Tim McNamara said:Another issue might be crank length. In 2003, I decided to try 180 mm
cranks because I have long legs (91 cm inseam). I rode them about
1000 miles/1600 km and developed pain in my left knee on the medial
side. It was a stabbing sort of pain on extension of my leg. X-rays
showed nothing disceribly amiss, so it's probably a soft tissue
problem. Going back to 175 mm cranks alleviated the pain when
cycling, but if I sit cross-legged for even a couple of minutes my
knee hurts like heck when I try to walk; zazen is out of the question.
No diagnosis thus far. Anyway, in a rambling and roundabout manner, I
am suggesting that you not only consider narrower cranks but shorter
ones as well. If you have short legs and are riding 175 mm cranks,
that might be a contributor.
I've often wondered about this. Considering how small 5mm is in relation to
your body, and to the variance between bodies, it doesn't seem like it could
matter. So if you've been riding 175mm cranks for many years, then switch to
180mm, you're merely hitting a new wear point on your knee -- whereas if you'd
started out with 180mm, or even 190mm, you'd be fine. ???
That aside, most knee problems are caused by two things -- pivoting an office
chair, and getting in and out of cars. The more overweight you are, the more
the latter is a problem. But the former can afflict anyone. So if you work in
an office, and you're constantly pivoting and pushing your chair around -- look
there, and not at your bicycle cranks.
Matt O.