Road Cycling · Public discussion

Keep The Faith You [censored] Heads!!!!

Started by Joe King · · Last activity · 7 posts · 436 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
5 August 2006
Last activity
5 August 2006
Original author
Joe King
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
436
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.floydlandis.com/blog/2006/08/04/175/#more-175

  2. Joe King said:

    http://www.floydlandis.com/blog/2006/08/04/175/#more-175

    They are just barking dogs chasing down a break away.

    Courage Floyd.

  3. I believe you, Floyd.

    Fight the good fight.

    Quoted message said:
    Joe King said:

    http://www.floydlandis.com/blog/2006/08/04/175/#more-175

    They are just barking dogs chasing down a break away.

    Courage Floyd.

  4. On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:10:50 -0700, "Joe King" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.floydlandis.com/blog/2006/08/04/175/#more-175


    "Much has been speculated about the presence of exogenous testosterone
    in the “A” sample. Together with some of the leading medical and
    scientific experts in the world, we are reviewing the documentation
    about the “carbon isotope ratio test.” All I can say at this time is
    that I did not take testosterone, so there must be another reason for
    the result, as leaked by the UCI."

    Ok so that spinning idiot thinks he can challenge the validity of the
    CIR/IRMS test developed by guys with twice his IQ...sounds good.

    As for the rest, pretty reasonable, bottom line is that if he doped
    and he surely did, then the rest is a moot point,"UCI is not nice to
    me", etc...

  5. Keith said:

    Ok so that spinning idiot thinks he can challenge the validity of the
    CIR/IRMS test developed by guys with twice his IQ...sounds good.

    IMHO there is an inverse relationship between brains and ethics...
    Why else would we hate lawyers so much?

  6. CowPunk said:
    Keith said:

    Ok so that spinning idiot thinks he can challenge the validity of the
    CIR/IRMS test developed by guys with twice his IQ...sounds good.

    IMHO there is an inverse relationship between brains and ethics...
    Why else would we hate lawyers so much?

    Or
    "Just because they're smart doesn't mean they're smart."

    (which is a quote from somebody, perhaps Yogi Berra, but Google doesn't
    identify it -- I'm probably off on the wording.)

  7. Keith said:

    On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:10:50 -0700, "Joe King" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.floydlandis.com/blog/2006/08/04/175/#more-175


    "Much has been speculated about the presence of exogenous testosterone
    in the "A" sample. Together with some of the leading medical and
    scientific experts in the world, we are reviewing the documentation
    about the "carbon isotope ratio test." All I can say at this time is
    that I did not take testosterone, so there must be another reason for
    the result, as leaked by the UCI."

    Ok so that spinning idiot thinks he can challenge the validity of the
    CIR/IRMS test developed by guys with twice his IQ...sounds good.

    Did you read that Landis' quote you just posted? Everybody is seeking
    explanations and that is what he said.

    Quoted message said:

    As for the rest, pretty reasonable, bottom line is that if he doped
    and he surely did, then the rest is a moot point,"UCI is not nice to
    me", etc...

    Are you suggesting that once the powers that be are convinced of guilt,
    prior to completion of testing and investigation, that it's okay for
    them to smear someone in anticipation of a guilty verdict? Cycling's
    answer to Majority Report?

    R

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.