UK and Europe · Public discussion

Knee issure returned

Started by Coyoteboy · · Last activity · 16 posts · 500 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 April 2007
Last activity
3 May 2007
Original author
Coyoteboy
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
500
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. You may remember my post about the knee injury I had a few weeks ago. I
    rested for a full 2 weeks until i felt no more problems, then started with
    light exercise. All went well, but I raised my seat height further as it
    still felt a little low. I can raise it over 50mm without my hips rocking,
    but I only raised it 10-12mm. I noticed even more ease in maintaining speed
    and it felt much easier, but this time the knee went wrong again about 3/4
    into the 18 miles. I also feel like im bending over too much, maybe a
    taller stem might do the job. I'm going to switch over to my old rigid
    frame and see if its different geom helps.

    I've not managed to get to see a physio yet, i was hoping to fix the bike
    issue to see if it was bike caused so i left it a while - will be booking
    in with the NHS one soon.

    Just thought I'd update those who have helped so far.

    --
    J
    __________________________________________
    http://www.jbuckle.homeip.net << My personal site
    http://www.aoskc.com << Ainsdale Kitesurf Club

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, Coyoteboy
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    You may remember my post about the knee injury I had a few weeks ago. I
    rested for a full 2 weeks until i felt no more problems, then started with
    light exercise. All went well, but I raised my seat height further as it
    still felt a little low. I can raise it over 50mm without my hips rocking,
    but I only raised it 10-12mm. I noticed even more ease in maintaining speed
    and it felt much easier, but this time the knee went wrong again about 3/4
    into the 18 miles. I also feel like im bending over too much, maybe a
    taller stem might do the job. I'm going to switch over to my old rigid
    frame and see if its different geom helps.


    I can't remember if you're using cleats - if you are look very carefully
    at how they're adjusted, and whether you need something with more float.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    Coyoteboy <[email hidden]> writes:
    |>
    |> You may remember my post about the knee injury I had a few weeks ago. I
    |> rested for a full 2 weeks until i felt no more problems, then started with
    |> light exercise. All went well, but I raised my seat height further as it
    |> still felt a little low. I can raise it over 50mm without my hips rocking,
    |> but I only raised it 10-12mm. I noticed even more ease in maintaining speed
    |> and it felt much easier, but this time the knee went wrong again about 3/4
    |> into the 18 miles. I also feel like im bending over too much, maybe a
    |> taller stem might do the job. I'm going to switch over to my old rigid
    |> frame and see if its different geom helps.

    The reason that almost all modern UK bicycles have such small frames
    and are ridden with very low saddles relative to 50 years back (and
    today, in Holland and Denmark) is that the deeper the crouch, the
    harder it is to straighten your legs. But, if you have certain
    (common) kinds of knee injury you need to keep them MUCH straighter
    than a semi-crouch permits. In order to do so, you may need to
    ankle - but DON'T start that without a physiotherapist's advice if
    your knees are causing trouble.

    That is one of the two reasons I ride upright. I am 6'2" and ride with
    the saddle 41" from the pedals, and my hands 46" above the ground and
    6" back from the stem. I doubt that you would need that :-)

    Regards,
    Nick Maclaren.

  4. Rob Morley proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    I can't remember if you're using cleats - if you are look very carefully
    at how they're adjusted, and whether you need something with more float.

    I'm using Onza cleats - essentially the same as the very common shimano MTB
    cleats. I was wondering if they might be worn (never changed them) but they
    don't "look" worn - not that that's very scientific! They have reasonable
    float, foot feels fairly free to move before I clip-out.

    --
    J
    __________________________________________
    http://www.jbuckle.homeip.net << My personal site
    http://www.aoskc.com << Ainsdale Kitesurf Club

  5. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Rob Morley proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    I can't remember if you're using cleats - if you are look very carefully
    at how they're adjusted, and whether you need something with more float.

    I'm using Onza cleats - essentially the same as the very common shimano
    MTB
    cleats. I was wondering if they might be worn (never changed them) but
    they
    don't "look" worn - not that that's very scientific! They have reasonable
    float, foot feels fairly free to move before I clip-out.

    I only get a bit of backache from bending on my bike, but I have a 'high'
    stem which probably helps (it's not low anyway). Something's started giving
    me butt cheek ache now but I think it's because I've had a week off and one
    too many croissants.

    Just wondering, how long have you been using cleats? Your knees aren't
    complaining because you're pulling up as well as pushing?
    --
    peter

    Cheap train tickets database
    http://www.petereverett.co.uk/tickets/

    Email sent to this address is generally deleted upon arrival
    Visit website if you want to contact me

  6. On 22 Apr, 18:59, "naked_draughtsman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Rob Morley proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I can't remember if you're using cleats - if you are look very carefully
    at how they're adjusted, and whether you need something with more float.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm using Onza cleats - essentially the same as the very common shimano
    MTB
    cleats. I was wondering if they might be worn (never changed them) but
    they
    don't "look" worn - not that that's very scientific! They have reasonable
    float, foot feels fairly free to move before I clip-out.

    I only get a bit of backache from bending on my bike, but I have a 'high'
    stem which probably helps (it's not low anyway). Something's started giving
    me butt cheek ache now but I think it's because I've had a week off and one
    too many croissants.

    Just wondering, how long have you been using cleats? Your knees aren't
    complaining because you're pulling up as well as pushing?
    --
    peter

    Cheap train tickets databasehttp://www.petereverett.co.uk/tickets/

    Email sent to this address is generally deleted upon arrival
    Visit website if you want to contact me

    Been using cleats for many years (off and on) but youre right, pulling
    up is what seems to cause the problem primarily - if I ride without
    pulling up I last a lot longer without the pain.

    All that said...
    I changed to my old larger and more upright MTB frame, but also a
    rigid instead of full sus. Spent hours last night swapping in and out
    several BBs as i forgot what size was required for the frame, and
    ended up not having the front mech fitted so stuck in top ring. Raised
    the seat higher than it is on the full sus (relative to BB) and set
    off to work this morning.

    Well I got here with slight outer knee pain on the other knee but
    nothing more than a twinge. Made it to the office a full 15 minutes!
    quicker (over 17-18 miles) and felt as fresh as a daisy! Wow!

  7. Further to my two earlier posts on getting sore knees I took the
    advice on board and had a good long play with my setup. I found that I
    had the bike set up as per the "best fit" suggestions yet I was still
    getting knee issues, even on my fully rigid bike.

    After snapping the saddle clamp bolt twice in 1 month, on a 25mm
    layback post, I came to the conclusion that maybe I need to either a)
    change my frame or b) try some different positions that dont fit
    "normal ideals" - i tend not to be normal anyway🙂 So I pushed the
    saddle forward to mid-rail position and then had to raise it about 1"
    to feel comfortable again.

    This appears to have cured the knee problems - I can feel them hint
    that they are beginning to return when I really push a tall gear but
    otherwise the pain has gone. Now my averages are notching up by about
    1mph per week over ~18 miles and im feeling very happy with myself!

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,
    CoyoteBoy <[email hidden]> writes:
    |>
    |> Further to my two earlier posts on getting sore knees I took the
    |> advice on board and had a good long play with my setup. I found that I
    |> had the bike set up as per the "best fit" suggestions yet I was still
    |> getting knee issues, even on my fully rigid bike.

    As I said, the modern "best fit" suggestions are all derived from
    the ones designed for racers, and dedicated ones at that. The
    traditional ones for more normal humans gave much higher saddle
    positions (typically 1-4" higher) - but were often for very different
    riding positions and styles and so you can't simply copy the saddle
    height recommendations in isolation.

    |> After snapping the saddle clamp bolt twice in 1 month, on a 25mm
    |> layback post, I came to the conclusion that maybe I need to either a)
    |> change my frame or b) try some different positions that dont fit
    |> "normal ideals" - i tend not to be normal anyway🙂 So I pushed the
    |> saddle forward to mid-rail position and then had to raise it about 1"
    |> to feel comfortable again.

    Those are VERY typical symptoms of a saddle that is too low. You
    were almost certainly bum-shoving in an unconscious attempt to get
    more legroom, and stressing the bolt. But you haven't said how LOW
    your shoulders are, because that makes a big difference to how high
    a saddle should be.

    Yes, seriously. Put a saddle right up while riding [censored] over [censored],
    and most people will immediately damage a hamstring. Do it while
    upright and they won't. Hamstrings stretch, but not quickly. An
    upright rider should typically have a saddle 1-2" higher than a
    croucher, and that's ignoring ankling. Most people are intermediate.

    |> This appears to have cured the knee problems - I can feel them hint
    |> that they are beginning to return when I really push a tall gear but
    |> otherwise the pain has gone. Now my averages are notching up by about
    |> 1mph per week over ~18 miles and im feeling very happy with myself!

    My wife's were also improved by raising the saddle 1". I have told
    her to wait a month and then try another 1/2", but she may not take
    any notice!

    Regards,
    Nick Maclaren.

  9. (Nick Maclaren) said:

    In article

    Those are VERY typical symptoms of a saddle that is too low. You
    were almost certainly bum-shoving in an unconscious attempt to get
    more legroom, and stressing the bolt. But you haven't said how LOW
    your shoulders are, because that makes a big difference to how high
    a saddle should be.

    Yes, I think I was bum-shoving (love that term) as I often found my
    shorts being pulled down and having to hike them back up again. This
    week I havent had that.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, seriously. Put a saddle right up while riding [censored] over [censored],
    and most people will immediately damage a hamstring. Do it while
    upright and they won't. Hamstrings stretch, but not quickly. An
    upright rider should typically have a saddle 1-2" higher than a
    croucher, and that's ignoring ankling. Most people are intermediate.

    I'm fairly flattened out now - I carry a ~20lb rucksack on my back too
    and I now start to feel much more pressure on my arms. I'm also
    noticing my extra fat around the lower abs region is starting to chafe
    - not a good sign, nor pretty lol.

    Quoted message said:

    My wife's were also improved by raising the saddle 1". I have told
    her to wait a month and then try another 1/2", but she may not take
    any notice!

    🙂 It is addictive lol.

    Cheers for your info!

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,
    CoyoteBoy <[email hidden]> writes:
    |>
    |> Yes, I think I was bum-shoving (love that term) as I often found my
    |> shorts being pulled down and having to hike them back up again. This
    |> week I havent had that.

    It's a rowing term :-)

    |> I'm fairly flattened out now - I carry a ~20lb rucksack on my back too
    |> and I now start to feel much more pressure on my arms. I'm also
    |> noticing my extra fat around the lower abs region is starting to chafe
    |> - not a good sign, nor pretty lol.

    Cripes. That would give me hellish problems in other ways. Anyway,
    watch out for your hamstrings.

    Regards,
    Nick Maclaren.

  11. CoyoteBoy said:

    I'm fairly flattened out now - I carry a ~20lb rucksack on my back too

    Dumb question time, but why the 20 lb pack?

    The only reason not to mount stuff on the frame is if you're doing
    particularly balancey and daft stuff, but if you /are/ doing that then
    an extra 20 lbs makes little sesne in any case.

    If you can get that 20 lbs onto the bike directly rather than via you
    then your cycling will get /much/ more comfortable. That's quite a lot
    of stuff!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. Peter Clinch said:
    CoyoteBoy said:

    I'm fairly flattened out now - I carry a ~20lb rucksack on my back too

    Dumb question time, but why the 20 lb pack?

    The only reason not to mount stuff on the frame is if you're doing
    particularly balancey and daft stuff, but if you /are/ doing that then
    an extra 20 lbs makes little sesne in any case.

    If you can get that 20 lbs onto the bike directly rather than via you
    then your cycling will get /much/ more comfortable. That's quite a lot
    of stuff!

    Pete.

    Riding with a backpack seems to be the fashion at present. I think this
    is a retrograde trend; I would never use a backpack myself if I could
    possibly help it, and so far I always have helped it.

    --
    Anthony Campbell - [email hidden]
    Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian
    http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews,
    on-line books and sceptical articles)

  13. Anthony Campbell said:

    Riding with a backpack seems to be the fashion at present. I think this
    is a retrograde trend; I would never use a backpack myself if I could
    possibly help it, and so far I always have helped it.

    There are times when it makes sense (as has been pointed out to me on at
    least one occasion where I've said otherwise), but when the pack has ~20
    lbs in is, IMHO, not one of those times! That's what I'd be carrying
    for a well equipped winter mountaineering day, never mind a run on the bike!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  14. Peter Clinch proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:
    Anthony Campbell said:

    Riding with a backpack seems to be the fashion at present. I think this
    is a retrograde trend; I would never use a backpack myself if I could
    possibly help it, and so far I always have helped it.

    There are times when it makes sense (as has been pointed out to me on at
    least one occasion where I've said otherwise), but when the pack has ~20
    lbs in is, IMHO, not one of those times! That's what I'd be carrying
    for a well equipped winter mountaineering day, never mind a run on the
    bike!

    Its nothing to do with fashion for me, its convenience, it means i dont have
    to keep swapping things in and out of bags/panniers every day because I
    only ride 3 days a week, the rest i take the train or car. I never find it
    a problem TBH, its heavy on the arms but when set up right that can be
    minimised. When commuting it doesnt really degrade stability, in fact it
    helps in gusty wind situations. 20lbs is light in comparison with what I
    used to carry to work, I often used to carry large chunks of steel to and
    fro and the weight could go up to 40+ lol. But thats only 25% of my body
    mass and I barely notice it until i hand it to someone else to hold 🙂

  15. Coyoteboy said:

    Its nothing to do with fashion for me, its convenience, it means i dont have
    to keep swapping things in and out of bags/panniers every day because I
    only ride 3 days a week, the rest i take the train or car.

    So why not take a pannier in the train or car? Ortlieb do a very
    neat rucksack conversion that clips onto any of theirs in a few
    seconds, and their bags come with shoulder straps too. Or just
    bungee the pack to a carrier.

    Quoted message said:

    I never find it a problem TBH

    "A problem" and "a major comfort negative" aren't necessarily the
    same thing depending on your POV, but 20 lbs on your back when you
    don't need it there 3 times a week (6, as it's 2 ways) is just a
    load of relatively uncomfortable stuff you simply don't have to do.

    Quoted message said:

    its heavy on the arms but when set up right that can be
    minimised. When commuting it doesnt really degrade stability

    No, but it does sit there and just weigh 20 lbs... I implore you
    to try it with the bike taking the weight for a change, especially
    on a nice hot day. I think you'll be very pleasantly surprised.
    Especially if you ask your arms and back afterwards!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  16. Peter Clinch said:

    No, but it does sit there and just weigh 20 lbs... I implore you
    to try it with the bike taking the weight for a change, especially
    on a nice hot day. I think you'll be very pleasantly surprised.
    Especially if you ask your arms and back afterwards!

    Pete.

    I'm seeing your point, my next door neighbour has some sitting around
    I can try - might be an eye opener 🙂 I sort of see it like its giving
    me an advantage when i remove the backpack and ride without 🙂

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.