In article <[email hidden]>,
Diablo Scott said:Cyclopath! - Keiron said:Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?
Klein and maybe some others have a pressed in housing stop at both
penetrations for the rear brake cable and at the shifter cables only at
the inlet penetration - penetrations near the bottom bracket are just
holes. If you have trouble with the other methods it might help to take
the housing stops out; usually you can re-use them.
Quoted message said:Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
braking than those which aren't?
The internal cables are bare; you don't route the housing inside the
tube so there's no weight difference in that regard.
Klein still does it, most triathlon bikes do it, available on quite a
few other bikes. Some concern that the penetrations are weak spots or
stress risers for fatigue, or that they allow water into the frame, or
that they add friction that could interfere with shifting, but mostly I
suspect its fallen out of favor because it costs more than its perceived
value. Your brake cable compression comment doesn't make any sense.
For non-steel frames a magnet can be very useful for moving a bare cable
around at the far end to get it near the exit hole...
Cervelo uses internally routed cables. They claim that it saves 200gms
because of the reduced amount of cable housing. As well as improved
aero... They also have an interesting way of getting the shifter cables
out that looks to be very user friendly.
Trek has them on some models as well, e.g. Equinox 7 (and probably
Equinox 9 and The Team Time Trial..)
I have had both internal and external and can only say that I'm going to
probably buy a Cervelo next year and the ICS system is one of the reasons..