-)
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 2-19-2006, Yummy! and church review. :-)

1. Don't use red plates; they skew the color balance something fierce.

2. More light. One overhead and diffuse, one oblique and more direct.

3. Focus. Please.

4. Less depth-of-field; i.e., move back and zoom in to fill the frame
instead of zooming out and moving closer.

5. Care in plating. Don't let the food slop all over. Wipe up
smears.

Then maybe, just maybe, food that sounds like it should be appetizing
will look appetizing.

--Blair

modom said:

Is this better?

http://i1.tinypic.com/o89non.jpg

Somewhat, but the red plate and the focus and depth of field are
smudging the entire image.

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

1. Don't use red plates; they skew the color balance something fierce.

2. More light. One overhead and diffuse, one oblique and more direct.

3. Focus. Please.

4. Less depth-of-field; i.e., move back and zoom in to fill the frame
instead of zooming out and moving closer.

5. Care in plating. Don't let the food slop all over. Wipe up
smears.

Then maybe, just maybe, food that sounds like it should be appetizing
will look appetizing.

Oh, give me a break! I'm sorry, but I really don't understand all the hostility and weird comments
people are making about his food picture posts. So what if the plates are bright (bright and simple is
better than fussy, hideous patterns) or the photography or plating isn't absolutely perfect - ? I, for one
(possibly the only one; most posts I have seen have been complaints, but whatever!) enjoy seeing the
pictures.

Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
<http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg> Beautiful, isn't it?

victoria said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

1. Don't use red plates; they skew the color balance something fierce.

2. More light. One overhead and diffuse, one oblique and more direct.

3. Focus. Please.

4. Less depth-of-field; i.e., move back and zoom in to fill the frame
instead of zooming out and moving closer.

5. Care in plating. Don't let the food slop all over. Wipe up
smears.

Then maybe, just maybe, food that sounds like it should be appetizing
will look appetizing.

Oh, give me a break! I'm sorry, but I really don't understand all the hostility and weird comments
people are making about his food picture posts. So what if the plates are bright (bright and simple is
better than fussy, hideous patterns) or the photography or plating isn't absolutely perfect - ? I, for one
(possibly the only one; most posts I have seen have been complaints, but whatever!) enjoy seeing the
pictures.

Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
<http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg> Beautiful, isn't it?

Amen Victoria!

victoria said:

Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
<http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg> Beautiful, isn't it?

No. The food looks like [censored]. And his shouldn't. If he learned to
take a picture, it would probably look very appetizing. Or at least
slightly so.

--Blair

victoria said:

Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
<http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg>

Victoria is a fraud, her buns have no sesame seeds.

Sheldon

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:19:37 -0600, in rec.food.cooking, modom
<[email hidden]> hit the crackpipe and declared:

Quoted message said:

Well I did:

http://i1.tinypic.com/o87406.jpg

This looks no different than that soup pic you posted the other day.
Do you realize that each and every one of your dishes look the same?
Every time it's the same thing: a sloppy mass covered with jicama
strips with some sliced fruit that looks like you retrieved them from
the garbage can. I keep clicking on the links in the hope that you'll
present something that looks appealing, alas my efforts are in vain.
BTW I hope you didn't pay a lot of money for that set of dishes, they
are just awful.

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:33:02 GMT, Lady Lazarus <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:19:37 -0600, in rec.food.cooking, modom
<[email hidden]> hit the crackpipe and declared:

Quoted message said:

Well I did:

http://i1.tinypic.com/o87406.jpg

This looks no different than that soup pic you posted the other day.
Do you realize that each and every one of your dishes look the same?
Every time it's the same thing: a sloppy mass covered with jicama
strips with some sliced fruit that looks like you retrieved them from
the garbage can. I keep clicking on the links in the hope that you'll
present something that looks appealing, alas my efforts are in vain.
BTW I hope you didn't pay a lot of money for that set of dishes, they
are just awful.

You speak as though your opinions were laws of nature. And that's
never a good idea.

Let me ask you something: What was your motivation for writing what
you wrote above? Be honest, now. Look into what you have in your
chest that passes for a heart and tell me what you gain from such
contrafactual insults. Do you feel at all better when you behave so?
Is it an ego thing, maybe? Not enough warm fuzzies in your day?

Anyhow, you're a few days late with this bit of foolishness. The
plates have been explained twice.
--
modom

"My baby's got no clothes
'Cause she's makin' chicken soup."

-- Chuck E. Weiss

In article <[email hidden]>, blair
"Everything 'looks like [censored]'" [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

victoria said:

Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
<http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg> Beautiful, isn't it?

No. The food looks like [censored].

My, what a lovely vocabulary you have! Such good taste! I can certainly see
why you consider yourself such a fine judge of aesthetics.

Quoted message said:

And his shouldn't.

It doesn't. So, *bzzzzzzttt* but thanks for playing anyway!

modom said:

Lady Lazarus said:

modom claims:

Quoted message said:

Well I did:

http://i1.tinypic.com/o87406.jpg

This looks no different than that soup pic you posted the other day.
Do you realize that each and every one of your dishes look the same?
Every time it's the same thing: a sloppy mass covered with jicama
strips with some sliced fruit that looks like you retrieved them from
the garbage can. I keep clicking on the links in the hope that you'll
present something that looks appealing, alas my efforts are in vain.
BTW I hope you didn't pay a lot of money for that set of dishes, they
are just awful.

What was your motivation for writing what you wrote above? Be honest, now.

She is being honest... something you need to learn, alibi boy. Not
only can't you cook, you can't write. Your writing is as slovenly as
your cooking; all sentence fragments and superfluous commas. It's
impossible to believe that you earn your living as an educator, if so
you're a thief... seems in Texas they ain't too picky.

victoria said:

In article <[email hidden]>, blair
"Everything 'looks like [censored]'" [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

victoria said:

Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
<http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg> Beautiful, isn't it?

No. The food looks like [censored].

My, what a lovely vocabulary you have! Such good taste! I can certainly see
why you consider yourself such a fine judge of aesthetics.

Quoted message said:

And his shouldn't.

It doesn't. So, *bzzzzzzttt* but thanks for playing anyway!

I know you intend to be a pain in the ass, but your attempt
is falling flat.

Several other people have pointed out the same problems
I did.

And if you don't think that food looks like [censored], then
you should bring a minder to meals.

--Blair

Sheldon said:

She is being honest... something you need to learn, alibi boy. Not
only can't you cook, you can't write. Your writing is as slovenly as
your cooking; all sentence fragments and superfluous commas. It's
impossible to believe that you earn your living as an educator, if so
you're a thief... seems in Texas they ain't too picky.

I think the Lady is a man. TAM at Commerce is not exactly "higher
education." It is an Texas A&M satelite campus.. which means it used to
be a "jr" college that attracted few. So they renamed it in hopes of some
enrollment. SOS ..different name..sorta like the red plate. I think
Commerce was originally supposed to be in Arkansas.

Blair P. Houghton said:

victoria said:

In article <[email hidden]>, blair
"Everything 'looks like [censored]'" [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

victoria wrote:
> Here, maybe this is more to your taste:
> <http://i1.tinypic.com/o9lavt.jpg> Beautiful, isn't it?

No. The food looks like [censored].

My, what a lovely vocabulary you have! Such good taste! I can certainly see
why you consider yourself such a fine judge of aesthetics.

Quoted message said:

And his shouldn't.

It doesn't. So, *bzzzzzzttt* but thanks for playing anyway!

I know you intend to be a pain in the ass, but your attempt
is falling flat.

Several other people have pointed out the same problems
I did.

And if you don't think that food looks like [censored], then
you should bring a minder to meals.

Your arrogance knows no bounds does it?
Get off your bleedin high horse and let the guy post. Sure constructive
critisism is useful, but you come across as a knowit all blowhard with
all the subtlety and tact of a train crash. Where are your
communication skills? What are you Simon Cowell or summat?
Doc

jay said:

Sheldon said:

She is being honest... something you need to learn, alibi boy. Not
only can't you cook, you can't write. Your writing is as slovenly as
your cooking; all sentence fragments and superfluous commas. It's
impossible to believe that you earn your living as an educator, if so
you're a thief... seems in Texas they ain't too picky.

I think the Lady is a man. TAM at Commerce is not exactly "higher
education." It is an Texas A&M satelite campus.. which means it used to
be a "jr" college that attracted few. So they renamed it in hopes of some
enrollment. SOS ..different name..sorta like the red plate. I think
Commerce was originally supposed to be in Arkansas.

This is all error. A simple Web search would have set you right, but
it wouldn't have enabled you to spew the ad himonems you appear to
love so dearly.

Anyhow, I don't think I'll continue talking with you.

--
modom

"My baby's got no clothes
'Cause she's makin' chicken soup."

-- Chuck E. Weiss