Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

internal cable routing

Started by Cyclopath! - Keiron · · Last activity · 14 posts · 627 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 September 2006
Last activity
7 September 2006
Original author
Cyclopath! - Keiron
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
627
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is there a trick to routing new cable housing through an internally routed
    toptube?
    There nothing there now so using the old piece to drag the new one through
    isn't an option.
    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?
    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't? Also the very real fear of snagging oneself
    on bosses which are on the top of the toptube is greatly reduced. Has any
    manufacturer created a toptube with such a section that the cables can be
    recessed while remaining on the outside? If so, who please?

    Thanks

  2. Put a slight bend in a long stiff wire like a coat hanger and fish it
    through, use that to pull the cable housing through.

  3. On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:49:45 GMT, "Cyclopath! - Keiron" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Is there a trick to routing new cable housing through an internally routed
    toptube?
    There nothing there now so using the old piece to drag the new one through
    isn't an option.

    You can use a length of cable and fish it through, capture it at the other end
    using a plastic cable tie formed into a loop and pushed into the tube.

    OR

    Stick the nozzle of the old lady's vacuum cleaner over one hole and feed string
    into the other.

    Quoted message said:

    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?

    You can fish housing through and feel for any bosses, but nothing is needed for
    the housing to work.

    Ron

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't? Also the very real fear of snagging oneself
    on bosses which are on the top of the toptube is greatly reduced. Has any
    manufacturer created a toptube with such a section that the cables can be
    recessed while remaining on the outside? If so, who please?

    Thanks

  4. Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Is there a trick to routing new cable housing through an internally routed
    toptube?
    There nothing there now so using the old piece to drag the new one through
    isn't an option.

    From an article I posted here in 1999:

    "Tie a small tissue paper "flag" to the end of length of light sewing
    thread. Apply the suction of a vacuum cleaner to one of the holes in
    the top tube. Feed the thread through the other hole. Eventually it
    will emerge. Use the thread to pull through a piece of string which
    can then be used to pull through a length of brake cable. The cable
    housing can then be fed through over the cable."

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

  5. Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Is there a trick to routing new cable housing through an internally routed
    toptube?
    There nothing there now so using the old piece to drag the new one through
    isn't an option.
    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?
    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't? Also the very real fear of snagging oneself
    on bosses which are on the top of the toptube is greatly reduced. Has any
    manufacturer created a toptube with such a section that the cables can be
    recessed while remaining on the outside? If so, who please?

    Thanks

    Bit of thread and a vacuum worked for me when I had to do that. Thread
    then string then cable.

  6. Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?

    Klein and maybe some others have a pressed in housing stop at both
    penetrations for the rear brake cable and at the shifter cables only at
    the inlet penetration - penetrations near the bottom bracket are just
    holes. If you have trouble with the other methods it might help to take
    the housing stops out; usually you can re-use them.

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't?

    The internal cables are bare; you don't route the housing inside the
    tube so there's no weight difference in that regard.

    Klein still does it, most triathlon bikes do it, available on quite a
    few other bikes. Some concern that the penetrations are weak spots or
    stress risers for fatigue, or that they allow water into the frame, or
    that they add friction that could interfere with shifting, but mostly I
    suspect its fallen out of favor because it costs more than its perceived
    value. Your brake cable compression comment doesn't make any sense.

  7. John Everett said:
    Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Is there a trick to routing new cable housing through an internally
    routed toptube?
    There nothing there now so using the old piece to drag the new one
    through isn't an option.

    From an article I posted here in 1999:

    "Tie a small tissue paper "flag" to the end of length of light sewing
    thread. Apply the suction of a vacuum cleaner to one of the holes in
    the top tube. Feed the thread through the other hole. Eventually it
    will emerge. Use the thread to pull through a piece of string which
    can then be used to pull through a length of brake cable. The cable
    housing can then be fed through over the cable."

    Brilliant! (Usually said in jest, but not this time.)

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Diablo Scott said:
    Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?

    Klein and maybe some others have a pressed in housing stop at both
    penetrations for the rear brake cable and at the shifter cables only at
    the inlet penetration - penetrations near the bottom bracket are just
    holes. If you have trouble with the other methods it might help to take
    the housing stops out; usually you can re-use them.

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't?

    The internal cables are bare; you don't route the housing inside the
    tube so there's no weight difference in that regard.

    Klein still does it, most triathlon bikes do it, available on quite a
    few other bikes. Some concern that the penetrations are weak spots or
    stress risers for fatigue, or that they allow water into the frame, or
    that they add friction that could interfere with shifting, but mostly I
    suspect its fallen out of favor because it costs more than its perceived
    value. Your brake cable compression comment doesn't make any sense.

    For non-steel frames a magnet can be very useful for moving a bare cable
    around at the far end to get it near the exit hole...

    Cervelo uses internally routed cables. They claim that it saves 200gms
    because of the reduced amount of cable housing. As well as improved
    aero... They also have an interesting way of getting the shifter cables
    out that looks to be very user friendly.

    Trek has them on some models as well, e.g. Equinox 7 (and probably
    Equinox 9 and The Team Time Trial..)

    I have had both internal and external and can only say that I'm going to
    probably buy a Cervelo next year and the ICS system is one of the reasons..

  9. "Stuart Lynne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:aoNLg.526709$IK3.169888@pd7tw1no...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Diablo Scott said:
    Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of
    or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?

    Klein and maybe some others have a pressed in housing stop at both
    penetrations for the rear brake cable and at the shifter cables only at
    the inlet penetration - penetrations near the bottom bracket are just
    holes. If you have trouble with the other methods it might help to take
    the housing stops out; usually you can re-use them.

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the
    external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't?

    The internal cables are bare; you don't route the housing inside the
    tube so there's no weight difference in that regard.

    Klein still does it, most triathlon bikes do it, available on quite a
    few other bikes. Some concern that the penetrations are weak spots or
    stress risers for fatigue, or that they allow water into the frame, or
    that they add friction that could interfere with shifting, but mostly I
    suspect its fallen out of favor because it costs more than its perceived
    value. Your brake cable compression comment doesn't make any sense.

    For non-steel frames a magnet can be very useful for moving a bare cable
    around at the far end to get it near the exit hole...

    I have found that a regular magnet is almost useless for this task but when
    I used a rare earth magnet it really worked.

  10. Stuart Lynne said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Diablo Scott said:
    Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Are there any kind of bosses inside the tube that i need to be aware of or
    does the tube itself provide enough 'pressure' on the housing when the
    housing is under pressure from the tensioned cable?

    Klein and maybe some others have a pressed in housing stop at both
    penetrations for the rear brake cable and at the shifter cables only at
    the inlet penetration - penetrations near the bottom bracket are just
    holes. If you have trouble with the other methods it might help to take
    the housing stops out; usually you can re-use them.

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally, why did this method of routing ever go away? the housing
    surely can't be that weighty compared to the extra weight of the external
    bosses and wouldn't a cable under complete compression provide better
    braking than those which aren't?

    The internal cables are bare; you don't route the housing inside the
    tube so there's no weight difference in that regard.

    Klein still does it, most triathlon bikes do it, available on quite a
    few other bikes. Some concern that the penetrations are weak spots or
    stress risers for fatigue, or that they allow water into the frame, or
    that they add friction that could interfere with shifting, but mostly I
    suspect its fallen out of favor because it costs more than its perceived
    value. Your brake cable compression comment doesn't make any sense.

    For non-steel frames a magnet can be very useful for moving a bare cable
    around at the far end to get it near the exit hole...

    A magnet on stainless steel cables?

    Quoted message said:

    Cervelo uses internally routed cables. They claim that it saves 200gms
    because of the reduced amount of cable housing. As well as improved
    aero... They also have an interesting way of getting the shifter cables
    out that looks to be very user friendly.

    200 grams savings? What cable housing are they replacing? My
    Waterford has cable stops at the headtube lug and the seattube lug.
    Bare wire stretches between them. An internally routed cable would not
    reduce any housing. Most Waterfords (mine has downtube shifter bosses)
    have cable stops at the headtube lug, a guide under the bottom bracket
    shell, and a cable stop at the end of the chainstay near the rear
    derailleur. Housing is only used to form the loop that goes into the
    back of the rear derailleur. An internally routed cable would not
    reduce any housing.

    More proof bike companies are run by liars. And they sell to gullible
    people.

    Quoted message said:

    I have had both internal and external and can only say that I'm going to
    probably buy a Cervelo next year and the ICS system is one of the reasons..

  11. Thanks for your views guys. shall employ the string/thread and vaccum
    method. Didn't realise the internal style was still prevelent for triathlon.
    wonder why mtb scene has rejected it? ah well.

    thanks all.

  12. Diablo Scott <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    .. Your brake cable compression comment doesn't make any sense.

    was convoluted, what i meant was this;

    givens:
    When the brake lever is pulled the cable is tensioned.
    Tensioned cable 'pushes' on the inside of the housing.
    Housing 'pushes' back, so to speak, this compression keeps the cable tension
    high.(as i understand it)

    So i was wondering if the housings position in the top tube increased the
    tension giving a better power transfer down the cable.
    In retrospect I would guess any effect is minimum or perhaps negative
    depending on the shape and angle of the openings. i dunno.

  13. 1. use a piece of spider-silk and vacuum cleaner, pull the silk out
    of the end.

    2. use the spider silk to pull some thread out of the end.

    3. use the thread to pull a piece of fishing monofilament out the
    end.

    4. use the monofilament to pull a piece of string out the end.

    5. use the string to pull a piece of cable out the end.

    If there's a simple way, i'd love to hear about it. I'm sick of
    having to catch a spider (they bite!) every time I have to build up
    one of these darned 1980's aero cable-routed bicycles ... :-) :-)

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA

  14. Cyclopath! - Keiron said:

    Thanks for your views guys. shall employ the string/thread and vaccum
    method.

    If the old cable is still in place, use a piece of plastic tubing like the
    ones that come with Klein frames. Slide the tubing over the cable, leave
    the tubing in place while you remove the old cable and put in a new one,
    then remove the tubing.

    Quoted message said:

    Didn't realise the internal style was still prevelent for triathlon.

    I guess they think it's more aerodynamic. I always thought it was for
    looks.

    Quoted message said:

    wonder why mtb scene has rejected it? ah well.

    Because MTB cables have to be removed frequently for cleaning and
    lubrication. But AFAIK, Klein MTBs still have internal cables.

    Really, it's all for looks.

    Matt O.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.