On Fri, 28 May 2004 13:54:34 -0500, Cindy Wells <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:J David Anderson said:
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:14:05 -0500, Cindy Wells
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Hello Cindy
<snip>>
Quoted message said:I am testing Cindy, I did say that I am ignoring my
Doctor's instructions in that regard. If for no other
reason than I am an intensely curious person.
<snip>
Quoted message said:I make rolls, not loaves and have better control that
way. <snip>
Here in the U.S. sometimes that is not a help. Muffins and
rolls can be 3-5 times more carbohydrates than a single
slice of bread.
There is no reason and no logic to a dinner roll containing
more carbs than a similar quantity, by weight, from a loaf
of bread. I sometimes make muffins as well, savory not
sweet; pumpkin or carrot muffins as a rule. I know the exact
carb and calorific values of them as well.
The entire point of my making my own rolls is to know and
control just how much carbohydrate, what type of
carbohydrate, how much sugar, salt and yeast etc., goes into
my food. Plus a nice crusty roll, hot from the oven has much
more appeal than sliced bread.
I was making rolls long before my type2 diagnosis. The
dough, before proving, is divided equally into roll portions
and so there is little variation.
It is not a difficult thing to do nowadays with the wide
variety of auto-breadmakers available. You select your
ingredients, Rye with whole grains for me, set the machine
to dough, not bread, remove the dough when finished, (about
fifty minutes), roll it, divide it, and then, after proving,
refrigerate it and bake for fifteen minutes before each
mealtime. Simple, tasty, and a very accurate record of the
carb intake from that source.
Some years ago, I bought a device called a Sentron Health
Scale. It is similar in shape, and about two thirds the size
of an old fashioned portable typewriter. It has a flat
weighing platform on top and a computer style keyboard in
font. You weigh any type of food and then set the readout to
display weight in ounces or grams, plus Carbs, Calcium,
Calories, Fat, Cholesterol, Poly-Unsaturated fats, Protein,
Fibre, Iron, Sodium etc.
When preparing a meal, you weigh each of the ingredients and
the machine totals them, so that you have an accurate
breakdown of the nutritional value of each meal. After
several years of preparing food using this scale, you find
that your instinctive knowledge of the nutritional knowledge
of food and complete meals is as good or better than most
dieticians. It is a wonderful device, but I became so used
to values of the portions I normally prepare ( I am the cook
in my household) that I seldom need to use the machine. I
will haul it out if I experiment with an entirely new
recipe,although even then I have a pretty good idea of how
it is going to work out.
Quoted message said:(Super-sizing got everywhere around here so it does
influence my judgment.) As to the "sugar fallacy", in my
experience, it isn't a fallacy. All digestible
carbohydrates start breaking down with saliva so my body
doesn't care about the vitamin content until well after the
carbs hit my blood stream and the insulin response has
occurred.
They don't for one second refute this, they just say the
idea that it is necessary to avoid natural sugars in your
diet is wrong. They do no more damage than other
carbohydrate foods, that the danger in sugar foods or snacks
is in the (usual) high added fat value, not the sugar
itself. That is why eating fruit is ok, no added fat, just
fructose. Chocolate for instance, is high in fat, sweet
cakes, the muffins you mentioned earlier, things like this
could be bad, but fruit is not.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:Regards
David
ps, I will do some Googling on the subject shortly, but
can anyone tell me about spikes?
I assume the endo was talking about the post-meal peaks.
Actually he was referring to periods of time where I tested
much higher than other. Since I first was tested I have had
days where I am very high when testing at the same reference
times, and days where I am only slightly above the max
accepted cut-off points for being diagnosed diabetic.
What he actually said was "you seem to be spiking on some
days but not others, we will have to find out why". I am
logging everything that I eat as well as my readings and
seeing him three times a week for the next week or two.
I have been given test glucose drinks several times aside
from the full OGTT and sometimes I have had readings go
through the roof and other times a much more moderate climb
in levels. These are the "spikes" that concern him. He has
requested a series of tests and biopsies for the pancreas
and adrenal glands, all scheduled for Monday and Tuesday.
Quoted message said:The time to maximum bg results will vary depending on your
meal's makeup and your digestive system (especially in
cases of gastroparesis). Some meals may peak at 30-45
minutes after eating. Different people have different
limits on what is an appropriate bg goal after meals (at
various times). 10.0 (180 on my meter) is the limit some
new diabetics aim for at 1 hour after a meal. At two hours,
everyone should be below 6.7 (120). Other people use a goal
of 7.8 (140) at the one hour point.
At the moment I am higher at the one hour point and lower at
the two hour point than those figures.
Quoted message said:If you have a meal with a lot of fat, sometimes you get
good results at the 1 and 2 hour point but go above 7 (126)
after those two hours of monitoring.
I don't eat much fat, I have been eating low fat (low, not
none) for so many years that to eat fatty foods, i.e.,
potato crisps, makes me feel bloated and nauseous. I still
like the taste of potato crisps but after a handful or so I
go right off them. I guess that you can make your body adapt
to almost anything. I used to love fatty foods when younger,
but I was always a skinny person so I guess that it didn't
do me too much damage.
I am testing (for the endocrinologist) before each meal,
then at one hour, then at two hourly intervals until the
next meal. This is only temporary until he gets a handle on
things. He has warned me that further down the track he may
strictly limit my diet to various test foods for a day or
two at a time and have me testing every fifteen minutes. I
can either do it myself or be hospitalised for a week or
two. Fun, fun, fun. I hope that it doesn't come to that. He
at least seems competent and thorough. Thank God for medical
insurance.
Quoted message said:Cindy Wells (whose initial testing routine included a few
extra tests at 30, 45, and 90 minutes just to find where
that peak seemed to be - but I was doing extended testing
to find out if my headaches correlated with bg. I found
that I needed small meals with protein and fats even with
higher fiber carbohydrates; this kept my bg in a specific
range throughout the day - with no peaks or valleys.)
My endocrinologist has recommended that I go back to eating
five small meals per day rather than three larger ones, but
not yet. I used to do this, I know that it is healthier, but
I stopped because it was inconvenient in several ways. It
also means more finger pricking. Hmmm.
David