General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Intro - Hello

Started by J David Anderso · · Last activity · 28 posts · 886 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 May 2004
Last activity
4 June 2004
Original author
J David Anderso
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
886
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello group.

    I haven't been lurking at all, just downloaded a couple of
    thousand posts and have been reading through a few.

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between my
    MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant - nothing
    much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who is a
    diabetes education specialist who says that I will probably
    be insulin dependant and need to be very concerned. So I
    have been googling around trying to determine which of them
    is correct.

    The reason I went for a check-up was headaches, a frequent
    and urgent need for urination, abnormal tiredness after what
    should be more than sufficient sleep (up to 12 hours),
    continual hunger leading to snacking, something that I had
    never done before, constant thirst, I simply could not drink
    enough, (I could stand in the shower and drink the water
    indefinitely) and pain in hands and feet. I had simply
    presumed that all of these symptoms were side effects of the
    medication after bone graft surgery and the related ongoing
    drug regime, but they continued after I stopped all
    medication.

    I am in my forties and was told when in my twenties that I
    was hypoglycemic. I often suffered from low blood sugar
    crashes until I modified my diet. During the interim I had
    little problem as long as I didn't neglect to eat for a day
    or two at a time as had been my earlier wont.

    I did an oral GTT and I didn't think that my results were
    that bad, as all of the horror stories seem to relate to
    people testing in the twenties or above, but my information
    is sketchy and pretty old. My fasting test was 8.8, my one
    hour was 11.1 and my two hour was 5.9. My doctor says this
    isn't too bad, but that I need to "keep an eye on things",
    and the nurse wants me to have far more intensive testing.

    I am fit for my age, 6', 180 pounds, ran 5-8 Kilometres
    daily until recently when I was fairly badly injured in a
    traffic accident and lost a knee, I still ride, kayak and
    walk the 5-8 K with my knee in a CTi brace. I eat well,
    don't smoke and basically don't see how I can improve my
    diet or lifestyle. For a few months after bone grafts and
    other joint surgery, I was on prednisone and I have been
    told that this may be what shifted me from hypo- to hyper-
    glycemic. Does anyone have any experience of this?

    How do I determine whether my Doctor or the Diabetes nurse
    is right? Are those figures nothing much to worry about or
    cause for concern?

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    Regards

    David

  2. J David Anderson said:

    Hello group.

    I haven't been lurking at all, just downloaded a couple of
    thousand posts and have been reading through a few.

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between
    my MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant -
    nothing much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who
    is a diabetes education specialist who says that I will
    probably be insulin dependant and need to be very
    concerned. So I have been googling around trying to
    determine which of them is correct.

    The reason I went for a check-up was headaches, a frequent
    and urgent need for urination, abnormal tiredness after
    what should be more than sufficient sleep (up to 12 hours),
    continual hunger leading to snacking, something that I had
    never done before, constant thirst, I simply could not
    drink enough, (I could stand in the shower and drink the
    water indefinitely) and pain in hands and feet. I had
    simply presumed that all of these symptoms were side
    effects of the medication after bone graft surgery and the
    related ongoing drug regime, but they continued after I
    stopped all medication.

    I am in my forties and was told when in my twenties that I
    was hypoglycemic. I often suffered from low blood sugar
    crashes until I modified my diet. During the interim I had
    little problem as long as I didn't neglect to eat for a day
    or two at a time as had been my earlier wont.

    I did an oral GTT and I didn't think that my results were
    that bad, as all of the horror stories seem to relate to
    people testing in the twenties or above, but my information
    is sketchy and pretty old. My fasting test was 8.8, my one
    hour was 11.1 and my two hour was 5.9. My doctor says this
    isn't too bad, but that I need to "keep an eye on things",
    and the nurse wants me to have far more intensive testing.

    I am fit for my age, 6', 180 pounds, ran 5-8 Kilometres
    daily until recently when I was fairly badly injured in a
    traffic accident and lost a knee, I still ride, kayak and
    walk the 5-8 K with my knee in a CTi brace. I eat well,
    don't smoke and basically don't see how I can improve my
    diet or lifestyle. For a few months after bone grafts and
    other joint surgery, I was on prednisone and I have been
    told that this may be what shifted me from hypo- to hyper-
    glycemic. Does anyone have any experience of this?

    How do I determine whether my Doctor or the Diabetes nurse
    is right? Are those figures nothing much to worry about or
    cause for concern?

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    Regards

    David

    Hi David

    Welcome to the group.

    I'll be brief, because others will be along.

    Has the nurse given any specific reasons for the different
    diagnosis? Is the doctor aware of this difference of
    opinion? If not, I would see the doctor first. It sounds
    very odd to me.

    There is only one way to resolve a "spat" like that if it
    continues. A third opinion. I would be asking the doctor for
    a referral to an endocrinologist if it is really worrying
    you. The specialist should have the expertise and the
    information to resolve the issue. What medical
    system/country are you in? That may have a bearing on where
    you can go for resolution.

    Until they do get it right, don't worry unduly unless you
    are getting BG swings (hypo and hyper) sufficient to cause
    problems. I'm not an expert on prednisone induced diabetes,
    but I've read sufficient to know it's a possibility. We have
    a couple who post here who may be able to help. Another
    thing to ask your endo.

    Now, as to what you can do in the interim. Obviously, as you
    are fit, it's not so much the quantity you are eating as the
    type of food. For the best advice I can give, go and read
    Jennifer's "test,test,test" advice at: alt-support-alt-support-
    diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm . It's worth reading
    twice. It works.

    As the majority of posters are from the US, be aware that
    you need to multiply your mmol numbers by 18 to compare with
    their mg/dl numbers. So, your numbers above would be FBG 8.8
    (160), 11.1 (200) one-hour and
    5.9 (105). I usually round it to the nearest 5. The rest of
    the world, including Oz, use mmol.

    Good luck with the diagnosis.

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  3. On Wed, 26 May 2004 19:14:09 +1000, you , J David Anderson

    Quoted post said:

    present I am in the middle of a spat between my MD who says
    I have type 2 non insulin dependant - nothing much to worry
    about - and a

    I'd think he's being a little too flippant ....

    Quoted message said:

    Registered Nurse, who is a diabetes education specialist
    who says that I will probably be insulin dependant

    Make that *MAY BE* .... while some T2's use insulin as well
    as medication (I'm one of them) it's not a foregone
    conclusion ...

    Quoted message said:

    and need to be very concerned. So I have been googling
    around trying to determine which of them is correct.

    To some degree, both of them - if you're diabetic, you have
    to take it seriously, but it's not a sword of doom hanging
    over your head ..

    Quoted message said:

    but my information is sketchy and pretty old. My
    fasting test was 8.8, my one hour was 11.1 and my two
    hour was 5.9. My

    Fasting of 8.8 would worry me ....

    Quoted message said:

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    You'll get plenty of those here ....

    Welcome to the club that nobody wanted to join ...

    --

    ]- "I am a man of many parts, ]- unfortunately most of them
    are no longer in stock" ]-
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------
    To reply by e-mail, move the Gnu from the address to the
    subject line.
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------

  4. On Wed, 26 May 2004 19:14:09 +1000, you , J David Anderson

    Quoted post said:

    present I am in the middle of a spat between my MD who says
    I have type 2 non insulin dependant - nothing much to worry
    about - and a

    I'd think he's being a little too flippant ....

    Quoted message said:

    Registered Nurse, who is a diabetes education specialist
    who says that I will probably be insulin dependant

    Make that *MAY BE* .... while some T2's use insulin as well
    as medication (I'm one of them) it's not a foregone
    conclusion ...

    Quoted message said:

    and need to be very concerned. So I have been googling
    around trying to determine which of them is correct.

    To some degree, both of them - if you're diabetic, you have
    to take it seriously, but it's not a sword of doom hanging
    over your head ..

    Quoted message said:

    but my information is sketchy and pretty old. My
    fasting test was 8.8, my one hour was 11.1 and my two
    hour was 5.9. My

    Fasting of 8.8 would worry me ....

    Quoted message said:

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    You'll get plenty of those here ....

    Welcome to the club that nobody wanted to join ...

    --

    ]- "I am a man of many parts, ]- unfortunately most of them
    are no longer in stock" ]-
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------
    To reply by e-mail, move the Gnu from the address to the
    subject line.
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------

  5. Without going into details about management of diabetes, I
    suggest you err on the case of caution. When you develop
    diabetes it is important that you tackle it as soon as
    possible - that you are diagnosed as soon as possible and
    tackle it. Case stories are full of doctors who say "we'll
    keep an eye on it" or "I wouldn't be concerned", where in
    actual fact they should have taken urgent action. I'g go
    along with the Registered Nurse you saw. Learn all you can
    about this disease. Stay with this newsgroup.

    Henry Australia

    "J David Anderson" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello group.

    I haven't been lurking at all, just downloaded a couple of
    thousand posts and have been reading through a few.

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between
    my MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant -
    nothing much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who
    is a diabetes education specialist who says that I will
    probably be insulin dependant and need to be very
    concerned. So I have been googling around trying to
    determine which of them is correct.

    The reason I went for a check-up was headaches, a frequent
    and urgent need for urination, abnormal tiredness after
    what should be more than sufficient sleep (up to 12
    hours), continual hunger leading to snacking, something
    that I had never done before, constant thirst, I simply
    could not drink enough, (I could stand in the shower and
    drink the water indefinitely) and pain in hands and feet.
    I had simply presumed that all of these symptoms were side
    effects of the medication after bone graft surgery and the
    related ongoing drug regime, but they continued after I
    stopped all medication.

    I am in my forties and was told when in my twenties that I
    was hypoglycemic. I often suffered from low blood sugar
    crashes until I modified my diet. During the interim I had
    little problem as long as I didn't neglect to eat for a
    day or two at a time as had been my earlier wont.

    I did an oral GTT and I didn't think that my results were
    that bad, as all of the horror stories seem to relate to
    people testing in the twenties or above, but my
    information is sketchy and pretty old. My fasting test was
    8.8, my one hour was 11.1 and my two hour was 5.9. My
    doctor says this isn't too bad, but that I need to "keep
    an eye on things", and the nurse wants me to have far more
    intensive testing.

    I am fit for my age, 6', 180 pounds, ran 5-8 Kilometres
    daily until recently when I was fairly badly injured in a
    traffic accident and lost a knee, I still ride, kayak and
    walk the 5-8 K with my knee in a CTi brace. I eat well,
    don't smoke and basically don't see how I can improve my
    diet or lifestyle. For a few months after bone grafts and
    other joint surgery, I was on prednisone and I have been
    told that this may be what shifted me from hypo- to hyper-
    glycemic. Does anyone have any experience of this?

    How do I determine whether my Doctor or the Diabetes nurse
    is right? Are those figures nothing much to worry about or
    cause for concern?

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    Regards

    David

  6. J David Anderson wrote in message <2hj5csFdi7fmU1@uni-
    berlin.de>...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello group.

    I haven't been lurking at all, just downloaded a couple of
    thousand posts and have been reading through a few.

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between
    my MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant -
    nothing much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who
    is a diabetes education specialist who says that I will
    probably be insulin dependant and need to be very
    concerned. So I have been googling around trying to
    determine which of them is correct.

    The reason I went for a check-up was headaches, a frequent
    and urgent need for urination, abnormal tiredness after
    what should be more than sufficient sleep (up to 12 hours),
    continual hunger leading to snacking, something that I had
    never done before, constant thirst, I simply could not
    drink enough, (I could stand in the shower and drink the
    water indefinitely) and pain in hands and feet. I had
    simply presumed that all of these symptoms were side
    effects of the medication after bone graft surgery and the
    related ongoing drug regime, but they continued after I
    stopped all medication.

    I am in my forties and was told when in my twenties that I
    was hypoglycemic. I often suffered from low blood sugar
    crashes until I modified my diet. During the interim I had
    little problem as long as I didn't neglect to eat for a day
    or two at a time as had been my earlier wont.

    I did an oral GTT and I didn't think that my results were
    that bad, as all of the horror stories seem to relate to
    people testing in the twenties or above, but my information
    is sketchy and pretty old. My fasting test was 8.8, my one
    hour was 11.1 and my two hour was 5.9. My doctor says this
    isn't too bad, but that I need to "keep an eye on things",
    and the nurse wants me to have far more intensive testing.

    I am fit for my age, 6', 180 pounds, ran 5-8 Kilometres
    daily until recently when I was fairly badly injured in a
    traffic accident and lost a knee, I still ride, kayak and
    walk the 5-8 K with my knee in a CTi brace. I eat well,
    don't smoke and basically don't see how I can improve my
    diet or lifestyle. For a few months after bone grafts and
    other joint surgery, I was on prednisone and I have been
    told that this may be what shifted me from hypo- to hyper-
    glycemic. Does anyone have any experience of this?

    How do I determine whether my Doctor or the Diabetes nurse
    is right? Are those figures nothing much to worry about or
    cause for concern?

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    Regards

    David

    1. Insulin Dependence:

    Actually, insulin dependence is not a lot to be concerned
    about. If you are an adult-onset Type 1 (T1), you are headed
    towards insulin and there's nothing anybody can do about it.

    If you are an adult-onset Type 2, everything you do to
    preserve your health will incidentally slow your progression
    towards insulin dependence. However, if you have the disease
    long enough, you will almost certainly become insulin
    dependent. Your goal is to need multiple daily insulin shots
    at age 120, not age 50.

    The danger an adult-onset T1 faces is a consequence of
    ignoring his blood sugars (bG). If your honeymoon ends and
    your sugars soar without you noticing (cause you weren't
    testing), you can go into Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) which
    is life-threatening. That's something to be concerned about
    but is easily avoided if you monitor your bG as recommended
    by most docs.

    2. Are you Adult-onset T1 or T2 ?

    Your nurse seems to think you may be adult-onset T1 because
    of your body build and history. (Like me for instance). That
    suggests that you are in a honeymoon which will end in an
    immediate need for multiple daily insulin injections. In
    general, the older you are when it hits, the longer the
    honeymoon. A 3-year old can have a 1-week honeymoon. At age
    53, mine lasted 3-5 years.

    Adult-onset T1 are the most common type of T1. We outnumber
    Juvenile-onset T1 by at least 2:1. However, we are swamped
    by the numbers of adult-onset T2. Thus, many docs
    automatically diagnose all adult-onset Diabetics as T2.

    That diagnosis sorta works out. Most of the time (95 -
    98%) he's right. The rest of the time, the mis-diagnosed
    T1 tries the diet, exercise, and oral meds for a while
    (the Honeymoon), then finds that he must use insulin to
    control. The last few months or year can be very, very
    unpleasant (like me for instance) if he delays going on
    insulin, or mostly uneventful if he is paying attention
    and willing to switch.

    I am sort of going with the doc in this one. Hypoglycemia is
    a symptom of slowly developing Type 2 diabetes. Prednisone
    is notorious for accelerating the standard Type 2 Diabetic
    Progression. IOW, you have had T2 symptoms for years and
    have a history which explains emerging T2 despite not
    displaying the overweight, apple-shaped body and sedentary
    lifestyle characteristic of a younger person developing T2.

    3. ". . . .MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant
    - nothing much to worry about . . ."

    [censored]. Type 2 Diabetes is worth worrying about. The
    earlier you figure out you have it and the harder you work
    to fight it, the easier, happier, more pleasant and longer
    your life will be.

    No matter if you are T1 or T2, you are in for a life-long
    fight. If we get lazy and sloppy, we die young, in pain. Use
    aggressive and diligent self-management and you can live a
    near-normal life.

    Diabetes is one of the odd diseases in which the patient
    does all of the work and most of the management. The docs
    mostly sit on the sidelines cheering us on. The more you
    learn and the faster you learn about this disease, the
    better your prospects.

    Your doc makes me a bit nervous. He seems a bit casual about
    this situation. Folks in your position should:

    a. Have their cholesterol monitored and use meds if
    they can't hit targets

    b. Have an immediate "Diabetic Eye Examination" looking
    primarily for retinopathy

    c. Have their blood pressure monitored and use meds if
    they can't hit targets

    Some targets:

    Total cholesterol less than 200 (much less is
    preferred) LDL less than 130, (100 or less preferred)
    HDL greater than 45 (the higher the better)
    Triglycerides less than 150 (the lower the better)
    Triglycerides/HDL ratio less than 3.0
    c.a. less than 120/80

    Keep coming back. Folks around here have "been there, done
    that" and been treated by a mix of docs ranging from superb
    to awful. It's worth listening to our experiences.

    Regards
    Old Al

  7. hi, David

    welcome to the group no one wants to join

    the first thing i did was look to see if OldAl had replied
    to you he has....... there isn't a word i would change, and
    there isn't anything i can add to his wisdom

    take care of this disease and you will not have to worry
    about extreme complications as a side affect of diabetes

    kate
    --
    Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet
    /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk More
    info: diabetic-talk.orgdiabetic-talk.org

    "J David Anderson" <> wrote in message berlin.de...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello group.

    I haven't been lurking at all, just downloaded a couple of
    thousand posts and have been reading through a few.

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between
    my MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant -
    nothing much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who
    is a diabetes education specialist who says that I will
    probably be insulin dependant and need to be very
    concerned. So I have been googling around trying to
    determine which of them is correct.

    Quoted message said:

    Regards

    David

  8. In article said:

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between
    my MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant -
    nothing much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who
    is a diabetes education specialist who says that I will
    probably be insulin dependant and need to be very
    concerned. So I have been googling around trying to
    determine which of them is correct.

    If your doctor actually said to you that diabetes -- of any
    kind -- is "nothing much to worry about," then run, don't
    walk, to another doctor. Diabetes IS something to worry
    about and take care of. Whether you use insulin now or later
    or never isn't the issue. Diabetes does damage to your body
    in many different ways and must be kept under control. In
    addition to monitoring your blood sugar, your doctor has to
    watch your blood pressure and cholesterol (we're prone to
    both being high), keep an eye out for protein in your urine
    or other signs of kidney damage, make sure your eyes are
    checked for damage, and keep an eye on your feet. All those
    things are needed whether or not you're on insulin or any
    other diabetes medications.

    --
    Lord, make me an instrument of your peace...
    where there is hatred, let me sow love.

    remove "spamtrap" for e-mail

  9. Alan said:
    Quoted message said:

    I did an oral GTT and I didn't think that my results were
    that bad, as all of the horror stories seem to relate to
    people testing in the twenties or above, but my
    information is sketchy and pretty old. My fasting test was
    8.8, my one hour was 11.1 and my two hour was 5.9. My
    doctor says this isn't too bad, but that I need to "keep
    an eye on things", and the nurse wants me to have far more
    intensive testing.

    I am fit for my age, 6', 180 pounds, ran 5-8 Kilometres
    daily until recently when I was fairly badly injured in a
    traffic accident and lost a knee, I still ride, kayak and
    walk the 5-8 K with my knee in a CTi brace. I eat well,
    don't smoke and basically don't see how I can improve my
    diet or lifestyle. For a few months after bone grafts and
    other joint surgery, I was on prednisone and I have been
    told that this may be what shifted me from hypo- to hyper-
    glycemic. Does anyone have any experience of this?

    How do I determine whether my Doctor or the Diabetes nurse
    is right? Are those figures nothing much to worry about or
    cause for concern?

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    Regards

    David

    Hi David

    Welcome to the group.

    I'll be brief, because others will be along.

    Has the nurse given any specific reasons for the different
    diagnosis? Is the doctor aware of this difference of
    opinion? If not, I would see the doctor first. It sounds
    very odd to me.

    Hi Alan

    The nurse wants me to see an endocrinologist and ignore what
    my MD is telling me. She says that I need to be taking
    medication to control my BGL right now.

    My MD says that an entire new industry has sprung up that
    hinges on unnecessary diagnoses of diabetes involving
    patients who aren't diabetic, but simply need to modify
    their lifestyle. According to him there are a great many
    people who have higher than normal blood glucose readings
    who are not truly diabetic but merely unhealthy - nutrition
    wise. Also, according to him, many Doctors are creating
    diabetics by beginning treatment before it was necessary
    rather than pushing their patients to take control of their
    own health.

    He tends to mock the Nurse, saying that by some never ending
    series of miracles all of these critically ill people, who
    have no previous awareness of their illness, manage to
    arrive at her clinic and start receiving pharmaceutically
    aided treatment just in time to save their lives. They can't
    delay for a day or two, let alone a month or two and let
    their bodies try to cope with the illness by use of
    appropriate lifestyle, exercise, and diet changes. I can
    kind of see his point.

    He claims that if he tested every one of his patients every
    day for a year, each one of them would at times be
    considered diabetic. He says that in my case, I should keep
    an eye on it, give myself time to rid my system of the
    effects of several months of drugs and chemicals and I will
    almost certainly have a very good chance of going back to
    normal because I am basically healthy. He also says that if
    I had been overweight and sedentary, he might have a
    different opinion. He is not a young guy himself, well into
    his sixties, but has specialised in sports medicine for much
    of his career. Says that he knows what he is doing.

    He doesn't want to put me, or anyone else, on medication
    unless it is last resort as he claims medication is a crutch
    and the body will stop trying to repair itself. He believes
    that good medicine consists of helping nature, not forcing
    it to change. He did have me purchase a MediSense Optium
    monitor, but he only wants me to use it once or twice a week
    at the same time and under the same conditions, unless I
    begin to feel distinctly ill, then use it and call him if
    the reading are abnormally different. He has me reducing my
    carb intake (it was quite high, I love garlic & cheese
    wholegrain rolls with meals) but has made no other
    suggestions re diet. I have cut back on the rolls and
    noodles (Singapore Noodles, the only unhealthy thing I eat -
    I love them!) and increased the seafood and mushrooms. It
    was reflected immediately in a lowered post prandial
    readings, but I am still high.

    He inspires confidence in his ability to maintain health in
    his patients. The nurse seems to think that as soon as you
    test high, you need pharmaceutical intervention.

    Quoted message said:

    There is only one way to resolve a "spat" like that if it
    continues. A third opinion. I would be asking the doctor
    for a referral to an endocrinologist if it is really
    worrying you. The specialist should have the expertise and
    the information to resolve the issue. What medical
    system/country are you in? That may have a bearing on where
    you can go for resolution.

    I like my MD and do believe that he might have the right
    approach. In the meantime, I will learn as much as I can and
    monitor myself carefully, much more than the couple of times
    a week that he suggested.

    My biggest concern is the fatigue, followed closely by the
    increased urination requirements. The increased thirst is
    not a major problem, I only drink mineral water, not soft
    drinks or alcohol. Long car trips could be a problem.

    Quoted message said:

    Until they do get it right, don't worry unduly unless you
    are getting BG swings (hypo and hyper) sufficient to cause
    problems. I'm not an expert on prednisone induced diabetes,
    but I've read sufficient to know it's a possibility. We
    have a couple who post here who may be able to help.
    Another thing to ask your endo.

    Now, as to what you can do in the interim. Obviously, as
    you are fit, it's not so much the quantity you are eating
    as the type of food. For the best advice I can give, go and
    read Jennifer's "test,test,test" advice at: alt-support-alt-support-
    diabetes.org/Newly%20Diagnosed.htm . It's worth reading
    twice. It works.

    I had a look at that, but I already exceed the suggestions
    as I have been enthusiastically involved in good nutrition
    and fitness for nearly twenty years. Ever since reading some
    Adele Davis books when I was first married.

    I eat organic vegetables, fish, limit red meat, I base my
    diet around Asian/Japanese food, drink no milk, but do eat
    hard cheeses and drink red or white wine with meals. A full
    third of my intake is fresh fruit and as a hobby, I make my
    own wholegrain Rye bread, grow my own vegetables, and set
    fish and crab traps and so I am sure that most of my food is
    fresh and healthy. Many of my friends consider me a bit
    eccentric as the time and expense of all this far exceeds
    supermarket prices for fresh food. It requires a good deal
    of time and exercise outdoors and so has its own rewards.

    I supplement with vitamins and minerals, I take Glucosamine
    (most runners my age do) I drink a litre or so of Magnesium
    Bicarbonate per day and have been doing so for several
    years. Until quite recently I was considered the epitome of
    good health and fitness in a mature man. All that has now
    changed. I feel as though I have suddenly become an old man.
    My MD says that in a year or so, I will be fully back to
    normal, the physical injuries healed and the diabetes gone
    and be ready for the next Masters Games. The nurse says get
    used to it, it is only going to get worse.

    Quoted message said:

    As the majority of posters are from the US, be aware that
    you need to multiply your mmol numbers by 18 to compare
    with their mg/dl numbers. So, your numbers above would be
    FBG 8.8 (160), 11.1 (200) one-hour and
    5.9 (105). I usually round it to the nearest 5. The rest of
    the world, including Oz, use mmol

    I didn't think about that Alan, I am so used to glancing
    at headers to see where posts originate that I forget
    that unless you give your location, many people will have
    no idea. Particularly since news individual has stopped
    using full headers. I was aware of the different
    measuring systems.

    I am also in Australia. Queensland, on the Gold Coast at
    Runaway Bay.

    Regards

    David

  10. J David Anderson said:

    I am also in Australia. Queensland, on the Gold Coast at
    Runaway Bay.

    Hi David.

    I snipped for brevity, but I did read it all.

    You may have missed the point on the referral to the
    "test, test, test" system. It is not so much about what
    you eat now, but what that is doing to you an hour and two
    hours after you eat it. As far as BGs go, it is neither
    healthy or unhealthy food, it is simply food that spikes
    you - or doesn't.

    The nutritional value of that food is a seperate, although
    also important, issue.

    If you are testing a lot, try using the routine that
    Jennifer suggests. You may get some surprises.

    On doctors, what do you have to lose by seeing the endo? I
    can't say whether your doc or your nurse is right;
    personally, I lean towards an impartial umpire. I try to
    avoid meds for personal reasons, but I also try to avoid
    complications. Get the third opinion. I think you would
    profit by closely reading OldAl's advice, particularly
    considering your lack of obesity, and Henry's warning;
    incidentally, Henry's also from Oz.

    I live in Pottsville Beach and I'm going to be shopping with
    swmbo in Tweed City tomorrow between 2 and 4 if you are able
    to meet for coffee. email direct (see sig) if you are
    interested.

    Or, if you want to send me your phone number, I'll give
    you a call.

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  11. "J David Anderson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello group.

    I haven't been lurking at all, just downloaded a couple of
    thousand posts and have been reading through a few.

    I have been diagnosed with type two diabetes, hence my
    interest. At present I am in the middle of a spat between
    my MD who says I have type 2 non insulin dependant -
    nothing much to worry about - and a Registered Nurse, who
    is a diabetes education specialist who says that I will
    probably be insulin dependant and need to be very
    concerned. So I have been googling around trying to
    determine which of them is correct.

    The reason I went for a check-up was headaches, a frequent
    and urgent need for urination, abnormal tiredness after
    what should be more than sufficient sleep (up to 12
    hours), continual hunger leading to snacking, something
    that I had never done before, constant thirst, I simply
    could not drink enough, (I could stand in the shower and
    drink the water indefinitely) and pain in hands and feet.
    I had simply presumed that all of these symptoms were side
    effects of the medication after bone graft surgery and the
    related ongoing drug regime, but they continued after I
    stopped all medication.

    I am in my forties and was told when in my twenties that I
    was hypoglycemic. I often suffered from low blood sugar
    crashes until I modified my diet. During the interim I had
    little problem as long as I didn't neglect to eat for a
    day or two at a time as had been my earlier wont.

    I did an oral GTT and I didn't think that my results were
    that bad, as all of the horror stories seem to relate to
    people testing in the twenties or above, but my
    information is sketchy and pretty old. My fasting test was
    8.8, my one hour was 11.1 and my two hour was 5.9. My
    doctor says this isn't too bad, but that I need to "keep
    an eye on things", and the nurse wants me to have far more
    intensive testing.

    I am fit for my age, 6', 180 pounds, ran 5-8 Kilometres
    daily until recently when I was fairly badly injured in a
    traffic accident and lost a knee, I still ride, kayak and
    walk the 5-8 K with my knee in a CTi brace. I eat well,
    don't smoke and basically don't see how I can improve my
    diet or lifestyle. For a few months after bone grafts and
    other joint surgery, I was on prednisone and I have been
    told that this may be what shifted me from hypo- to hyper-
    glycemic. Does anyone have any experience of this?

    How do I determine whether my Doctor or the Diabetes nurse
    is right? Are those figures nothing much to worry about or
    cause for concern?

    I would be interested in any thoughts or personal
    experiences.

    Sorry you had to join our group. Your age would likely put
    you as a type 2. But your weight would likely put you as a
    type 1. Keep in mind that not all type 2's are overweight
    though. So you seem to be one of the rare ones. I think
    there are tests that can be done to try to determine whether
    you actually have type 1 or 2. But I think the usual course
    of action is to try oral meds, diet and exercise first and
    then move on to insulin if those things don't work. If your
    Dr. says type 2 is nothing to worry about, you need another
    Dr. Type 1 and type 2 are both different things, but both
    are cause for worry.

    --
    Type 2 users.bestweb.net~jbove

  12. <snip>

    You indicate you are eating a lot of fruit (high fruit
    sugar) and home-made bread. You really need to follow
    Jennifer's advice on testing
    - so you can get the portion size to fit your needs. How
    else do you find out if your slice of bread has more carbs
    than you can handle? (Many homemade breads are denser than
    the American store bought with ~15 g of carbohydrates per
    slice. Also, my experience is that it's hard to slice
    homemade breads as thinly as the commercial bakeries do.)

    2) Your doctor will not have to live with the complications;
    you will. How aggressive do you want to be? High bg
    levels impair healing so you may take longer to get back
    into your previous running shape unless you get those bgs
    down as soon as possible.

    Many find their bodies get comfortable with their current bg
    levels. Without meds, they find themselves in a plateau that
    diet and exercise doesn't break. With meds, they get to
    normal levels and then can maintain normal bgs with diet and
    exercise alone (no more meds for a while).

    3) If you are a late-onset type 1, you may be able to use a
    small amount of insulin for several years and lengthen
    the time your pancreas still functions.

    Cindy Wells (Your current doc has forgotten one thing -
    those with unhealthy lifestyles who lower bg values with
    diet and exercise will have their bg go back up if they ever
    return to the old habits. A true non-diabetic would not have
    a problem with a few days of junk foods.)

  13. On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:14:05 -0500, Cindy Wells <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Hello Cindy

    Quoted message said:

    <snip>

    You indicate you are eating a lot of fruit (high
    fruit sugar)

    According to Diabetes Australia ( they have just mailed me a
    "Welcome to the Club package"😉 there is no problem
    whatsoever with eating fruit, in fact they make strong
    reference to the "Sugar Myth", the belief that diabetics
    should avoid all sugar at all cost.They say to avoid sugary
    snacks that have no nutritional value and may also have high
    fat levels, but to follow current healthy eating guidelines.

    Quoted message said:

    and home-made bread. You really need to follow Jennifer's
    advice on testing
    - so you can get the portion size to fit your needs.

    I am testing Cindy, I did say that I am ignoring my Doctor's
    instructions in that regard. If for no other reason than I
    am an intensely curious person.

    Quoted message said:

    How else do you find out if your slice of bread has more
    carbs than you can handle?

    Because long before this episode I had a very strong
    interest in nutrition and can tell you the nutritional
    value, carbs, protein, fats, minerals, amino acid breakdown,
    etc., etc., of everything that I eat. I started making my
    own bread in order to have a product that is more
    nutritional than the purchased variety.

    Quoted message said:

    (Many homemade breads are denser than the American store
    bought with ~15 g of carbohydrates per slice. Also, my
    experience is that it's hard to slice homemade breads as
    thinly as the commercial bakeries do.)

    I make rolls, not loaves and have better control that way.

    Quoted message said:

    2) Your doctor will not have to live with the
    complications; you will. How aggressive do you want to
    be? High bg levels impair healing so you may take longer
    to get back into your previous running shape unless you
    get those bgs down as soon as possible.

    I have already had a small degree of success and hopefully
    can look forward to more.

    I had my day in hospital today with an endocrinologist and
    he supports my Doctor, not the Diabetes Ed. Nurse. He has
    diagnosed me as type 2 but says that I am experiencing
    "spikes" and they could confuse some people and make them
    believe that I am type 1. He needs further tests etc., to
    determine why. I am testing very painstakingly (pun?) on
    awakening, before each meal, at 1 & 2 hour intervals after
    each meal, plus before and after exercise and before sleep.
    I am logging the total carb, fat, protein and type of each
    meal I eat. I have cut out coffee ( not that I drank very
    much) but am continuing to drink tea.

    I have yet to find out more about the spikes that he refers
    to and see if I can make sense of them. The only other thing
    that was a bit of a shock is that I have high blood pressure
    at the moment as well as all the other problems. I have been
    borderline hypotensive until now and this is a real
    surprise. I am told that this is the main cause of my
    headaches, not the high glucose. I appear to have managed to
    go from both hypoglycemic and hypotensive to hyperglycemic
    and hypertensive, albeit over a space of years for the
    hyp**glycemia.

    Quoted message said:

    Many find their bodies get comfortable with their current
    bg levels. Without meds, they find themselves in a plateau
    that diet and exercise doesn't break. With meds, they get
    to normal levels and then can maintain normal bgs with diet
    and exercise alone (no more meds for a while).

    Well I will try to avoid meds at all costs. If I can't then
    I will have to live with it, but at the moment I will
    continue with diet and exercise.

    Quoted message said:


    3) If you are a late-onset type 1, you may be able to use a
    small amount of insulin for several years and lengthen
    the time your pancreas still functions.

    Quoted message said:


    Cindy Wells

    Quoted message said:

    (Your current doc has forgotten one thing - those with
    unhealthy lifestyles who lower bg values with diet and
    exercise will have their bg go back up if they ever return
    to the old habits. A true non-diabetic would not have a
    problem with a few days of junk foods.)

    It wasn't a matter of a few days of junk food, it was
    several months of hospitalisation and bed rest with all
    manner of drugs, many of them NSAIDs, some steroids, plus
    synthetic narcotics, all without the ability to exercise.

    Regards

    David

    ps, I will do some Googling on the subject shortly, but can
    anyone tell me about spikes?

  14. Alan said:
    J David Anderson said:

    I am also in Australia. Queensland, on the Gold Coast at
    Runaway Bay.

    Hi David.

    I snipped for brevity, but I did read it all.

    You may have missed the point on the referral to the
    "test, test, test" system. It is not so much about what
    you eat now, but what that is doing to you an hour and two
    hours after you eat it. As far as BGs go, it is neither
    healthy or unhealthy food, it is simply food that spikes
    you - or doesn't.

    The nutritional value of that food is a seperate, although
    also important, issue.

    If you are testing a lot, try using the routine that
    Jennifer suggests. You may get some surprises.

    On doctors, what do you have to lose by seeing the endo? I
    can't say whether your doc or your nurse is right;
    personally, I lean towards an impartial umpire. I try to
    avoid meds for personal reasons, but I also try to avoid
    complications. Get the third opinion. I think you would
    profit by closely reading OldAl's advice, particularly
    considering your lack of obesity, and Henry's warning;
    incidentally, Henry's also from Oz.

    I live in Pottsville Beach and I'm going to be shopping
    with swmbo in Tweed City tomorrow between 2 and 4 if you
    are able to meet for coffee. email direct (see sig) if you
    are interested.

    I am sorry Allan, I was amusing myself playing doctors and
    nurses all day today and didn't see your post in time to
    contact you.

    I have a friend in Pottsville that I haven't seen for some
    time. Dianna Fisher. It is a rather small village down
    there, perhaps you know her?

    Quoted message said:

    Or, if you want to send me your phone number, I'll give
    you a call.

    I will email you a little later, perhaps we can meet another
    time. I am often down as far as Palm Beach, perhaps we could
    work something out then, or maybe I should make a day of it
    and arrange to visit Dianna, it has been a year or two.

    David

  15. J David Anderson said:


    On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:14:05 -0500, Cindy Wells
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Hello Cindy


    <snip>>

    Quoted message said:

    I am testing Cindy, I did say that I am ignoring my
    Doctor's instructions in that regard. If for no other
    reason than I am an intensely curious person.


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    I make rolls, not loaves and have better control that
    way. <snip>

    Here in the U.S. sometimes that is not a help. Muffins and
    rolls can be 3-5 times more carbohydrates than a single
    slice of bread. (Super-sizing got everywhere around here
    so it does influence my judgment.) As to the "sugar
    fallacy", in my experience, it isn't a fallacy. All
    digestible carbohydrates start breaking down with saliva
    so my body doesn't care about the vitamin content until
    well after the carbs hit my blood stream and the insulin
    response has occurred.

    Quoted message said:

    Regards

    David

    ps, I will do some Googling on the subject shortly, but
    can anyone tell me about spikes?

    I assume the endo was talking about the post-meal peaks. The
    time to maximum bg results will vary depending on your
    meal's makeup and your digestive system (especially in cases
    of gastroparesis). Some meals may peak at 30-45 minutes
    after eating. Different people have different limits on what
    is an appropriate bg goal after meals (at various times).
    10.0 (180 on my meter) is the limit some new diabetics aim
    for at 1 hour after a meal. At two hours, everyone should be
    below 6.7 (120). Other people use a goal of 7.8 (140) at the
    one hour point.

    If you have a meal with a lot of fat, sometimes you get good
    results at the 1 and 2 hour point but go above 7 (126) after
    those two hours of monitoring.

    Cindy Wells (whose initial testing routine included a few
    extra tests at 30, 45, and 90 minutes just to find where
    that peak seemed to be - but I was doing extended testing to
    find out if my headaches correlated with bg. I found that I
    needed small meals with protein and fats even with higher
    fiber carbohydrates; this kept my bg in a specific range
    throughout the day - with no peaks or valleys.)

  16. J David Anderson said:
    Alan said:
    J David Anderson said:

    I am also in Australia. Queensland, on the Gold Coast at
    Runaway Bay.

    Hi David.

    I snipped for brevity, but I did read it all.

    You may have missed the point on the referral to the
    "test, test, test" system. It is not so much about what
    you eat now, but what that is doing to you an hour and two
    hours after you eat it. As far as BGs go, it is neither
    healthy or unhealthy food, it is simply food that spikes
    you - or doesn't.

    The nutritional value of that food is a seperate, although
    also important, issue.

    If you are testing a lot, try using the routine that
    Jennifer suggests. You may get some surprises.

    On doctors, what do you have to lose by seeing the endo? I
    can't say whether your doc or your nurse is right;
    personally, I lean towards an impartial umpire. I try to
    avoid meds for personal reasons, but I also try to avoid
    complications. Get the third opinion. I think you would
    profit by closely reading OldAl's advice, particularly
    considering your lack of obesity, and Henry's warning;
    incidentally, Henry's also from Oz.

    I live in Pottsville Beach and I'm going to be shopping
    with swmbo in Tweed City tomorrow between 2 and 4 if you
    are able to meet for coffee. email direct (see sig) if you
    are interested.

    I am sorry Allan, I was amusing myself playing doctors and
    nurses all day today and didn't see your post in time to
    contact you.

    I have a friend in Pottsville that I haven't seen for some
    time. Dianna Fisher. It is a rather small village down
    there, perhaps you know her?

    Quoted message said:

    Or, if you want to send me your phone number, I'll give
    you a call.

    I will email you a little later, perhaps we can meet
    another time. I am often down as far as Palm Beach,
    perhaps we could work something out then, or maybe I
    should make a day of it and arrange to visit Dianna, it
    has been a year or two.

    David

    Hi David

    Sorry - maybe know your friend by sight but not name. Seeing
    my periodontist in Bundall on Monday week (7th June) at
    10:30 am, possibly see you for coffee or lunch then?

    Best to contact me off-list now; I suspect we're boring the
    other readers:-)

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  17. J David Anderson said:

    According to Diabetes Australia ( they have just mailed me
    a "Welcome to the Club package"😉 there is no problem
    whatsoever with eating fruit, in fact they make strong
    reference to the "Sugar Myth", the belief that diabetics
    should avoid all sugar at all cost.They say to avoid sugary
    snacks that have no nutritional value and may also have
    high fat levels, but to follow current healthy eating
    guidelines.

    Hi David

    To answer your later question on spikes. The spike is simply
    the rise in your BGs after food. What matters is the size of
    the spike. You said you are testing a lot now. My early
    definition of an unacceptable spike is anything over 8 (145)
    at one hour or 6.5 (115) at two hours after eating. Nowadays
    I've reduced my personal definition to 7 (125) and 6
    (110) respectively.

    Another definiton of an unacceptable spike is what you get
    at one hour if you follow Diabetes Australia's dieticians
    advice on carbohydrates.

    Use those tests you are doing to go back to the food that
    caused the result and review what you ate to minimise the
    spike next time.

    Since you seem to be into the heavy analysis bit, check out
    Derek Paice's "Diet and Diabetes" at diabetes.about.-diabetes.about.-
    com/library/mendosagi/DiabetesAndDiet.pdf .

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  18. "Cindy Wells" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I make rolls, not loaves and have better control that
    way. <snip>

    Here in the U.S. sometimes that is not a help. Muffins and
    rolls can be 3-5 times more carbohydrates than a single
    slice of bread.

    I thought she meant "I make rolls & can control the serving
    size better" than with slices (which can be difficult to
    make uniform & thin) bj

  19. On Fri, 28 May 2004 13:54:34 -0500, Cindy Wells <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    J David Anderson said:


    On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:14:05 -0500, Cindy Wells
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Hello Cindy


    <snip>>

    Quoted message said:

    I am testing Cindy, I did say that I am ignoring my
    Doctor's instructions in that regard. If for no other
    reason than I am an intensely curious person.


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    I make rolls, not loaves and have better control that
    way. <snip>

    Here in the U.S. sometimes that is not a help. Muffins and
    rolls can be 3-5 times more carbohydrates than a single
    slice of bread.

    There is no reason and no logic to a dinner roll containing
    more carbs than a similar quantity, by weight, from a loaf
    of bread. I sometimes make muffins as well, savory not
    sweet; pumpkin or carrot muffins as a rule. I know the exact
    carb and calorific values of them as well.

    The entire point of my making my own rolls is to know and
    control just how much carbohydrate, what type of
    carbohydrate, how much sugar, salt and yeast etc., goes into
    my food. Plus a nice crusty roll, hot from the oven has much
    more appeal than sliced bread.

    I was making rolls long before my type2 diagnosis. The
    dough, before proving, is divided equally into roll portions
    and so there is little variation.

    It is not a difficult thing to do nowadays with the wide
    variety of auto-breadmakers available. You select your
    ingredients, Rye with whole grains for me, set the machine
    to dough, not bread, remove the dough when finished, (about
    fifty minutes), roll it, divide it, and then, after proving,
    refrigerate it and bake for fifteen minutes before each
    mealtime. Simple, tasty, and a very accurate record of the
    carb intake from that source.

    Some years ago, I bought a device called a Sentron Health
    Scale. It is similar in shape, and about two thirds the size
    of an old fashioned portable typewriter. It has a flat
    weighing platform on top and a computer style keyboard in
    font. You weigh any type of food and then set the readout to
    display weight in ounces or grams, plus Carbs, Calcium,
    Calories, Fat, Cholesterol, Poly-Unsaturated fats, Protein,
    Fibre, Iron, Sodium etc.

    When preparing a meal, you weigh each of the ingredients and
    the machine totals them, so that you have an accurate
    breakdown of the nutritional value of each meal. After
    several years of preparing food using this scale, you find
    that your instinctive knowledge of the nutritional knowledge
    of food and complete meals is as good or better than most
    dieticians. It is a wonderful device, but I became so used
    to values of the portions I normally prepare ( I am the cook
    in my household) that I seldom need to use the machine. I
    will haul it out if I experiment with an entirely new
    recipe,although even then I have a pretty good idea of how
    it is going to work out.

    Quoted message said:

    (Super-sizing got everywhere around here so it does
    influence my judgment.) As to the "sugar fallacy", in my
    experience, it isn't a fallacy. All digestible
    carbohydrates start breaking down with saliva so my body
    doesn't care about the vitamin content until well after the
    carbs hit my blood stream and the insulin response has
    occurred.

    They don't for one second refute this, they just say the
    idea that it is necessary to avoid natural sugars in your
    diet is wrong. They do no more damage than other
    carbohydrate foods, that the danger in sugar foods or snacks
    is in the (usual) high added fat value, not the sugar
    itself. That is why eating fruit is ok, no added fat, just
    fructose. Chocolate for instance, is high in fat, sweet
    cakes, the muffins you mentioned earlier, things like this
    could be bad, but fruit is not.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Regards

    David

    ps, I will do some Googling on the subject shortly, but
    can anyone tell me about spikes?

    I assume the endo was talking about the post-meal peaks.

    Actually he was referring to periods of time where I tested
    much higher than other. Since I first was tested I have had
    days where I am very high when testing at the same reference
    times, and days where I am only slightly above the max
    accepted cut-off points for being diagnosed diabetic.

    What he actually said was "you seem to be spiking on some
    days but not others, we will have to find out why". I am
    logging everything that I eat as well as my readings and
    seeing him three times a week for the next week or two.

    I have been given test glucose drinks several times aside
    from the full OGTT and sometimes I have had readings go
    through the roof and other times a much more moderate climb
    in levels. These are the "spikes" that concern him. He has
    requested a series of tests and biopsies for the pancreas
    and adrenal glands, all scheduled for Monday and Tuesday.

    Quoted message said:

    The time to maximum bg results will vary depending on your
    meal's makeup and your digestive system (especially in
    cases of gastroparesis). Some meals may peak at 30-45
    minutes after eating. Different people have different
    limits on what is an appropriate bg goal after meals (at
    various times). 10.0 (180 on my meter) is the limit some
    new diabetics aim for at 1 hour after a meal. At two hours,
    everyone should be below 6.7 (120). Other people use a goal
    of 7.8 (140) at the one hour point.

    At the moment I am higher at the one hour point and lower at
    the two hour point than those figures.

    Quoted message said:

    If you have a meal with a lot of fat, sometimes you get
    good results at the 1 and 2 hour point but go above 7 (126)
    after those two hours of monitoring.

    I don't eat much fat, I have been eating low fat (low, not
    none) for so many years that to eat fatty foods, i.e.,
    potato crisps, makes me feel bloated and nauseous. I still
    like the taste of potato crisps but after a handful or so I
    go right off them. I guess that you can make your body adapt
    to almost anything. I used to love fatty foods when younger,
    but I was always a skinny person so I guess that it didn't
    do me too much damage.

    I am testing (for the endocrinologist) before each meal,
    then at one hour, then at two hourly intervals until the
    next meal. This is only temporary until he gets a handle on
    things. He has warned me that further down the track he may
    strictly limit my diet to various test foods for a day or
    two at a time and have me testing every fifteen minutes. I
    can either do it myself or be hospitalised for a week or
    two. Fun, fun, fun. I hope that it doesn't come to that. He
    at least seems competent and thorough. Thank God for medical
    insurance.

    Quoted message said:

    Cindy Wells (whose initial testing routine included a few
    extra tests at 30, 45, and 90 minutes just to find where
    that peak seemed to be - but I was doing extended testing
    to find out if my headaches correlated with bg. I found
    that I needed small meals with protein and fats even with
    higher fiber carbohydrates; this kept my bg in a specific
    range throughout the day - with no peaks or valleys.)

    My endocrinologist has recommended that I go back to eating
    five small meals per day rather than three larger ones, but
    not yet. I used to do this, I know that it is healthier, but
    I stopped because it was inconvenient in several ways. It
    also means more finger pricking. Hmmm.

    David

  20. Alan said:
    Quoted message said:


    I have a friend in Pottsville that I haven't seen for some
    time. Dianna Fisher. It is a rather small village down
    there, perhaps you know her?

    Quoted message said:

    Or, if you want to send me your phone number, I'll give
    you a call.

    I will email you a little later, perhaps we can meet
    another time. I am often down as far as Palm Beach,
    perhaps we could work something out then, or maybe I
    should make a day of it and arrange to visit Dianna, it
    has been a year or two.

    David

    Hi David

    Sorry - maybe know your friend by sight but not name.
    Seeing my periodontist in Bundall on Monday week (7th June)
    at 10:30 am, possibly see you for coffee or lunch then?

    Best to contact me off-list now; I suspect we're boring the
    other readers:-)

    No problem Alan, check your email.

    Regards

    David

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.