Some ankle braces say
"Great for supporting weak ankles"
some say
"Protects your ankles from sprains etc"
some say
"Protects weakened ankles"
Is there really much difference between ankle braces, or do they really
all do the same thing?
I've got one ankle that's in great shape, and one that's mostly
recovered from a torn tendon...I want to get a pair to wear so that I
don't tear another tendon or break an ankle.
I don't really understand how ankle braces work...when I uni now, I wear
a neoprene brace on my weak ankle at the advice of my doctor. It's like
a little rupper slice of a sock that just fits over the ankle...I can
still move like normal, it doesn't stop anything, and I have no idea why
it would stop my ankle from breaking or stop a tendon from ripping. It's
just like wearing a thick tight sock. Yet, my doctor said it was
good...but not as good as one with plastic sides.
I've seen some other ones, made of heavey fabric that laces up with
"steel supportive springs" in the sides that is supposed to offer
"Maximum protection for weak ankles" and I was going to get a pair to
wear on both feet so that I next time I twist an ankle falling down
stairs on the uni, I don't end up in the hospital and unable to ride for
a month. I feel like these will offer more protection, because they look
like they might actually stop my feet from snapping off. But they're
quite a bit cheaper than the expensive ones which "allow full range of
motion" which seems to imply that it lets your ankle bend 90 degrees in
the wrong direction.
So, any advice would be appreciated.
--
Skippii - Kingpin, One for the Road
One for the Road: Harrisonburg's Unicycle gang.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Skippii's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7822
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/38103