Cheers, helen s ;-) --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get correct one remove dependency on fame & fortune h*$el*$$e**nd***$o$ts***i*$*$m**m$$o*n**s@$*$a$$o**l.c**$*$om$$
Outlook Express could not post your message. Subject 'Re: Incredibly useful', Account: 'news.individual.net', Server: 'news.individual.net', Protocol: NNTP, Server Response: '441 Line 20 too long', Port: 119, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 441, Error Number: 0x800CCCA9
You had the same problem as me. It generates a URL which is too long to post on one line but if you split it half the "URL" drops out of the hyperlink. Nice idea but needs some work on the practicalities
Of course, in reality, I'm going to be using such a site to make a small URL into a *huge* URL... not ;-)
Cheers, helen s
--This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get correct one remove dependency on fame & fortune h*$el*$$e**nd***$o$ts***i*$*$m**m$$o*n**s@$*$a$$o**l.c**$*$om$$
Of course, in reality, I'm going to be using such a site to make a small URL into a *huge* URL... not ;-)
I know its funny but even funnier to be able to use it otherwise the URL's it creates remain a private joke. If I could I can imagine lots of occassions where I might use a huge URL :-)
It's silly! Might have to post a few useful pointers to the Highway Code on uk.tosspot. :-)
Oh sweet delight ;-)
Cheers, helen s
--This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get correct one remove dependency on fame & fortune h*$el*$$e**nd***$o$ts***i*$*$m**m$$o*n**s@$*$a$$o**l.c**$*$om$$
You had the same problem as me. It generates a URL which is too long to post on one line but if you split it half the "URL" drops out of the hyperlink. Nice idea but needs some work on the practicalities
That's because, as I keep telling you, the correct syntax is <URL:http://www.hugeurl.com/?NTJjOGVmN- mM4Yzc5ZjA2MzA4YmMxODg2OWExNWZkN2YmMTImVm0wd2QyUXlVWGxXYTJoV1YwZG9WVll3Wkc5alJsWjBUVlpPV0Zac2JETlhh- MUpUVmpGYWMySkVUbGhoTWsweFZqQmFTMk15U2tWVWJHaG9UVmhDVVZadGVGWmxSbGw1Vkd0c2FsSnRhRzlVVjNOM1pVWmFkR05- GZEZSTlZUVkpWbTEwYTFkSFNrZGpTRUpYVFVad1NGUlVSbUZqVmtaMFVteFNUbUY2UlRGV1ZFb3dWakZhV0ZOcmJGSmlSMmhZV1- d4b2IwMHhXbGRYYlVaclVsUkdXbGt3WkRSVk1rcElaSHBHVjJFeVVYZFpWRVpyVTBaT2NscEhjRlJTVlhCWlZrWldhMVV5VW5Oa- lJtUllZbFZhY1ZscldtRmxWbVJ5VjI1a1YwMUVSa1pWYkZKRFZqQXhkVlZ1V2xaaGExcFlXa1ZhVDJOdFNrZFRiV3hYVWpOb1dG- WnRNSGRsUjBsNFUydGthVk5GV2xSWmJHaFRWMVpXY1ZKcmRGUldiRm93V2xWb2ExWXdNVVZTYTFwWFlrZG9jbFpxU2tabFZsWlp- Xa1prYUdFeGNGaFhiRnBoVkRKT2RGSnJhR2hTYXpWeldXeG9iMWRHV25STlNHaFBVbTE0VjFSVmFHOVhSMHBJVld4c1dtSkhhRl- JXTUZwVFZqRmtkRkp0ZUZkaWEwcElWbXBKZUUxR1dsaFRhMlJxVWtWYVYxWnFUbTlsYkZweFUydGthbUpWVmpaWlZWcHJZVWRGZ- WxGcmJGZFdNMEpJVmtSS1UxWXhXblZWYldoVFlYcFdkMVp0Y0V0aU1rbDRWMWhvWVZKRlNtOVVWbHBYVGxaYVdFNVZPVmhTTUhC- SlZsZDRjMWR0U2toaFJsSmFUVlp3ZWxreWVHdGtWbkJHVGxaT2FXRXdjRWxXYlhCTFpXczFWMWRzYUZSaE1sSndWV3RhUzFZeFV- saE9WazVyWWtad2VGVnRkSGRpUjBwV1YydHNXbFpXY0ROWlZXUkdaV3hHY2sxV1pGZE5NRXBKVm10U1MxUnRWa2RhU0ZaVllrWm- FjRlpxVG05a2JGcEhWbTA1VWsxWFVucFdNV2h2VjBkS1JrNVdWbFZXYkhCb1ZGVmFZV1JGTlZaUFZtUnBWbGhDU2xac1pEUmpNV- 1IwVWxoc2FGSldTbUZhVjNSaFlVWnNObEpzWkdwTldFSklXVlZrYzFVeVNrZGhNMmhYVFZaS1VGcEVSa3BsUm1SWldrVTFWMkpX- U25oV1YzaHJWVEZrUjFWc2FFOVdlbXhQVkZaYWQyVkdWblJOVldSVlRXdHdSMWt3YUc5V01VbDZZVWhLVjFaRldreFdha3BQVWp- KS1IxcEhiRmhTVlhCS1ZqRmFVMU14VVhsVVdHaGhVMFphVmxscldrdGpSbFp4VW10MFYxWnNjRWhXVjNSTFlUQXhSVkpzVGxaU2- JFWXpWVVpGT1ZCUlBUMD0=>
Now if that breaks in your newsreader it's because Microsoft's programmers are too unprofessional to actually read published standards documents...
And whether it will work when quoting an earlier usenet post (using chevrons at the beginning of each line) is something I expect to find out within the next few seconds.
Well that answers that question. It doesn't.
-- Danny Colyer (the UK company has been laughed out of my reply address) speedy5.freeserve.co.ukdannyOpen ↗ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine
You had the same problem as me. It generates a URL which is too long to post on one line but if you split it half the "URL" drops out of the hyperlink. Nice idea but needs some work on the practicalities
You can still get there by clicking the link, then copying and pasting the remainder of the address to the end of the address in your browser's address bar.
Now if that breaks in your newsreader it's because Microsoft's programmers are too unprofessional to actually read published standards documents...
Its not the newsreader that breaks it, its the server that rejects it as the line being too long if you don't break it.
H'mmm... as far as I can see neither RFC 1036 nor RFC 822 specify any upper bound for the length of a line in message text, so the server's borken too.
Now if that breaks in your newsreader it's because Microsoft's programmers are too unprofessional to actually read published standards documents...
Its not the newsreader that breaks it, its the server that rejects it as the line being too long if you don't break it.
H'mmm... as far as I can see neither RFC 1036 nor RFC 822 specify any upper bound for the length of a line in message text, so the server's borken too.
IIRC the maximum line length is 998 characters (RFC2822 Section 2.1.1).